i3-12300 vs i3-4350 - The Last of Us Part I R9 Nano - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12300 i3-4350

Multi-Thread Performance

14493 Pts
4963 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3550 Pts
2094 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i3-12300 vs i3-4350 in The Last of Us Part I using R9 Nano - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12300 i3-4350

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
27.6 FPS
1080p
16.6 FPS
1440p
20.3 FPS
1440p
12.6 FPS
2160p
10.7 FPS
2160p
6.7 FPS
w1440p
16.6 FPS
w1440p
10.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
52.4 FPS
1080p
33.6 FPS
1440p
40.1 FPS
1440p
26.4 FPS
2160p
22.8 FPS
2160p
15.1 FPS
w1440p
33.6 FPS
w1440p
22.1 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
77.1 FPS
1080p
50.6 FPS
1440p
59.9 FPS
1440p
40.2 FPS
2160p
35.0 FPS
2160p
23.5 FPS
w1440p
50.6 FPS
w1440p
33.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
126.7 FPS
1080p
84.6 FPS
1440p
99.4 FPS
1440p
67.7 FPS
2160p
59.3 FPS
2160p
40.2 FPS
w1440p
84.6 FPS
w1440p
57.4 FPS
i3-12300
  • The i3-12300 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12300 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12300 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i3-12300 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-4350
  • The i3-4350 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-4350 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-4350 specifications

i3-12300 vs i3-4350 Architecture

i3-12300 i3-4350
CodenameAlder Lake-SHaswell
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i3 (Haswell)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR3
Part#SRL61unknown
Production StatusActiveunknown

i3-12300 vs i3-4350 Cache

i3-12300 i3-4350
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)4MB (shared)

i3-12300 vs i3-4350 Cores

i3-12300 i3-4350
# of Cores42
# of Threads84
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730Intel HD 4600
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12300 vs i3-4350 Performance

i3-12300 i3-4350
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.5 GHz3.6 GHz
Multiplier35.0x36.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W54 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzN/A

i3-12300 vs i3-4350 Physical

i3-12300 i3-4350
Die Size163 mm²177 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA12C
Process Size10 nm22 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1150

Compare i3-12300 vs i3-4350 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments