i3-9320 vs i3-10100 - Need For Speed: Payback Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9320 i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

10144 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2552 Pts
2531 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-9320 vs i3-10100 in Need For Speed: Payback using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9320 i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
66.6 FPS
1080p
67.5 FPS
1440p
48.1 FPS
1440p
48.7 FPS
2160p
33.6 FPS
2160p
34.0 FPS
w1440p
43.7 FPS
w1440p
44.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
111.7 FPS
1080p
113.0 FPS
1440p
84.6 FPS
1440p
85.5 FPS
2160p
62.1 FPS
2160p
62.7 FPS
w1440p
77.9 FPS
w1440p
78.8 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
156.8 FPS
1080p
158.5 FPS
1440p
121.1 FPS
1440p
122.3 FPS
2160p
90.6 FPS
2160p
91.5 FPS
w1440p
112.1 FPS
w1440p
113.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
247.0 FPS
1080p
249.5 FPS
1440p
194.1 FPS
1440p
195.9 FPS
2160p
147.6 FPS
2160p
149.0 FPS
w1440p
180.5 FPS
w1440p
182.4 FPS
i3-9320
  • The i3-9320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10100
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-9320 vs i3-10100 specifications

i3-9320 vs i3-10100 Architecture

i3-9320 i3-10100

i3-9320 vs i3-10100 Cache

i3-9320 i3-10100

i3-9320 vs i3-10100 Cores

i3-9320 i3-10100

i3-9320 vs i3-10100 Performance

i3-9320 i3-10100
Frequency3.7 GHz3.60 GHz
TDP62 W65 W

i3-9320 vs i3-10100 Physical

i3-9320 i3-10100

Compare i3-9320 vs i3-10100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments