i3-9320 vs Phenom II X4 B95 - Need For Speed: Heat Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9320 Phenom II X4 B95

Multi-Thread Performance

10144 Pts
3708 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2552 Pts
1048 Pts

Need For Speed: Heat

i3-9320 vs Phenom II X4 B95 in Need For Speed: Heat using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9320 Phenom II X4 B95

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
44.6 FPS
1080p
21.1 FPS
1440p
34.9 FPS
1440p
16.5 FPS
2160p
22.0 FPS
2160p
10.4 FPS
w1440p
30.5 FPS
w1440p
14.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
79.3 FPS
1080p
41.5 FPS
1440p
64.2 FPS
1440p
33.4 FPS
2160p
43.0 FPS
2160p
22.3 FPS
w1440p
57.1 FPS
w1440p
29.7 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
114.0 FPS
1080p
61.8 FPS
1440p
93.4 FPS
1440p
50.4 FPS
2160p
64.0 FPS
2160p
34.1 FPS
w1440p
83.7 FPS
w1440p
44.9 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
183.3 FPS
1080p
102.5 FPS
1440p
152.0 FPS
1440p
84.2 FPS
2160p
106.0 FPS
2160p
57.9 FPS
w1440p
136.9 FPS
w1440p
75.5 FPS
i3-9320
  • The i3-9320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-9320 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Phenom II X4 B95
  • The Phenom II X4 B95 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Phenom II X4 B95 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The Phenom II X4 B95 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The Phenom II X4 B95 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-9320 vs Phenom II X4 B95 specifications

i3-9320 vs Phenom II X4 B95 Architecture

i3-9320 Phenom II X4 B95
CodenameCoffee LakeDeneb
GenerationCore i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Phenom II X4 (Deneb)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownHDXB95WFK4DGI
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedApr 2019Oct 2009

i3-9320 vs Phenom II X4 B95 Cache

i3-9320 Phenom II X4 B95
Cache L164K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L36MB (shared)6MB (shared)

i3-9320 vs Phenom II X4 B95 Cores

i3-9320 Phenom II X4 B95
# of Cores44
# of Threads44
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-9320 vs Phenom II X4 B95 Performance

i3-9320 Phenom II X4 B95
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier37.0x15.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP62 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.425 V

i3-9320 vs Phenom II X4 B95 Physical

i3-9320 Phenom II X4 B95
Die Sizeunknown258 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1151µPGA
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown758 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i3-9320 vs Phenom II X4 B95 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments