i5-10400 vs i5-12600K - The Last of Us Part I RX 6700 XT - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-10400 i5-12600K

Multi-Thread Performance

12716 Pts
17640 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2609 Pts
3590 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i5-10400 vs i5-12600K in The Last of Us Part I using RX 6700 XT - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-10400 i5-12600K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
57.3 FPS
1080p
61.3 FPS
1440p
43.5 FPS
1440p
45.7 FPS
2160p
22.9 FPS
2160p
24.0 FPS
w1440p
35.5 FPS
w1440p
37.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
98.3 FPS
1080p
104.1 FPS
1440p
77.6 FPS
1440p
81.0 FPS
2160p
44.5 FPS
2160p
46.4 FPS
w1440p
65.1 FPS
w1440p
68.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
139.2 FPS
1080p
146.9 FPS
1440p
111.7 FPS
1440p
116.2 FPS
2160p
66.1 FPS
2160p
68.8 FPS
w1440p
94.8 FPS
w1440p
98.6 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
221.1 FPS
1080p
232.4 FPS
1440p
179.9 FPS
1440p
186.7 FPS
2160p
109.4 FPS
2160p
113.5 FPS
w1440p
154.0 FPS
w1440p
160.0 FPS
i5-10400
  • The i5-10400 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i5-10400 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i5-10400 has a higher turbo clock boost. Turbo Boost is a CPU feature that will run CPU clock speed faster than its base clock, if certain conditions are present. It will enable older software that runs on fewer cores, to perform better on newer hardware. Since games are software too, it is also applicable to them.
i5-12600K
  • The i5-12600K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-12600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-12600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i5-12600K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i5-10400 vs i5-12600K specifications

i5-10400 vs i5-12600K Architecture

i5-10400 i5-12600K
CodenameComet LakeAlder Lake
GenerationCore i5 (Comet Lake)Core i5 (Alder Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4-3200 MHz Dual-channel
Part#unknownunknown
Production StatusActiveActive

i5-10400 vs i5-12600K Cache

i5-10400 i5-12600K
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)9.5MB (shared)
Cache L312MB (shared)20MB (shared)

i5-10400 vs i5-12600K Cores

i5-10400 i5-12600K
# of Cores610
# of Threads1216
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 630UHD Graphics 770
SMP # CPUs11

i5-10400 vs i5-12600K Features

i5-10400 i5-12600K

i5-10400 vs i5-12600K Notes

i5-10400 i5-12600K

i5-10400 vs i5-12600K Performance

i5-10400 i5-12600K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency2.9 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier29.0x37.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP65 W125 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzup to 4.9 GHz

i5-10400 vs i5-12600K Physical

i5-10400 i5-12600K
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1200FC-LGA1700
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1200Intel Socket 1700
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax72°C72°C

Compare i5-10400 vs i5-12600K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments