i5-11600K vs i3-10100 - Microsoft Flight Simulator RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - Game Performance Benchmarks


i5-11600K i3-10100

Multi-Thread Performance

14700 Pts
9549 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

2992 Pts
2531 Pts

Microsoft Flight Simulator

i5-11600K vs i3-10100 in Microsoft Flight Simulator using RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i5-11600K i3-10100

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
38.3 FPS
1080p
34.8 FPS
1440p
33.8 FPS
1440p
30.8 FPS
2160p
28.4 FPS
2160p
25.8 FPS
w1440p
33.3 FPS
w1440p
30.3 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
69.5 FPS
1080p
64.0 FPS
1440p
62.4 FPS
1440p
57.6 FPS
2160p
53.7 FPS
2160p
49.4 FPS
w1440p
61.6 FPS
w1440p
56.8 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
100.8 FPS
1080p
93.2 FPS
1440p
91.0 FPS
1440p
84.4 FPS
2160p
79.0 FPS
2160p
73.0 FPS
w1440p
89.9 FPS
w1440p
83.3 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
163.2 FPS
1080p
151.7 FPS
1440p
148.3 FPS
1440p
138.0 FPS
2160p
129.5 FPS
2160p
120.2 FPS
w1440p
146.6 FPS
w1440p
136.2 FPS
i5-11600K
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
i3-10100
  • The i3-10100 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i5-11600K vs i3-10100 specifications

i5-11600K vs i3-10100 Architecture

i5-11600K i3-10100

i5-11600K vs i3-10100 Cache

i5-11600K i3-10100

i5-11600K vs i3-10100 Cores

i5-11600K i3-10100

i5-11600K vs i3-10100 Features

i5-11600K i3-10100

i5-11600K vs i3-10100 Notes

i5-11600K i3-10100

i5-11600K vs i3-10100 Performance

i5-11600K i3-10100
Frequency3.9 GHz3.60 GHz
TDP125 W65 W

i5-11600K vs i3-10100 Physical

i5-11600K i3-10100

Compare i5-11600K vs i3-10100 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments