i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core - Need For Speed: Payback GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

Multi-Thread Performance

22851 Pts
8017 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3099 Pts
1397 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core in Need For Speed: Payback using GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
58.1 FPS
1080p
32.9 FPS
1440p
41.9 FPS
1440p
23.8 FPS
2160p
28.6 FPS
2160p
16.2 FPS
w1440p
37.7 FPS
w1440p
21.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
99.4 FPS
1080p
61.0 FPS
1440p
75.1 FPS
1440p
46.0 FPS
2160p
54.0 FPS
2160p
32.9 FPS
w1440p
68.6 FPS
w1440p
42.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
140.8 FPS
1080p
89.1 FPS
1440p
108.4 FPS
1440p
68.3 FPS
2160p
79.4 FPS
2160p
49.6 FPS
w1440p
99.5 FPS
w1440p
62.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
223.4 FPS
1080p
145.2 FPS
1440p
174.8 FPS
1440p
112.8 FPS
2160p
130.3 FPS
2160p
83.0 FPS
w1440p
161.3 FPS
w1440p
103.7 FPS
i9-10900K
    FX-8320 Eight-Core

      Compare i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core specifications

      i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Architecture

      i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Cache

      i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Cores

      i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Features

      i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Notes

      i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Performance

      i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core Physical

      i9-10900K FX-8320 Eight-Core

      Compare i9-10900K vs FX-8320 Eight-Core in more games


      Discussion and Comments

      Share Your Comments