i9-13900K vs i3-10100 - F1 2016 Graphics 384SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i9-13900K i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

34549 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

4683 Pts
2531 Pts

F1 2016

i9-13900K vs i3-10100 in F1 2016 using Graphics 384SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i9-13900K i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
65.4 FPS
1080p
54.6 FPS
1440p
53.7 FPS
1440p
46.9 FPS
2160p
34.7 FPS
2160p
30.3 FPS
w1440p
47.3 FPS
w1440p
41.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
110.0 FPS
1080p
94.3 FPS
1440p
93.0 FPS
1440p
82.8 FPS
2160p
63.9 FPS
2160p
56.8 FPS
w1440p
83.4 FPS
w1440p
74.2 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
154.6 FPS
1080p
134.0 FPS
1440p
132.2 FPS
1440p
118.7 FPS
2160p
93.0 FPS
2160p
83.3 FPS
w1440p
119.5 FPS
w1440p
107.1 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
243.8 FPS
1080p
213.4 FPS
1440p
210.7 FPS
1440p
190.4 FPS
2160p
151.3 FPS
2160p
136.2 FPS
w1440p
191.6 FPS
w1440p
172.9 FPS
i9-13900K
    i3-10100
    • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
    • The i3-10100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

    Compare i9-13900K vs i3-10100 specifications

    i9-13900K vs i3-10100 Architecture

    i9-13900K i3-10100

    i9-13900K vs i3-10100 Cache

    i9-13900K i3-10100

    i9-13900K vs i3-10100 Cores

    i9-13900K i3-10100

    i9-13900K vs i3-10100 Performance

    i9-13900K i3-10100
    Frequency3 GHz3.60 GHz
    TDP125 W65 W

    i9-13900K vs i3-10100 Physical

    i9-13900K i3-10100

    Compare i9-13900K vs i3-10100 in more games


    Discussion and Comments

    Share Your Comments