i3-9320 vs i3-12100 - Need For Speed: Payback Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9320 i3-12100

Multi-Thread Performance

10144 Pts
12603 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2552 Pts
3340 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-9320 vs i3-12100 in Need For Speed: Payback using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9320 i3-12100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
66.6 FPS
1080p
70.9 FPS
1440p
48.1 FPS
1440p
51.2 FPS
2160p
33.6 FPS
2160p
35.7 FPS
w1440p
43.7 FPS
w1440p
46.5 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
111.7 FPS
1080p
117.8 FPS
1440p
84.6 FPS
1440p
89.2 FPS
2160p
62.1 FPS
2160p
65.4 FPS
w1440p
77.9 FPS
w1440p
82.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
156.8 FPS
1080p
164.7 FPS
1440p
121.1 FPS
1440p
127.3 FPS
2160p
90.6 FPS
2160p
95.2 FPS
w1440p
112.1 FPS
w1440p
117.8 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
247.0 FPS
1080p
258.5 FPS
1440p
194.1 FPS
1440p
203.4 FPS
2160p
147.6 FPS
2160p
154.7 FPS
w1440p
180.5 FPS
w1440p
189.2 FPS
i3-9320
  • The i3-9320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-9320 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i3-12100 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12100 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12100 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-9320 vs i3-12100 specifications

i3-9320 vs i3-12100 Architecture

i3-9320 i3-12100
CodenameCoffee LakeAlder Lake-S
GenerationCore i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Core i3 (Alder Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Part#unknownSRL62
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-9320 vs i3-12100 Cache

i3-9320 i3-12100
Cache L164K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)1.25MB (per core)
Cache L36MB (shared)12MB (shared)

i3-9320 vs i3-12100 Cores

i3-9320 i3-12100
# of Cores44
# of Threads48
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630UHD Graphics 730
SMP # CPUs11

i3-9320 vs i3-12100 Performance

i3-9320 i3-12100
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplier37.0x33.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP62 W60 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzup to 4.3 GHz

i3-9320 vs i3-12100 Physical

i3-9320 i3-12100
Die Sizeunknown163 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1700

Compare i3-9320 vs i3-12100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments