RX Vega 64 benchmark with i7-7700K 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K benchmarks at Ultra Quality
It is worth noting that the RX Vega 64 is a very power hungry card and requires a decent power supply unit. In terms of memory, the RX Vega 64 's 8192 MB RAM is more than enough for modern games and should not cause any bottlenecks. It is important to know that RX Vega 64 's max load temperature is very high and might require custom cooling solutions. In short the performance is exceptional, there's no question that this is one of the most powerful single GPU out there in 2025 .
The release year of the graphics card. The newer the better technology and performance optimization and
driver support.
Year
2016
2019
13
2015
2016
11
2014
2015
8
2013
2014
4
2007
2013
2
The price of the graphics card. The cheaper the better.
Price
0
250
35
250
400
30
400
550
25
550
650
15
650
9999
5
Power Supply Wattage required for overall system. The lower the better.
PSU
0
350
4
350
450
4
450
550
3
550
650
2
650
9999
1
Maximum recorded temperature under load. The lower the better for longer life of the graphics card.
Temp
0
70
2
70
75
2
75
80
1
80
85
1
85
999
1
Noise Levels under load. The lower the better.
Noise
0
45
2
45
48
2
48
50
2
50
55
1
55
999
1
Full HD performance at 1080p resolution. The higher the better.
FHD
60
9999
18
55
60
13
45
55
11
35
45
7
0
35
5
Quad HD performance at 1440p resolution. The higher the better.
QHD
60
9999
10
55
60
8
45
55
5
35
45
4
0
35
2
4K performance at 2160p resolution. The higher the better.
F4K
60
9999
5
55
60
4
45
55
3
35
45
2
0
35
1
Current CPU Impact on performance with respect to the highest performing CPU used for benchmark at the
time this graphics card was released.
CPU
-5
9999
5
-7
-5
4
-10
-7
3
-15
-10
2
-9999
-15
1
Graphics card memory (RAM) capacity. The higher the better for higher resolution textures and future
demanding games.
MEM
8
9999
5
4
8
4
2
4
3
1
2
2
0
1
1
FROM
TO
VERDICT
The overall score is determined based on the calculated weightings for the individual components.
OVERALL SCORE
80
99
Excellent
70
80
Very Good
60
70
Good
40
60
Acceptable
0
40
Weak
79/100
Very Good
AMD ’s xx64 cards have always been defined by high-end prices with performance that knocks on the door of extreme graphics cards – especially when overclocked. After taking the time to fully test the GCN 5.0 graphics card inside the RX Vega 64, we can say without a doubt that it continues the trend. Compared to its NVIDIA 's closest rival, GTX 1080, the RX Vega 64 was -6.8 % slower.
For 1080p Full HD, we were able to play Elden Ring, Marvel's Avengers, Dying Light 2, Total War: Warhammer III, Borderlands 3 at 60 fps to 65 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 63 fps. For 1440p Quad HD, we were able to play Godfall, Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Monster Hunter: World, Hitman 3, Guardians of the Galaxy at 60 fps to 62 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 61 fps.
For 2160p 4K, we were able to play F1 2018, Overwatch 2, Valorant at 61 fps to 146 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 92 fps.
The RX Vega 64 sits between the RTX 2060 and the GTX 1070 Ti, falling slower than RTX 2060 by 1.5% and faster than GTX 1070 Ti by 0.9%. It has an average relative performance against every graphics card here. Its results are actually indistinguishable from those of the RTX 2060.
The RX Vega 64 sits between the GTX 980 Ti and the RX Vega 56, falling slower than GTX 980 Ti by 3.3% and faster than RX Vega 56 by 2.2%. It has an average relative performance against every graphics card here. Against its rival - the GTX 1080, the RX Vega 64 is much slower.
The RX Vega 64 sits between the RTX 2060 and the GTX 1070 Ti, falling slower than RTX 2060 by 1.5% and faster than GTX 1070 Ti by 0.9%. It has an average relative performance against every graphics card here. Its results are actually indistinguishable from those of the RTX 2060.
The RX Vega 64 sits between the GTX 1660 SUPER and the GTX 1660, falling slower than GTX 1660 SUPER by 6.3% and faster than GTX 1660 by 0%. It has an average relative performance against every graphics card here. Against its rival - the GTX 1080, the RX Vega 64 is much slower.
The RX Vega 64 sits between the RTX 2060 and the GTX 1070 Ti, falling slower than RTX 2060 by 1.6% and faster than GTX 1070 Ti by 0.8%. It has an average relative performance against every graphics card here. Its results are actually indistinguishable from those of the RTX 2060. Those who have a high refresh rate monitor will enjoy what RX Vega 64 has to offer as it averages 124.5 fps.
• See the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 at Best Buy The Verdict If this were two separate reviews the Vega 56 would get a higher score than the Vega 64, but since it's one review I'm labeling both of ...
Conclusion. On the one hand, AMD's Radeon RX Vega cards get the company back into the ring against Nvidia, fighting in a higher GPU weight class. ... both the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 and the Nvidia ...
Our AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 review confirms that the company achieved major performance improvements over their last-generation Polaris and Fiji cards: Vega is faster than the GTX 1080. We tested six different performance configurations of the Vega 64, with surprising results.
Conclusion (RX Vega 56) The Radeon RX Vega 56 is easily the best card of this launch. It is cooler, quieter, and more efficient than the Radeon RX Vega 64 and delivers only 10 percent less ...
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64: the Digital Foundry verdict The numbers don't lie. There's an RX Vega out there that offers great performance for the money and brings the fight to the competition, but it's ...
A better comparison for purchasing decisions would have been to use the RX Vega 64 Air Cooled, or to have compared the RX Vega 64 LC to the GTX 1080ti as the pricing is more in line.
Our Verdict. The Radeon RX Vega 64 is an excellent first showing of AMD’s newest graphics cards with Nvidia GTX 1080-equivalent performance and the potential of so much more.
AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 review AMD's top GPU is a fast but power-hungry beast.
Conclusion (RX Vega 64) The RX Vega 64 is an answer to the GTX 1080, but currently it's not a whole lot more than that, and it's not an especially great answer either.
After months of teases and delays, the wait for Vega is finally over. First, AMD launched its flagship Radeon RX 64 lineup: the $499 Radeon RX Vega 64 and the $699 liquid-cooled Radeon RX Vega 64 ...
The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 and Vega 64 preview. ... so thanks AMD! RX Vega vs. the World: a 15-round heavyweight battle ... The RX Vega 64 is available starting today. As discussed previously ...
Radeon RX Vega 64: At a Glance (Again) Speeds and feeds are always good to recap, so borrowing from our earlier coverage: Like the Radeon R9 Fury X's Fiji processor, Radeon RX Vega 64 employs four ...
AMD's Radeon RX Vega 64 requires a pair of eight-pin power connectors, and AMD's packaging says you'll need a 750-watt power supply, at minimum. Even if you don't care much about extra power ...
The Radeon RX Vega 64 is an excellent first showing of AMD’s newest graphics cards with Nvidia GTX 1080-equivalent performance and the potential of so much more. AMD Vega has been on the tip of ...
AMD’s current suggested retail price for its RX Vega 64 is $499 (£549, about AU$630), but third party manufacturers, like Gigabyte and Asus, are still selling the card for far more than that on ...
The Radeon RX Vega 64 is a high-end graphics card by AMD, launched in August 2017. Built on the 14 nm process, and based on the Vega 10 graphics processor, in its Vega 10 XT variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.
Ich weiß nicht wie ihr auf solche fps kommt mittlere Einstellungen rainbow six siege 222 bis....
Ihr habt wohl einen rostigen Nagel im Kopf
Maximal 177 fps werden erreicht und das sogar OC und UV
00
C
cookeroxidize6 years ago
Should I buy RX VEGA 64 or GTX 1070???Should I buy RX VEGA 64 or GTX 1070 if I have a chance to buy RX VEGA 64 for 350 euro (used, 3 months, only for gaming) and I can buy the GTX 1070 for 400 euro (used, 2 years, gaming).Which one should I buy? I know that gtx 1070 is better at power usage, but it's used for already 2 years...So please help me decide!!!
00
P
portbillet6 years ago
Providing you have a sufficient power supply to care for the RX Vega AND it hasn’t been used for mining, then I wouldn’t personally say go for the 64. It is a much more powerful card and currently by your prices cheaper than a 1070. Especially with the Vega card been much newer and only been used for 3 months it is a much better option in my opinion.
What to Consider Before Buying a Graphics Card
If you have been planning to upgrade your system by purchasing a new graphics card. Then there are some important factors to consider.
Resolution VS Quality: Impact on Game Performance
What affects game performance? Clarity or Details?
Ultra VS High Quality Settings in PC Games
Every player has a different notion about the ideal setting for PC games. But in most cases, opting for a High quality graphics configuration is the way to go.
What are CPU or GPU Bottlenecks?
Are you getting sudden frame drops? you might have a bottleneck.
What is the acceptable FPS speed for me?
For some games, you can still enjoy great garphics at lower frame rates.
GPU Hierarchy
GPU Compare
CPU Compare
Gaming Laptops
Gaming Monitors
Gaming Headsets
Discussion and Comments
Share Your Comments
Ihr habt wohl einen rostigen Nagel im Kopf
Maximal 177 fps werden erreicht und das sogar OC und UV