i3-9320 vs i3-12100 - Dead Space Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9320 i3-12100

Multi-Thread Performance

10144 Pts
12603 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2552 Pts
3340 Pts

Dead Space

i3-9320 vs i3-12100 in Dead Space using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9320 i3-12100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
32.5 FPS
1080p
34.6 FPS
1440p
21.7 FPS
1440p
23.1 FPS
2160p
8.6 FPS
2160p
9.2 FPS
w1440p
16.3 FPS
w1440p
17.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
60.3 FPS
1080p
63.7 FPS
1440p
42.5 FPS
1440p
44.9 FPS
2160p
18.8 FPS
2160p
20.0 FPS
w1440p
33.1 FPS
w1440p
34.8 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
88.2 FPS
1080p
92.8 FPS
1440p
63.3 FPS
1440p
66.6 FPS
2160p
29.1 FPS
2160p
30.8 FPS
w1440p
49.9 FPS
w1440p
52.4 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
143.9 FPS
1080p
151.0 FPS
1440p
104.8 FPS
1440p
110.1 FPS
2160p
49.5 FPS
2160p
52.3 FPS
w1440p
83.4 FPS
w1440p
87.5 FPS
i3-9320
  • The i3-9320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-9320 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The i3-12100 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12100 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12100 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-9320 vs i3-12100 specifications

i3-9320 vs i3-12100 Architecture

i3-9320 i3-12100
CodenameCoffee LakeAlder Lake-S
GenerationCore i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Core i3 (Alder Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel
Part#unknownSRL62
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-9320 vs i3-12100 Cache

i3-9320 i3-12100
Cache L164K (per core)80K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)1.25MB (per core)
Cache L36MB (shared)12MB (shared)

i3-9320 vs i3-12100 Cores

i3-9320 i3-12100
# of Cores44
# of Threads48
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630UHD Graphics 730
SMP # CPUs11

i3-9320 vs i3-12100 Performance

i3-9320 i3-12100
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3.3 GHz
Multiplier37.0x33.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP62 W60 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzup to 4.3 GHz

i3-9320 vs i3-12100 Physical

i3-9320 i3-12100
Die Sizeunknown163 mm²
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA16A
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1700

Compare i3-9320 vs i3-12100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments