i3-9320 vs i3-10100 - Armored Core VI Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9320 i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

10144 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2552 Pts
2531 Pts

Armored Core VI

i3-9320 vs i3-10100 in Armored Core VI using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9320 i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
38.6 FPS
1080p
39.1 FPS
1440p
31.3 FPS
1440p
31.7 FPS
2160p
17.4 FPS
2160p
17.6 FPS
w1440p
26.0 FPS
w1440p
26.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
70.0 FPS
1080p
70.8 FPS
1440p
58.4 FPS
1440p
59.1 FPS
2160p
35.0 FPS
2160p
35.4 FPS
w1440p
49.7 FPS
w1440p
50.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
101.4 FPS
1080p
102.5 FPS
1440p
85.5 FPS
1440p
86.4 FPS
2160p
52.6 FPS
2160p
53.2 FPS
w1440p
73.4 FPS
w1440p
74.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
164.2 FPS
1080p
165.8 FPS
1440p
139.7 FPS
1440p
141.1 FPS
2160p
87.9 FPS
2160p
88.7 FPS
w1440p
120.9 FPS
w1440p
122.3 FPS
i3-9320
  • The i3-9320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10100
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-9320 vs i3-10100 specifications

i3-9320 vs i3-10100 Architecture

i3-9320 i3-10100

i3-9320 vs i3-10100 Cache

i3-9320 i3-10100

i3-9320 vs i3-10100 Cores

i3-9320 i3-10100

i3-9320 vs i3-10100 Performance

i3-9320 i3-10100
Frequency3.7 GHz3.60 GHz
TDP62 W65 W

i3-9320 vs i3-10100 Physical

i3-9320 i3-10100

Compare i3-9320 vs i3-10100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments