R7 265 dengan i7-4770K benchmark di Kualitas ultra pengaturan kualitas

R7 265 Lebih cocok untuk membangun PC anggaran dan kurang menuntut permainan. Dengan arus 2048 MB RAM, R7 265 dapat memiliki kemacetan yang berhubungan dengan memori serius dalam permainan yang lebih modern. Berkaitan dengan suhu beban max, R7 265 's pendinginan yang sangat baik di menjaganya agar tetap dingin dan di bawah kontrol. Kombinasi antara R7 265 dan Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.50GHz memiliki kurang dari 8% kemacetan di banyak permainan dan sempurna cocok untuk menghindari kehilangan FPS. Kombinasi antara R7 265 dan Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.50GHz cocok untuk menghindari kehilangan FPS. Dengan arus 2048 MB RAM, R7 265 dapat memiliki sangat sedikit kemacetan yang berhubungan dengan memori dalam permainan yang lebih modern.

Lihat daftar harga

R7 265 Summary R7 265 Competitors R7 265 Review and Analysis R7 265 Specifications
R7 265 1080p Benchmarks R7 265 1440p Benchmarks R7 265 Ultrawide 1440p Benchmarks R7 265 4K Benchmarks
R7 265 Prices R7 265 Variants R7 265 Mining Profitability
R7 265 dengan i7-4770K benchmark di Kualitas ultra pengaturan kualitas
Bagikan Komentar Anda 0
AMD Radeon R7 265
Harga ₨ 2,172,472.2
Tahun 2014
Maksimum tercatat suhu 61C
Suara kipas Max 43.6dB
Direkomendasikan Power Supply 500W
Patokan CPU Intel Core i7-4770K @ 3.50GHz ($284.99)
CPU dampak pada FPS + 0.0 FPS
CPU dampak pada FPS % 0.0%
Pengaturan kualitas patokan Ultra Quality Settings
Rata-rata 1080p kinerja 28.7 FPS
Rata-rata 1440p kinerja 19.4 FPS
(Ultrawide) Rata-rata 1440p kinerja 16.8 FPS
Rata-rata 4K kinerja 12.0 FPS
Memori 2 GB
Biaya 1080p Per Bingkai ₨ 75,672.0
Biaya 1440p Per Bingkai ₨ 111,977.1
(Ultrawide) Biaya 1440p Per Bingkai ₨ 129,327.7
Biaya 4K Per Bingkai ₨ 181,087.9
Seri R7 265
Variant AMD Radeon R7 265
Keseluruhan kombinasi Skor 60/100 Bagus

AMD 's xx65 kartu selalu ditentukan oleh harga entry-level dengan kinerja yang mengetuk pintu mid-range kartu grafis - terutama ketika overclock. Setelah meluangkan waktu untuk menguji sepenuhnya kartu grafis GCN 1.0 di dalam R7 265, kita dapat mengatakan tanpa ragu bahwa itu melanjutkan tren. Dibandingkan dengan saingan terdekat NVIDIA, GTX 650 Ti Boost, R7 265 adalah -2.7 % lebih lambat.

Compare R7 265 Variants Performance in Kualitas ultra

Assassin's Creed Valhalla (2020)

Kualitas ultra

Resolusi 1920x1080

Tahun Kartu grafis Harga Frame Per detik
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti ₨ 2,464,079
18.3 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 ₨ 3,630,507
17.5 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 ₨ 2,901,490
17.4 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 ₨ 4,067,918
17.2 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 ₨ 2,901,490
17.0 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 ₨ 3,630,507
15.3 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 460 ₨ 2,041,249
14.9 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 270 ₨ 2,609,883
14.3 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 ₨ 2,318,276
13.8 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 ₨ 3,338,900
12.8 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R7 370 ₨ 2,172,472
12.7 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 560 ₨ 1,443,455
12.7 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R7 265 ₨ 2,172,472
12.5 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7850 ₨ 3,630,507
11.5 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost ₨ 2,464,079
11.4 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti ₨ 2,172,472
10.9 FPS
2011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti ₨ 3,630,507
10.6 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 550 ₨ 1,151,848
9.3 FPS
2011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 ₨ 2,901,490
9.1 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon HD 7790 ₨ 2,172,472
8.9 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti ₨ 2,172,472
8.9 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 ₨ 1,151,848
7.4 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 ₨ 1,589,258
6.2 FPS
2011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti ₨ 2,172,472
6.1 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7750 ₨ 1,589,258
5.8 FPS

R7 265 berada di antara RX 560 dan HD 7850 , jatuh lebih lambat dari RX 560 oleh 1.6 % dan lebih cepat dari HD 7850 oleh 8.7 %. Ini memiliki kinerja relatif rata-rata terhadap setiap kartu grafis di sini. Hasilnya sebenarnya tidak bisa dibedakan dengan hasil dari RX 560 . Ini adalah panggilan dekat antara R7 265 dan rivalnya GTX 650 Ti Boost dengan selisih kecil.

Cyberpunk 2077 (2020)

Kualitas ultra

Resolusi 1920x1080

Tahun Kartu grafis Harga Frame Per detik
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti ₨ 2,464,079
18.3 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 ₨ 3,630,507
17.5 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 ₨ 2,901,490
17.4 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 ₨ 4,067,918
17.2 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 ₨ 2,901,490
17.0 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 ₨ 3,630,507
15.3 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 460 ₨ 2,041,249
14.9 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 270 ₨ 2,609,883
14.3 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 ₨ 2,318,276
13.8 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 ₨ 3,338,900
12.8 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R7 370 ₨ 2,172,472
12.7 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 560 ₨ 1,443,455
12.7 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R7 265 ₨ 2,172,472
12.5 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7850 ₨ 3,630,507
11.5 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost ₨ 2,464,079
11.4 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti ₨ 2,172,472
10.9 FPS
2011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti ₨ 3,630,507
10.6 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 550 ₨ 1,151,848
9.3 FPS
2011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 ₨ 2,901,490
9.1 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon HD 7790 ₨ 2,172,472
8.9 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti ₨ 2,172,472
8.9 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 ₨ 1,151,848
7.4 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 ₨ 1,589,258
6.2 FPS
2011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti ₨ 2,172,472
6.1 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7750 ₨ 1,589,258
5.8 FPS

R7 265 berada di antara RX 560 dan HD 7850 , jatuh lebih lambat dari RX 560 oleh 1.6 % dan lebih cepat dari HD 7850 oleh 8.7 %. Ini memiliki kinerja relatif rata-rata terhadap setiap kartu grafis di sini. Hasilnya sebenarnya tidak bisa dibedakan dengan hasil dari RX 560 . Ini adalah panggilan dekat antara R7 265 dan rivalnya GTX 650 Ti Boost dengan selisih kecil.

Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)

Kualitas ultra

Resolusi 1920x1080

Tahun Kartu grafis Harga Frame Per detik
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti ₨ 2,464,079
48.7 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 ₨ 3,630,507
46.6 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 ₨ 2,901,490
46.4 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 ₨ 4,067,918
45.8 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 ₨ 2,901,490
45.2 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 ₨ 3,630,507
40.9 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 460 ₨ 2,041,249
39.7 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 270 ₨ 2,609,883
38.0 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 ₨ 2,318,276
36.8 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 ₨ 3,338,900
34.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R7 370 ₨ 2,172,472
33.9 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 560 ₨ 1,443,455
33.9 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R7 265 ₨ 2,172,472
33.3 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7850 ₨ 3,630,507
30.7 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost ₨ 2,464,079
30.5 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti ₨ 2,172,472
29.0 FPS
2011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti ₨ 3,630,507
28.3 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 550 ₨ 1,151,848
24.8 FPS
2011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 ₨ 2,901,490
24.2 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon HD 7790 ₨ 2,172,472
23.7 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti ₨ 2,172,472
23.7 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 ₨ 1,151,848
19.7 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 ₨ 1,589,258
16.5 FPS
2011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti ₨ 2,172,472
16.3 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7750 ₨ 1,589,258
15.5 FPS

R7 265 berada di antara RX 560 dan HD 7850 , jatuh lebih lambat dari RX 560 oleh 1.8 % dan lebih cepat dari HD 7850 oleh 8.5 %. Ini memiliki kinerja relatif rata-rata terhadap setiap kartu grafis di sini. Hasilnya sebenarnya tidak bisa dibedakan dengan hasil dari RX 560 . Ini adalah panggilan dekat antara R7 265 dan rivalnya GTX 650 Ti Boost dengan selisih kecil.

Permainan kinerja di Kualitas ultra pengaturan

Mengubah pengaturan kualitas
Kualitas ultra Kualitas tinggi Kualitas suara sedang Kualitas rendah

Resolusi 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Tahun Permainan Frame Per detik
2023 Resident Evil 4
19
22.0
2023 A Plague Tale: Requiem
13
15.0
2023 Hogwarts Legacy
11
13.0
2023 The Last of Us Part I
9
10.0
2023 Forspoken
10
11.6
2023 The Callisto Protocol
8
9.0
2023 Dead Space
13
15.0
2023 Baldur's Gate 3
16
17.8
2023 Armored Core VI
16
17.8
2023 Immortals of Aveum
7
8.0
2023 Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart
14
16.0
2023 Remnant II
8
9.0
2023 Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
10
12.0
2023 Atomic Heart
10
12.0
2023 Starfield
5
6.0
2022 Elden Ring
14
16.2
2022 God of War
13
15.3
2022 Overwatch 2
25
28.5
2022 F1 22
16
18.0
2022 Dying Light 2
15
17.0
2022 Total War: Warhammer III
15
17.0
2022 Spider-Man Remastered
25
28.0
2022 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
18
20.0
2021 Forza Horizon 5
13
15.5
2021 Halo Infinite
10
11.8
2021 Battlefield 2042
19
21.8
2021 Hitman 3
20
23.0
2021 Far Cry 6
19
21.4
2021 Guardians of the Galaxy
21
23.4
2020 Watch Dogs: Legion
21
23.6
2020 Assassin's Creed Valhalla
11
12.5
2020 Microsoft Flight Simulator
7
8.2
2020 Valorant
49
54.8
2020 Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
19
21.5
2020 Death Stranding
22
24.8
2020 Marvel's Avengers
14
16.2
2020 Godfall
21
24.1
2020 Cyberpunk 2077
11
12.5
2019 Apex Legends
24
27.0
2019 Anthem
15
17.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
22
25.5
2019 Resident Evil 2
30
33.6
2019 Metro Exodus
13
15.0
2019 World War Z
27
31.0
2019 Gears of War 5
19
21.8
2019 F1 2019
24
27.4
2019 GreedFall
22
24.6
2019 Borderlands 3
15
17.3
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
29
33.3
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
11
12.8
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
18
20.1
2018 Just Cause 4
19
21.6
2018 Monster Hunter: World
20
23.3
2018 Strange Brigade
31
35.1
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
27
30.0
2017 For Honor
36
40.0
2017 Project CARS 2
25
28.3
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
30
34.3
2016 Dishonored 2
18
20.6
2015 Rocket League
104
116.6
2015 Need For Speed
29
32.3
2015 Project CARS
27
31.0
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
50
56.6
2013 Bioshock Infinite
42
46.8
2013 Company of Heroes 2
26
29.7
2013 Crysis 3
36
40.7
2013 GRID 2
48
54.3
2013 Metro: Last Light
29
33.3
2013 Total War: Rome 2
27
30.4
2013 Battlefield 4
31
35.3
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
71
79.9
2009 League of Legends
134
149.9
2008 Crysis: Warhead
38
43.2

Resolusi 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Tahun Permainan Frame Per detik
2023 Resident Evil 4
12
16.0
2023 A Plague Tale: Requiem
8
11.0
2023 Hogwarts Legacy
8
10.0
2023 The Last of Us Part I
6
7.6
2023 Forspoken
6
7.6
2023 The Callisto Protocol
5
6.4
2023 Dead Space
8
10.0
2023 Baldur's Gate 3
11
14.4
2023 Armored Core VI
11
14.4
2023 Immortals of Aveum
4
5.6
2023 Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart
8
11.0
2023 Remnant II
4
6.0
2023 Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
7
9.0
2023 Atomic Heart
6
8.6
2023 Starfield
4
5.4
2022 Elden Ring
10
12.8
2022 God of War
10
13.2
2022 Overwatch 2
19
24.5
2022 F1 22
8
11.0
2022 Dying Light 2
8
11.0
2022 Total War: Warhammer III
9
12.0
2022 Spider-Man Remastered
16
20.0
2022 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
10
13.0
2021 Forza Horizon 5
10
13.3
2021 Halo Infinite
8
10.7
2021 Battlefield 2042
11
14.5
2021 Hitman 3
13
16.4
2021 Far Cry 6
12
16.0
2021 Guardians of the Galaxy
13
16.6
2020 Watch Dogs: Legion
12
15.4
2020 Assassin's Creed Valhalla
8
10.8
2020 Microsoft Flight Simulator
5
7.2
2020 Valorant
35
44.8
2020 Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
13
16.8
2020 Death Stranding
15
19.2
2020 Marvel's Avengers
9
11.5
2020 Godfall
12
16.2
2020 Cyberpunk 2077
9
11.7
2019 Apex Legends
16
20.1
2019 Anthem
11
13.8
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
15
19.8
2019 Resident Evil 2
18
22.6
2019 Metro Exodus
9
11.7
2019 World War Z
18
22.6
2019 Gears of War 5
12
15.8
2019 F1 2019
15
19.4
2019 GreedFall
14
17.8
2019 Borderlands 3
9
12.2
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
19
24.0
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
8
10.5
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
12
15.8
2018 Just Cause 4
12
16.0
2018 Monster Hunter: World
13
16.3
2018 Strange Brigade
19
24.5
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
17
21.6
2017 For Honor
18
23.3
2017 Project CARS 2
16
20.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
24
31.0
2016 Dishonored 2
14
17.6
2015 Rocket League
40
50.0
2015 Need For Speed
20
25.0
2015 Project CARS
18
23.6
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
29
36.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
53
66.6
2009 League of Legends
66
83.3

Resolusi 3440x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Tahun Permainan Frame Per detik
2019 Apex Legends
13
17.2
2019 Anthem
8
11.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
12
16.2
2019 Resident Evil 2
13
18.1
2019 Metro Exodus
7
10.2
2019 World War Z
14
19.0
2019 Gears of War 5
10
13.8
2019 F1 2019
12
17.0
2019 GreedFall
10
13.4
2019 Borderlands 3
7
9.9
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
15
20.5
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
6
9.2
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
10
13.8
2018 Just Cause 4
9
13.0
2018 Monster Hunter: World
9
12.9
2018 Strange Brigade
15
20.2
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
14
19.6
2017 For Honor
14
18.7
2017 Project CARS 2
14
19.6
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
23
30.5
2016 Dishonored 2
12
16.9
2015 Rocket League
29
39.2
2015 Need For Speed
16
22.3
2015 Project CARS
16
21.5
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
21
28.7
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
51
67.7
2009 League of Legends
47
62.4

Resolusi 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Tahun Permainan Frame Per detik
2023 Resident Evil 4
8
12.0
2023 A Plague Tale: Requiem
4
7.0
2023 Hogwarts Legacy
4
7.0
2023 The Last of Us Part I
2
4.0
2023 Forspoken
2
3.6
2023 The Callisto Protocol
2
3.2
2023 Dead Space
2
4.0
2023 Baldur's Gate 3
5
8.0
2023 Armored Core VI
5
8.0
2023 Immortals of Aveum
1
2.6
2023 Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart
4
6.0
2023 Remnant II
2
3.0
2023 Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
3
4.4
2023 Atomic Heart
3
5.4
2023 Starfield
2
3.6
2022 Elden Ring
5
7.3
2022 God of War
7
10.2
2022 Overwatch 2
12
18.5
2022 F1 22
5
8.0
2022 Dying Light 2
5
8.0
2022 Total War: Warhammer III
6
9.0
2022 Spider-Man Remastered
9
14.0
2022 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
5
8.0
2021 Forza Horizon 5
7
10.3
2021 Halo Infinite
5
7.3
2021 Battlefield 2042
6
9.3
2021 Hitman 3
7
10.0
2021 Far Cry 6
6
8.6
2021 Guardians of the Galaxy
6
9.0
2020 Watch Dogs: Legion
7
10.0
2020 Assassin's Creed Valhalla
5
7.3
2020 Microsoft Flight Simulator
3
5.7
2020 Valorant
27
39.0
2020 Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
6
9.0
2020 Death Stranding
8
11.7
2020 Marvel's Avengers
4
6.0
2020 Godfall
5
7.7
2020 Cyberpunk 2077
5
7.7
2019 Apex Legends
8
12.0
2019 Anthem
5
7.5
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
7
10.5
2019 Resident Evil 2
7
11.2
2019 Metro Exodus
5
7.3
2019 World War Z
9
13.0
2019 Gears of War 5
7
10.0
2019 F1 2019
8
12.3
2019 GreedFall
5
7.3
2019 Borderlands 3
4
6.3
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
10
14.3
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
4
6.7
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
7
10.0
2018 Just Cause 4
5
8.3
2018 Monster Hunter: World
5
7.8
2018 Strange Brigade
9
13.3
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
10
15.0
2017 For Honor
8
11.7
2017 Project CARS 2
11
16.6
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
18
26.0
2016 Dishonored 2
9
14.0
2015 Rocket League
16
23.3
2015 Need For Speed
11
16.6
2015 Project CARS
11
16.6
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
11
17.0
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
41
59.9
2009 League of Legends
23
33.3
R7 265 with i7-4770K at 1080p and Kualitas ultra settings
R7 265 with i7-4770K at 1440p and Kualitas ultra settings
R7 265 with i7-4770K at 4K and Kualitas ultra settings

Membandingkan terhadap pesaing

NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030
2017 2GB ₨ 1,151,848
35% slower
Compare
AMD Radeon RX 550
AMD Radeon RX 550
2017 2GB ₨ 1,078,946
29% slower
Compare
AMD Radeon RX 560
AMD Radeon RX 560
2017 4GB ₨ 1,443,455
6% faster
Compare
AMD Radeon RX 460
AMD Radeon RX 460
2016 4GB ₨ 2,041,249
3% slower
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
2016 4GB ₨ 1,880,865
31% faster
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
2015 2GB ₨ 1,297,651
4% faster
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
2015 2GB ₨ 1,297,651
28% faster
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 370
AMD Radeon R7 370
2015 2GB ₨ 2,945,231
2% faster
Compare
AMD Radeon R9 380
AMD Radeon R9 380
2015 2GB ₨ 4,359,525
31% faster
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
2014 2GB ₨ 4,067,918
11% slower
Compare
AMD Radeon R9 280
AMD Radeon R9 280
2014 3GB ₨ 5,103,123
29% faster
Compare
AMD Radeon R9 285
AMD Radeon R9 285
2014 2GB ₨ 5,540,533
32% faster
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
2013 1GB ₨ 714,437
40% slower
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
2013 2GB ₨ 2,464,079
3% faster
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
2013 2GB ₨ 4,665,712
25% faster
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
2013 2GB ₨ 2,609,883
39% faster
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 7790
AMD Radeon HD 7790
2013 1GB ₨ 2,172,472
19% slower
Compare
AMD Radeon R9 270
AMD Radeon R9 270
2013 2GB ₨ 4,009,596
13% faster
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
2012 1GB ₨ 933,142
6% slower
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
2012 2GB ₨ 1,151,848
17% faster
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 7750
AMD Radeon HD 7750
2012 1GB ₨ 2,041,249
43% slower
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 7850
AMD Radeon HD 7850
2012 2GB ₨ 3,630,507
17% faster
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
2011 1GB ₨ 2,901,490
38% slower
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
2011 1GB ₨ 2,230,794
5% slower
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
2011 1GB ₨ 3,207,677
9% faster
Compare

R7 265 Spesifikasi

R7 265 Board Design

Board NumberC630
Length8.28 inches 210 mm
Outputs2x DVI1x HDMI1x DisplayPort
Power Connectors1x 6-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP150 W

R7 265 Clock Speeds

Boost Clock925 MHz
GPU Clock900 MHz
Memory Clock1400 MHz 5600 MHz effective

R7 265 Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationVolcanic Islands (R7 200)
Launch Price149 USD
ProductionEnd-of-life
Release DateFeb 13th, 2014

R7 265 Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL1.2
OpenGL4.5
Shader Model5.1
Vulkan1.1.77

R7 265 Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 1.0
Die Size212 mm²
GPU NamePitcairn
GPU VariantPitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
Process Size28 nm
Transistors2,800 million

R7 265 Memory

Bandwidth179.2 GB/s
Memory Bus256 bit
Memory Size2048 MB
Memory TypeGDDR5

R7 265 Render Config

Compute Units16
ROPs32
Shading Units1024
TMUs64

R7 265 Theoretical Performance

FP32 (float) performance1,894 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance118.4 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate29.60 GPixel/s
Texture Rate59.20 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

AMD's Radeon R7 265 was launched a few months ago with little fanfare – after all, it's essentially just a rebadged and moderately overclocked version of the HD 7850.
HotHardware takes a detailed look at the brand new AMD Radeon R7 265, mainstream graphics card. - Page 2
AMD Radeon R7 265 - Overclocking Using MSI Afterburner, we ramped up the card's power limit by 20 percent, the maximum allowed. Voltage increases were not an option, but even so we were quickly ...
The Radeon R7 265 fits into AMD's line-up between the R7 260X and R9 270. The R7 265 uses a cut-down 'Curacao' GPU which we've seen used for the R9 270 and R9 270X.
Crysis 3, which is powered by Crytek’s proprietary CryENGINE 3 technology, is the third installment in this popular franchise. Crysis 3 is the sequel to 2011’s Crysis 2 and follows Prophet as ...
AMD said that the Radeon R7 265 will offer 2GB of GDDR-5 memory on a 256-bit memory bus, “crowning the AMD R7 series,” according to the company.
Based on AMD’s venerable Pitcairn GPU, R7 265 will be filling this gap by bringing a variant of the Radeon HD 7850 back to the market, creating a 3 rd tier Pitcairn product for the 200 series.
The Radeon R7 265 was a mid-range graphics card by AMD, launched in February 2014. Built on the 28 nm process, and based on the Pitcairn graphics processor, in its Pitcairn PRO variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.
Neither the R7 260 nor the R7 265 are remarkable as far as voltages are concerned. Both of these are right in the range of common voltages for lower clocked Pitcairn and Bonaire products respectively.
We take a look at the £115 R7 265 2GB, essentially a rebadged and overclocked HD 7850 2GB
AMD is shaking up its mid-range graphics line-up today, by slashing the price of the Radeon R7 260X and introducing the more powerful Radeon R7 265. Though their model numbers are quite similar ...
The overclocked R7 265 saw a 13% boost in frame rates in Metro: Last Light hitting 35fps compared to the GTX 750 Ti's 31fps, which was an 11% increase over the standard frequency.
Marking the introduction of its Maxwell architecture, Nvidia has targeted AMD's $150 Radeon R7 265 with the new GeForce GTX 750 Ti, a card that promises to be more than another rebadge. The GTX ...
The Radeon R7 A265 was a graphics card by AMD, launched in January 2014. Built on the 28 nm process, and based on the Opal graphics processor, in its Opal XT variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.
Apa yang Perlu Dipertimbangkan Sebelum Membeli Kartu Grafis

Apa yang Perlu Dipertimbangkan Sebelum Membeli Kartu Grafis

Jika Anda telah berencana untuk meningkatkan sistem Anda dengan membeli kartu grafis baru. Lalu ada beberapa faktor penting untuk dipertimbangkan.
Resolusi VS Kualitas: Dampak pada Kinerja Game

Resolusi VS Kualitas: Dampak pada Kinerja Game

Apa yang memengaruhi kinerja game? Kejelasan atau Detail?
Pengaturan Kualitas Tinggi Ultra VS di Game PC

Pengaturan Kualitas Tinggi Ultra VS di Game PC

Setiap pemain memiliki gagasan berbeda tentang pengaturan ideal untuk game PC. Tetapi dalam kebanyakan kasus, memilih untuk konfigurasi grafis berkualitas tinggi adalah cara untuk pergi.
Apa yang dimaksud dengan bottleneck CPU atau GPU?

Apa yang dimaksud dengan bottleneck CPU atau GPU?

Apakah Anda mendapatkan tetes bingkai mendadak? Anda mungkin mengalami hambatan.
Berapa kecepatan FPS yang bisa saya terima?

Berapa kecepatan FPS yang bisa saya terima?

Untuk beberapa gim, Anda masih bisa menikmati garphics hebat dengan frame rate lebih rendah.
GPU Hierarchy
GPU Hierarchy
GPU Compare
GPU Compare
CPU Hierarchy
CPU Compare
Laptop Hierarchy
Gaming Laptops
Monitor Hierarchy
Gaming Monitors
Headset Hierarchy
Gaming Headsets

Diskusi dan Komentar

Bagikan Komentar Anda