i3-12100 vs i3-10300 - Godfall GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i3-10300

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
10980 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
2690 Pts

Godfall

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 in Godfall using GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i3-10300

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
57.5 FPS
1080p
55.9 FPS
1440p
38.4 FPS
1440p
37.3 FPS
2160p
18.3 FPS
2160p
17.8 FPS
w1440p
30.3 FPS
w1440p
29.5 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
98.6 FPS
1080p
96.2 FPS
1440p
69.7 FPS
1440p
68.0 FPS
2160p
36.6 FPS
2160p
35.7 FPS
w1440p
56.8 FPS
w1440p
55.5 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
139.6 FPS
1080p
136.5 FPS
1440p
101.0 FPS
1440p
98.6 FPS
2160p
54.9 FPS
2160p
53.7 FPS
w1440p
83.3 FPS
w1440p
81.5 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
221.7 FPS
1080p
217.1 FPS
1440p
163.6 FPS
1440p
160.0 FPS
2160p
91.5 FPS
2160p
89.5 FPS
w1440p
136.2 FPS
w1440p
133.4 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
i3-10300
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-10300 specifications

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Architecture

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Cache

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Cores

i3-12100 i3-10300

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Performance

i3-12100 i3-10300
Frequency3.3 GHz3.70 GHz
TDP60 W65 W

i3-12100 vs i3-10300 Physical

i3-12100 i3-10300

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-10300 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments