R9 Nano 品質 FX-4350 設定で 超品質 のベンチマーク

1440p では R9 Nano 、アンチエイリアシング、以下のアンビエントオクルージョンなしで、ウルトラでかなり多くのすべてに 50-60 fps を打つことができると影を断った。 との間 R9 Nano の AMD FX-4350 Quad-Core この組み合わせは、多くのゲームで深刻なボトルネックを引き起こすと深刻な FPS の損失を引き起こす予定です。 ハイエンドの GPU のように多くのお金を投資するか R9 Nano どうかを決定する慎重な思考が必要です。 現在 4096 の MB の RAM R9 Nano を使用すると、より近代的なゲームで非常に少ないメモリ関連のボトルネックを持つことができます。

 R9 Nano 品質 FX-4350 設定で 超品質 のベンチマーク
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
価格 ¥ 172,838.2
2015
最高記録温度 73C
最大ファンノイズ 45.8dB
推奨電源 525W
ベンチマーク CPU AMD FX-4350 Quad-Core ($129.99)
FPS に対する CPU の影響 -33.4 FPS
FPS% の CPU への影響 -50.0%
ベンチマークの品質設定 Ultra Quality Settings
平均1080p のパフォーマンス 37.6 FPS
平均1440p パフォーマンス 28.4 FPS
(Ultrawide) 平均1440p パフォーマンス 24.4 FPS
平均4k パフォーマンス 17.2 FPS
メモリ 4 GB
1フレームあたり1080 pのコスト ¥ 1,951.1
1フレームあたり1440pのコスト ¥ 2,583.0
(Ultrawide) 1フレームあたり1440pのコスト ¥ 3,006.9
1フレームあたり4Kの費用 ¥ 4,265.0
シリーズ R9 Nano
Variant AMD Radeon R9 Nano
全体の組み合わせのスコア 35/100 弱い

R9 Nano は R9 390 よりもはるかに高価で、なんと ¥ 73363 かかります。これを元々 ¥ 37190.2, ¥ 48494.2 価格で R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 390X れていた R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 390X と比較してください。一方、 NVIDIA 最も近い同等のカードである GTX 980 コスト ¥ 62059 。 仕様の仕様として、この R9 Nano 19.1 %fpsを誇ることで、直接の前身である R9 390 飛躍させます。

幸いなことに、ゲームのパフォーマンスは非常に印象的でした。 R9 Nano は、一貫して R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 390X よりも優れたフレームレートの増加を実現し、アップグレードを正当化します。 NVIDIA の最も近いライバルである GTX 980 と比較して、 R9 Nano は -3.7 %遅くなりました。

以下のために 1080p Full HD 、我々はプレーすることができました Hitman 3, Monster Hunter: World, Guardians of the Galaxy, Watch Dogs: Legion, Final Fantasy XV で 60 にfpsの 63 FPSと の周りに浮かんでフレームレートを保持 61 FPSを。 以下のために 1440p Quad HD 、我々はプレーすることができました Call of Duty Modern Warfare, World War Z, Overwatch 2, Strange Brigade, Fallout 76 で 63 にfpsの 70 FPSと の周りに浮かんでフレームレートを保持 65 FPSを。

以下のために 2160p 4K 、我々はプレーすることができました Valorant で 102 にfpsの 102 FPSと の周りに浮かんでフレームレートを保持 102 FPSを。

Assassin's Creed Valhalla (2020)

超品質

解像 度 1920x1080

グラフィックカード 価格 1秒あたりのフレーム数
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 ¥ 56,407
46.7 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti ¥ 46,233
46.3 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 ¥ 45,103
45.2 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X ¥ 112,927
45.0 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 295X2 ¥ 169,447
44.3 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 ¥ 45,103
43.0 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti ¥ 73,363
35.2 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY X ¥ 73,363
34.6 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 ¥ 31,538
34.3 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 Nano ¥ 73,363
14.3 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 ¥ 62,059
31.9 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY ¥ 62,059
30.9 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 ¥ 25,886
29.9 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ¥ 28,712
29.3 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK ¥ 112,927
29.1 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 ¥ 112,927
28.4 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 480 ¥ 45,216
28.1 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB ¥ 19,217
28.1 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon HD 7990 ¥ 112,927
28.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X ¥ 48,494
27.9 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti ¥ 79,015
27.5 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 ¥ 19,104
27.4 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN ¥ 112,927
27.1 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 ¥ 37,190
26.8 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290X ¥ 62,059
26.4 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390 ¥ 37,190
26.3 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290 ¥ 45,103
24.6 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 ¥ 20,234
24.3 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 ¥ 73,363
22.1 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition ¥ 56,407
19.9 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380X ¥ 25,886
19.8 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 280X ¥ 33,799
19.7 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 ¥ 45,103
18.8 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti ¥ 19,104
18.3 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 ¥ 56,407
17.9 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 ¥ 28,147
17.5 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 ¥ 22,495
17.4 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 ¥ 31,538
17.2 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 ¥ 22,495
17.0 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 ¥ 45,103
16.5 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 ¥ 28,147
15.3 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7950 ¥ 50,755
14.7 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti ¥ 33,799
14.4 FPS

R9 Nano の間に位置 RX 590 と GTX 980 よりも遅い立ち下がり、 RX 590 によって 5.2 %及びより速い GTX 980 によって 2.2 ここでは、すべてのグラフィックカードに対して強力な相対パフォーマンスを備えています。 ライバルである GTX 980 に対して、 R9 Nano ははるかに遅いです。

Forza Horizon 4 (2018)

超品質

解像 度 1920x1080

グラフィックカード 価格 1秒あたりのフレーム数
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti ¥ 46,233
105.0 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X ¥ 112,927
100.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 ¥ 45,103
96.0 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti ¥ 73,363
94.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 ¥ 56,407
91.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 ¥ 45,103
89.0 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 ¥ 31,538
75.5 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 ¥ 62,059
73.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ¥ 28,712
70.2 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 ¥ 25,886
68.2 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY X ¥ 73,363
68.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB ¥ 19,217
66.6 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 ¥ 37,190
63.4 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 Nano ¥ 73,363
27.5 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X ¥ 48,494
57.0 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN ¥ 112,927
54.0 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290 ¥ 45,103
53.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390 ¥ 37,190
52.0 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 ¥ 19,104
52.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 ¥ 20,234
45.0 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti ¥ 79,015
42.6 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 ¥ 73,363
41.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380X ¥ 25,886
40.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 ¥ 22,495
38.0 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 ¥ 22,495
38.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti ¥ 19,104
37.2 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290X ¥ 62,059
37.0 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 ¥ 56,407
37.0 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 ¥ 45,103
35.0 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 ¥ 28,147
32.0 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 ¥ 28,147
31.5 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 ¥ 45,103
30.4 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 ¥ 31,538
29.0 FPS

R9 Nano の間に位置 GTX 970 と R9 390X よりも遅い立ち下がり、 GTX 970 によって 0.6 %及びより速い R9 390X によって 10.5 ここでは、すべてのグラフィックカードに対する平均相対パフォーマンスがあります。 その結果は、実際には GTX 970 結果と区別できません。 ライバルである GTX 980 に対して、 R9 Nano ははるかに遅いです。

Cyberpunk 2077 (2020)

超品質

解像 度 1920x1080

グラフィックカード 価格 1秒あたりのフレーム数
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 ¥ 56,407
46.7 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti ¥ 46,233
46.3 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 ¥ 45,103
45.2 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X ¥ 112,927
45.0 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 295X2 ¥ 169,447
44.3 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 ¥ 45,103
43.0 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti ¥ 73,363
35.2 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY X ¥ 73,363
34.6 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 ¥ 31,538
34.3 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 Nano ¥ 73,363
14.3 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 ¥ 62,059
31.9 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY ¥ 62,059
30.9 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 ¥ 25,886
29.9 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ¥ 28,712
29.3 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK ¥ 112,927
29.1 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 ¥ 112,927
28.4 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 480 ¥ 45,216
28.1 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB ¥ 19,217
28.1 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon HD 7990 ¥ 112,927
28.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X ¥ 48,494
27.9 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti ¥ 79,015
27.5 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 ¥ 19,104
27.4 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN ¥ 112,927
27.1 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 ¥ 37,190
26.8 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290X ¥ 62,059
26.4 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390 ¥ 37,190
26.3 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290 ¥ 45,103
24.6 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 ¥ 20,234
24.3 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 ¥ 73,363
22.1 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition ¥ 56,407
19.9 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380X ¥ 25,886
19.8 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 280X ¥ 33,799
19.7 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 ¥ 45,103
18.8 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti ¥ 19,104
18.3 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 ¥ 56,407
17.9 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 ¥ 28,147
17.5 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 ¥ 22,495
17.4 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 ¥ 31,538
17.2 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 ¥ 22,495
17.0 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 ¥ 45,103
16.5 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 ¥ 28,147
15.3 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7950 ¥ 50,755
14.7 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti ¥ 33,799
14.4 FPS

R9 Nano の間に位置 RX 590 と GTX 980 よりも遅い立ち下がり、 RX 590 によって 5.2 %及びより速い GTX 980 によって 2.2 ここでは、すべてのグラフィックカードに対して強力な相対パフォーマンスを備えています。 ライバルである GTX 980 に対して、 R9 Nano ははるかに遅いです。

Grand Theft Auto V (2015)

超品質

解像 度 1920x1080

グラフィックカード 価格 1秒あたりのフレーム数
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti ¥ 46,233
100.1 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 295X2 ¥ 169,447
96.9 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 ¥ 45,103
92.7 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 ¥ 56,407
83.7 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 ¥ 45,103
83.6 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X ¥ 112,927
82.4 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti ¥ 73,363
80.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY X ¥ 73,363
70.0 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 ¥ 31,538
66.4 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 ¥ 62,059
65.7 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 Nano ¥ 73,363
27.1 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ¥ 28,712
61.4 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 ¥ 25,886
60.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB ¥ 19,217
58.3 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X ¥ 48,494
58.1 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 ¥ 37,190
56.2 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390 ¥ 37,190
55.5 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN ¥ 112,927
51.7 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 ¥ 73,363
51.0 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290 ¥ 45,103
50.7 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 ¥ 19,104
50.3 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290X ¥ 62,059
47.7 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 ¥ 20,234
47.7 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti ¥ 79,015
44.1 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380X ¥ 25,886
38.1 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 ¥ 56,407
37.8 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 ¥ 22,495
37.4 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 ¥ 45,103
36.3 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 ¥ 22,495
35.9 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 ¥ 28,147
35.7 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 ¥ 31,538
35.6 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti ¥ 19,104
32.7 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 ¥ 45,103
31.5 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 ¥ 28,147
31.1 FPS

R9 Nano の間に位置 GTX 980 と GTX 1060 6GB よりも遅い立ち下がり、 GTX 980 によって 5.8 %及びより速い GTX 1060 6GB によって 1.1 ここでは、すべてのグラフィックカードに対する平均相対パフォーマンスがあります。 ライバルである GTX 980 に対して、 R9 Nano ははるかに遅いです。

Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)

超品質

解像 度 1920x1080

グラフィックカード 価格 1秒あたりのフレーム数
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 ¥ 56,407
124.5 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti ¥ 46,233
123.5 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 ¥ 45,103
120.5 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X ¥ 112,927
120.0 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 295X2 ¥ 169,447
118.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 ¥ 45,103
114.7 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti ¥ 73,363
93.8 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY X ¥ 73,363
92.2 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 ¥ 31,538
91.5 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 Nano ¥ 73,363
38.0 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 ¥ 62,059
85.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY ¥ 62,059
82.4 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 ¥ 25,886
79.7 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ¥ 28,712
78.0 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK ¥ 112,927
77.7 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 ¥ 112,927
75.7 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 480 ¥ 45,216
75.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB ¥ 19,217
75.0 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon HD 7990 ¥ 112,927
74.7 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X ¥ 48,494
74.4 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti ¥ 79,015
73.3 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 ¥ 19,104
73.0 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN ¥ 112,927
72.3 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 ¥ 37,190
71.4 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290X ¥ 62,059
70.5 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390 ¥ 37,190
70.1 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290 ¥ 45,103
65.7 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 ¥ 20,234
64.8 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 ¥ 73,363
58.9 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition ¥ 56,407
53.1 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380X ¥ 25,886
52.9 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 280X ¥ 33,799
52.4 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 ¥ 45,103
50.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti ¥ 19,104
48.7 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 ¥ 56,407
47.6 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 ¥ 28,147
46.6 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 ¥ 22,495
46.4 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 ¥ 31,538
45.8 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 ¥ 22,495
45.2 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 ¥ 45,103
44.1 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 ¥ 28,147
40.9 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7950 ¥ 50,755
39.1 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti ¥ 33,799
38.5 FPS

R9 Nano の間に位置 RX 590 と GTX 980 よりも遅い立ち下がり、 RX 590 によって 5.2 %及びより速い GTX 980 によって 2.4 ここでは、すべてのグラフィックカードに対して強力な相対パフォーマンスを備えています。 ライバルである GTX 980 に対して、 R9 Nano ははるかに遅いです。

設定時の 超品質 ゲームパフォーマンス

品質設定の変更

解像 度 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
ゲーム 1秒あたりのフレーム数
2023 Resident Evil 4
10
25.1
2023 A Plague Tale: Requiem
7
17.1
2023 Hogwarts Legacy
6
14.9
2023 The Last of Us Part I
5
11.5
2023 Forspoken
5
13.2
2023 The Callisto Protocol
4
10.3
2023 Dead Space
7
17.1
2023 Baldur's Gate 3
8
20.3
2023 Armored Core VI
8
20.3
2023 Immortals of Aveum
3
9.1
2023 Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart
7
18.3
2023 Remnant II
4
10.3
2023 Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
5
13.7
2023 Atomic Heart
5
13.7
2023 Starfield
3
6.9
2022 Elden Ring
8
18.4
2022 God of War
7
17.5
2022 Overwatch 2
14
32.5
2022 F1 22
9
20.6
2022 Dying Light 2
8
19.5
2022 Total War: Warhammer III
8
19.5
2022 Spider-Man Remastered
13
32.0
2022 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
10
22.9
2021 Forza Horizon 5
7
17.7
2021 Halo Infinite
5
13.5
2021 Battlefield 2042
10
24.9
2021 Hitman 3
11
26.3
2021 Far Cry 6
10
24.5
2021 Guardians of the Galaxy
11
26.8
2020 Watch Dogs: Legion
11
27.0
2020 Assassin's Creed Valhalla
6
14.3
2020 Microsoft Flight Simulator
4
9.3
2020 Valorant
27
62.6
2020 Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
10
24.5
2020 Death Stranding
12
28.3
2020 Marvel's Avengers
8
18.4
2020 Godfall
12
27.6
2020 Cyberpunk 2077
6
14.3
2019 Apex Legends
13
31.5
2019 Anthem
8
20.3
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
12
29.7
2019 Resident Evil 2
16
38.4
2019 Metro Exodus
7
17.1
2019 World War Z
16
38.0
2019 Gears of War 5
10
24.9
2019 F1 2019
13
31.3
2019 GreedFall
12
28.2
2019 Borderlands 3
8
19.8
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
16
38.0
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
6
14.6
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
10
23.0
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
15
34.5
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
7
16.2
2018 Final Fantasy XV
12
27.5
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
9
21.9
2018 Forza Horizon 4
12
27.5
2018 Fallout 76
12
29.7
2018 Hitman 2
10
23.2
2018 Just Cause 4
10
24.7
2018 Monster Hunter: World
11
26.6
2018 Strange Brigade
17
40.1
2018 Battlefield V
12
28.4
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
10
23.2
2017 Destiny 2
19
44.6
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
10
23.2
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
12
27.8
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
14
34.2
2017 For Honor
19
45.6
2017 Project CARS 2
14
32.3
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
17
39.2
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
10
24.1
2016 Hitman
15
36.6
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
13
31.1
2016 The Division
12
28.2
2016 Overwatch
18
43.1
2016 Dishonored 2
10
23.6
2015 DiRT Rally
21
49.9
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
11
27.1
2015 The Witcher 3
11
25.9
2015 Total War: Attila
10
24.4
2015 Rocket League
58
133.1
2015 Need For Speed
16
36.9
2015 Project CARS
15
35.4
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
28
64.7
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
21
49.5
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
15
34.8
2014 Far Cry 4
14
32.8
2014 GRID Autosport
15
35.0
2014 Shadow of Mordor
19
45.0
2014 The Talos Principle
21
49.8
2013 Crysis 3
13
30.7
2013 Battlefield 4
16
38.8
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
39
91.3
2009 League of Legends
74
171.1

解像 度 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
ゲーム 1秒あたりのフレーム数
2023 Resident Evil 4
7
18.3
2023 A Plague Tale: Requiem
5
12.6
2023 Hogwarts Legacy
5
11.5
2023 The Last of Us Part I
3
8.7
2023 Forspoken
3
8.7
2023 The Callisto Protocol
3
7.3
2023 Dead Space
5
11.5
2023 Baldur's Gate 3
7
16.5
2023 Armored Core VI
7
16.5
2023 Immortals of Aveum
2
6.4
2023 Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart
5
12.6
2023 Remnant II
3
6.9
2023 Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
4
10.3
2023 Atomic Heart
4
9.8
2023 Starfield
2
6.2
2022 Elden Ring
6
14.6
2022 God of War
6
15.0
2022 Overwatch 2
12
27.9
2022 F1 22
5
12.6
2022 Dying Light 2
5
12.6
2022 Total War: Warhammer III
5
13.7
2022 Spider-Man Remastered
10
22.9
2022 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
6
14.9
2021 Forza Horizon 5
6
15.2
2021 Halo Infinite
5
12.2
2021 Battlefield 2042
7
16.5
2021 Hitman 3
8
18.8
2021 Far Cry 6
7
18.3
2021 Guardians of the Galaxy
8
19.0
2020 Watch Dogs: Legion
7
17.6
2020 Assassin's Creed Valhalla
5
12.4
2020 Microsoft Flight Simulator
3
8.2
2020 Valorant
22
51.1
2020 Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
8
19.2
2020 Death Stranding
9
22.0
2020 Marvel's Avengers
5
13.1
2020 Godfall
8
18.4
2020 Cyberpunk 2077
5
13.3
2019 Apex Legends
10
23.4
2019 Anthem
7
16.1
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
10
23.1
2019 Resident Evil 2
11
25.9
2019 Metro Exodus
5
13.3
2019 World War Z
12
27.8
2019 Gears of War 5
7
18.1
2019 F1 2019
9
22.1
2019 GreedFall
8
20.3
2019 Borderlands 3
6
13.9
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
11
27.4
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
5
12.0
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
7
18.1
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
8
20.5
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
5
12.7
2018 Final Fantasy XV
8
19.7
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
6
15.3
2018 Forza Horizon 4
10
23.6
2018 Fallout 76
13
30.6
2018 Hitman 2
6
15.3
2018 Just Cause 4
7
18.3
2018 Monster Hunter: World
8
18.6
2018 Strange Brigade
12
27.9
2018 Battlefield V
9
22.3
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
8
18.4
2017 Destiny 2
16
38.5
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
7
17.5
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
7
18.1
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
10
24.7
2017 For Honor
11
26.6
2017 Project CARS 2
9
22.8
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
15
35.4
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
9
21.4
2016 Hitman
12
28.2
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
9
22.2
2016 The Division
9
21.2
2016 Overwatch
12
29.7
2016 Dishonored 2
8
20.2
2015 DiRT Rally
15
36.0
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
8
19.5
2015 The Witcher 3
8
20.1
2015 Total War: Attila
7
17.4
2015 Rocket League
24
57.0
2015 Need For Speed
12
28.5
2015 Project CARS
11
27.0
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
18
41.8
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
17
39.4
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
10
24.8
2014 Far Cry 4
13
30.1
2014 GRID Autosport
15
35.5
2014 Shadow of Mordor
14
32.8
2014 The Talos Principle
16
37.0
2013 Crysis 3
8
20.5
2013 Battlefield 4
11
26.5
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
33
76.1
2009 League of Legends
41
95.1

解像 度 3440x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
ゲーム 1秒あたりのフレーム数
2019 Apex Legends
8
20.0
2019 Anthem
5
13.3
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
8
18.9
2019 Resident Evil 2
9
20.6
2019 Metro Exodus
5
11.6
2019 World War Z
10
23.4
2019 Gears of War 5
6
15.8
2019 F1 2019
8
19.4
2019 GreedFall
6
15.3
2019 Borderlands 3
4
11.3
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
10
23.4
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
4
10.5
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
6
15.8
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
8
18.7
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
5
11.5
2018 Final Fantasy XV
7
16.6
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
5
12.4
2018 Forza Horizon 4
9
20.8
2018 Fallout 76
11
25.5
2018 Hitman 2
5
12.9
2018 Just Cause 4
6
14.9
2018 Monster Hunter: World
6
14.7
2018 Strange Brigade
10
23.1
2018 Battlefield V
7
17.5
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
7
16.1
2017 Destiny 2
13
30.9
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
6
14.7
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
6
14.9
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
9
22.3
2017 For Honor
9
21.3
2017 Project CARS 2
9
22.4
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
15
34.8
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
8
20.3
2016 Hitman
10
23.8
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
7
18.3
2016 The Division
7
17.8
2016 Overwatch
10
24.1
2016 Dishonored 2
8
19.3
2015 DiRT Rally
13
30.2
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
6
15.6
2015 The Witcher 3
7
17.3
2015 Total War: Attila
7
17.6
2015 Rocket League
19
44.8
2015 Need For Speed
11
25.4
2015 Project CARS
10
24.6
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
14
32.8
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
15
34.6
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
8
20.5
2014 Far Cry 4
10
24.9
2014 GRID Autosport
13
31.7
2014 Shadow of Mordor
11
27.4
2014 The Talos Principle
13
31.1
2013 Crysis 3
7
16.4
2013 Battlefield 4
10
24.7
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
33
77.3
2009 League of Legends
31
71.2

解像 度 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
ゲーム 1秒あたりのフレーム数
2023 Resident Evil 4
5
13.7
2023 A Plague Tale: Requiem
3
8.0
2023 Hogwarts Legacy
3
8.0
2023 The Last of Us Part I
2
4.6
2023 Forspoken
1
4.1
2023 The Callisto Protocol
1
3.7
2023 Dead Space
2
4.6
2023 Baldur's Gate 3
3
9.1
2023 Armored Core VI
3
9.1
2023 Immortals of Aveum
1
3.0
2023 Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart
3
6.9
2023 Remnant II
1
3.4
2023 Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
2
5.0
2023 Atomic Heart
2
6.2
2023 Starfield
1
4.1
2022 Elden Ring
3
8.3
2022 God of War
5
11.7
2022 Overwatch 2
9
21.1
2022 F1 22
3
9.1
2022 Dying Light 2
3
9.1
2022 Total War: Warhammer III
4
10.3
2022 Spider-Man Remastered
6
16.0
2022 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
3
9.1
2021 Forza Horizon 5
5
11.8
2021 Halo Infinite
3
8.3
2021 Battlefield 2042
4
10.7
2021 Hitman 3
5
11.5
2021 Far Cry 6
4
9.8
2021 Guardians of the Galaxy
4
10.3
2020 Watch Dogs: Legion
5
11.5
2020 Assassin's Creed Valhalla
3
8.3
2020 Microsoft Flight Simulator
2
6.5
2020 Valorant
19
44.5
2020 Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
4
10.3
2020 Death Stranding
5
13.3
2020 Marvel's Avengers
3
6.9
2020 Godfall
3
8.8
2020 Cyberpunk 2077
3
8.7
2019 Apex Legends
6
14.0
2019 Anthem
3
8.7
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
5
12.2
2019 Resident Evil 2
5
12.7
2019 Metro Exodus
3
8.3
2019 World War Z
6
16.0
2019 Gears of War 5
4
11.4
2019 F1 2019
6
14.1
2019 GreedFall
3
8.3
2019 Borderlands 3
3
7.2
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
7
16.3
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
3
7.6
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
4
11.4
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
6
14.4
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
3
8.7
2018 Final Fantasy XV
4
11.4
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
3
7.9
2018 Forza Horizon 4
6
15.3
2018 Fallout 76
7
17.0
2018 Hitman 2
3
8.7
2018 Just Cause 4
4
9.5
2018 Monster Hunter: World
3
8.9
2018 Strange Brigade
6
15.2
2018 Battlefield V
4
10.5
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
5
11.8
2017 Destiny 2
8
19.2
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
4
10.1
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
4
9.8
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
7
17.1
2017 For Honor
5
13.3
2017 Project CARS 2
8
19.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
12
29.7
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
7
16.6
2016 Hitman
7
16.3
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
5
12.1
2016 The Division
5
12.1
2016 Overwatch
6
15.3
2016 Dishonored 2
6
16.0
2015 DiRT Rally
8
20.4
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
4
9.7
2015 The Witcher 3
5
12.2
2015 Total War: Attila
6
15.5
2015 Rocket League
11
26.6
2015 Need For Speed
8
19.0
2015 Project CARS
8
19.0
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
8
19.4
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
11
25.2
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
5
13.5
2014 Far Cry 4
7
16.4
2014 GRID Autosport
10
23.7
2014 Shadow of Mordor
8
18.4
2014 The Talos Principle
9
21.2
2013 Crysis 3
4
10.2
2013 Battlefield 4
8
19.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
29
68.5
2009 League of Legends
16
38.0
R9 Nano with FX-4350 at 1080p and 超品質 settings
R9 Nano with FX-4350 at 1440p and 超品質 settings
R9 Nano with FX-4350 at 4K and 超品質 settings

競合他社との比較

R9 Nano 仕様

R9 Nano Board Design

Board NumberC882
Length6 inches 152 mm
Outputs1x HDMI3x DisplayPort
Power Connectors1x 8-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP175 W

R9 Nano Clock Speeds

GPU Clock1000 MHz
Memory Clock500 MHz 1000 MHz effective

R9 Nano Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationPirate Islands (R9 300)
Launch Price649 USD
ProductionActive
Release DateAug 27th, 2015

R9 Nano Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL2
OpenGL4.5
Shader Model6
Vulkan1.1.82

R9 Nano Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 3.0
Die Size596 mm²
GPU NameFiji
GPU VariantFiji XT CA (215-0862120)
Process Size28 nm
Transistors8,900 million

R9 Nano Memory

Bandwidth512.0 GB/s
Memory Bus4096 bit
Memory Size4096 MB
Memory TypeHBM

R9 Nano Render Config

Compute Units64
ROPs64
Shading Units4096
TMUs256

R9 Nano Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance8,192 GFLOPS (1:1)
FP32 (float) performance8,192 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance512.0 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate64.00 GPixel/s
Texture Rate256.0 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

The AMD Radeon R9 Nano shows that you don’t always have to be the fastest to win the race. Some races are more of a marathon, and it’s more important to pace yourself well. MORE: Best Graphics ...
The Radeon R9 Nano is the fruition of AMD's gamble of integrating stacked high-bandwidth memory (HBM) and a 4,096 SP pixel-grinder into a compact multi-chip module that eliminates the need for external memory chips, freeing up large swathes of PCB area.
The new Radeon R9 Nano is the little brother to the existing AMD Radeon R9 Fury cards – in water-cooled 'X' and air-cooled standard models – and deserves that distinction in more ways than one.
AMD seems to have hit all the cues it set out to with the Radeon R9 Nano. This card is ridiculously tiny in light of other high-end GPUs, its power consumption characteristics are significantly ...
AMD's R9 Nano is a graphics card that serves its (very) niche high-end small form factor market well but its premium pricing makes it unaffordable to many small form factor system builders, and ...
AMD's R9 Nano is a hell of a little graphics card, delivering near-R9 Fury X performance in a compact mini-ITX form-factor. It's also expensive—very expensive—at $650, matching the price of ...
The AMD Radeon R9 Fury Nano is one of the most exciting graphics cards I’ve seen for years and, at only 6in long, it’s also one of the smallest. ... Verdict. AMD’s latest card is one of its ...
While AMD is pegging the Radeon R9 Nano as a luxury card, a component that isn't meant to be about value for money, rather it's all about getting the maximum performance for a small form factor PC ...
With the Radeon R9 Nano at the heart of our test rig, it consumed over 90 fewer watts than the Fury X--AMD's specified power ratings are in-line with our testing.
AMD Radeon R9 Nano Overclocking Results Extra performance with the R9 Nano comes in two distinct areas, overclocking and power management. Interestingly, AMD lets users unlock the power management ...
The R9 Nano is stunningly powerful given its Mini-ITX-friendly form factor, and a true leap ahead for AMD. Just know that this is a specialized component meant for very tight, compact PCs, and ...
As it turns out, AMD's Radeon R9 Nano is a great piece of hardware; there's really nothing like it out there. That’s probably why AMD is setting its price at an eye-popping $649. A lack of ...
The Radeon R9 Nano is AMD's solution for all small-form-factor system builders that want to create a 4K-capable gaming PC in a tiny volume. Thanks to a new approach to power management, the card stays below 200 W at all times, while still delivering excellent framerates.
AMD Radeon R9 Nano - the Digital Foundry verdict The R9 Nano packs an unprecedented amount of rendering power into an absolutely tiny product, and possesses superb build quality.
AMD deserves some serious props for even creating the Radeon R9 Nano in the first place. This pint-sized powerhouse is the latest in a long line of AMD technical innovations that skate to where ...
We’ll have a full suite of Radeon R9 Nano benchmarks recorded in our ultra-high-end graphics test-bed, along with comparison numbers from an array of other high-end GPUs, a little later.
AMD’s itty-bitty Radeon R9 Nano isn’t due to launch until September 10, but a review unit landed on my doorstep today. Sadly, I can’t talk about its performance until then, but an AMD ...
The Radeon R9 Nano is a high-end graphics card by AMD, launched in August 2015. Built on the 28 nm process, and based on the Fiji graphics processor, in its Fiji XT CA variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.
The AMD Radeon R9 Nano finished just behind the Radeon R9 Fury here, but well ahead of the R9 390 or similarly-sized GeForce GTX 970 mini (the Asus GeForce GTX 970 Direct-CU mini to be exact).
As it turns out, AMD's Radeon R9 Nano is a great piece of hardware; there's really nothing like it out there. That’s probably why AMD is setting its price at an eye-popping $649.
Meanwhile at the other end of the spectrum is the Radeon R9 Nano, which sees AMD push the limits on miniaturization and pack Fiji into a card just 6 inches long.

議論とコメント

あなたのコメントを共有する
S
Stan 6 years ago
649 $ NOT 1529$ lmao
1 0