i3-12300 vs i3-10100 - Overwatch 2 R9 Nano - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
2531 Pts

Overwatch 2

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 in Overwatch 2 using R9 Nano - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
78.5 FPS
1080p
74.4 FPS
1440p
65.3 FPS
1440p
63.9 FPS
2160p
49.4 FPS
2160p
48.3 FPS
w1440p
61.3 FPS
w1440p
60.0 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
128.4 FPS
1080p
122.7 FPS
1440p
109.8 FPS
1440p
107.8 FPS
2160p
86.5 FPS
2160p
84.9 FPS
w1440p
104.1 FPS
w1440p
102.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
178.4 FPS
1080p
171.1 FPS
1440p
154.4 FPS
1440p
151.8 FPS
2160p
123.7 FPS
2160p
121.5 FPS
w1440p
146.9 FPS
w1440p
144.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
278.3 FPS
1080p
267.7 FPS
1440p
243.5 FPS
1440p
239.7 FPS
2160p
198.0 FPS
2160p
194.7 FPS
w1440p
232.4 FPS
w1440p
228.8 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10100
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-10100 specifications

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Architecture

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Cache

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Cores

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Performance

i3-12300 i3-10100
Frequency3.5 GHz3.60 GHz
TDP60 W65 W

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Physical

i3-12300 i3-10100

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-10100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments