i3-12300 vs i3-10100 - Need For Speed: Heat R9 Nano - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
2531 Pts

Need For Speed: Heat

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 in Need For Speed: Heat using R9 Nano - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
55.5 FPS
1080p
52.6 FPS
1440p
42.2 FPS
1440p
41.3 FPS
2160p
26.7 FPS
2160p
26.1 FPS
w1440p
36.8 FPS
w1440p
36.1 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
95.6 FPS
1080p
91.3 FPS
1440p
75.6 FPS
1440p
74.2 FPS
2160p
50.9 FPS
2160p
49.9 FPS
w1440p
67.2 FPS
w1440p
66.1 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
135.7 FPS
1080p
130.1 FPS
1440p
109.0 FPS
1440p
107.1 FPS
2160p
75.1 FPS
2160p
73.7 FPS
w1440p
97.6 FPS
w1440p
96.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
216.0 FPS
1080p
207.5 FPS
1440p
175.8 FPS
1440p
172.9 FPS
2160p
123.4 FPS
2160p
121.3 FPS
w1440p
158.3 FPS
w1440p
156.0 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10100
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-10100 specifications

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Architecture

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Cache

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Cores

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Performance

i3-12300 i3-10100
Frequency3.5 GHz3.60 GHz
TDP60 W65 W

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Physical

i3-12300 i3-10100

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-10100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments