R9 Nano med Phenom 8450 benchmarks ved Lav kvalitet kvalitetsinnstillinger
Ved 1440p kan R9 Nano slå 50-60 fps på stort sett alt på ultra, bare uten antialiasing, mindre omgivende okklusjon og skrudd ned skygger. Denne kombinasjonen mellom R9 Nano og AMD Phenom 8450 Triple-Core kommer til å forårsake alvorlige flaskehalser i mange spill og forårsake alvorlig FPS-tap. Å bestemme om du skal investere så mye penger i en high-end GPU som R9 Nano krever nøye tenkt. Med dagens 4096 MB RAM kan R9 Nano ha svært få minnerelaterte flaskehalser i mer moderne spill.
The release year of the graphics card. The newer the better technology and performance optimization and
driver support.
Year
2016
2019
13
2015
2016
11
2014
2015
8
2013
2014
4
2007
2013
2
The price of the graphics card. The cheaper the better.
Price
0
250
35
250
400
30
400
550
25
550
650
15
650
9999
5
Power Supply Wattage required for overall system. The lower the better.
PSU
0
350
4
350
450
4
450
550
3
550
650
2
650
9999
1
Maximum recorded temperature under load. The lower the better for longer life of the graphics card.
Temp
0
70
2
70
75
2
75
80
1
80
85
1
85
999
1
Noise Levels under load. The lower the better.
Noise
0
45
2
45
48
2
48
50
2
50
55
1
55
999
1
Full HD performance at 1080p resolution. The higher the better.
FHD
60
9999
18
55
60
13
45
55
11
35
45
7
0
35
5
Quad HD performance at 1440p resolution. The higher the better.
QHD
60
9999
10
55
60
8
45
55
5
35
45
4
0
35
2
4K performance at 2160p resolution. The higher the better.
F4K
60
9999
5
55
60
4
45
55
3
35
45
2
0
35
1
Current CPU Impact on performance with respect to the highest performing CPU used for benchmark at the
time this graphics card was released.
CPU
-5
9999
5
-7
-5
4
-10
-7
3
-15
-10
2
-9999
-15
1
Graphics card memory (RAM) capacity. The higher the better for higher resolution textures and future
demanding games.
MEM
8
9999
5
4
8
4
2
4
3
1
2
2
0
1
1
FROM
TO
VERDICT
The overall score is determined based on the calculated weightings for the individual components.
OVERALL SCORE
80
99
Excellent
70
80
Very Good
60
70
Good
40
60
Acceptable
0
40
Weak
66/100
Flink
R9 Nano er mye dyrere enn R9 390 ettersom den koster en enorm kr 5685.2. Sammenlign dette med R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 390X, som opprinnelig kom til en pris av kr 2882, kr 3758. I mellomtiden er NVIDIA nærmeste ekvivalente kort GTX 980 som koster kr 4809.2. Spesiell for spesifikasjoner, denne R9 Nano hopper fra sin direkte forgjenger, R9 390, ved å skryte av 19.1 % flere fps.
Heldigvis var spillytelsen ganske imponerende. R9 Nano leverer kontinuerlig gode bildefrekvensøkninger over R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 390X og det rettferdiggjør virkelig en oppgradering. Sammenlignet med NVIDIA sin nærmeste rival, GTX 980, var R9 Nano -3.7 % tregere.
For 1080p Full HD kunne vi spille Hitman 3, Monster Hunter: World, Guardians of the Galaxy, Watch Dogs: Legion, Final Fantasy XV på 60 fps til 63 fps og holdt bildefrekvensene svevet rundt 61 fps. For 1440p Quad HD kunne vi spille Call of Duty Modern Warfare, World War Z, Overwatch 2, Strange Brigade, Fallout 76 på 63 fps til 70 fps og holdt bildefrekvensene svevet rundt 65 fps.
For 2160p 4K kunne vi spille Valorant på 102 fps til 102 fps og holdt bildefrekvensene svevet rundt 102 fps.
R9 Nano sitter mellom RX 590 og GTX 980 og faller langsommere enn RX 590 med 4 % og raskere enn GTX 980 med 1.7 %. Det har en sterk relativ ytelse mot hvert grafikkort her. R9 Nano 's ytelse i dette spillet svømmer rundt 60fps-merket. Mot sin rival - GTX 980 , er R9 Nano mye tregere.
R9 Nano sitter mellom GTX 970 og R9 390X og faller langsommere enn GTX 970 med 0.5 % og raskere enn R9 390X med 7.7 %. Det har en gjennomsnittlig relativ ytelse mot hvert grafikkort her. Resultatene kan faktisk ikke skilles fra GTX 970 . Mot sin rival - GTX 980 , er R9 Nano mye tregere.
R9 Nano sitter mellom RX 590 og GTX 980 og faller langsommere enn RX 590 med 4 % og raskere enn GTX 980 med 1.7 %. Det har en sterk relativ ytelse mot hvert grafikkort her. R9 Nano 's ytelse i dette spillet svømmer rundt 60fps-merket. Mot sin rival - GTX 980 , er R9 Nano mye tregere.
R9 Nano sitter mellom GTX 980 og GTX 1060 6GB og faller langsommere enn GTX 980 med 4.2 % og raskere enn GTX 1060 6GB med 0.8 %. Det har en gjennomsnittlig relativ ytelse mot hvert grafikkort her. Mot sin rival - GTX 980 , er R9 Nano mye tregere.
R9 Nano sitter mellom RX 590 og GTX 980 og faller langsommere enn RX 590 med 3.6 % og raskere enn GTX 980 med 1.7 %. Det har en sterk relativ ytelse mot hvert grafikkort her. De som har en høy oppdateringsfrekvensmonitor vil glede seg over hva R9 Nano har å tilby når det gjennomsnitt 139.03402599969 fps. Mot sin rival - GTX 980 , er R9 Nano mye tregere.
The AMD Radeon R9 Nano shows that you don’t always have to be the fastest to win the race. Some races are more of a marathon, and it’s more important to pace yourself well. MORE: Best Graphics ...
The Radeon R9 Nano is the fruition of AMD's gamble of integrating stacked high-bandwidth memory (HBM) and a 4,096 SP pixel-grinder into a compact multi-chip module that eliminates the need for external memory chips, freeing up large swathes of PCB area.
The new Radeon R9 Nano is the little brother to the existing AMD Radeon R9 Fury cards – in water-cooled 'X' and air-cooled standard models – and deserves that distinction in more ways than one.
AMD seems to have hit all the cues it set out to with the Radeon R9 Nano. This card is ridiculously tiny in light of other high-end GPUs, its power consumption characteristics are significantly ...
AMD's R9 Nano is a graphics card that serves its (very) niche high-end small form factor market well but its premium pricing makes it unaffordable to many small form factor system builders, and ...
AMD's R9 Nano is a hell of a little graphics card, delivering near-R9 Fury X performance in a compact mini-ITX form-factor. It's also expensive—very expensive—at $650, matching the price of ...
The AMD Radeon R9 Fury Nano is one of the most exciting graphics cards I’ve seen for years and, at only 6in long, it’s also one of the smallest. ... Verdict. AMD’s latest card is one of its ...
While AMD is pegging the Radeon R9 Nano as a luxury card, a component that isn't meant to be about value for money, rather it's all about getting the maximum performance for a small form factor PC ...
With the Radeon R9 Nano at the heart of our test rig, it consumed over 90 fewer watts than the Fury X--AMD's specified power ratings are in-line with our testing.
AMD Radeon R9 Nano Overclocking Results Extra performance with the R9 Nano comes in two distinct areas, overclocking and power management. Interestingly, AMD lets users unlock the power management ...
The R9 Nano is stunningly powerful given its Mini-ITX-friendly form factor, and a true leap ahead for AMD. Just know that this is a specialized component meant for very tight, compact PCs, and ...
As it turns out, AMD's Radeon R9 Nano is a great piece of hardware; there's really nothing like it out there. That’s probably why AMD is setting its price at an eye-popping $649. A lack of ...
The Radeon R9 Nano is AMD's solution for all small-form-factor system builders that want to create a 4K-capable gaming PC in a tiny volume. Thanks to a new approach to power management, the card stays below 200 W at all times, while still delivering excellent framerates.
AMD Radeon R9 Nano - the Digital Foundry verdict The R9 Nano packs an unprecedented amount of rendering power into an absolutely tiny product, and possesses superb build quality.
AMD deserves some serious props for even creating the Radeon R9 Nano in the first place. This pint-sized powerhouse is the latest in a long line of AMD technical innovations that skate to where ...
We’ll have a full suite of Radeon R9 Nano benchmarks recorded in our ultra-high-end graphics test-bed, along with comparison numbers from an array of other high-end GPUs, a little later.
AMD’s itty-bitty Radeon R9 Nano isn’t due to launch until September 10, but a review unit landed on my doorstep today. Sadly, I can’t talk about its performance until then, but an AMD ...
The Radeon R9 Nano is a high-end graphics card by AMD, launched in August 2015. Built on the 28 nm process, and based on the Fiji graphics processor, in its Fiji XT CA variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.
The AMD Radeon R9 Nano finished just behind the Radeon R9 Fury here, but well ahead of the R9 390 or similarly-sized GeForce GTX 970 mini (the Asus GeForce GTX 970 Direct-CU mini to be exact).
As it turns out, AMD's Radeon R9 Nano is a great piece of hardware; there's really nothing like it out there. That’s probably why AMD is setting its price at an eye-popping $649.
Meanwhile at the other end of the spectrum is the Radeon R9 Nano, which sees AMD push the limits on miniaturization and pack Fiji into a card just 6 inches long.
Hva du bør vurdere før du kjøper et grafikkort
Hvis du har planlagt å oppgradere systemet ved å kjøpe et nytt grafikkort. Deretter er det noen viktige faktorer å vurdere.
Oppløsning VS Kvalitet: Påvirkning på spillytelse
Hva påvirker spillytelsen? Klarhet eller detaljer?
Ultra VS høy kvalitet innstillinger i PC-spill
Hver spiller har et annet begrep om den ideelle innstillingen for PC-spill. Men i de fleste tilfeller velger du en grafikkkonfigurasjon av høy kvalitet.
Hva er CPU eller GPU flaskehalser?
Får du plutselige rammedråper? du kan ha en flaskehals.
Hva er akseptabel FPS-hastighet for meg?
For noen spill kan du fortsatt nyte flotte gaver ved lavere rammepriser.
GPU Hierarchy
GPU Compare
CPU Compare
Gaming Laptops
Gaming Monitors
Gaming Headsets
Diskusjon og kommentarer
Del dine kommentarer