i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core - Need For Speed GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
8017 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
1397 Pts

Need For Speed

i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core in Need For Speed using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
62.4 FPS
1080p
35.4 FPS
1440p
47.8 FPS
1440p
27.1 FPS
2160p
31.6 FPS
2160p
17.9 FPS
w1440p
42.5 FPS
w1440p
24.1 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
105.7 FPS
1080p
65.0 FPS
1440p
84.1 FPS
1440p
51.5 FPS
2160p
58.9 FPS
2160p
35.9 FPS
w1440p
76.1 FPS
w1440p
46.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
149.0 FPS
1080p
94.5 FPS
1440p
120.5 FPS
1440p
76.0 FPS
2160p
86.2 FPS
2160p
53.9 FPS
w1440p
109.6 FPS
w1440p
69.0 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
235.5 FPS
1080p
153.7 FPS
1440p
193.1 FPS
1440p
124.9 FPS
2160p
140.8 FPS
2160p
89.9 FPS
w1440p
176.7 FPS
w1440p
113.9 FPS
i9-10900K
    FX-8320 Eight-Core

      Compare i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core specifications

      i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Architecture

      i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Cache

      i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Cores

      i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Features

      i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Notes

      i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Performance

      i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Physical

      i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      Compare i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core in more games


      Discussion and Comments

      Share Your Comments