RX Vega 56 med i7-7700K benchmarks på Ultra kvalitet kvalitetsindstillinger
Det er klart, at RX Vega 56 det er en betydeligt mere i stand high-end kort, der kan spille AAA titler på 1080p/1440p med 50-60 frames per sekund. Det er værd at bemærke, at RX Vega 56 det er en meget strømslugende kort og kræver en anstændig strømforsyning. Med hensyn til hukommelse, RX Vega 56 8192 er MB RAM mere end nok til moderne spil og bør ikke forårsage nogen flaskehalse. Kort sagt forestillingen er usædvanlig, er der ingen tvivl om, at dette er en af de mest magtfulde enkelt 2026 GPU derude i.
The release year of the graphics card. The newer the better technology and performance optimization and
driver support.
Year
2016
2019
13
2015
2016
11
2014
2015
8
2013
2014
4
2007
2013
2
The price of the graphics card. The cheaper the better.
Price
0
250
35
250
400
30
400
550
25
550
650
15
650
9999
5
Power Supply Wattage required for overall system. The lower the better.
PSU
0
350
4
350
450
4
450
550
3
550
650
2
650
9999
1
Maximum recorded temperature under load. The lower the better for longer life of the graphics card.
Temp
0
70
2
70
75
2
75
80
1
80
85
1
85
999
1
Noise Levels under load. The lower the better.
Noise
0
45
2
45
48
2
48
50
2
50
55
1
55
999
1
Full HD performance at 1080p resolution. The higher the better.
FHD
60
9999
18
55
60
13
45
55
11
35
45
7
0
35
5
Quad HD performance at 1440p resolution. The higher the better.
QHD
60
9999
10
55
60
8
45
55
5
35
45
4
0
35
2
4K performance at 2160p resolution. The higher the better.
F4K
60
9999
5
55
60
4
45
55
3
35
45
2
0
35
1
Current CPU Impact on performance with respect to the highest performing CPU used for benchmark at the
time this graphics card was released.
CPU
-5
9999
5
-7
-5
4
-10
-7
3
-15
-10
2
-9999
-15
1
Graphics card memory (RAM) capacity. The higher the better for higher resolution textures and future
demanding games.
MEM
8
9999
5
4
8
4
2
4
3
1
2
2
0
1
1
FROM
TO
VERDICT
The overall score is determined based on the calculated weightings for the individual components.
OVERALL SCORE
80
99
Excellent
70
80
Very Good
60
70
Good
40
60
Acceptable
0
40
Weak
81/100
Fremragende
RX Vega 64 muligvis flagskibet high-end i det nyeste GCN 5.0 sæt grafikkort, men deres priser holder dem uden for rækkevidde for de fleste mid-range pc-spillere. På den anden side er RX Vega 56 tættere på at være rimelig overkommelig til en pris på kr 2621.4. AMD 's xx56 -kort er altid blevet defineret af mid-range priser med ydeevne, der banker på døren til high-end grafikkort - især når de er overklokket. Efter at have taget os tid til fuldt ud at teste GCN 5.0 grafikkortet inde i RX Vega 56, kan vi uden tvivl sige, at det fortsætter trenden.
Sammenlignet med NVIDIA 's nærmeste rival, GTX 1070 Ti, var RX Vega 56 -5.1 % langsommere. Til 1080p Full HD kunne vi spille Baldur's Gate 3, Armored Core VI, Borderlands 3, F1 22, Anthem på 62 fps til 68 fps og holdt billedhastighederne svævende rundt på 64 fps.
Til 1440p Quad HD kunne vi spille Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War, GreedFall, Death Stranding, Spider-Man Remastered, F1 2019 på 61 fps til 70 fps og holdt billedhastighederne svævende rundt på 67 fps. Til 2160p 4K kunne vi spille Overwatch 2, Valorant på 67 fps til 141 fps og holdt billedhastighederne svævende rundt på 104 fps.
RX Vega 56 sidder mellem GTX 1070 Ti og GTX 1660 Ti og falder langsommere end GTX 1070 Ti med 2.4 % og hurtigere end GTX 1660 Ti med 1.6 %. Det har en gennemsnitlig relativ ydelse mod hvert grafikkort her. Dets resultater kan faktisk ikke skelnes fra GTX 1070 Ti . Det er et tæt opkald mellem RX Vega 56 og dens rival GTX 1070 Ti med en lille margin.
RX Vega 56 sidder mellem RX Vega 64 og GTX 1660 og falder langsommere end RX Vega 64 med 2.2 % og hurtigere end GTX 1660 med 1.4 %. Det har en gennemsnitlig relativ ydelse mod hvert grafikkort her. Dets resultater kan faktisk ikke skelnes fra RX Vega 64 . Mod sin rival - GTX 1070 Ti , er RX Vega 56 meget langsommere.
RX Vega 56 sidder mellem GTX 1070 Ti og GTX 1660 Ti og falder langsommere end GTX 1070 Ti med 2.4 % og hurtigere end GTX 1660 Ti med 1.6 %. Det har en gennemsnitlig relativ ydelse mod hvert grafikkort her. Dets resultater kan faktisk ikke skelnes fra GTX 1070 Ti . Det er et tæt opkald mellem RX Vega 56 og dens rival GTX 1070 Ti med en lille margin.
RX Vega 56 sidder mellem GTX 1660 og GTX 1650 SUPER og falder langsommere end GTX 1660 med 0.1 % og hurtigere end GTX 1650 SUPER med 22.4 %. Det har en gennemsnitlig relativ ydelse mod hvert grafikkort her. Dets resultater kan faktisk ikke skelnes fra GTX 1660 . Mod sin rival - GTX 1070 Ti , er RX Vega 56 meget langsommere.
RX Vega 56 sidder mellem GTX 1070 Ti og GTX 1660 Ti og falder langsommere end GTX 1070 Ti med 2.5 % og hurtigere end GTX 1660 Ti med 1.6 %. Det har en gennemsnitlig relativ ydelse mod hvert grafikkort her. Dets resultater kan faktisk ikke skelnes fra GTX 1070 Ti . De, der har en skærm med høj opdateringsfrekvens, vil nyde, hvad RX Vega 56 har at tilbyde, da den gennemsnitligt 120.5 fps. Det er et tæt opkald mellem RX Vega 56 og dens rival GTX 1070 Ti med en lille margin.
Spillets ydeevne Ultra kvalitet under indstillinger
• See the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 at Best Buy The Verdict If this were two separate reviews the Vega 56 would get a higher score than the Vega 64, but since it's one review I'm labeling both of ...
Conclusion. Radeon RX Vega 56 is a close derivative of Vega 64, so its behaviors largely carry over from AMD’s flagship. The company does cut this card’s board power rating by almost 30% ...
Years in development, the new Radeon RX Vega line is finally arriving - AMD's return to the higher-end of GPU performance after concentrating its efforts more on the mainstream and budget sectors ...
Similar to AMD's Radeon RX Vega 64, the Vega 56 offers two BIOSes with corresponding power profiles that can be selected using a switch on the card. If you don't change the driver-based profiles ...
Perhaps the most telling comparison, however, is that despite the 20 percent price reduction compared to the RX Vega 64, the RX Vega 56 is slower by less than 10 percent on average.
Radeon RX Vega 56 is the second AMD Vega card launched today. It comes at an affordable $399 price point, with a slightly reduced shader count that actually improves things greatly. For example, power efficiency now trades blows with some Pascal cards, which means less heat and noise, too.
On the AMD side of things, it is the AMD Radeon RX 480, or that card's successors, the Radeon RX 580 and Radeon RX 570. Therefore, the Vega 56 should be more than adequate for today's VR ...
Conclusion (RX Vega 56) The Radeon RX Vega 56 is easily the best card of this launch. It is cooler, quieter, and more efficient than the Radeon RX Vega 64 and delivers only 10 percent less ...
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is the little sister of Vega 64. It comes in at a 20% lower price than the RX Vega 64, but only has 12.5% fewer stream processors, and runs lower operating frequencies.
Meet Radeon RX Vega 56 and RX Vega 64 Brad Chacos/IDG AMD sent PCWorld every version of Vega for testing, including both the air-cooled and liquid-cooled versions of the Radeon RX Vega 64.
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is an upper mid-range graphics card, intended to beat Nvidia's GeForce GTX 1070 - a job it performs admirably as the benchmarks on this page demonstrate.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 - the Digital Foundry verdict. If you're looking for an alternative to the GTX 1070, the bottom line is that you're generally getting around 10 to 12 per cent of additional ...
The Radeon RX Vega 56 is a high-end graphics card by AMD, launched in August 2017. Built on the 14 nm process, and based on the Vega 10 graphics processor, in its Vega 10 XL variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.
Launching today is the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, or just Vega 64 for short. Based on a fully enabled Vega 10 GPU, the Vega 64 will come in two physical variants: air cooled and liquid cooled.
Radeon RX Vega 56 utilizes the same Vega 10 processor found in Vega 64. It’s a 486 mm² behemoth sporting 12.5 billion transistors manufactured on GlobalFoundries’ 14LPP platform.
Vega 56 vs GTX 1070, Vega goes 6-2-2 = Winner Vega! Good job AMD, hopefully next gen you can make more headway in power efficiency. But this is a good card, even beats the factory OC 1070.
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 and Vega 64 preview. ... so thanks AMD! RX Vega vs. the World: a 15-round heavyweight battle ... The RX Vega 56 is the more compelling choice, given the lower price and ...
Rx580 or vega 56 or gtx 1070I will buy a new gaming pc in march with a ryzen 7 2700, but i dont know which graphics card should i buy. In my country i can get the rx 580 around 120k ft, the vega 56 around 185k ft, and a gtx 1070 about 150-160k ft. Which should I buy? I already have my monitor, it supports freesync. (75hz, 1080x2560 resolution)
00
E
effortcreamy7 years ago
If you want to use freesync you would have to go for either of the amd cards. you could get a vega 56 but its a pricey and can draw quite a lot of power than a 1070, which give almost similar performance which run much cooler with a third party cooler. So you would be good with the gtx 1070 and save some bucks for some of performance and there are cases where the gtx 1070 outperforms the vega 56,and you could overclock it to get vega like performance but or if that isn't the case you don't mind the extra power draw and heat, and want to make use of the free sync you can surely go for the vega 56. The rx 580 doesn't come anywhere these two so it is out if the question.Check this link out for comparison of two cards at stock and overclocked- http://blog.logicalincrements.com/2017/08/rx-vega-56-vs-gtx-1070-gtx-1080/
10
U
underpassaffected7 years ago
Should I buy the RX Vega 56 over the GTX 1070?I'll be building a new rig in a few weeks. For a few days, I've been having trouble deciding on which graphics card I want to get. For a while, I was decided that I'd go with the 1070, but then I realized that Vega 56 performs just as well or better while offering Freesync, which my monitor does offer. For some reason, I still can't decide whether or not I should go for the Vega 56. Should I?
00
U
underpassaffected7 years ago
On much smaller case blower type cooler is better due to heat being dump outside the case directly. But on much bigger case "open air" cooler usually end up being better. Also noise. Those blower type cooler can be very loud when the fan speed start ramping up.
Hvad skal du overveje, før du køber et grafikkort
Hvis du har planer om at opgradere dit system ved at købe et nyt grafikkort. Så er der nogle vigtige faktorer at overveje.
Opløsning VS Kvalitet: Indvirkning på spilytelse
Hvad påvirker spilytelsen? Klarhed eller detaljer?
Ultra VS Højkvalitetsindstillinger i PC-spil
Hver spiller har et andet begreb om den ideelle indstilling til pc-spil. Men i de fleste tilfælde vælger man en grafikkonfiguration af høj kvalitet.
Hvad er CPU eller GPU flaskehalse?
Får du pludselige rammeledninger? du har måske en flaskehals.
Hvad er den acceptable FPS-hastighed for mig?
For nogle spil kan du stadig nyde flotte gaver ved lavere billedfrekvenser.
GPU Hierarchy
GPU Compare
CPU Compare
Gaming Laptops
Gaming Monitors
Gaming Headsets
Diskussion og kommentarer
Del dine kommentarer