i3-12100 vs i3-8300 - Minecraft R9 FURY X - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i3-8300

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
8715 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
2172 Pts

Minecraft

i3-12100 vs i3-8300 in Minecraft using R9 FURY X - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i3-8300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
626.7 FPS
1080p
570.6 FPS
1440p
281.7 FPS
1440p
263.4 FPS
2160p
140.8 FPS
2160p
131.7 FPS
w1440p
226.0 FPS
w1440p
211.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
699.9 FPS
1080p
650.6 FPS
1440p
370.9 FPS
1440p
351.2 FPS
2160p
209.8 FPS
2160p
198.4 FPS
w1440p
310.0 FPS
w1440p
293.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
773.1 FPS
1080p
730.7 FPS
1440p
460.1 FPS
1440p
439.1 FPS
2160p
278.8 FPS
2160p
265.2 FPS
w1440p
394.1 FPS
w1440p
375.7 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
919.5 FPS
1080p
890.7 FPS
1440p
638.6 FPS
1440p
614.8 FPS
2160p
416.8 FPS
2160p
398.7 FPS
w1440p
562.1 FPS
w1440p
539.9 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12100 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-12100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-8300
  • The i3-8300 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-8300 specifications

i3-12100 vs i3-8300 Architecture

i3-12100 i3-8300
CodenameAlder Lake-SCoffee Lake
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i3 (Coffee Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRL62SR3XY
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-12100 vs i3-8300 Cache

i3-12100 i3-8300
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)8MB (shared)

i3-12100 vs i3-8300 Cores

i3-12100 i3-8300
# of Cores44
# of Threads84
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12100 vs i3-8300 Performance

i3-12100 i3-8300
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.3 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier33.0x37.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W62 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzN/A

i3-12100 vs i3-8300 Physical

i3-12100 i3-8300
Die Size163 mm²unknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA1151
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1151

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-8300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments