RX Vega 56 с i7-7700K эталонами в Ультра качество настройках качества

Ясно, что RX Vega 56 это значительно более способный высокого класса карты, которые могут играть AAA названия на 1080p/1440p с 50-60 кадров в секунду. Стоит отметить, что RX Vega 56 это очень мощность голодные карты и требует достойного блока питания. С точки зрения памяти, RX Vega 56 8192 МБ ОЗУ более чем достаточно для современных игр и не должно вызывать никаких узких мест. Короче производительность является исключительным, нет никаких сомнений, что это один из самых мощных одного GPU там 2026 .

Просмотреть текущий прайс-лист

RX Vega 56 с i7-7700K эталонами в Ультра качество настройках качества

Поделитесь своими комментариями 4

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

Цена

₽ 17,643.7

Год

2017

Максимальная записанная температура

75C

Максимальный шум вентилятора

55.2dB

Рекомендуемый источник питания

560W

Эталонный процессор

Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz ($354.99)

Влияние ЦП на FPS

+ 0.0 FPS

Влияние ЦП на FPS%

0.0%

Параметры качества эталонного теста

Ultra Quality Settings

Средняя производительность 1080p

95.9 FPS

Средняя производительность 1440p

71.7 FPS

(Ultrawide) Средняя производительность 1440p

61.3 FPS

Средняя производительность 4K

42.8 FPS

Памяти

8 GB

Стоимость 1080p за кадр

₽ 272.9

1440p Стоимость за кадр

₽ 364.7

(Ultrawide) 1440p Стоимость за кадр

₽ 427.0

4K Стоимость за кадр

₽ 611.3

Серии

RX Vega 56

Variant

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56

Общая комбинация баллов

Description	Metric	From	To	Weight
The release year of the graphics card. The newer the better technology and performance optimization and driver support.	Year	2016	2019	13
		2015	2016	11
		2014	2015	8
		2013	2014	4
		2007	2013	2
The price of the graphics card. The cheaper the better.	Price	0	250	35
		250	400	30
		400	550	25
		550	650	15
		650	9999	5
Power Supply Wattage required for overall system. The lower the better.	PSU	0	350	4
		350	450	4
		450	550	3
		550	650	2
		650	9999	1
Maximum recorded temperature under load. The lower the better for longer life of the graphics card.	Temp	0	70	2
		70	75	2
		75	80	1
		80	85	1
		85	999	1
Noise Levels under load. The lower the better.	Noise	0	45	2
		45	48	2
		48	50	2
		50	55	1
		55	999	1
Full HD performance at 1080p resolution. The higher the better.	FHD	60	9999	18
		55	60	13
		45	55	11
		35	45	7
		0	35	5
Quad HD performance at 1440p resolution. The higher the better.	QHD	60	9999	10
		55	60	8
		45	55	5
		35	45	4
		0	35	2
4K performance at 2160p resolution. The higher the better.	F4K	60	9999	5
		55	60	4
		45	55	3
		35	45	2
		0	35	1
Current CPU Impact on performance with respect to the highest performing CPU used for benchmark at the time this graphics card was released.	CPU	-5	9999	5
		-7	-5	4
		-10	-7	3
		-15	-10	2
		-9999	-15	1
Graphics card memory (RAM) capacity. The higher the better for higher resolution textures and future demanding games.	MEM	8	9999	5
		4	8	4
		2	4	3
		1	2	2
		0	1	1

		FROM	TO	VERDICT
The overall score is determined based on the calculated weightings for the individual components.	OVERALL SCORE	80	99	Excellent
		70	80	Very Good
		60	70	Good
		40	60	Acceptable
		0	40	Weak

81/100

Отлично

Сравнить с

Изменение ЦП на

Change Variant To

Желаемое качество настройки

RX Vega 64 может быть high-end флагманом последней GCN 5.0 набора графических карт, но их цены держать их вне досягаемости большинства mid-range PC геймеров. С другой стороны, RX Vega 56 ближе к тому, чтобы быть разумно доступным по цене ₽ 26170.4. AMD «s xx56 карта всегда был определена mid-range цены с производительностью, которая стучится в двери high-end графических карт - особенно при разгоне. Потратив время на полное тестирование видеокарты GCN 5.0 внутри RX Vega 56, мы можем без сомнения сказать, что она продолжает тенденцию.

По сравнению с ближайшим конкурентом NVIDIA, GTX 1070 Ti, RX Vega 56 был -5.1 медленнее. Для 1080p Full HD мы могли играть в Baldur's Gate 3, Armored Core VI, Borderlands 3, F1 22, Anthem скоростью 62 fps до 68 fps, а сохранял частоту кадров, 64 вокруг 64 fps.

Для 1440p Quad HD мы могли играть в Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War, GreedFall, Death Stranding, Spider-Man Remastered, F1 2019 скоростью 61 fps до 70 fps, а сохранял частоту кадров, 67 вокруг 67 fps. Для 2160p 4K мы могли играть в Overwatch 2, Valorant скоростью 67 fps до 141 fps, а сохранял частоту кадров, 104 вокруг 104 fps.

Compare RX Vega 56 Variants Performance in Ультра качество

Assassin's Creed Valhalla (2020)

Ультра качество

Разрешение 1920x1080

Год	Видеокарты	Цена	Кадры в секунду
2019	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER	₽ 32,729	60.0 FPS
2018	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070	₽ 32,729	56.0 FPS
2019	AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT	₽ 26,170	55.5 FPS
2019	AMD Radeon RX 5700	₽ 22,891	51.4 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER	₽ 26,236	51.2 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080	₽ 32,729	48.9 FPS
2020	AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT	₽ 18,300	47.6 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060	₽ 22,957	47.4 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX Vega 64	₽ 32,729	46.7 FPS
2017	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti	₽ 26,826	46.3 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX Vega 56	₽ 26,170	45.2 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	₽ 18,300	44.5 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070	₽ 26,170	43.0 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER	₽ 15,020	42.8 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660	₽ 14,430	41.3 FPS
2018	AMD Radeon RX 590	₽ 18,300	34.3 FPS
2019	AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB	₽ 13,052	31.9 FPS
2019	AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB	₽ 11,085	30.0 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX 580	₽ 15,020	29.9 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	₽ 10,494	29.6 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB	₽ 16,660	29.3 FPS
2016	AMD Radeon RX 480	₽ 26,236	28.1 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB	₽ 11,150	28.1 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 390X	₽ 28,138	27.9 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX 570	₽ 11,085	27.4 FPS
2014	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970	₽ 21,579	26.8 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 390	₽ 21,579	26.3 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650	₽ 9,773	26.3 FPS
2016	AMD Radeon RX 470	₽ 11,741	24.3 FPS

RX Vega 56 находится между GTX 1070 Ti и GTX 1660 Ti , падая медленнее, чем GTX 1070 Ti на 2.4 % и быстрее, чем GTX 1660 Ti на 1.6 %. Он имеет среднюю относительную производительность по сравнению с каждой видеокартой. Его результаты на самом деле неотличимы от результатов GTX 1070 Ti . Это близкий вызов между RX Vega 56 и его конкурентом GTX 1070 Ti с небольшим отрывом.

Forza Horizon 4 (2018)

Ультра качество

Разрешение 1920x1080

Год	Видеокарты	Цена	Кадры в секунду
2019	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER	₽ 32,729	132.0 FPS
2018	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070	₽ 32,729	125.0 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER	₽ 26,236	121.0 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080	₽ 32,729	117.0 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060	₽ 22,957	111.1 FPS
2019	AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT	₽ 26,170	109.7 FPS
2017	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti	₽ 26,826	105.0 FPS
2019	AMD Radeon RX 5700	₽ 22,891	100.8 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	₽ 18,300	99.8 FPS
2020	AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT	₽ 18,300	99.0 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070	₽ 26,170	96.0 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER	₽ 15,020	94.0 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX Vega 64	₽ 32,729	91.0 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX Vega 56	₽ 26,170	89.0 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660	₽ 14,430	87.8 FPS
2018	AMD Radeon RX 590	₽ 18,300	75.5 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	₽ 10,494	74.5 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB	₽ 16,660	70.2 FPS
2019	AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB	₽ 13,052	69.7 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX 580	₽ 15,020	68.2 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB	₽ 11,150	66.6 FPS
2014	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970	₽ 21,579	63.4 FPS
2019	AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB	₽ 11,085	62.2 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 390X	₽ 28,138	57.0 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650	₽ 9,773	54.5 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 390	₽ 21,579	52.0 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX 570	₽ 11,085	52.0 FPS
2016	AMD Radeon RX 470	₽ 11,741	45.0 FPS

RX Vega 56 находится между RX Vega 64 и GTX 1660 , падая медленнее, чем RX Vega 64 на 2.2 % и быстрее, чем GTX 1660 на 1.4 %. Он имеет среднюю относительную производительность по сравнению с каждой видеокартой. Его результаты на самом деле неотличимы от результатов RX Vega 64 . Против своего конкурента - GTX 1070 Ti , RX Vega 56 намного медленнее.

Cyberpunk 2077 (2020)

Ультра качество

Разрешение 1920x1080

Год	Видеокарты	Цена	Кадры в секунду
2019	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER	₽ 32,729	60.0 FPS
2018	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070	₽ 32,729	56.0 FPS
2019	AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT	₽ 26,170	55.5 FPS
2019	AMD Radeon RX 5700	₽ 22,891	51.4 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER	₽ 26,236	51.2 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080	₽ 32,729	48.9 FPS
2020	AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT	₽ 18,300	47.6 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060	₽ 22,957	47.4 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX Vega 64	₽ 32,729	46.7 FPS
2017	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti	₽ 26,826	46.3 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX Vega 56	₽ 26,170	45.2 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	₽ 18,300	44.5 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070	₽ 26,170	43.0 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER	₽ 15,020	42.8 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660	₽ 14,430	41.3 FPS
2018	AMD Radeon RX 590	₽ 18,300	34.3 FPS
2019	AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB	₽ 13,052	31.9 FPS
2019	AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB	₽ 11,085	30.0 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX 580	₽ 15,020	29.9 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	₽ 10,494	29.6 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB	₽ 16,660	29.3 FPS
2016	AMD Radeon RX 480	₽ 26,236	28.1 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB	₽ 11,150	28.1 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 390X	₽ 28,138	27.9 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX 570	₽ 11,085	27.4 FPS
2014	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970	₽ 21,579	26.8 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 390	₽ 21,579	26.3 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650	₽ 9,773	26.3 FPS
2016	AMD Radeon RX 470	₽ 11,741	24.3 FPS

Grand Theft Auto V (2015)

Ультра качество

Разрешение 1920x1080

Год	Видеокарты	Цена	Кадры в секунду
2019	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER	₽ 32,729	126.0 FPS
2018	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070	₽ 32,729	120.0 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080	₽ 32,729	111.4 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER	₽ 26,236	110.0 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060	₽ 22,957	107.3 FPS
2019	AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT	₽ 26,170	100.7 FPS
2017	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti	₽ 26,826	100.1 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	₽ 18,300	95.1 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070	₽ 26,170	92.7 FPS
2019	AMD Radeon RX 5700	₽ 22,891	92.4 FPS
2020	AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT	₽ 18,300	89.0 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER	₽ 15,020	89.0 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX Vega 64	₽ 32,729	83.7 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660	₽ 14,430	83.7 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX Vega 56	₽ 26,170	83.6 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	₽ 10,494	68.3 FPS
2018	AMD Radeon RX 590	₽ 18,300	66.4 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB	₽ 16,660	61.4 FPS
2019	AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB	₽ 13,052	61.1 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX 580	₽ 15,020	60.0 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB	₽ 11,150	58.3 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 390X	₽ 28,138	58.1 FPS
2014	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970	₽ 21,579	56.2 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 390	₽ 21,579	55.5 FPS
2019	AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB	₽ 11,085	55.1 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX 570	₽ 11,085	50.3 FPS
2016	AMD Radeon RX 470	₽ 11,741	47.7 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650	₽ 9,773	47.2 FPS

RX Vega 56 находится между GTX 1660 и GTX 1650 SUPER , падая медленнее, чем GTX 1660 на 0.1 % и быстрее, чем GTX 1650 SUPER на 22.4 %. Он имеет среднюю относительную производительность по сравнению с каждой видеокартой. Его результаты на самом деле неотличимы от результатов GTX 1660 . Против своего конкурента - GTX 1070 Ti , RX Vega 56 намного медленнее.

Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)

Ультра качество

Разрешение 1920x1080

Год	Видеокарты	Цена	Кадры в секунду
2019	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER	₽ 32,729	159.0 FPS
2019	AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT	₽ 26,170	148.0 FPS
2018	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070	₽ 32,729	148.0 FPS
2019	AMD Radeon RX 5700	₽ 22,891	137.0 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER	₽ 26,236	136.5 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080	₽ 32,729	130.3 FPS
2020	AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT	₽ 18,300	127.0 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060	₽ 22,957	126.5 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX Vega 64	₽ 32,729	124.5 FPS
2017	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti	₽ 26,826	123.5 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX Vega 56	₽ 26,170	120.5 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	₽ 18,300	118.6 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070	₽ 26,170	114.7 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER	₽ 15,020	114.0 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660	₽ 14,430	110.0 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	₽ 10,494	94.5 FPS
2018	AMD Radeon RX 590	₽ 18,300	91.5 FPS
2019	AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB	₽ 13,052	82.4 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX 580	₽ 15,020	79.7 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB	₽ 16,660	78.0 FPS
2016	AMD Radeon RX 480	₽ 26,236	75.0 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB	₽ 11,150	75.0 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 390X	₽ 28,138	74.4 FPS
2019	AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB	₽ 11,085	73.4 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX 570	₽ 11,085	73.0 FPS
2014	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970	₽ 21,579	71.4 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 390	₽ 21,579	70.1 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650	₽ 9,773	70.0 FPS
2016	AMD Radeon RX 470	₽ 11,741	64.8 FPS

RX Vega 56 находится между GTX 1070 Ti и GTX 1660 Ti , падая медленнее, чем GTX 1070 Ti на 2.5 % и быстрее, чем GTX 1660 Ti на 1.6 %. Он имеет среднюю относительную производительность по сравнению с каждой видеокартой. Его результаты на самом деле неотличимы от результатов GTX 1070 Ti . Тем, у кого монитор с высокой частотой обновления, понравится то, что может предложить RX Vega 56 , так как он в среднем дает 120.5 кадров в секунду. Это близкий вызов между RX Vega 56 и его конкурентом GTX 1070 Ti с небольшим отрывом.

Производительность игры в Ультра качество настройках

Изменение параметров качества

Разрешение 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS

Год	Игра	Кадры в секунду
2023	Resident Evil 4	69 77.1
2023	A Plague Tale: Requiem	47 52.6
2023	Hogwarts Legacy	41 45.6
2023	The Last of Us Part I	31 35.1
2023	Forspoken	36 40.7
2023	The Callisto Protocol	28 31.6
2023	Dead Space	47 52.6
2023	Baldur's Gate 3	56 62.4
2023	Armored Core VI	56 62.4
2023	Immortals of Aveum	25 28.1
2023	Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart	50 56.1
2023	Remnant II	28 31.6
2023	Star Wars Jedi: Survivor	37 42.1
2023	Atomic Heart	37 42.1
2023	Starfield	18 21.0
2022	Elden Ring	52 58.4
2022	God of War	49 55.4
2022	Overwatch 2	92 103.0
2022	F1 22	56 63.1
2022	Dying Light 2	53 59.6
2022	Total War: Warhammer III	53 59.6
2022	Spider-Man Remastered	88 98.2
2022	Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II	63 70.1
2021	Forza Horizon 5	50 56.0
2021	Halo Infinite	38 42.8
2021	Battlefield 2042	71 78.9
2021	Hitman 3	72 80.7
2021	Far Cry 6	67 75.0
2021	Guardians of the Galaxy	73 82.1
2020	Watch Dogs: Legion	74 82.8
2020	Assassin's Creed Valhalla	40 45.2
2020	Microsoft Flight Simulator	26 29.5
2020	Valorant	178 198.2
2020	Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War	69 77.7
2020	Death Stranding	80 89.8
2020	Marvel's Avengers	52 58.4
2020	Godfall	78 87.4
2020	Cyberpunk 2077	40 45.2
2019	Apex Legends	104 116.6
2019	Anthem	60 67.6
2019	Far Cry New Dawn	89 99.1
2019	Resident Evil 2	106 118.5
2019	Metro Exodus	47 52.8
2019	World War Z	111 124.0
2019	Gears of War 5	71 78.9
2019	F1 2019	89 99.1
2019	GreedFall	80 89.2
2019	Borderlands 3	56 62.7
2019	Call of Duty Modern Warfare	108 120.5
2019	Red Dead Redemption 2	41 46.4
2019	Need For Speed: Heat	65 72.9
2018	Call of Duty: Black Ops 4	116 129.2
2018	Assassin's Creed Odyssey	50 56.2
2018	Final Fantasy XV	68 76.3
2018	Shadow of the Tomb Raider	77 85.7
2018	Forza Horizon 4	80 89.0
2018	Fallout 76	91 101.7
2018	Hitman 2	71 79.5
2018	Just Cause 4	68 76.3
2018	Monster Hunter: World	73 82.1
2018	Strange Brigade	114 127.1
2018	Battlefield V	110 123.1
2017	Dawn of War III	90 100.9
2017	Ghost Recon Wildlands	61 68.4
2017	Assassin's Creed Origins	51 57.2
2017	Destiny 2	113 126.2
2017	PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds	63 71.0
2017	Fortnite Battle Royale	80 89.0
2017	Need For Speed: Payback	94 105.5
2017	For Honor	126 140.7
2017	Project CARS 2	89 99.7
2017	Forza Motorsport 7	108 120.8
2016	Deus Ex: Mankind Divided	69 77.5
2016	Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation	70 77.9
2016	Doom	162 180.3
2016	F1 2016	95 106.0
2016	Total War: Warhammer	88 97.9
2016	Battlefield 1	120 133.5
2016	Overwatch	124 138.0
2016	Dishonored 2	65 72.7
2015	Grand Theft Auto V	75 83.6
2015	Rocket League	369 410.6
2015	Need For Speed	102 113.9
2015	Project CARS	98 109.1
2015	Rainbow Six Siege	184 204.8
2012	Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	253 281.7
2009	League of Legends	475 528.0

Разрешение 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS

Год	Игра	Кадры в секунду
2023	Resident Evil 4	44 56.1
2023	A Plague Tale: Requiem	30 38.6
2023	Hogwarts Legacy	28 35.1
2023	The Last of Us Part I	21 26.7
2023	Forspoken	21 26.7
2023	The Callisto Protocol	17 22.4
2023	Dead Space	28 35.1
2023	Baldur's Gate 3	40 50.5
2023	Armored Core VI	40 50.5
2023	Immortals of Aveum	15 19.6
2023	Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart	30 38.6
2023	Remnant II	16 21.0
2023	Star Wars Jedi: Survivor	25 31.6
2023	Atomic Heart	24 30.2
2023	Starfield	15 18.9
2022	Elden Ring	36 46.2
2022	God of War	38 47.6
2022	Overwatch 2	70 88.6
2022	F1 22	30 38.6
2022	Dying Light 2	30 38.6
2022	Total War: Warhammer III	33 42.1
2022	Spider-Man Remastered	56 70.1
2022	Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II	36 45.6
2021	Forza Horizon 5	38 48.2
2021	Halo Infinite	30 38.6
2021	Battlefield 2042	41 52.4
2021	Hitman 3	46 57.5
2021	Far Cry 6	44 56.1
2021	Guardians of the Galaxy	46 58.2
2020	Watch Dogs: Legion	43 54.0
2020	Assassin's Creed Valhalla	31 39.2
2020	Microsoft Flight Simulator	20 25.9
2020	Valorant	129 162.1
2020	Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War	48 60.9
2020	Death Stranding	55 69.6
2020	Marvel's Avengers	33 41.6
2020	Godfall	46 58.4
2020	Cyberpunk 2077	33 42.2
2019	Apex Legends	69 86.9
2019	Anthem	42 53.6
2019	Far Cry New Dawn	61 76.9
2019	Resident Evil 2	63 79.9
2019	Metro Exodus	32 41.0
2019	World War Z	72 90.5
2019	Gears of War 5	45 57.2
2019	F1 2019	56 70.1
2019	GreedFall	51 64.5
2019	Borderlands 3	35 44.0
2019	Call of Duty Modern Warfare	69 86.8
2019	Red Dead Redemption 2	30 38.0
2019	Need For Speed: Heat	45 57.2
2018	Call of Duty: Black Ops 4	65 81.5
2018	Assassin's Creed Odyssey	28 36.1
2018	Final Fantasy XV	43 54.2
2018	Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45 57.2
2018	Forza Horizon 4	60 75.1
2018	Fallout 76	69 86.9
2018	Hitman 2	41 51.9
2018	Just Cause 4	45 56.3
2018	Monster Hunter: World	45 57.4
2018	Strange Brigade	70 88.6
2018	Battlefield V	72 91.1
2017	Dawn of War III	71 89.4
2017	Ghost Recon Wildlands	48 61.0
2017	Assassin's Creed Origins	41 51.9
2017	Destiny 2	86 108.1
2017	PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds	43 54.2
2017	Fortnite Battle Royale	46 57.8
2017	Need For Speed: Payback	61 76.3
2017	For Honor	65 82.1
2017	Project CARS 2	56 70.3
2017	Forza Motorsport 7	87 109.1
2016	Deus Ex: Mankind Divided	42 52.5
2016	Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation	51 64.3
2016	Doom	99 124.9
2016	F1 2016	76 95.2
2016	Total War: Warhammer	58 72.6
2016	Battlefield 1	80 100.3
2016	Overwatch	75 94.9
2016	Dishonored 2	49 62.1
2015	Grand Theft Auto V	46 58.0
2015	Rocket League	140 176.0
2015	Need For Speed	70 88.0
2015	Project CARS	66 83.3
2015	Rainbow Six Siege	106 132.6
2012	Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	187 234.7
2009	League of Legends	234 293.3

Разрешение 3440x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS

Год	Игра	Кадры в секунду
2019	Apex Legends	54 71.4
2019	Anthem	33 44.3
2019	Far Cry New Dawn	47 63.0
2019	Resident Evil 2	48 63.8
2019	Metro Exodus	27 35.8
2019	World War Z	57 76.3
2019	Gears of War 5	37 49.9
2019	F1 2019	46 61.4
2019	GreedFall	37 48.7
2019	Borderlands 3	27 35.8
2019	Call of Duty Modern Warfare	56 74.2
2019	Red Dead Redemption 2	25 33.2
2019	Need For Speed: Heat	37 49.9
2018	Call of Duty: Black Ops 4	47 62.3
2018	Assassin's Creed Odyssey	25 33.0
2018	Final Fantasy XV	34 46.0
2018	Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35 46.5
2018	Forza Horizon 4	50 66.8
2018	Fallout 76	54 72.0
2018	Hitman 2	33 44.2
2018	Just Cause 4	34 45.8
2018	Monster Hunter: World	34 45.4
2018	Strange Brigade	55 73.2
2018	Battlefield V	57 75.4
2017	Dawn of War III	54 72.2
2017	Ghost Recon Wildlands	39 52.3
2017	Assassin's Creed Origins	34 45.9
2017	Destiny 2	65 86.8
2017	PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds	34 45.5
2017	Fortnite Battle Royale	36 47.6
2017	Need For Speed: Payback	52 69.1
2017	For Honor	50 65.9
2017	Project CARS 2	52 69.0
2017	Forza Motorsport 7	81 107.3
2016	Deus Ex: Mankind Divided	32 42.8
2016	Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation	48 63.9
2016	Doom	77 102.0
2016	F1 2016	63 83.0
2016	Total War: Warhammer	46 61.0
2016	Battlefield 1	63 83.9
2016	Overwatch	58 77.0
2016	Dishonored 2	45 59.6
2015	Grand Theft Auto V	35 47.2
2015	Rocket League	104 138.1
2015	Need For Speed	59 78.5
2015	Project CARS	57 76.0
2015	Rainbow Six Siege	78 103.8
2012	Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	181 238.6
2009	League of Legends	166 219.7

Разрешение 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS

Год	Игра	Кадры в секунду
2023	Resident Evil 4	29 42.1
2023	A Plague Tale: Requiem	17 24.5
2023	Hogwarts Legacy	17 24.5
2023	The Last of Us Part I	9 14.0
2023	Forspoken	8 12.6
2023	The Callisto Protocol	7 11.2
2023	Dead Space	9 14.0
2023	Baldur's Gate 3	19 28.1
2023	Armored Core VI	19 28.1
2023	Immortals of Aveum	6 9.1
2023	Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart	14 21.0
2023	Remnant II	7 10.5
2023	Star Wars Jedi: Survivor	10 15.4
2023	Atomic Heart	13 18.9
2023	Starfield	8 12.6
2022	Elden Ring	18 26.3
2022	God of War	25 37.0
2022	Overwatch 2	46 66.9
2022	F1 22	19 28.1
2022	Dying Light 2	19 28.1
2022	Total War: Warhammer III	22 31.6
2022	Spider-Man Remastered	34 49.1
2022	Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II	19 28.1
2021	Forza Horizon 5	26 37.4
2021	Halo Infinite	18 26.5
2021	Battlefield 2042	23 33.7
2021	Hitman 3	24 35.1
2021	Far Cry 6	21 30.2
2021	Guardians of the Galaxy	22 31.6
2020	Watch Dogs: Legion	24 35.1
2020	Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18 26.5
2020	Microsoft Flight Simulator	14 20.5
2020	Valorant	98 141.0
2020	Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War	22 32.5
2020	Death Stranding	29 42.3
2020	Marvel's Avengers	15 21.8
2020	Godfall	19 27.8
2020	Cyberpunk 2077	19 27.7
2019	Apex Legends	32 46.6
2019	Anthem	20 29.2
2019	Far Cry New Dawn	28 40.8
2019	Resident Evil 2	27 39.4
2019	Metro Exodus	18 25.9
2019	World War Z	36 52.1
2019	Gears of War 5	25 36.1
2019	F1 2019	31 44.6
2019	GreedFall	18 26.5
2019	Borderlands 3	16 22.9
2019	Call of Duty Modern Warfare	36 51.8
2019	Red Dead Redemption 2	16 24.1
2019	Need For Speed: Heat	25 36.1
2018	Call of Duty: Black Ops 4	24 34.9
2018	Assassin's Creed Odyssey	17 25.5
2018	Final Fantasy XV	22 31.7
2018	Shadow of the Tomb Raider	20 29.7
2018	Forza Horizon 4	34 49.8
2018	Fallout 76	33 47.6
2018	Hitman 2	21 30.8
2018	Just Cause 4	20 29.4
2018	Monster Hunter: World	19 27.5
2018	Strange Brigade	33 48.2
2018	Battlefield V	34 49.8
2017	Dawn of War III	31 45.6
2017	Ghost Recon Wildlands	25 36.7
2017	Assassin's Creed Origins	23 33.9
2017	Destiny 2	37 54.2
2017	PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds	21 30.8
2017	Fortnite Battle Royale	21 31.2
2017	Need For Speed: Payback	36 52.8
2017	For Honor	28 41.0
2017	Project CARS 2	41 58.7
2017	Forza Motorsport 7	63 91.4
2016	Deus Ex: Mankind Divided	19 27.5
2016	Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation	38 55.1
2016	Doom	45 65.7
2016	F1 2016	42 60.0
2016	Total War: Warhammer	28 41.4
2016	Battlefield 1	39 56.6
2016	Overwatch	34 49.0
2016	Dishonored 2	34 49.3
2015	Grand Theft Auto V	21 30.3
2015	Rocket League	57 82.1
2015	Need For Speed	41 58.7
2015	Project CARS	41 58.7
2015	Rainbow Six Siege	43 61.5
2012	Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	147 211.2
2009	League of Legends	82 117.3

RX Vega 56 with i7-7700K at 1080p and Ультра качество settings

RX Vega 56 with i7-7700K at 1440p and Ультра качество settings

RX Vega 56 with i7-7700K at 4K and Ультра качество settings

Сравните с конкурентами

AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
2020 6GB ₽ 18,300
10% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
2019 6GB ₽ 22,891
12% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon VII
2019 16GB ₽ 43,552
27% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
2019 6GB ₽ 18,300
0% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
2019 6GB ₽ 14,430
11% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
2019 4GB ₽ 9,773
51% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
2019 8GB ₽ 26,236
18% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
2019 8GB ₽ 32,729
29% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon RX 5700
2019 8GB ₽ 22,891
16% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
2019 8GB ₽ 26,170
25% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
2019 6GB ₽ 15,020
5% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
2019 4GB ₽ 10,494
27% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB
2019 8GB ₽ 13,052
26% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB
2019 4GB ₽ 11,085
36% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
2018 8GB ₽ 45,454
35% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
2018 8GB ₽ 30,762
23% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon RX 590
2018 8GB ₽ 14,036
17% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
2017 8GB ₽ 32,992
5% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
2017 11GB ₽ 52,931
30% faster

Compare

NVIDIA TITAN V
2017 12GB ₽ 196,704
37% faster

Compare

NVIDIA TITAN Xp
2017 12GB ₽ 78,642
27% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon RX 570
2017 4GB ₽ 8,068
47% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon RX 580
2017 8GB ₽ 9,904
29% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
2017 8GB ₽ 27,482
6% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon RX 470
2016 4GB ₽ 22,432
58% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon RX 480
2016 8GB ₽ 26,170
46% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
2016 8GB ₽ 34,238
13% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
2016 8GB ₽ 21,579
2% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
2016 6GB ₽ 10,429
35% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
2016 3GB ₽ 11,150
40% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
2015 12GB ₽ 72,083
2% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
2015 6GB ₽ 40,600
13% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 390
2015 8GB ₽ 30,499
47% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 390X
2015 8GB ₽ 32,467
40% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 FURY
2015 4GB ₽ 36,009
37% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
2015 4GB ₽ 42,568
21% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 Nano
2015 4GB ₽ 100,287
30% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
2014 6GB ₽ 65,524
35% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
2014 4GB ₽ 16,332
26% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
2014 4GB ₽ 29,450
43% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 295X2
2014 4GB ₽ 98,319
5% faster

Compare

RX Vega 56 Спецификации

RX Vega 56 Board Design

Board Number	D050-03
Length	10.5 inches 267 mm
Outputs	1x HDMI3x DisplayPort
Power Connectors	2x 8-pin
Slot Width	Dual-slot
TDP	210 W

RX Vega 56 Clock Speeds

Boost Clock	1474 MHz
GPU Clock	1138 MHz
Memory Clock	800 MHz 1600 MHz effective

RX Vega 56 Graphics Card

Bus Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16
Generation	Vega (RX Vega)
Launch Price	399 USD
Production	Active
Release Date	Aug 14th, 2017

RX Vega 56 Graphics Features

DirectX	12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL	2
OpenGL	4.6
Shader Model	6.1
Vulkan	1.1.82

RX Vega 56 Graphics Processor

Architecture	GCN 5.0
Die Size	510 mm²
GPU Name	Vega 10
GPU Variant	Vega 10 XL (215-0894216)
Process Size	14 nm
Transistors	12,500 million

RX Vega 56 Memory

Bandwidth	409.6 GB/s
Memory Bus	2048 bit
Memory Size	8192 MB
Memory Type	HBM2

RX Vega 56 Render Config

Compute Units	56
ROPs	64
Shading Units	3584
TMUs	224

RX Vega 56 Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance	21,131 GFLOPS (2:1)
FP32 (float) performance	10,566 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance	660.4 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate	94.34 GPixel/s
Texture Rate	330.2 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

• See the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 at Best Buy The Verdict If this were two separate reviews the Vega 56 would get a higher score than the Vega 64, but since it's one review I'm labeling both of ...

Conclusion. Radeon RX Vega 56 is a close derivative of Vega 64, so its behaviors largely carry over from AMD’s flagship. The company does cut this card’s board power rating by almost 30% ...

Years in development, the new Radeon RX Vega line is finally arriving - AMD's return to the higher-end of GPU performance after concentrating its efforts more on the mainstream and budget sectors ...

Similar to AMD's Radeon RX Vega 64, the Vega 56 offers two BIOSes with corresponding power profiles that can be selected using a switch on the card. If you don't change the driver-based profiles ...

Perhaps the most telling comparison, however, is that despite the 20 percent price reduction compared to the RX Vega 64, the RX Vega 56 is slower by less than 10 percent on average.

Radeon RX Vega 56 is the second AMD Vega card launched today. It comes at an affordable $399 price point, with a slightly reduced shader count that actually improves things greatly. For example, power efficiency now trades blows with some Pascal cards, which means less heat and noise, too.

On the AMD side of things, it is the AMD Radeon RX 480, or that card's successors, the Radeon RX 580 and Radeon RX 570. Therefore, the Vega 56 should be more than adequate for today's VR ...

Conclusion (RX Vega 56) The Radeon RX Vega 56 is easily the best card of this launch. It is cooler, quieter, and more efficient than the Radeon RX Vega 64 and delivers only 10 percent less ...

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is the little sister of Vega 64. It comes in at a 20% lower price than the RX Vega 64, but only has 12.5% fewer stream processors, and runs lower operating frequencies.

Meet Radeon RX Vega 56 and RX Vega 64 Brad Chacos/IDG AMD sent PCWorld every version of Vega for testing, including both the air-cooled and liquid-cooled versions of the Radeon RX Vega 64.

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is an upper mid-range graphics card, intended to beat Nvidia's GeForce GTX 1070 - a job it performs admirably as the benchmarks on this page demonstrate.

AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 - the Digital Foundry verdict. If you're looking for an alternative to the GTX 1070, the bottom line is that you're generally getting around 10 to 12 per cent of additional ...

The Radeon RX Vega 56 is a high-end graphics card by AMD, launched in August 2017. Built on the 14 nm process, and based on the Vega 10 graphics processor, in its Vega 10 XL variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.

Launching today is the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, or just Vega 64 for short. Based on a fully enabled Vega 10 GPU, the Vega 64 will come in two physical variants: air cooled and liquid cooled.

Radeon RX Vega 56 utilizes the same Vega 10 processor found in Vega 64. It’s a 486 mm² behemoth sporting 12.5 billion transistors manufactured on GlobalFoundries’ 14LPP platform.

Vega 56 vs GTX 1070, Vega goes 6-2-2 = Winner Vega! Good job AMD, hopefully next gen you can make more headway in power efficiency. But this is a good card, even beats the factory OC 1070.

The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 and Vega 64 preview. ... so thanks AMD! RX Vega vs. the World: a 15-round heavyweight battle ... The RX Vega 56 is the more compelling choice, given the lower price and ...

Что следует учитывать перед покупкой видеокарты

Если вы планируете обновить свою систему, купив новую видеокарту. Тогда есть несколько важных факторов для рассмотрения.

Разрешение VS Качество: влияние на производительность игры

Что влияет на производительность игры? Ясность или детали?

Ultra VS Настройки высокого качества в компьютерных играх

У каждого игрока свое представление об идеальных настройках для компьютерных игр. Но в большинстве случаев выбор конфигурации высокого качества графики - это путь.

Каковы узкие места CPU или GPU?

Вы получаете внезапные падения кадров? у вас может быть узкое место.

Какова приемлемая скорость FPS для меня?

В некоторых играх вы можете по-прежнему наслаждаться великолепной графикой при более низкой частоте кадров.

GPU Hierarchy

GPU Compare

CPU Compare

Gaming Laptops

Gaming Monitors

Gaming Headsets

Обсуждение и комментарии

Поделитесь своими комментариями

sputterequilibrium 7 years ago

Rx580 or vega 56 or gtx 1070I will buy a new gaming pc in march with a ryzen 7 2700, but i dont know which graphics card should i buy. In my country i can get the rx 580 around 120k ft, the vega 56 around 185k ft, and a gtx 1070 about 150-160k ft. Which should I buy? I already have my monitor, it supports freesync. (75hz, 1080x2560 resolution)

0 0

radiationhig 7 years ago

If you want to use freesync you would have to go for either of the amd cards. you could get a vega 56 but its a pricey and can draw quite a lot of power than a 1070, which give almost similar performance which run much cooler with a third party cooler. So you would be good with the gtx 1070 and save some bucks for some of performance and there are cases where the gtx 1070 outperforms the vega 56,and you could overclock it to get vega like performance but or if that isn't the case you don't mind the extra power draw and heat, and want to make use of the free sync you can surely go for the vega 56. The rx 580 doesn't come anywhere these two so it is out if the question.Check this link out for comparison of two cards at stock and overclocked- http://blog.logicalincrements.com/2017/08/rx-vega-56-vs-gtx-1070-gtx-1080/

1 0

interestrigil 7 years ago

Should I buy the RX Vega 56 over the GTX 1070?I'll be building a new rig in a few weeks. For a few days, I've been having trouble deciding on which graphics card I want to get. For a while, I was decided that I'd go with the 1070, but then I realized that Vega 56 performs just as well or better while offering Freesync, which my monitor does offer. For some reason, I still can't decide whether or not I should go for the Vega 56. Should I?

0 0

walruschokehold 7 years ago

On much smaller case blower type cooler is better due to heat being dump outside the case directly. But on much bigger case "open air" cooler usually end up being better. Also noise. Those blower type cooler can be very loud when the fan speed start ramping up.

0 0