i3-12100 vs i3-10300 - Need For Speed: Payback GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i3-10300

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
10980 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
2690 Pts

Need For Speed: Payback

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 in Need For Speed: Payback using GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i3-10300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
70.5 FPS
1080p
68.6 FPS
1440p
51.0 FPS
1440p
49.6 FPS
2160p
35.3 FPS
2160p
34.3 FPS
w1440p
46.1 FPS
w1440p
44.9 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
117.2 FPS
1080p
114.6 FPS
1440p
88.9 FPS
1440p
86.8 FPS
2160p
64.8 FPS
2160p
63.2 FPS
w1440p
81.6 FPS
w1440p
79.7 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
164.0 FPS
1080p
160.5 FPS
1440p
126.9 FPS
1440p
124.1 FPS
2160p
94.3 FPS
2160p
92.1 FPS
w1440p
117.0 FPS
w1440p
114.6 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
257.5 FPS
1080p
252.4 FPS
1440p
202.8 FPS
1440p
198.6 FPS
2160p
153.3 FPS
2160p
150.0 FPS
w1440p
187.9 FPS
w1440p
184.2 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10300
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-10300 specifications

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Architecture

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Cache

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Cores

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Performance

i3-12100 i3-10300
Frequency3.3 GHz3.70 GHz
TDP60 W65 W

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Physical

i3-12100 i3-10300

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-10300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments