i3-7300 vs i5-12600K - Need For Speed: Payback Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-7300 i5-12600K

Multi-Thread Performance

6436 Pts
17640 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2317 Pts
3590 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-7300 vs i5-12600K in Need For Speed: Payback using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-7300 i5-12600K

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
56.3 FPS
1080p
77.3 FPS
1440p
40.6 FPS
1440p
54.7 FPS
2160p
28.4 FPS
2160p
38.2 FPS
w1440p
36.9 FPS
w1440p
49.7 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
96.8 FPS
1080p
126.8 FPS
1440p
73.1 FPS
1440p
94.4 FPS
2160p
53.7 FPS
2160p
69.4 FPS
w1440p
67.3 FPS
w1440p
87.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
137.3 FPS
1080p
176.2 FPS
1440p
105.6 FPS
1440p
134.2 FPS
2160p
79.0 FPS
2160p
100.6 FPS
w1440p
97.8 FPS
w1440p
124.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
218.3 FPS
1080p
275.2 FPS
1440p
170.7 FPS
1440p
213.7 FPS
2160p
129.5 FPS
2160p
162.9 FPS
w1440p
158.7 FPS
w1440p
198.9 FPS
i3-7300
  • The i3-7300 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-7300 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i5-12600K
  • The i5-12600K has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i5-12600K has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i5-12600K has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i5-12600K has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.

Compare i3-7300 vs i5-12600K specifications

i3-7300 vs i5-12600K Architecture

i3-7300 i5-12600K
CodenameKaby LakeAlder Lake
GenerationCore i3 (Kaby Lake)Core i5 (Alder Lake-S)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR4-3200 MHz Dual-channel
Part#SR359unknown
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-7300 vs i5-12600K Cache

i3-7300 i5-12600K
Cache L164K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)9.5MB (shared)
Cache L34MB (shared)20MB (shared)

i3-7300 vs i5-12600K Cores

i3-7300 i5-12600K
# of Cores210
# of Threads416
Integrated GraphicsIntel HD 630UHD Graphics 770
SMP # CPUs11

i3-7300 vs i5-12600K Features

i3-7300 i5-12600K

i3-7300 vs i5-12600K Performance

i3-7300 i5-12600K
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency4 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier40.0x37.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoYes
TDP51 W125 W
Turbo ClockN/Aup to 4.9 GHz

i3-7300 vs i5-12600K Physical

i3-7300 i5-12600K
Die Sizeunknownunknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA1151FC-LGA1700
Process Size14 nm10 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151Intel Socket 1700
Transistorsunknownunknown
tCaseMax65°C72°C

Compare i3-7300 vs i5-12600K in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments