i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core - Starfield GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
8017 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
1397 Pts

Starfield

i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core in Starfield using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
10.8 FPS
1080p
6.1 FPS
1440p
9.7 FPS
1440p
5.5 FPS
2160p
6.5 FPS
2160p
3.7 FPS
w1440p
8.7 FPS
w1440p
4.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
23.0 FPS
1080p
13.9 FPS
1440p
20.9 FPS
1440p
12.7 FPS
2160p
14.7 FPS
2160p
8.9 FPS
w1440p
19.0 FPS
w1440p
11.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
35.3 FPS
1080p
21.7 FPS
1440p
32.2 FPS
1440p
19.8 FPS
2160p
22.9 FPS
2160p
14.1 FPS
w1440p
29.3 FPS
w1440p
17.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
59.7 FPS
1080p
37.2 FPS
1440p
54.7 FPS
1440p
34.1 FPS
2160p
39.2 FPS
2160p
24.4 FPS
w1440p
50.0 FPS
w1440p
31.0 FPS
i9-10900K
    FX-8320 Eight-Core

      Compare i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core specifications

      i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Architecture

      i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Cache

      i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Cores

      i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Features

      i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Notes

      i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Performance

      i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Physical

      i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      Compare i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core in more games


      Discussion and Comments

      Share Your Comments