RX Vega 56 品質 i7-7700K 設定で 超品質 のベンチマーク

これは、 RX Vega 56 1 秒あたり50-60 フレームで 1080p/1440p で AAA タイトルを再生することができます大幅に多くの可能なハイエンドカードであることは明らかである。 それは、 RX Vega 56 非常にパワー空腹カードであり、まともな電源ユニットを必要とすることは注目に値する。 メモリ RX Vega 56 の面では、の 8192 MB の RAM は、現代のゲームのための十分以上であり、任意のボトルネックを引き起こすことはありません。 要するに、パフォーマンスは例外的ですが、これはそこに 2026 最も強力な単一の GPU の一つであることは問題ありません。

現在の価格表の表示

RX Vega 56 Summary RX Vega 56 Competitors RX Vega 56 Review and Analysis RX Vega 56 Specifications
RX Vega 56 1080p Benchmarks RX Vega 56 1440p Benchmarks RX Vega 56 Ultrawide 1440p Benchmarks RX Vega 56 4K Benchmarks
RX Vega 56 Prices RX Vega 56 Variants RX Vega 56 Mining Profitability
RX Vega 56 品質 i7-7700K 設定で 超品質 のベンチマーク
あなたのコメントを共有する 4
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
価格 ¥ 30,407.8
年 2017
最高記録温度 75C
最大ファンノイズ 55.2dB
推奨電源 560W
ベンチマーク CPU Intel Core i7-7700K @ 4.20GHz ($354.99)
FPS に対する CPU の影響 + 0.0 FPS
FPS% の CPU への影響 0.0%
ベンチマークの品質設定 Ultra Quality Settings
平均1080p のパフォーマンス 95.9 FPS
平均1440p パフォーマンス 71.7 FPS
(Ultrawide) 平均1440p パフォーマンス 61.3 FPS
平均4k パフォーマンス 42.8 FPS
メモリ 8 GB
1フレームあたり1080 pのコスト ¥ 470.2
1フレームあたり1440pのコスト ¥ 628.5
(Ultrawide) 1フレームあたり1440pのコスト ¥ 735.9
1フレームあたり4Kの費用 ¥ 1,053.5
シリーズ RX Vega 56
Variant AMD Radeon RX Vega 56
全体の組み合わせのスコア 81/100 たいへん良い

RX Vega 64 は、最新の GCN 5.0 セットのグラフィックカードの high-end フラッグシップかもしれませんが、その価格により、ほとんどの mid-range PCゲーマーの手の届かないところにあります。一方、 RX Vega 56 は ¥ 45103 値札で手頃な価格に近づいています。 AMD の xx56 カードは常に mid-range 価格で定義されており、特にオーバークロック時に high-end グラフィックスカードの性能を発揮します。 RX Vega 56 内の GCN 5.0 グラフィックカードを完全にテストするために時間をかけた後、それがトレンドを継続していることは疑いなく言えます。

NVIDIA の最も近いライバルである GTX 1070 Ti と比較して、 RX Vega 56 は -5.1 ％遅くなりました。 以下のために 1080p Full HD 、我々はプレーすることができました Baldur's Gate 3, Armored Core VI, Borderlands 3, F1 22, Anthem で 62 にfpsの 68 FPSと の周りに浮かんでフレームレートを保持 64 FPSを。

以下のために 1440p Quad HD 、我々はプレーすることができました Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War, GreedFall, Death Stranding, Spider-Man Remastered, F1 2019 で 61 にfpsの 70 FPSと の周りに浮かんでフレームレートを保持 67 FPSを。 以下のために 2160p 4K 、我々はプレーすることができました Overwatch 2, Valorant で 67 にfpsの 141 FPSと の周りに浮かんでフレームレートを保持 104 FPSを。

Compare RX Vega 56 Variants Performance in 超品質

Assassin's Creed Valhalla (2020)

超品質

解像 度 1920x1080

年 グラフィックカード 価格 1秒あたりのフレーム数
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ¥ 56,407
60.0 FPS
2018 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 ¥ 56,407
56.0 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT ¥ 45,103
55.5 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 ¥ 39,451
51.4 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER ¥ 45,216
51.2 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 ¥ 56,407
48.9 FPS
2020 AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT ¥ 31,538
47.6 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 ¥ 39,564
47.4 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 ¥ 56,407
46.7 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti ¥ 46,233
46.3 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 ¥ 45,103
45.2 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti ¥ 31,538
44.5 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 ¥ 45,103
43.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER ¥ 25,886
42.8 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 ¥ 24,869
41.3 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 ¥ 31,538
34.3 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB ¥ 22,495
31.9 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB ¥ 19,104
30.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 ¥ 25,886
29.9 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER ¥ 18,086
29.6 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ¥ 28,712
29.3 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 480 ¥ 45,216
28.1 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB ¥ 19,217
28.1 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X ¥ 48,494
27.9 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 ¥ 19,104
27.4 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 ¥ 37,190
26.8 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390 ¥ 37,190
26.3 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 ¥ 16,843
26.3 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 ¥ 20,234
24.3 FPS

RX Vega 56 の間に位置 GTX 1070 Ti と GTX 1660 Ti よりも遅い立ち下がり、 GTX 1070 Ti によって 2.4 ％及びより速い GTX 1660 Ti によって 1.6 ここでは、すべてのグラフィックカードに対する平均相対パフォーマンスがあります。 その結果は、実際には GTX 1070 Ti 結果と区別できません。 RX Vega 56 とそのライバルである GTX 1070 Ti にはわずかな差があります。

Forza Horizon 4 (2018)

超品質

解像 度 1920x1080

年 グラフィックカード 価格 1秒あたりのフレーム数
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ¥ 56,407
132.0 FPS
2018 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 ¥ 56,407
125.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER ¥ 45,216
121.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 ¥ 56,407
117.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 ¥ 39,564
111.1 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT ¥ 45,103
109.7 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti ¥ 46,233
105.0 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 ¥ 39,451
100.8 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti ¥ 31,538
99.8 FPS
2020 AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT ¥ 31,538
99.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 ¥ 45,103
96.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER ¥ 25,886
94.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 ¥ 56,407
91.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 ¥ 45,103
89.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 ¥ 24,869
87.8 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 ¥ 31,538
75.5 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER ¥ 18,086
74.5 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ¥ 28,712
70.2 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB ¥ 22,495
69.7 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 ¥ 25,886
68.2 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB ¥ 19,217
66.6 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 ¥ 37,190
63.4 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB ¥ 19,104
62.2 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X ¥ 48,494
57.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 ¥ 16,843
54.5 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390 ¥ 37,190
52.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 ¥ 19,104
52.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 ¥ 20,234
45.0 FPS

RX Vega 56 の間に位置 RX Vega 64 と GTX 1660 よりも遅い立ち下がり、 RX Vega 64 によって 2.2 ％及びより速い GTX 1660 によって 1.4 ここでは、すべてのグラフィックカードに対する平均相対パフォーマンスがあります。 その結果は、実際には RX Vega 64 結果と区別できません。 ライバルである GTX 1070 Ti に対して、 RX Vega 56 ははるかに遅いです。

Cyberpunk 2077 (2020)

超品質

解像 度 1920x1080

年 グラフィックカード 価格 1秒あたりのフレーム数
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ¥ 56,407
60.0 FPS
2018 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 ¥ 56,407
56.0 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT ¥ 45,103
55.5 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 ¥ 39,451
51.4 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER ¥ 45,216
51.2 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 ¥ 56,407
48.9 FPS
2020 AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT ¥ 31,538
47.6 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 ¥ 39,564
47.4 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 ¥ 56,407
46.7 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti ¥ 46,233
46.3 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 ¥ 45,103
45.2 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti ¥ 31,538
44.5 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 ¥ 45,103
43.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER ¥ 25,886
42.8 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 ¥ 24,869
41.3 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 ¥ 31,538
34.3 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB ¥ 22,495
31.9 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB ¥ 19,104
30.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 ¥ 25,886
29.9 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER ¥ 18,086
29.6 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ¥ 28,712
29.3 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 480 ¥ 45,216
28.1 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB ¥ 19,217
28.1 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X ¥ 48,494
27.9 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 ¥ 19,104
27.4 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 ¥ 37,190
26.8 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390 ¥ 37,190
26.3 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 ¥ 16,843
26.3 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 ¥ 20,234
24.3 FPS

RX Vega 56 の間に位置 GTX 1070 Ti と GTX 1660 Ti よりも遅い立ち下がり、 GTX 1070 Ti によって 2.4 ％及びより速い GTX 1660 Ti によって 1.6 ここでは、すべてのグラフィックカードに対する平均相対パフォーマンスがあります。 その結果は、実際には GTX 1070 Ti 結果と区別できません。 RX Vega 56 とそのライバルである GTX 1070 Ti にはわずかな差があります。

Grand Theft Auto V (2015)

超品質

解像 度 1920x1080

年 グラフィックカード 価格 1秒あたりのフレーム数
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ¥ 56,407
126.0 FPS
2018 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 ¥ 56,407
120.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 ¥ 56,407
111.4 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER ¥ 45,216
110.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 ¥ 39,564
107.3 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT ¥ 45,103
100.7 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti ¥ 46,233
100.1 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti ¥ 31,538
95.1 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 ¥ 45,103
92.7 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 ¥ 39,451
92.4 FPS
2020 AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT ¥ 31,538
89.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER ¥ 25,886
89.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 ¥ 56,407
83.7 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 ¥ 24,869
83.7 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 ¥ 45,103
83.6 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER ¥ 18,086
68.3 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 ¥ 31,538
66.4 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ¥ 28,712
61.4 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB ¥ 22,495
61.1 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 ¥ 25,886
60.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB ¥ 19,217
58.3 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X ¥ 48,494
58.1 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 ¥ 37,190
56.2 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390 ¥ 37,190
55.5 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB ¥ 19,104
55.1 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 ¥ 19,104
50.3 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 ¥ 20,234
47.7 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 ¥ 16,843
47.2 FPS

RX Vega 56 の間に位置 GTX 1660 と GTX 1650 SUPER よりも遅い立ち下がり、 GTX 1660 によって 0.1 ％及びより速い GTX 1650 SUPER によって 22.4 ここでは、すべてのグラフィックカードに対する平均相対パフォーマンスがあります。 その結果は、実際には GTX 1660 結果と区別できません。 ライバルである GTX 1070 Ti に対して、 RX Vega 56 ははるかに遅いです。

Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)

超品質

解像 度 1920x1080

年 グラフィックカード 価格 1秒あたりのフレーム数
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER ¥ 56,407
159.0 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT ¥ 45,103
148.0 FPS
2018 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 ¥ 56,407
148.0 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5700 ¥ 39,451
137.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER ¥ 45,216
136.5 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 ¥ 56,407
130.3 FPS
2020 AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT ¥ 31,538
127.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 ¥ 39,564
126.5 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 ¥ 56,407
124.5 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti ¥ 46,233
123.5 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 ¥ 45,103
120.5 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti ¥ 31,538
118.6 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 ¥ 45,103
114.7 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER ¥ 25,886
114.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 ¥ 24,869
110.0 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER ¥ 18,086
94.5 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 ¥ 31,538
91.5 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB ¥ 22,495
82.4 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 ¥ 25,886
79.7 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ¥ 28,712
78.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 480 ¥ 45,216
75.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB ¥ 19,217
75.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X ¥ 48,494
74.4 FPS
2019 AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB ¥ 19,104
73.4 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 ¥ 19,104
73.0 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 ¥ 37,190
71.4 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390 ¥ 37,190
70.1 FPS
2019 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 ¥ 16,843
70.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 ¥ 20,234
64.8 FPS

RX Vega 56 の間に位置 GTX 1070 Ti と GTX 1660 Ti よりも遅い立ち下がり、 GTX 1070 Ti によって 2.5 ％及びより速い GTX 1660 Ti によって 1.6 ここでは、すべてのグラフィックカードに対する平均相対パフォーマンスがあります。 その結果は、実際には GTX 1070 Ti 結果と区別できません。 リフレッシュレートの高いモニターをお持ちの方は、平均で 120.5 fpsの RX Vega 56 が提供するものをお楽しみ RX Vega 56 ます。 RX Vega 56 とそのライバルである GTX 1070 Ti にはわずかな差があります。

設定時の 超品質 ゲームパフォーマンス

品質設定の変更
超品質 高品質 中品質 低品質

解像 度 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
年 ゲーム 1秒あたりのフレーム数
2023 Resident Evil 4
69
77.1
2023 A Plague Tale: Requiem
47
52.6
2023 Hogwarts Legacy
41
45.6
2023 The Last of Us Part I
31
35.1
2023 Forspoken
36
40.7
2023 The Callisto Protocol
28
31.6
2023 Dead Space
47
52.6
2023 Baldur's Gate 3
56
62.4
2023 Armored Core VI
56
62.4
2023 Immortals of Aveum
25
28.1
2023 Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart
50
56.1
2023 Remnant II
28
31.6
2023 Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
37
42.1
2023 Atomic Heart
37
42.1
2023 Starfield
18
21.0
2022 Elden Ring
52
58.4
2022 God of War
49
55.4
2022 Overwatch 2
92
103.0
2022 F1 22
56
63.1
2022 Dying Light 2
53
59.6
2022 Total War: Warhammer III
53
59.6
2022 Spider-Man Remastered
88
98.2
2022 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
63
70.1
2021 Forza Horizon 5
50
56.0
2021 Halo Infinite
38
42.8
2021 Battlefield 2042
71
78.9
2021 Hitman 3
72
80.7
2021 Far Cry 6
67
75.0
2021 Guardians of the Galaxy
73
82.1
2020 Watch Dogs: Legion
74
82.8
2020 Assassin's Creed Valhalla
40
45.2
2020 Microsoft Flight Simulator
26
29.5
2020 Valorant
178
198.2
2020 Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
69
77.7
2020 Death Stranding
80
89.8
2020 Marvel's Avengers
52
58.4
2020 Godfall
78
87.4
2020 Cyberpunk 2077
40
45.2
2019 Apex Legends
104
116.6
2019 Anthem
60
67.6
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
89
99.1
2019 Resident Evil 2
106
118.5
2019 Metro Exodus
47
52.8
2019 World War Z
111
124.0
2019 Gears of War 5
71
78.9
2019 F1 2019
89
99.1
2019 GreedFall
80
89.2
2019 Borderlands 3
56
62.7
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
108
120.5
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
41
46.4
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
65
72.9
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
116
129.2
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
50
56.2
2018 Final Fantasy XV
68
76.3
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
77
85.7
2018 Forza Horizon 4
80
89.0
2018 Fallout 76
91
101.7
2018 Hitman 2
71
79.5
2018 Just Cause 4
68
76.3
2018 Monster Hunter: World
73
82.1
2018 Strange Brigade
114
127.1
2018 Battlefield V
110
123.1
2017 Dawn of War III
90
100.9
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
61
68.4
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
51
57.2
2017 Destiny 2
113
126.2
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
63
71.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
80
89.0
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
94
105.5
2017 For Honor
126
140.7
2017 Project CARS 2
89
99.7
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
108
120.8
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
69
77.5
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
70
77.9
2016 Doom
162
180.3
2016 F1 2016
95
106.0
2016 Total War: Warhammer
88
97.9
2016 Battlefield 1
120
133.5
2016 Overwatch
124
138.0
2016 Dishonored 2
65
72.7
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
75
83.6
2015 Rocket League
369
410.6
2015 Need For Speed
102
113.9
2015 Project CARS
98
109.1
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
184
204.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
253
281.7
2009 League of Legends
475
528.0

解像 度 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
年 ゲーム 1秒あたりのフレーム数
2023 Resident Evil 4
44
56.1
2023 A Plague Tale: Requiem
30
38.6
2023 Hogwarts Legacy
28
35.1
2023 The Last of Us Part I
21
26.7
2023 Forspoken
21
26.7
2023 The Callisto Protocol
17
22.4
2023 Dead Space
28
35.1
2023 Baldur's Gate 3
40
50.5
2023 Armored Core VI
40
50.5
2023 Immortals of Aveum
15
19.6
2023 Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart
30
38.6
2023 Remnant II
16
21.0
2023 Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
25
31.6
2023 Atomic Heart
24
30.2
2023 Starfield
15
18.9
2022 Elden Ring
36
46.2
2022 God of War
38
47.6
2022 Overwatch 2
70
88.6
2022 F1 22
30
38.6
2022 Dying Light 2
30
38.6
2022 Total War: Warhammer III
33
42.1
2022 Spider-Man Remastered
56
70.1
2022 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
36
45.6
2021 Forza Horizon 5
38
48.2
2021 Halo Infinite
30
38.6
2021 Battlefield 2042
41
52.4
2021 Hitman 3
46
57.5
2021 Far Cry 6
44
56.1
2021 Guardians of the Galaxy
46
58.2
2020 Watch Dogs: Legion
43
54.0
2020 Assassin's Creed Valhalla
31
39.2
2020 Microsoft Flight Simulator
20
25.9
2020 Valorant
129
162.1
2020 Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
48
60.9
2020 Death Stranding
55
69.6
2020 Marvel's Avengers
33
41.6
2020 Godfall
46
58.4
2020 Cyberpunk 2077
33
42.2
2019 Apex Legends
69
86.9
2019 Anthem
42
53.6
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
61
76.9
2019 Resident Evil 2
63
79.9
2019 Metro Exodus
32
41.0
2019 World War Z
72
90.5
2019 Gears of War 5
45
57.2
2019 F1 2019
56
70.1
2019 GreedFall
51
64.5
2019 Borderlands 3
35
44.0
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
69
86.8
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
30
38.0
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
45
57.2
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
65
81.5
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
28
36.1
2018 Final Fantasy XV
43
54.2
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
45
57.2
2018 Forza Horizon 4
60
75.1
2018 Fallout 76
69
86.9
2018 Hitman 2
41
51.9
2018 Just Cause 4
45
56.3
2018 Monster Hunter: World
45
57.4
2018 Strange Brigade
70
88.6
2018 Battlefield V
72
91.1
2017 Dawn of War III
71
89.4
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
48
61.0
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
41
51.9
2017 Destiny 2
86
108.1
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
43
54.2
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
46
57.8
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
61
76.3
2017 For Honor
65
82.1
2017 Project CARS 2
56
70.3
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
87
109.1
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
42
52.5
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
51
64.3
2016 Doom
99
124.9
2016 F1 2016
76
95.2
2016 Total War: Warhammer
58
72.6
2016 Battlefield 1
80
100.3
2016 Overwatch
75
94.9
2016 Dishonored 2
49
62.1
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
46
58.0
2015 Rocket League
140
176.0
2015 Need For Speed
70
88.0
2015 Project CARS
66
83.3
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
106
132.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
187
234.7
2009 League of Legends
234
293.3

解像 度 3440x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
年 ゲーム 1秒あたりのフレーム数
2019 Apex Legends
54
71.4
2019 Anthem
33
44.3
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
47
63.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
48
63.8
2019 Metro Exodus
27
35.8
2019 World War Z
57
76.3
2019 Gears of War 5
37
49.9
2019 F1 2019
46
61.4
2019 GreedFall
37
48.7
2019 Borderlands 3
27
35.8
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
56
74.2
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
25
33.2
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
37
49.9
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
47
62.3
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
25
33.0
2018 Final Fantasy XV
34
46.0
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
35
46.5
2018 Forza Horizon 4
50
66.8
2018 Fallout 76
54
72.0
2018 Hitman 2
33
44.2
2018 Just Cause 4
34
45.8
2018 Monster Hunter: World
34
45.4
2018 Strange Brigade
55
73.2
2018 Battlefield V
57
75.4
2017 Dawn of War III
54
72.2
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
39
52.3
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
34
45.9
2017 Destiny 2
65
86.8
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
34
45.5
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
36
47.6
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
52
69.1
2017 For Honor
50
65.9
2017 Project CARS 2
52
69.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
81
107.3
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
32
42.8
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
48
63.9
2016 Doom
77
102.0
2016 F1 2016
63
83.0
2016 Total War: Warhammer
46
61.0
2016 Battlefield 1
63
83.9
2016 Overwatch
58
77.0
2016 Dishonored 2
45
59.6
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
35
47.2
2015 Rocket League
104
138.1
2015 Need For Speed
59
78.5
2015 Project CARS
57
76.0
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
78
103.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
181
238.6
2009 League of Legends
166
219.7

解像 度 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
年 ゲーム 1秒あたりのフレーム数
2023 Resident Evil 4
29
42.1
2023 A Plague Tale: Requiem
17
24.5
2023 Hogwarts Legacy
17
24.5
2023 The Last of Us Part I
9
14.0
2023 Forspoken
8
12.6
2023 The Callisto Protocol
7
11.2
2023 Dead Space
9
14.0
2023 Baldur's Gate 3
19
28.1
2023 Armored Core VI
19
28.1
2023 Immortals of Aveum
6
9.1
2023 Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart
14
21.0
2023 Remnant II
7
10.5
2023 Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
10
15.4
2023 Atomic Heart
13
18.9
2023 Starfield
8
12.6
2022 Elden Ring
18
26.3
2022 God of War
25
37.0
2022 Overwatch 2
46
66.9
2022 F1 22
19
28.1
2022 Dying Light 2
19
28.1
2022 Total War: Warhammer III
22
31.6
2022 Spider-Man Remastered
34
49.1
2022 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
19
28.1
2021 Forza Horizon 5
26
37.4
2021 Halo Infinite
18
26.5
2021 Battlefield 2042
23
33.7
2021 Hitman 3
24
35.1
2021 Far Cry 6
21
30.2
2021 Guardians of the Galaxy
22
31.6
2020 Watch Dogs: Legion
24
35.1
2020 Assassin's Creed Valhalla
18
26.5
2020 Microsoft Flight Simulator
14
20.5
2020 Valorant
98
141.0
2020 Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
22
32.5
2020 Death Stranding
29
42.3
2020 Marvel's Avengers
15
21.8
2020 Godfall
19
27.8
2020 Cyberpunk 2077
19
27.7
2019 Apex Legends
32
46.6
2019 Anthem
20
29.2
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
28
40.8
2019 Resident Evil 2
27
39.4
2019 Metro Exodus
18
25.9
2019 World War Z
36
52.1
2019 Gears of War 5
25
36.1
2019 F1 2019
31
44.6
2019 GreedFall
18
26.5
2019 Borderlands 3
16
22.9
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
36
51.8
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
16
24.1
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
25
36.1
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
24
34.9
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
17
25.5
2018 Final Fantasy XV
22
31.7
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
20
29.7
2018 Forza Horizon 4
34
49.8
2018 Fallout 76
33
47.6
2018 Hitman 2
21
30.8
2018 Just Cause 4
20
29.4
2018 Monster Hunter: World
19
27.5
2018 Strange Brigade
33
48.2
2018 Battlefield V
34
49.8
2017 Dawn of War III
31
45.6
2017 Ghost Recon Wildlands
25
36.7
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
23
33.9
2017 Destiny 2
37
54.2
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
21
30.8
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
21
31.2
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
36
52.8
2017 For Honor
28
41.0
2017 Project CARS 2
41
58.7
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
63
91.4
2016 Deus Ex: Mankind Divided
19
27.5
2016 Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation
38
55.1
2016 Doom
45
65.7
2016 F1 2016
42
60.0
2016 Total War: Warhammer
28
41.4
2016 Battlefield 1
39
56.6
2016 Overwatch
34
49.0
2016 Dishonored 2
34
49.3
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
21
30.3
2015 Rocket League
57
82.1
2015 Need For Speed
41
58.7
2015 Project CARS
41
58.7
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
43
61.5
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
147
211.2
2009 League of Legends
82
117.3
RX Vega 56 with i7-7700K at 1080p and 超品質 settings
RX Vega 56 with i7-7700K at 1440p and 超品質 settings
RX Vega 56 with i7-7700K at 4K and 超品質 settings

競合他社との比較

AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT
2020 6GB ¥ 31,538
10% faster
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
2019 6GB ¥ 39,451
12% faster
Compare
AMD Radeon VII
AMD Radeon VII
2019 16GB ¥ 75,059
27% faster
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
2019 6GB ¥ 31,538
0% faster
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
2019 6GB ¥ 24,869
11% slower
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
2019 4GB ¥ 16,843
51% slower
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
2019 8GB ¥ 45,216
18% faster
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER
2019 8GB ¥ 56,407
29% faster
Compare
AMD Radeon RX 5700
AMD Radeon RX 5700
2019 8GB ¥ 39,451
16% faster
Compare
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
2019 8GB ¥ 45,103
25% faster
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
2019 6GB ¥ 25,886
5% slower
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
2019 4GB ¥ 18,086
27% slower
Compare
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB
2019 8GB ¥ 22,495
26% slower
Compare
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB
AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB
2019 4GB ¥ 19,104
36% slower
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080
2018 8GB ¥ 78,337
35% faster
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070
2018 8GB ¥ 53,016
23% faster
Compare
AMD Radeon RX 590
AMD Radeon RX 590
2018 8GB ¥ 24,191
17% slower
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
2017 8GB ¥ 56,859
5% faster
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
2017 11GB ¥ 91,223
30% faster
Compare
NVIDIA TITAN V
NVIDIA TITAN V
2017 12GB ¥ 339,007
37% faster
Compare
NVIDIA TITAN Xp
NVIDIA TITAN Xp
2017 12GB ¥ 135,535
27% faster
Compare
AMD Radeon RX 570
AMD Radeon RX 570
2017 4GB ¥ 13,904
47% slower
Compare
AMD Radeon RX 580
AMD Radeon RX 580
2017 8GB ¥ 17,069
29% slower
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
2017 8GB ¥ 47,364
6% faster
Compare
AMD Radeon RX 470
AMD Radeon RX 470
2016 4GB ¥ 38,660
58% slower
Compare
AMD Radeon RX 480
AMD Radeon RX 480
2016 8GB ¥ 45,103
46% slower
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
2016 8GB ¥ 59,007
13% faster
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
2016 8GB ¥ 37,190
2% slower
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
2016 6GB ¥ 17,973
35% slower
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
2016 3GB ¥ 19,217
40% slower
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
2015 12GB ¥ 124,231
2% faster
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
2015 6GB ¥ 69,972
13% slower
Compare
AMD Radeon R9 390
AMD Radeon R9 390
2015 8GB ¥ 52,564
47% slower
Compare
AMD Radeon R9 390X
AMD Radeon R9 390X
2015 8GB ¥ 55,955
40% slower
Compare
AMD Radeon R9 FURY
AMD Radeon R9 FURY
2015 4GB ¥ 62,059
37% slower
Compare
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
2015 4GB ¥ 73,363
21% slower
Compare
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
2015 4GB ¥ 172,838
30% slower
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
2014 6GB ¥ 112,927
35% slower
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
2014 4GB ¥ 28,147
26% slower
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
2014 4GB ¥ 50,755
43% slower
Compare
AMD Radeon R9 295X2
AMD Radeon R9 295X2
2014 4GB ¥ 169,447
5% faster
Compare

RX Vega 56 仕様

RX Vega 56 Board Design

Board NumberD050-03
Length10.5 inches 267 mm
Outputs1x HDMI3x DisplayPort
Power Connectors2x 8-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP210 W

RX Vega 56 Clock Speeds

Boost Clock1474 MHz
GPU Clock1138 MHz
Memory Clock800 MHz 1600 MHz effective

RX Vega 56 Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationVega (RX Vega)
Launch Price399 USD
ProductionActive
Release DateAug 14th, 2017

RX Vega 56 Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL2
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model6.1
Vulkan1.1.82

RX Vega 56 Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 5.0
Die Size510 mm²
GPU NameVega 10
GPU VariantVega 10 XL (215-0894216)
Process Size14 nm
Transistors12,500 million

RX Vega 56 Memory

Bandwidth409.6 GB/s
Memory Bus2048 bit
Memory Size8192 MB
Memory TypeHBM2

RX Vega 56 Render Config

Compute Units56
ROPs64
Shading Units3584
TMUs224

RX Vega 56 Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance21,131 GFLOPS (2:1)
FP32 (float) performance10,566 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance660.4 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate94.34 GPixel/s
Texture Rate330.2 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

• See the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 at Best Buy The Verdict If this were two separate reviews the Vega 56 would get a higher score than the Vega 64, but since it's one review I'm labeling both of ...
Conclusion. Radeon RX Vega 56 is a close derivative of Vega 64, so its behaviors largely carry over from AMD’s flagship. The company does cut this card’s board power rating by almost 30% ...
Years in development, the new Radeon RX Vega line is finally arriving - AMD's return to the higher-end of GPU performance after concentrating its efforts more on the mainstream and budget sectors ...
Similar to AMD's Radeon RX Vega 64, the Vega 56 offers two BIOSes with corresponding power profiles that can be selected using a switch on the card. If you don't change the driver-based profiles ...
Perhaps the most telling comparison, however, is that despite the 20 percent price reduction compared to the RX Vega 64, the RX Vega 56 is slower by less than 10 percent on average.
Radeon RX Vega 56 is the second AMD Vega card launched today. It comes at an affordable $399 price point, with a slightly reduced shader count that actually improves things greatly. For example, power efficiency now trades blows with some Pascal cards, which means less heat and noise, too.
On the AMD side of things, it is the AMD Radeon RX 480, or that card's successors, the Radeon RX 580 and Radeon RX 570. Therefore, the Vega 56 should be more than adequate for today's VR ...
Conclusion (RX Vega 56) The Radeon RX Vega 56 is easily the best card of this launch. It is cooler, quieter, and more efficient than the Radeon RX Vega 64 and delivers only 10 percent less ...
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is the little sister of Vega 64. It comes in at a 20% lower price than the RX Vega 64, but only has 12.5% fewer stream processors, and runs lower operating frequencies.
Meet Radeon RX Vega 56 and RX Vega 64 Brad Chacos/IDG AMD sent PCWorld every version of Vega for testing, including both the air-cooled and liquid-cooled versions of the Radeon RX Vega 64.
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is an upper mid-range graphics card, intended to beat Nvidia's GeForce GTX 1070 - a job it performs admirably as the benchmarks on this page demonstrate.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 - the Digital Foundry verdict. If you're looking for an alternative to the GTX 1070, the bottom line is that you're generally getting around 10 to 12 per cent of additional ...
The Radeon RX Vega 56 is a high-end graphics card by AMD, launched in August 2017. Built on the 14 nm process, and based on the Vega 10 graphics processor, in its Vega 10 XL variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.
Launching today is the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64, or just Vega 64 for short. Based on a fully enabled Vega 10 GPU, the Vega 64 will come in two physical variants: air cooled and liquid cooled.
Radeon RX Vega 56 utilizes the same Vega 10 processor found in Vega 64. It’s a 486 mm² behemoth sporting 12.5 billion transistors manufactured on GlobalFoundries’ 14LPP platform.
Vega 56 vs GTX 1070, Vega goes 6-2-2 = Winner Vega! Good job AMD, hopefully next gen you can make more headway in power efficiency. But this is a good card, even beats the factory OC 1070.
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 and Vega 64 preview. ... so thanks AMD! RX Vega vs. the World: a 15-round heavyweight battle ... The RX Vega 56 is the more compelling choice, given the lower price and ...
グラフィックカードを購入する前に考慮すべきこと

グラフィックカードを購入する前に考慮すべきこと

新しいグラフィックカードを購入してシステムをアップグレードすることを計画していた場合。それから考慮すべきいくつかの重要な要素があります。
解像度と品質：ゲームパフォーマンスへの影響

解像度と品質：ゲームパフォーマンスへの影響

ゲームのパフォーマンスに影響するものは何ですか？明快さまたは詳細？
PCゲームにおけるUltra VS高品質設定

PCゲームにおけるUltra VS高品質設定

各プレイヤーは、PCゲームの理想的な設定について異なる考え方を持っています。しかし、ほとんどの場合、高品質のグラフィック構成を選択するのが良い方法です。
CPUやGPUのボトルネックとは何ですか？

CPUやGPUのボトルネックとは何ですか？

あなたは突然のフレームドロップを受けていますか？ボトルネックがあるかもしれません。
私にとって許容できるFPS速度は？

私にとって許容できるFPS速度は？

ゲームによっては、それでも低いフレームレートで素晴らしいニンニクを楽しむことができます。
GPU Hierarchy
GPU Hierarchy
GPU Compare
GPU Compare
CPU Hierarchy
CPU Compare
Laptop Hierarchy
Gaming Laptops
Monitor Hierarchy
Gaming Monitors
Headset Hierarchy
Gaming Headsets

議論とコメント

あなたのコメントを共有する
F
foderntider 7 years ago
Rx580 or vega 56 or gtx 1070I will buy a new gaming pc in march with a ryzen 7 2700, but i dont know which graphics card should i buy. In my country i can get the rx 580 around 120k ft, the vega 56 around 185k ft, and a gtx 1070 about 150-160k ft. Which should I buy? I already have my monitor, it supports freesync. (75hz, 1080x2560 resolution)
0 0
R
radiatorspiffy 7 years ago
If you want to use freesync you would have to go for either of the amd cards. you could get a vega 56 but its a pricey and can draw quite a lot of power than a 1070, which give almost similar performance which run much cooler with a third party cooler. So you would be good with the gtx 1070 and save some bucks for some of performance and there are cases where the gtx 1070 outperforms the vega 56,and you could overclock it to get vega like performance but or if that isn't the case you don't mind the extra power draw and heat, and want to make use of the free sync you can surely go for the vega 56. The rx 580 doesn't come anywhere these two so it is out if the question.Check this link out for comparison of two cards at stock and overclocked- http://blog.logicalincrements.com/2017/08/rx-vega-56-vs-gtx-1070-gtx-1080/
1 0
M
meiosisrocky 7 years ago
Should I buy the RX Vega 56 over the GTX 1070?I'll be building a new rig in a few weeks. For a few days, I've been having trouble deciding on which graphics card I want to get. For a while, I was decided that I'd go with the 1070, but then I realized that Vega 56 performs just as well or better while offering Freesync, which my monitor does offer. For some reason, I still can't decide whether or not I should go for the Vega 56. Should I?
0 0
F
factorvolvox 7 years ago
On much smaller case blower type cooler is better due to heat being dump outside the case directly. But on much bigger case "open air" cooler usually end up being better. Also noise. Those blower type cooler can be very loud when the fan speed start ramping up.
0 0