i3-12300 vs i3-10100 - Need For Speed: Payback R9 Nano - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
2531 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 in Need For Speed: Payback using R9 Nano - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
82.6 FPS
1080p
78.3 FPS
1440p
57.7 FPS
1440p
56.5 FPS
2160p
40.0 FPS
2160p
39.1 FPS
w1440p
52.3 FPS
w1440p
51.1 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
134.1 FPS
1080p
128.2 FPS
1440p
98.8 FPS
1440p
97.1 FPS
2160p
72.2 FPS
2160p
70.8 FPS
w1440p
90.9 FPS
w1440p
89.1 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
185.6 FPS
1080p
178.0 FPS
1440p
140.0 FPS
1440p
137.7 FPS
2160p
104.4 FPS
2160p
102.5 FPS
w1440p
129.5 FPS
w1440p
127.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
288.6 FPS
1080p
277.7 FPS
1440p
222.3 FPS
1440p
218.9 FPS
2160p
168.8 FPS
2160p
165.8 FPS
w1440p
206.6 FPS
w1440p
203.1 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10100
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-10100 specifications

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Architecture

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Cache

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Cores

i3-12300 i3-10100

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Performance

i3-12300 i3-10100
Frequency3.5 GHz3.60 GHz
TDP60 W65 W

i3-12300 vs i3-10100 Physical

i3-12300 i3-10100

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-10100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments