i3-9320 vs Phenom II X4 B95 - Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-9320 Phenom II X4 B95

Multi-Thread Performance

10144 Pts
3708 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2552 Pts
1048 Pts

Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation

i3-9320 vs Phenom II X4 B95 in Ashes of the Singularity: Escalation using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-9320 Phenom II X4 B95

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
51.0 FPS
1080p
24.1 FPS
1440p
43.5 FPS
1440p
20.5 FPS
2160p
34.2 FPS
2160p
16.2 FPS
w1440p
41.6 FPS
w1440p
19.6 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
88.9 FPS
1080p
46.5 FPS
1440p
77.6 FPS
1440p
40.4 FPS
2160p
63.1 FPS
2160p
32.9 FPS
w1440p
74.7 FPS
w1440p
38.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
126.9 FPS
1080p
69.0 FPS
1440p
111.7 FPS
1440p
60.3 FPS
2160p
91.9 FPS
2160p
49.6 FPS
w1440p
107.7 FPS
w1440p
58.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
202.8 FPS
1080p
113.9 FPS
1440p
179.9 FPS
1440p
100.2 FPS
2160p
149.6 FPS
2160p
83.0 FPS
w1440p
173.9 FPS
w1440p
96.7 FPS
i3-9320
  • The i3-9320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.
  • The i3-9320 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
Phenom II X4 B95
  • The Phenom II X4 B95 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • The Phenom II X4 B95 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The Phenom II X4 B95 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The Phenom II X4 B95 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.

Compare i3-9320 vs Phenom II X4 B95 specifications

i3-9320 vs Phenom II X4 B95 Architecture

i3-9320 Phenom II X4 B95
CodenameCoffee LakeDeneb
GenerationCore i3 (Coffee Lake Refresh)Phenom II X4 (Deneb)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4DDR3
Part#unknownHDXB95WFK4DGI
Production StatusActiveEnd-of-life
ReleasedApr 2019Oct 2009

i3-9320 vs Phenom II X4 B95 Cache

i3-9320 Phenom II X4 B95
Cache L164K (per core)128K (per core)
Cache L2256K (per core)512K (per core)
Cache L36MB (shared)6MB (shared)

i3-9320 vs Phenom II X4 B95 Cores

i3-9320 Phenom II X4 B95
# of Cores44
# of Threads44
Integrated GraphicsUHD 630N/A
SMP # CPUs11

i3-9320 vs Phenom II X4 B95 Performance

i3-9320 Phenom II X4 B95
Base Clock100 MHz200 MHz
Frequency3.7 GHz3 GHz
Multiplier37.0x15.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP62 W95 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.4 GHzN/A
Voltagevariable1.425 V

i3-9320 vs Phenom II X4 B95 Physical

i3-9320 Phenom II X4 B95
Die Sizeunknown258 mm²
PackageFC-LGA1151µPGA
Process Size14 nm45 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1151AMD Socket AM3
Transistorsunknown758 million
tCaseMax72°Cunknown

Compare i3-9320 vs Phenom II X4 B95 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments