i3-9320 vs i3-10100 - Starfield Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9320 i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

10144 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2552 Pts
2531 Pts

Starfield

i3-9320 vs i3-10100 in Starfield using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9320 i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
13.0 FPS
1080p
13.2 FPS
1440p
11.7 FPS
1440p
11.8 FPS
2160p
7.8 FPS
2160p
7.9 FPS
w1440p
10.4 FPS
w1440p
10.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
27.1 FPS
1080p
27.5 FPS
1440p
24.7 FPS
1440p
24.9 FPS
2160p
17.3 FPS
2160p
17.5 FPS
w1440p
22.3 FPS
w1440p
22.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
41.2 FPS
1080p
41.8 FPS
1440p
37.7 FPS
1440p
38.0 FPS
2160p
26.7 FPS
2160p
27.0 FPS
w1440p
34.1 FPS
w1440p
34.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
69.5 FPS
1080p
70.3 FPS
1440p
63.7 FPS
1440p
64.2 FPS
2160p
45.7 FPS
2160p
46.1 FPS
w1440p
57.9 FPS
w1440p
58.8 FPS
i3-9320
  • The i3-9320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10100
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-9320 vs i3-10100 specifications

i3-9320 vs i3-10100 Architecture

i3-9320 i3-10100

i3-9320 vs i3-10100 Cache

i3-9320 i3-10100

i3-9320 vs i3-10100 Cores

i3-9320 i3-10100

i3-9320 vs i3-10100 Performance

i3-9320 i3-10100
Frequency3.7 GHz3.60 GHz
TDP62 W65 W

i3-9320 vs i3-10100 Physical

i3-9320 i3-10100

Compare i3-9320 vs i3-10100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments