i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core - Starfield Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
8017 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
1397 Pts

Starfield

i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core in Starfield using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
14.6 FPS
1080p
8.3 FPS
1440p
13.1 FPS
1440p
7.4 FPS
2160p
8.8 FPS
2160p
5.0 FPS
w1440p
11.7 FPS
w1440p
6.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
30.0 FPS
1080p
18.2 FPS
1440p
27.3 FPS
1440p
16.5 FPS
2160p
19.2 FPS
2160p
11.6 FPS
w1440p
24.7 FPS
w1440p
14.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
45.5 FPS
1080p
28.2 FPS
1440p
41.5 FPS
1440p
25.6 FPS
2160p
29.6 FPS
2160p
18.2 FPS
w1440p
37.7 FPS
w1440p
23.2 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
76.3 FPS
1080p
48.1 FPS
1440p
69.9 FPS
1440p
43.7 FPS
2160p
50.5 FPS
2160p
31.5 FPS
w1440p
63.7 FPS
w1440p
39.7 FPS
i9-10900K
    FX-8320 Eight-Core

      Compare i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core specifications

      i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Architecture

      i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Cache

      i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Cores

      i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Features

      i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Notes

      i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Performance

      i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Physical

      i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      Compare i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core in more games


      Discussion and Comments

      Share Your Comments