i3-9320 vs i3-10100 - Need For Speed: Heat Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9320 i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

10144 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2552 Pts
2531 Pts

Need For Speed: Heat

i3-9320 vs i3-10100 in Need For Speed: Heat using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9320 i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
44.6 FPS
1080p
45.2 FPS
1440p
34.9 FPS
1440p
35.4 FPS
2160p
22.0 FPS
2160p
22.3 FPS
w1440p
30.5 FPS
w1440p
30.8 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
79.3 FPS
1080p
80.2 FPS
1440p
64.2 FPS
1440p
65.0 FPS
2160p
43.0 FPS
2160p
43.5 FPS
w1440p
57.1 FPS
w1440p
57.6 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
114.0 FPS
1080p
115.2 FPS
1440p
93.4 FPS
1440p
94.5 FPS
2160p
64.0 FPS
2160p
64.7 FPS
w1440p
83.7 FPS
w1440p
84.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
183.3 FPS
1080p
185.2 FPS
1440p
152.0 FPS
1440p
153.7 FPS
2160p
106.0 FPS
2160p
107.1 FPS
w1440p
136.9 FPS
w1440p
138.0 FPS
i3-9320
  • The i3-9320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10100
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-9320 vs i3-10100 specifications

i3-9320 vs i3-10100 Architecture

i3-9320 i3-10100

i3-9320 vs i3-10100 Cache

i3-9320 i3-10100

i3-9320 vs i3-10100 Cores

i3-9320 i3-10100

i3-9320 vs i3-10100 Performance

i3-9320 i3-10100
Frequency3.7 GHz3.60 GHz
TDP62 W65 W

i3-9320 vs i3-10100 Physical

i3-9320 i3-10100

Compare i3-9320 vs i3-10100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments