i3-12100 vs i3-7320 - Anthem Graphics 512SP Mobile - Game Performance Benchmarks


i3-12100 i3-7320

Multi-Thread Performance

12603 Pts
6541 Pts

Single-Thread Performance

3340 Pts
2364 Pts

Anthem

i3-12100 vs i3-7320 in Anthem using Graphics 512SP Mobile - CPU Performance comparison at Ultra, High, Medium, and Low Quality Settings with 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K resolutions

i3-12100 i3-7320

Ultra Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
43.8 FPS
1080p
35.3 FPS
1440p
34.5 FPS
1440p
27.8 FPS
2160p
19.1 FPS
2160p
15.4 FPS
w1440p
28.7 FPS
w1440p
23.1 FPS
High Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
78.1 FPS
1080p
64.8 FPS
1440p
63.5 FPS
1440p
52.7 FPS
2160p
38.0 FPS
2160p
31.5 FPS
w1440p
54.2 FPS
w1440p
44.9 FPS
Medium Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
112.3 FPS
1080p
94.3 FPS
1440p
92.6 FPS
1440p
77.6 FPS
2160p
56.9 FPS
2160p
47.5 FPS
w1440p
79.7 FPS
w1440p
66.6 FPS
Low Quality
Resolution Frames Per Second
1080p
180.8 FPS
1080p
153.3 FPS
1440p
150.7 FPS
1440p
127.4 FPS
2160p
94.7 FPS
2160p
79.7 FPS
w1440p
130.6 FPS
w1440p
110.1 FPS
i3-12100
  • The i3-12100 has higher Level 3 Cache. This is useful when you have substantial multiprocessing workloads, many computationally intense simultaneous processes. More likely on a server, less on a personally used computer for interactive desktop workloads.
  • The i3-12100 has more cores. The benefit of having more cores is that the system can handle more threads. Each core can handle a separate stream of data. This architecture greatly increases the performance of a system that is running concurrent applications.
  • The i3-12100 has more threads. Larger programs are divided into threads (small sections) so that the processor can execute them simultaneously to get faster execution.
  • The i3-12100 has a smaller process size. The faster a transistor can toggle on and off, the faster it can do work. And transistors that turn on and off with less energy are more efficient, reducing the operating power, or “dynamic power consumption,” required by a processor.
i3-7320
  • The i3-7320 has higher Level 2 Cache. Data/instructions which have to be processed can be loaded from the fast L2 and the CPU does not have to wait for the very slow DDR RAM
  • For some games, a cpu with a higher clock speed, or in a technical name IPC (Instructions per clock), has better results than other CPU's with higher core count and lower core speed.
  • The i3-7320 is more power efficient and generates less heat.

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-7320 specifications

i3-12100 vs i3-7320 Architecture

i3-12100 i3-7320
CodenameAlder Lake-SKaby Lake
GenerationCore i3 (Alder Lake-S)Core i3 (Kaby Lake)
MarketDesktopDesktop
Memory SupportDDR4, DDR5 Dual-channelDDR4
Part#SRL62SR358
Production StatusActiveActive

i3-12100 vs i3-7320 Cache

i3-12100 i3-7320
Cache L180K (per core)64K (per core)
Cache L21.25MB (per core)256K (per core)
Cache L312MB (shared)4MB (shared)

i3-12100 vs i3-7320 Cores

i3-12100 i3-7320
# of Cores42
# of Threads84
Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 730Intel HD 630
SMP # CPUs11

i3-12100 vs i3-7320 Performance

i3-12100 i3-7320
Base Clock100 MHz100 MHz
Frequency3.3 GHz4.1 GHz
Multiplier33.0x41.0x
Multiplier UnlockedNoNo
TDP60 W51 W
Turbo Clockup to 4.3 GHzN/A

i3-12100 vs i3-7320 Physical

i3-12100 i3-7320
Die Size163 mm²unknown
FoundryIntelIntel
PackageFC-LGA16AFC-LGA1151
Process Size10 nm14 nm
SocketIntel Socket 1700Intel Socket 1151

Compare i3-12100 vs i3-7320 in more games


Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments