i9-13900K vs i3-10100 - Microsoft Flight Simulator Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-13900K i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

34549 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

4683 Pts
2531 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i9-13900K vs i3-10100 in Microsoft Flight Simulator using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-13900K i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
17.7 FPS
1080p
14.8 FPS
1440p
14.9 FPS
1440p
13.0 FPS
2160p
11.6 FPS
2160p
10.1 FPS
w1440p
14.1 FPS
w1440p
12.4 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
35.6 FPS
1080p
30.4 FPS
1440p
30.6 FPS
1440p
27.1 FPS
2160p
24.5 FPS
2160p
21.7 FPS
w1440p
29.1 FPS
w1440p
26.0 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
53.4 FPS
1080p
46.0 FPS
1440p
46.2 FPS
1440p
41.2 FPS
2160p
37.4 FPS
2160p
33.3 FPS
w1440p
44.1 FPS
w1440p
39.6 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
89.1 FPS
1080p
77.2 FPS
1440p
77.6 FPS
1440p
69.5 FPS
2160p
63.3 FPS
2160p
56.5 FPS
w1440p
74.2 FPS
w1440p
66.8 FPS
i9-13900K
    i3-10100
    • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
    • The i3-10100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

    Compare i9-13900K vs i3-10100 specifications

    i9-13900K vs i3-10100 Architecture

    i9-13900K i3-10100

    i9-13900K vs i3-10100 Cache

    i9-13900K i3-10100

    i9-13900K vs i3-10100 Cores

    i9-13900K i3-10100

    i9-13900K vs i3-10100 Performance

    i9-13900K i3-10100
    Frequency3 GHz3.60 GHz
    TDP125 W65 W

    i9-13900K vs i3-10100 Physical

    i9-13900K i3-10100

    Compare i9-13900K vs i3-10100 in more games


    Discussion and Comments

    Share Your Comments