HD 6950 benchmark with i7-975 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K benchmarks at Ultra Quality
It is worth noting that the HD 6950 is a very power hungry card and requires a decent power supply unit. With current 2048 MB RAM, the HD 6950 can have serious memory-related bottlenecks in more modern games. This combination between HD 6950 and Intel Core i7-975 @ 3.33GHz has less than 8% bottleneck in many games and is perfect match to avoid FPS loss. This combination between HD 6950 and Intel Core i7-975 @ 3.33GHz is a perfect match to avoid FPS loss. With current 2048 MB RAM, the HD 6950 can have very few memory-related bottlenecks in more modern games.
The release year of the graphics card. The newer the better technology and performance optimization and
driver support.
Year
2016
2019
13
2015
2016
11
2014
2015
8
2013
2014
4
2007
2013
2
The price of the graphics card. The cheaper the better.
Price
0
250
35
250
400
30
400
550
25
550
650
15
650
9999
5
Power Supply Wattage required for overall system. The lower the better.
PSU
0
350
4
350
450
4
450
550
3
550
650
2
650
9999
1
Maximum recorded temperature under load. The lower the better for longer life of the graphics card.
Temp
0
70
2
70
75
2
75
80
1
80
85
1
85
999
1
Noise Levels under load. The lower the better.
Noise
0
45
2
45
48
2
48
50
2
50
55
1
55
999
1
Full HD performance at 1080p resolution. The higher the better.
FHD
60
9999
18
55
60
13
45
55
11
35
45
7
0
35
5
Quad HD performance at 1440p resolution. The higher the better.
QHD
60
9999
10
55
60
8
45
55
5
35
45
4
0
35
2
4K performance at 2160p resolution. The higher the better.
F4K
60
9999
5
55
60
4
45
55
3
35
45
2
0
35
1
Current CPU Impact on performance with respect to the highest performing CPU used for benchmark at the
time this graphics card was released.
CPU
-5
9999
5
-7
-5
4
-10
-7
3
-15
-10
2
-9999
-15
1
Graphics card memory (RAM) capacity. The higher the better for higher resolution textures and future
demanding games.
MEM
8
9999
5
4
8
4
2
4
3
1
2
2
0
1
1
FROM
TO
VERDICT
The overall score is determined based on the calculated weightings for the individual components.
OVERALL SCORE
80
99
Excellent
70
80
Very Good
60
70
Good
40
60
Acceptable
0
40
Weak
47/100
Acceptable
AMD ’s xx50 cards have always been defined by budget prices with performance that knocks on the door of entry-level graphics cards – especially when overclocked. After taking the time to fully test the TeraScale 3 graphics card inside the HD 6950, we can say without a doubt that it continues the trend. The HD 6950 is much more expensive than the HD 6850 as it costs a whopping $ 299. Compare this to the HD 6850, which came originally at a price of $ 179. Meanwhile, the NVIDIA closest equivalent card is the GTX 560 Ti which costs $ 249.
Spec for spec, this HD 6950 leapfrogs its direct predecessor, the HD 6850, by boasting 30.8 % more fps. The HD 6950 has 2 GB RAM compared to the HD 6850 's 1 GB video memory.
Fortunately, gaming performance was quite impressive. The HD 6950 consistently delivers great frame rate increases over the HD 6850 and it really justifies an upgrade. Compared to its NVIDIA 's closest rival, GTX 560 Ti, the HD 6950 was -1.3 % slower.
AMD ’s xx50 cards have always been defined by budget prices with performance that knocks on the door of entry-level graphics cards – especially when overclocked. After taking the time to fully test the TeraScale 3 graphics card inside the HD 6950, we can say without a doubt that it continues the trend. The HD 6950 is much more expensive than the HD 6850 as it costs a whopping $ 299. Compare this to the HD 6850, which came originally at a price of $ 179. Meanwhile, the NVIDIA closest equivalent card is the GTX 560 Ti which costs $ 249.
Spec for spec, this HD 6950 leapfrogs its direct predecessor, the HD 6850, by boasting 30.8 % more fps. The HD 6950 has 2 GB RAM compared to the HD 6850 's 1 GB video memory.
Fortunately, gaming performance was quite impressive. The HD 6950 consistently delivers great frame rate increases over the HD 6850 and it really justifies an upgrade. Compared to its NVIDIA 's closest rival, GTX 560 Ti, the HD 6950 was -1.3 % slower.
The HD 6950 sits between the GTX 650 Ti Boost and the GTX 560 Ti, falling slower than GTX 650 Ti Boost by 4.6% and faster than GTX 560 Ti by 2.8%. It has an average relative performance against every graphics card here. It is a close call between the HD 6950 and its rival GTX 560 Ti by a small margin. In addition, the HD 6950 was also faster than the HD 6850 by a good margin.
The HD 6950 sits between the GTX 650 Ti Boost and the GTX 560 Ti, falling slower than GTX 650 Ti Boost by 4.6% and faster than GTX 560 Ti by 2.8%. It has an average relative performance against every graphics card here. It is a close call between the HD 6950 and its rival GTX 560 Ti by a small margin. In addition, the HD 6950 was also faster than the HD 6850 by a good margin.
The HD 6950 sits between the GTX 650 Ti Boost and the GTX 560 Ti, falling slower than GTX 650 Ti Boost by 4.8% and faster than GTX 560 Ti by 2.8%. It has an average relative performance against every graphics card here. It is a close call between the HD 6950 and its rival GTX 560 Ti by a small margin. In addition, the HD 6950 was also faster than the HD 6850 by a good margin.
Launching today are the Radeon HD 6970 and Radeon HD 6950, utilizing AMD’s new Cayman GPU. Born from the ashes of TSMC’s canceled 32nm node, Cayman is the biggest change to AMD’s GPU ...
With the Radeon HD 6950 1 GB AMD introduces a new HD 6950 variant that is more cost effective than the 2 GB version. The price difference is about $40, just for 1 GB less memory, all other specs have remained the same.
The Test. For the launch of the Radeon HD 6900 series, AMD supplied us with a 6900-enabled version of the Catalyst 10.11 driver, version 8.79.6.2RC2.
AMD Radeon HD 6950 - Verdict In performance terms the Radeon HD 6950 is a rather impressive beast. Considering it's around £80 cheaper than the Radeon HD 6970, and you're only losing a couple of ...
HotHardware takes a detailed look at the new AMD Radeon HD 6970 and 6950 DirectX 11 graphics cards based on the Cayman 40nm GPU. - Page 6
AMD's $300 gaming video card, the Radeon HD 6950, is fairly powerful but may be a tough sell.
A few weeks ago AMD released the Radeon HD 6970 and Radeon HD 6950. Both cards are based on AMD's new Cayman core which is their first graphics processor to use a VLIW4 shader configuration. Just like on all other similar products, AMD's two Cayman variants, called Cayman Pro and Cayman XT, are based on the exact same GPU silicon.
AMD's Radeon HD 6970 & Radeon HD 6950: Paving The Future For AMD ... but even the cheaper 6950 holds parity. In the case of the 6900 series it also hits a special milestone at 2560, being the ...
AMD Radeon HD 6950 - Verdict The Radeon HD 6950 may lose out in the DirectX 10 benchmarks, but the card's performance at DirectX 11, especially at 2560x1600, is thoroughly impressive.
What to Consider Before Buying a Graphics Card
If you have been planning to upgrade your system by purchasing a new graphics card. Then there are some important factors to consider.
Resolution VS Quality: Impact on Game Performance
What affects game performance? Clarity or Details?
Ultra VS High Quality Settings in PC Games
Every player has a different notion about the ideal setting for PC games. But in most cases, opting for a High quality graphics configuration is the way to go.
What are CPU or GPU Bottlenecks?
Are you getting sudden frame drops? you might have a bottleneck.
What is the acceptable FPS speed for me?
For some games, you can still enjoy great garphics at lower frame rates.
GPU Hierarchy
GPU Compare
CPU Compare
Gaming Laptops
Gaming Monitors
Gaming Headsets
Discussion and Comments
Share Your Comments