i3-7320 vs i5-14600K - The Last of Us Part I GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-7320 i5-14600K

Multi-Thread Performance

6541 Pts
21168 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2364 Pts
4308 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i3-7320 vs i5-14600K in The Last of Us Part I using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-7320 i5-14600K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
14.2 FPS
1080p
20.0 FPS
1440p
10.8 FPS
1440p
14.5 FPS
2160p
5.6 FPS
2160p
7.6 FPS
w1440p
8.8 FPS
w1440p
11.8 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
29.3 FPS
1080p
39.6 FPS
1440p
23.0 FPS
1440p
29.8 FPS
2160p
12.9 FPS
2160p
16.9 FPS
w1440p
19.2 FPS
w1440p
24.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
44.4 FPS
1080p
59.1 FPS
1440p
35.3 FPS
1440p
45.2 FPS
2160p
20.1 FPS
2160p
26.1 FPS
w1440p
29.6 FPS
w1440p
38.0 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
74.6 FPS
1080p
98.2 FPS
1440p
59.7 FPS
1440p
75.9 FPS
2160p
34.6 FPS
2160p
44.7 FPS
w1440p
50.5 FPS
w1440p
64.2 FPS
i3-7320
  • The i3-7320 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-7320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i5-14600K
  • The i5-14600K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-14600K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i3-7320 vs i5-14600K specifications

i3-7320 vs i5-14600K Architecture

i3-7320 i5-14600K
CodenameKaby LakeRaptor Lake-R
GenerationCore i3 (Kaby Lake)Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh)
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5

i3-7320 vs i5-14600K Cache

i3-7320 i5-14600K
Cache L164K (per core)80 KB (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)2 MB (per core)
Cache L34MB (shared)24 MB (shared)

i3-7320 vs i5-14600K Cores

i3-7320 i5-14600K

i3-7320 vs i5-14600K Features

i3-7320 i5-14600K

i3-7320 vs i5-14600K Performance

i3-7320 i5-14600K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency4.1 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier41.0x35.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP51 W125 W
Turbo ClockN/Aup to 5.3 GHz

i3-7320 vs i5-14600K Physical

i3-7320 i5-14600K
Die Sizeunknown257 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1700
tCaseMax65°C72°C

Compare i3-7320 vs i5-14600K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments