i3-12100 vs i3-8300 - The Last of Us Part I R9 FURY X - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i3-8300

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
8715 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
2172 Pts

The Last of Us Part I

i3-12100 vs i3-8300 in The Last of Us Part I using R9 FURY X - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i3-8300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
30.3 FPS
1080p
27.6 FPS
1440p
22.4 FPS
1440p
20.9 FPS
2160p
11.8 FPS
2160p
11.0 FPS
w1440p
18.3 FPS
w1440p
17.1 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
56.8 FPS
1080p
52.4 FPS
1440p
43.7 FPS
1440p
41.1 FPS
2160p
24.9 FPS
2160p
23.4 FPS
w1440p
36.6 FPS
w1440p
34.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
83.3 FPS
1080p
77.1 FPS
1440p
64.9 FPS
1440p
61.3 FPS
2160p
38.0 FPS
2160p
35.8 FPS
w1440p
54.9 FPS
w1440p
51.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
136.2 FPS
1080p
126.7 FPS
1440p
107.5 FPS
1440p
101.7 FPS
2160p
64.2 FPS
2160p
60.6 FPS
w1440p
91.5 FPS
w1440p
86.7 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12100 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-8300
  • The i3-8300 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-8300 specifications

i3-12100 vs i3-8300 Architecture

i3-12100 i3-8300
CodenameAlder Lake-SCoffee Lake
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i3 (Coffee Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRL62SR3XY
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-12100 vs i3-8300 Cache

i3-12100 i3-8300
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)8MB (shared)

i3-12100 vs i3-8300 Cores

i3-12100 i3-8300
# of Cores44
# of Threads84
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12100 vs i3-8300 Performance

i3-12100 i3-8300
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.3 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier33.0x37.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W62 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzN/A

i3-12100 vs i3-8300 Physical

i3-12100 i3-8300
Die Size163 mm²unknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA1151
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1151

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-8300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments