i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core - Doom Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
8017 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
1397 Pts

Doom

i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core in Doom using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
130.0 FPS
1080p
73.7 FPS
1440p
94.3 FPS
1440p
53.5 FPS
2160p
48.8 FPS
2160p
27.7 FPS
w1440p
76.6 FPS
w1440p
43.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
196.3 FPS
1080p
121.7 FPS
1440p
150.0 FPS
1440p
92.7 FPS
2160p
85.6 FPS
2160p
52.5 FPS
w1440p
125.8 FPS
w1440p
77.4 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
262.6 FPS
1080p
169.8 FPS
1440p
205.6 FPS
1440p
131.8 FPS
2160p
122.5 FPS
2160p
77.4 FPS
w1440p
175.0 FPS
w1440p
111.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
395.2 FPS
1080p
265.9 FPS
1440p
317.0 FPS
1440p
210.2 FPS
2160p
196.2 FPS
2160p
127.0 FPS
w1440p
273.4 FPS
w1440p
179.6 FPS
i9-10900K
    FX-8320 Eight-Core

      Compare i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core specifications

      i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Architecture

      i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Cache

      i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Cores

      i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Features

      i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Notes

      i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Performance

      i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Physical

      i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      Compare i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core in more games


      Discussion and Comments

      Share Your Comments