i3-9320 vs i3-10100 - Microsoft Flight Simulator Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9320 i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

10144 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2552 Pts
2531 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i3-9320 vs i3-10100 in Microsoft Flight Simulator using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9320 i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
18.1 FPS
1080p
18.3 FPS
1440p
15.8 FPS
1440p
16.0 FPS
2160p
12.5 FPS
2160p
12.6 FPS
w1440p
15.1 FPS
w1440p
15.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
36.3 FPS
1080p
36.6 FPS
1440p
32.2 FPS
1440p
32.5 FPS
2160p
26.2 FPS
2160p
26.4 FPS
w1440p
30.9 FPS
w1440p
31.3 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
54.4 FPS
1080p
54.9 FPS
1440p
48.6 FPS
1440p
49.1 FPS
2160p
39.9 FPS
2160p
40.2 FPS
w1440p
46.8 FPS
w1440p
47.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
90.7 FPS
1080p
91.5 FPS
1440p
81.3 FPS
1440p
82.2 FPS
2160p
67.3 FPS
2160p
67.7 FPS
w1440p
78.4 FPS
w1440p
79.3 FPS
i3-9320
  • The i3-9320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10100
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-9320 vs i3-10100 specifications

i3-9320 vs i3-10100 Architecture

i3-9320 i3-10100

i3-9320 vs i3-10100 Cache

i3-9320 i3-10100

i3-9320 vs i3-10100 Cores

i3-9320 i3-10100

i3-9320 vs i3-10100 Performance

i3-9320 i3-10100
Frequency3.7 GHz3.60 GHz
TDP62 W65 W

i3-9320 vs i3-10100 Physical

i3-9320 i3-10100

Compare i3-9320 vs i3-10100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments