i3-12300 vs i3-10100 - Dead Space R9 Nano - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
2531 Pts

Dead Space

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 in Dead Space using R9 Nano - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
41.3 FPS
1080p
39.2 FPS
1440p
26.8 FPS
1440p
26.2 FPS
2160p
10.7 FPS
2160p
10.5 FPS
w1440p
20.1 FPS
w1440p
19.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
74.2 FPS
1080p
70.9 FPS
1440p
51.0 FPS
1440p
50.1 FPS
2160p
22.8 FPS
2160p
22.5 FPS
w1440p
39.7 FPS
w1440p
38.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
107.1 FPS
1080p
102.7 FPS
1440p
75.3 FPS
1440p
73.9 FPS
2160p
35.0 FPS
2160p
34.4 FPS
w1440p
59.4 FPS
w1440p
58.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
172.9 FPS
1080p
166.2 FPS
1440p
123.8 FPS
1440p
121.6 FPS
2160p
59.3 FPS
2160p
58.3 FPS
w1440p
98.6 FPS
w1440p
96.7 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10100
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-10100 specifications

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Architecture

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Cache

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Cores

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Performance

i3-12300 i3-10100
Frequency3.5 GHz3.60 GHz
TDP60 W65 W

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Physical

i3-12300 i3-10100

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-10100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments