i3-12300 vs i3-10100 - Anthem R9 Nano - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
2531 Pts

Anthem

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 in Anthem using R9 Nano - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
48.9 FPS
1080p
46.4 FPS
1440p
37.6 FPS
1440p
36.8 FPS
2160p
20.4 FPS
2160p
20.0 FPS
w1440p
31.1 FPS
w1440p
30.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
85.8 FPS
1080p
82.0 FPS
1440p
68.4 FPS
1440p
67.2 FPS
2160p
40.3 FPS
2160p
39.6 FPS
w1440p
58.1 FPS
w1440p
56.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
122.7 FPS
1080p
117.6 FPS
1440p
99.3 FPS
1440p
97.6 FPS
2160p
60.1 FPS
2160p
59.1 FPS
w1440p
85.1 FPS
w1440p
83.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
196.5 FPS
1080p
188.9 FPS
1440p
161.0 FPS
1440p
158.3 FPS
2160p
99.8 FPS
2160p
98.2 FPS
w1440p
139.0 FPS
w1440p
136.6 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10100
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-10100 specifications

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Architecture

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Cache

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Cores

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Performance

i3-12300 i3-10100
Frequency3.5 GHz3.60 GHz
TDP60 W65 W

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Physical

i3-12300 i3-10100

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-10100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments