i3-12300 vs i3-10100 - The Division R9 Nano - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
2531 Pts

The Division

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 in The Division using R9 Nano - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
68.1 FPS
1080p
64.6 FPS
1440p
49.6 FPS
1440p
48.5 FPS
2160p
28.3 FPS
2160p
27.7 FPS
w1440p
41.7 FPS
w1440p
40.8 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
113.8 FPS
1080p
108.8 FPS
1440p
86.8 FPS
1440p
85.2 FPS
2160p
53.5 FPS
2160p
52.5 FPS
w1440p
74.8 FPS
w1440p
73.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
159.6 FPS
1080p
153.1 FPS
1440p
124.1 FPS
1440p
121.9 FPS
2160p
78.7 FPS
2160p
77.4 FPS
w1440p
107.9 FPS
w1440p
106.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
251.1 FPS
1080p
241.6 FPS
1440p
198.6 FPS
1440p
195.3 FPS
2160p
129.2 FPS
2160p
127.0 FPS
w1440p
174.2 FPS
w1440p
171.3 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10100
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-10100 specifications

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Architecture

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Cache

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Cores

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Performance

i3-12300 i3-10100
Frequency3.5 GHz3.60 GHz
TDP60 W65 W

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Physical

i3-12300 i3-10100

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-10100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments