R9 285 품질 i7-4770K 설정에서 울트라 품질 벤치 마크와

현재 2048 MB RAM R9 285 , 더 현대 게임에서 심각한 메모리 관련 병목을 가질 수 있습니다. 이 조합은 R9 285 Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.50GHz 많은 게임에서 8% 미만의 병목 현상을가지고 있으며, FPS의 손실을 피하기 위해 완벽 하 게 일치 합니다. 이 조합은 R9 285 Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.50GHz FPS의 손실을 막기 위해 완벽 하 게 일치 합니다. 현재 2048 MB RAM R9 285 , 더 현대 게임에서 거의 메모리 관련 병목을 가질 수 있습니다.

 R9 285 품질 i7-4770K 설정에서 울트라 품질 벤치 마크와
AMD Radeon R9 285
가격 ₩ 429,286.0
2014
최대 기록 온도 70C
최대 팬 소음 48.3dB
권장 전원 공급 장치 540W
벤치 마크 CPU Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.50GHz ($284.99)
FPS에 CPU 영향 + 0.0 FPS
FPS%에 CPU 영향 0.0%
벤치 마크 품질 설정 Ultra Quality Settings
평균 1080p 성능 39.5 FPS
평균 1440p 성능 28.9 FPS
(Ultrawide) 평균 1440p 성능 24.4 FPS
평균 4k 성능 16.7 FPS
메모리 2 GB
프레임 당 1080p 비용 ₩ 7,117.1
프레임 당 1440p 비용 ₩ 9,738.0
(Ultrawide) 프레임 당 1440p 비용 ₩ 11,522.9
프레임 당 4K 비용 ₩ 16,843.8
시리즈 R9 285
Variant AMD Radeon R9 285
전체 조합 점수 57/100 용인되는

R9 295X2 은 최신 GCN 3.0 그래픽 카드 세트의 extreme 플래그쉽 일 수 있지만 가격은 대부분의 high-end PC 게이머의 손이 닿지 않는 곳에 있습니다. 반면, R9 285 은 ₩ 281295.3 의 가격표에서 합리적으로 저렴한 가격에 가깝습니다. AMD 의 xx85 카드는 항상 오버 클럭 된 경우 extreme 그래픽 카드의 문을 두드리는 성능으로 high-end 가격으로 정의되었습니다. R9 285 내부에서 GCN 3.0 그래픽 카드를 완전히 테스트하는 데 시간을 투자 한 후에도 계속 추세를 유지할 것이라고 말할 수 있습니다.

NVIDIA 의 가장 가까운 라이벌 인 GTX 960 과 비교하여 R9 285 은 3.9 % 빠릅니다. 1080p Full HD 경우 77 fps ~ 77 fps에서 Valorant 을 (를) 재생할 수 있었고 은 77 fps 주위의 프레임 속도를 유지했습니다.

1440p Quad HD 경우 63 fps ~ 63 fps에서 Valorant 을 (를) 재생할 수 있었고 은 63 fps 주위의 프레임 속도를 유지했습니다.

Assassin's Creed Valhalla (2020)

울트라 품질

해상도 1920x1080

그래픽 카드 가격 초당 프레임
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290 ₩ 450,750
24.6 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 ₩ 202,216
24.3 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 ₩ 733,175
22.1 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition ₩ 563,720
19.9 FPS
2011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 ₩ 789,660
19.9 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380X ₩ 258,701
19.8 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 280X ₩ 337,780
19.7 FPS
2011 AMD Radeon HD 6990 ₩ 789,660
19.2 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 ₩ 450,750
18.8 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti ₩ 190,919
18.3 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 ₩ 563,720
17.9 FPS
2011 AMD Radeon HD 7970 ₩ 620,205
17.7 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 ₩ 281,295
17.5 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 ₩ 224,810
17.4 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 ₩ 315,186
17.2 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 ₩ 224,810
17.0 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 ₩ 450,750
16.5 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 ₩ 281,295
15.3 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 460 ₩ 158,158
14.9 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7950 ₩ 507,235
14.7 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti ₩ 337,780
14.4 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 270 ₩ 202,216
14.3 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 ₩ 179,622
13.8 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 ₩ 258,701
12.8 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R7 370 ₩ 168,325
12.7 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 560 ₩ 111,840
12.7 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R7 265 ₩ 168,325
12.5 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7850 ₩ 281,295
11.5 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost ₩ 190,919
11.4 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti ₩ 168,325
10.9 FPS
2011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti ₩ 281,295
10.6 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 550 ₩ 89,246
9.3 FPS
2011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 ₩ 224,810
9.1 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon HD 7790 ₩ 168,325
8.9 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti ₩ 168,325
8.9 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 ₩ 89,246
7.4 FPS

R9 285 사이 앉는 HD 7970 및 R9 380 보다 느린 하강 HD 7970 의해 1.1 % 및보다 빠른 R9 380 의해 0.6 %. 여기의 모든 그래픽 카드에 대한 평균 상대 성능이 있습니다. 결과는 실제로 HD 7970 의 결과와 구별 할 수 없습니다. 그것은 R9 285 와 그 경쟁자 GTX 960 사이의 작은 마진에 의한 긴밀한 호출입니다.

Forza Horizon 4 (2018)

울트라 품질

해상도 1920x1080

그래픽 카드 가격 초당 프레임
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290 ₩ 450,750
53.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 ₩ 202,216
45.0 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 ₩ 733,175
41.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380X ₩ 258,701
40.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 ₩ 224,810
38.0 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 ₩ 224,810
38.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti ₩ 190,919
37.2 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 ₩ 563,720
37.0 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 ₩ 450,750
35.0 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 ₩ 281,295
32.0 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 ₩ 281,295
31.5 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 ₩ 450,750
30.4 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 ₩ 315,186
29.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 560 ₩ 111,840
29.0 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 ₩ 179,622
28.4 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R7 370 ₩ 168,325
25.0 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 ₩ 258,701
23.4 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 460 ₩ 158,158
23.0 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 ₩ 89,246
22.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 550 ₩ 89,246
17.0 FPS

R9 285 사이 앉는 GTX 670 및 GTX 760 보다 느린 하강 GTX 670 의해 9.4 % 및보다 빠른 GTX 760 의해 1.6 %. 여기의 모든 그래픽 카드에 대한 평균 상대 성능이 있습니다. 경쟁사 인 GTX 960 에 비해 R9 285 는 훨씬 느립니다.

Cyberpunk 2077 (2020)

울트라 품질

해상도 1920x1080

그래픽 카드 가격 초당 프레임
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290 ₩ 450,750
24.6 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 ₩ 202,216
24.3 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 ₩ 733,175
22.1 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition ₩ 563,720
19.9 FPS
2011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 ₩ 789,660
19.9 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380X ₩ 258,701
19.8 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 280X ₩ 337,780
19.7 FPS
2011 AMD Radeon HD 6990 ₩ 789,660
19.2 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 ₩ 450,750
18.8 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti ₩ 190,919
18.3 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 ₩ 563,720
17.9 FPS
2011 AMD Radeon HD 7970 ₩ 620,205
17.7 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 ₩ 281,295
17.5 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 ₩ 224,810
17.4 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 ₩ 315,186
17.2 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 ₩ 224,810
17.0 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 ₩ 450,750
16.5 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 ₩ 281,295
15.3 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 460 ₩ 158,158
14.9 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7950 ₩ 507,235
14.7 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti ₩ 337,780
14.4 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 270 ₩ 202,216
14.3 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 ₩ 179,622
13.8 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 ₩ 258,701
12.8 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R7 370 ₩ 168,325
12.7 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 560 ₩ 111,840
12.7 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R7 265 ₩ 168,325
12.5 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7850 ₩ 281,295
11.5 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost ₩ 190,919
11.4 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti ₩ 168,325
10.9 FPS
2011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti ₩ 281,295
10.6 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 550 ₩ 89,246
9.3 FPS
2011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 ₩ 224,810
9.1 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon HD 7790 ₩ 168,325
8.9 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti ₩ 168,325
8.9 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 ₩ 89,246
7.4 FPS

R9 285 사이 앉는 HD 7970 및 R9 380 보다 느린 하강 HD 7970 의해 1.1 % 및보다 빠른 R9 380 의해 0.6 %. 여기의 모든 그래픽 카드에 대한 평균 상대 성능이 있습니다. 결과는 실제로 HD 7970 의 결과와 구별 할 수 없습니다. 그것은 R9 285 와 그 경쟁자 GTX 960 사이의 작은 마진에 의한 긴밀한 호출입니다.

Grand Theft Auto V (2015)

울트라 품질

해상도 1920x1080

그래픽 카드 가격 초당 프레임
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 ₩ 733,175
51.0 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290 ₩ 450,750
50.7 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 ₩ 202,216
47.7 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380X ₩ 258,701
38.1 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 ₩ 563,720
37.8 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 ₩ 224,810
37.4 FPS
2011 AMD Radeon HD 7970 ₩ 620,205
36.9 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 ₩ 450,750
36.3 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 ₩ 224,810
35.9 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 ₩ 281,295
35.7 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 ₩ 315,186
35.6 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti ₩ 168,325
35.3 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti ₩ 190,919
32.7 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 ₩ 450,750
31.5 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 ₩ 281,295
31.1 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R7 370 ₩ 168,325
28.4 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 560 ₩ 111,840
27.3 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 ₩ 258,701
25.1 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 ₩ 179,622
24.9 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7850 ₩ 281,295
24.6 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 460 ₩ 158,158
23.0 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 ₩ 89,246
21.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 550 ₩ 89,246
19.1 FPS

R9 285 사이 앉는 GTX 960 및 R9 280 보다 느린 하강 GTX 960 의해 0.6 % 및보다 빠른 R9 280 의해 0.3 %. 여기의 모든 그래픽 카드에 대한 평균 상대 성능이 있습니다. 결과는 실제로 GTX 960 의 결과와 구별 할 수 없습니다. 그것은 R9 285 와 그 경쟁자 GTX 960 사이의 작은 마진에 의한 긴밀한 호출입니다.

Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)

울트라 품질

해상도 1920x1080

그래픽 카드 가격 초당 프레임
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290 ₩ 450,750
65.7 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 ₩ 202,216
64.8 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 ₩ 733,175
58.9 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition ₩ 563,720
53.1 FPS
2011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 ₩ 789,660
53.1 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380X ₩ 258,701
52.9 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 280X ₩ 337,780
52.4 FPS
2011 AMD Radeon HD 6990 ₩ 789,660
51.1 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 ₩ 450,750
50.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti ₩ 190,919
48.7 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 ₩ 563,720
47.6 FPS
2011 AMD Radeon HD 7970 ₩ 620,205
47.1 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 ₩ 281,295
46.6 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 ₩ 224,810
46.4 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 ₩ 315,186
45.8 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 ₩ 224,810
45.2 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 ₩ 450,750
44.1 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 ₩ 281,295
40.9 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 460 ₩ 158,158
39.7 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7950 ₩ 507,235
39.1 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti ₩ 337,780
38.5 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 270 ₩ 202,216
38.0 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 ₩ 179,622
36.8 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 ₩ 258,701
34.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R7 370 ₩ 168,325
33.9 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 560 ₩ 111,840
33.9 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R7 265 ₩ 168,325
33.3 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7850 ₩ 281,295
30.7 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost ₩ 190,919
30.5 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti ₩ 168,325
29.0 FPS
2011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti ₩ 281,295
28.3 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 550 ₩ 89,246
24.8 FPS
2011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 ₩ 224,810
24.2 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon HD 7790 ₩ 168,325
23.7 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti ₩ 168,325
23.7 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 ₩ 89,246
19.7 FPS

R9 285 사이 앉는 HD 7970 및 R9 380 보다 느린 하강 HD 7970 의해 1.1 % 및보다 빠른 R9 380 의해 0.4 %. 여기의 모든 그래픽 카드에 대한 평균 상대 성능이 있습니다. 결과는 실제로 HD 7970 의 결과와 구별 할 수 없습니다. 그것은 R9 285 와 그 경쟁자 GTX 960 사이의 작은 마진에 의한 긴밀한 호출입니다.

설정에서 울트라 품질 게임 성능

품질 설정 변경

해상도 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
게임 초당 프레임
2023 Resident Evil 4
28
31.2
2023 A Plague Tale: Requiem
19
21.3
2023 Hogwarts Legacy
16
18.4
2023 The Last of Us Part I
12
14.2
2023 Forspoken
14
16.5
2023 The Callisto Protocol
11
12.8
2023 Dead Space
19
21.3
2023 Baldur's Gate 3
22
25.2
2023 Armored Core VI
22
25.2
2023 Immortals of Aveum
10
11.3
2023 Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart
20
22.7
2023 Remnant II
11
12.8
2023 Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
15
17.0
2023 Atomic Heart
15
17.0
2023 Starfield
7
8.5
2022 Elden Ring
20
22.6
2022 God of War
19
21.4
2022 Overwatch 2
35
39.8
2022 F1 22
22
25.5
2022 Dying Light 2
21
24.1
2022 Total War: Warhammer III
21
24.1
2022 Spider-Man Remastered
35
39.7
2022 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
25
28.4
2021 Forza Horizon 5
19
21.7
2021 Halo Infinite
14
16.5
2021 Battlefield 2042
27
30.5
2021 Hitman 3
29
32.6
2021 Far Cry 6
27
30.4
2021 Guardians of the Galaxy
29
33.2
2020 Watch Dogs: Legion
30
33.5
2020 Assassin's Creed Valhalla
15
17.5
2020 Microsoft Flight Simulator
10
11.4
2020 Valorant
69
76.7
2020 Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
27
30.1
2020 Death Stranding
31
34.7
2020 Marvel's Avengers
20
22.6
2020 Godfall
30
33.8
2020 Cyberpunk 2077
15
17.5
2019 Apex Legends
32
36.0
2019 Anthem
20
23.2
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
30
34.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
42
47.1
2019 Metro Exodus
18
21.0
2019 World War Z
43
48.0
2019 Gears of War 5
27
30.5
2019 F1 2019
34
38.3
2019 GreedFall
31
34.5
2019 Borderlands 3
21
24.2
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
41
46.6
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
16
17.9
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
25
28.2
2018 Forza Horizon 4
28
32.0
2018 Fallout 76
32
36.0
2018 Hitman 2
25
28.0
2018 Just Cause 4
27
30.3
2018 Monster Hunter: World
29
32.6
2018 Strange Brigade
44
49.2
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
43
48.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
28
31.5
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
37
41.9
2017 For Honor
50
55.9
2017 Project CARS 2
35
39.6
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
43
48.0
2016 Overwatch
44
49.0
2016 Dishonored 2
26
28.9
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
32
35.7
2015 Total War: Attila
28
32.1
2015 Rocket League
146
163.1
2015 Need For Speed
40
45.2
2015 Project CARS
38
43.3
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
71
79.2
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
66
74.2
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
46
52.0
2014 Far Cry 4
43
48.5
2014 GRID Autosport
62
69.2
2014 Shadow of Mordor
42
46.8
2014 The Talos Principle
54
60.3
2013 Crysis 3
36
40.6
2013 Battlefield 4
41
45.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
100
111.8
2009 League of Legends
188
209.7

해상도 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
게임 초당 프레임
2023 Resident Evil 4
18
22.7
2023 A Plague Tale: Requiem
12
15.6
2023 Hogwarts Legacy
11
14.2
2023 The Last of Us Part I
8
10.8
2023 Forspoken
8
10.8
2023 The Callisto Protocol
7
9.1
2023 Dead Space
11
14.2
2023 Baldur's Gate 3
16
20.4
2023 Armored Core VI
16
20.4
2023 Immortals of Aveum
6
7.9
2023 Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart
12
15.6
2023 Remnant II
6
8.5
2023 Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
10
12.8
2023 Atomic Heart
9
12.2
2023 Starfield
6
7.7
2022 Elden Ring
14
17.8
2022 God of War
14
18.4
2022 Overwatch 2
27
34.3
2022 F1 22
12
15.6
2022 Dying Light 2
12
15.6
2022 Total War: Warhammer III
13
17.0
2022 Spider-Man Remastered
22
28.4
2022 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
14
18.4
2021 Forza Horizon 5
14
18.6
2021 Halo Infinite
11
14.9
2021 Battlefield 2042
16
20.3
2021 Hitman 3
18
23.3
2021 Far Cry 6
18
22.7
2021 Guardians of the Galaxy
18
23.5
2020 Watch Dogs: Legion
17
21.8
2020 Assassin's Creed Valhalla
12
15.1
2020 Microsoft Flight Simulator
8
10.0
2020 Valorant
50
62.7
2020 Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
18
23.5
2020 Death Stranding
21
26.9
2020 Marvel's Avengers
12
16.1
2020 Godfall
18
22.6
2020 Cyberpunk 2077
13
16.3
2019 Apex Legends
21
26.8
2019 Anthem
14
18.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
21
26.4
2019 Resident Evil 2
25
31.7
2019 Metro Exodus
13
16.3
2019 World War Z
28
35.0
2019 Gears of War 5
17
22.1
2019 F1 2019
21
27.1
2019 GreedFall
19
24.9
2019 Borderlands 3
13
17.0
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
26
33.6
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
11
14.7
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
17
22.1
2018 Forza Horizon 4
21
27.0
2018 Hitman 2
14
18.0
2018 Just Cause 4
17
22.4
2018 Monster Hunter: World
18
22.8
2018 Strange Brigade
27
34.3
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
29
37.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
16
20.3
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
24
30.3
2017 For Honor
26
32.6
2017 Project CARS 2
22
28.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
34
43.3
2016 Overwatch
26
33.6
2016 Dishonored 2
19
24.7
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
17
21.3
2015 Total War: Attila
17
21.3
2015 Rocket League
55
69.9
2015 Need For Speed
28
35.0
2015 Project CARS
26
33.1
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
41
51.3
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
44
55.7
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
27
34.3
2014 Far Cry 4
27
34.6
2014 GRID Autosport
40
50.4
2014 Shadow of Mordor
25
32.0
2014 The Talos Principle
34
42.9
2013 Crysis 3
27
34.7
2013 Battlefield 4
23
29.5
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
74
93.2
2009 League of Legends
93
116.5

해상도 3440x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
게임 초당 프레임
2019 Apex Legends
17
22.9
2019 Anthem
11
15.2
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
16
21.6
2019 Resident Evil 2
19
25.3
2019 Metro Exodus
10
14.2
2019 World War Z
22
29.5
2019 Gears of War 5
14
19.3
2019 F1 2019
18
23.7
2019 GreedFall
14
18.8
2019 Borderlands 3
10
13.9
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
21
28.7
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
9
12.8
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
14
19.3
2018 Forza Horizon 4
18
24.1
2018 Hitman 2
11
15.5
2018 Just Cause 4
13
18.2
2018 Monster Hunter: World
13
18.1
2018 Strange Brigade
21
28.3
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
23
31.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
12
16.9
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
20
27.4
2017 For Honor
19
26.2
2017 Project CARS 2
20
27.4
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
32
42.6
2016 Overwatch
20
27.3
2016 Dishonored 2
18
23.7
2015 Rocket League
41
54.8
2015 Need For Speed
23
31.2
2015 Project CARS
22
30.2
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
30
40.2
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
71
94.7
2009 League of Legends
66
87.3

해상도 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
게임 초당 프레임
2023 Resident Evil 4
11
17.0
2023 A Plague Tale: Requiem
6
9.9
2023 Hogwarts Legacy
6
9.9
2023 The Last of Us Part I
3
5.7
2023 Forspoken
3
5.1
2023 The Callisto Protocol
3
4.5
2023 Dead Space
3
5.7
2023 Baldur's Gate 3
7
11.3
2023 Armored Core VI
7
11.3
2023 Immortals of Aveum
2
3.7
2023 Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart
5
8.5
2023 Remnant II
3
4.3
2023 Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
4
6.2
2023 Atomic Heart
5
7.7
2023 Starfield
3
5.1
2022 Elden Ring
7
10.2
2022 God of War
10
14.3
2022 Overwatch 2
18
25.9
2022 F1 22
7
11.3
2022 Dying Light 2
7
11.3
2022 Total War: Warhammer III
8
12.8
2022 Spider-Man Remastered
13
19.9
2022 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
7
11.3
2021 Forza Horizon 5
10
14.4
2021 Halo Infinite
7
10.3
2021 Battlefield 2042
9
13.0
2021 Hitman 3
9
14.2
2021 Far Cry 6
8
12.2
2021 Guardians of the Galaxy
8
12.8
2020 Watch Dogs: Legion
9
14.2
2020 Assassin's Creed Valhalla
7
10.3
2020 Microsoft Flight Simulator
5
7.9
2020 Valorant
38
54.5
2020 Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
8
12.6
2020 Death Stranding
11
16.4
2020 Marvel's Avengers
5
8.4
2020 Godfall
7
10.8
2020 Cyberpunk 2077
7
10.7
2019 Apex Legends
11
16.0
2019 Anthem
7
10.0
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
9
14.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
10
15.6
2019 Metro Exodus
7
10.3
2019 World War Z
14
20.2
2019 Gears of War 5
9
14.0
2019 F1 2019
12
17.2
2019 GreedFall
7
10.3
2019 Borderlands 3
6
8.9
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
14
20.0
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
6
9.3
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
9
14.0
2018 Forza Horizon 4
12
18.0
2018 Hitman 2
7
11.0
2018 Just Cause 4
8
11.7
2018 Monster Hunter: World
7
11.0
2018 Strange Brigade
13
18.6
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
14
21.0
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
7
11.2
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
14
21.0
2017 For Honor
11
16.3
2017 Project CARS 2
16
23.3
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
25
36.3
2016 Overwatch
12
17.5
2016 Dishonored 2
13
19.6
2015 Rocket League
22
32.6
2015 Need For Speed
16
23.3
2015 Project CARS
16
23.3
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
16
23.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
58
83.9
2009 League of Legends
32
46.6
R9 285 with i7-4770K at 1080p and 울트라 품질 settings
R9 285 with i7-4770K at 1440p and 울트라 품질 settings
R9 285 with i7-4770K at 4K and 울트라 품질 settings

경쟁사와 비교

R9 285 사양

R9 285 Board Design

Board NumberC766
Length8.7 inches 221 mm
Outputs2x DVI1x HDMI1x DisplayPort
Power Connectors2x 6-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP190 W

R9 285 Clock Speeds

GPU Clock918 MHz
Memory Clock1375 MHz 5500 MHz effective

R9 285 Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationVolcanic Islands (R9 200)
Launch Price249 USD
ProductionEnd-of-life
Release DateSep 2nd, 2014

R9 285 Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL2
OpenGL4.5
Shader Model6
Vulkan1.1.82

R9 285 Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 3.0
Die Size366 mm²
GPU NameTonga
GPU VariantTonga PRO (215-0851128)
Process Size28 nm
Transistors5,000 million

R9 285 Memory

Bandwidth176.0 GB/s
Memory Bus256 bit
Memory Size2048 MB
Memory TypeGDDR5

R9 285 Render Config

Compute Units28
ROPs32
Shading Units1792
TMUs112

R9 285 Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance3,290 GFLOPS (1:1)
FP32 (float) performance3,290 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance205.6 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate29.38 GPixel/s
Texture Rate102.8 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

AMD's $249 Radeon R9 285 delivers modern features (such as support for TrueAudio and FreeSync) found on other AMD cards, and performance that edges out Nvidia's GeForce GTX 760.
AMD's $249 Radeon R9 285 delivers modern features (such as support for TrueAudio and FreeSync) found on other AMD cards, and performance that edges out Nvidia's GeForce GTX 760.
Having said that, the Radeon R9 285 is a wonderful option at $250 and probably represents the best product a gamer can buy for that price, just as the Radeon R9 280 did.
AMD’s reference specifications call for up to a 918MHz engine clock for the Radeon R9 285 with 1375MHz memory (5.5 Gbps effective). The specifications list 2GB of on-board memory, but 4GB ...
The R9 285 starts slightly behind the GTX 760 in Battlefield 4 and the R9 280 is also ahead by a few fps. The new card also only manages to be 1fps faster than the R9 270X at both resolutions tested.
AMD Radeon R9 285: Other Benchmarks Fire Strike is 3D Mark’s toughest graphics benchmark, and in this test the R9 285 scored 6,744 points. That’s better than the 5,905 scored by the R9 280 ...
The Radeon R9 285 is indeed a new piece of silicon, code-named "Tonga." What's newest about it: It brings with it the features of other recent AMD cards, such as TrueAudio and support for multi ...
Last month AMD held their 30 years of graphics celebration, during which they announced their next Radeon video card, the Radeon R9 285. Designed to be AMD’s new $249 midrange enthusiast card ...
The R9 280 debuted with an MSRP of $249 and this is the exact price point that the R9 285 is arriving at, placing it directly between the R9 270X ($200) and R9 280X ($300). Given their similar ...
On paper, the new Tonga-based R9 285 looks to be slightly slower than the R9 280 it is intended to replace, but there's more than meets the eye. When we first heard about the new Radeon R9 285 ...
AMD Radeon R9 285 Review: Feat. Sapphire R9 285 Dual-X OC ... Power, Temperature, & Noise. As always, last but not least is our look at power, temperature, and noise. Next to price and performance ...
AMD Radeon R9 285: Under the Hood. The R9 285 is the only card to currently use the Tonga core. It’s a mid-range core, but it shares a crucial part of its architecture with AMD’s high-end 290 ...

토론 및 의견

귀하의 의견을 공유하십시오