R9 Nano 품질 Phenom 9600B 설정에서 중간 품질 벤치 마크와

1440p에서, R9 Nano 거의 모든 것에 50-60 fps를 칠 수, 안티 앨리어싱 없이, 덜 앰비언트 오 클 루 젼과 그림자를 해제. 이 조합은 R9 Nano AMD Phenom 9600B Quad-Core 많은 게임에서 심각한 병목 현상을 일으키고 심각한 FPS 손실을 유발할 것입니다. 세심 한 생각을 필요로 하는 것 처럼 R9 Nano 하이 엔드 GPU에 너무 많은 돈을 투자 여부를 결정. 현재 4096 MB RAM R9 Nano , 더 현대 게임에서 거의 메모리 관련 병목을 가질 수 있습니다.

 R9 Nano 품질 Phenom 9600B 설정에서 중간 품질 벤치 마크와
AMD Radeon R9 Nano
가격 ₩ 1,727,311.3
2015
최대 기록 온도 73C
최대 팬 소음 45.8dB
권장 전원 공급 장치 525W
벤치 마크 CPU AMD Phenom 9600B Quad-Core ($147.19)
FPS에 CPU 영향 -34.8 FPS
FPS%에 CPU 영향 -50.0%
벤치 마크 품질 설정 Medium Quality Settings
평균 1080p 성능 96.3 FPS
평균 1440p 성능 76.5 FPS
(Ultrawide) 평균 1440p 성능 67.3 FPS
평균 4k 성능 50.4 FPS
메모리 4 GB
프레임 당 1080p 비용 ₩ 20,255.5
프레임 당 1440p 비용 ₩ 26,853.0
(Ultrawide) 프레임 당 1440p 비용 ₩ 31,337.9
프레임 당 4K 비용 ₩ 44,431.1
시리즈 R9 Nano
Variant AMD Radeon R9 Nano
전체 조합 점수 60/100 좋은

R9 Nano 훨씬 더 비싼보다 R9 390 는 무려 비용으로 ₩ 733175.3. 받는 사람이 비교 R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 390X 의 가격으로 원래 온, ₩ 371671.3, ₩ 484641.3. 한편, NVIDIA 가장 가까운 해당 카드가있다 GTX 980 요금 ₩ 620205.3. 사양에 대한 사양 인이 R9 Nano 은 19.1 % 더 많은 fps를 자랑함으로써 R9 390 의 R9 390 뛰어 넘습니다.

다행히도 게임 성능은 매우 인상적이었습니다. R9 Nano 은 R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 390X 비해 지속적으로 뛰어난 프레임 속도를 제공하며 실제로 업그레이드를 정당화합니다. NVIDIA 의 가장 가까운 라이벌 인 GTX 980 과 비교하여 R9 Nano 은 -3.7 % 느 렸습니다.

1080p Full HD 경우 60 fps ~ 63 fps에서 Hitman 3, Monster Hunter: World, Guardians of the Galaxy, Watch Dogs: Legion, Final Fantasy XV 을 (를) 재생할 수 있었고 은 61 fps 주위의 프레임 속도를 유지했습니다. 1440p Quad HD 경우 63 fps ~ 70 fps에서 Call of Duty Modern Warfare, World War Z, Overwatch 2, Strange Brigade, Fallout 76 을 (를) 재생할 수 있었고 은 65 fps 주위의 프레임 속도를 유지했습니다.

2160p 4K 경우 102 fps ~ 102 fps에서 Valorant 을 (를) 재생할 수 있었고 은 102 fps 주위의 프레임 속도를 유지했습니다.

Assassin's Creed Valhalla (2020)

중간 품질

해상도 1920x1080

그래픽 카드 가격 초당 프레임
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 ₩ 563,720
118.2 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti ₩ 462,047
117.4 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 ₩ 450,750
115.2 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X ₩ 1,128,570
114.8 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 295X2 ₩ 1,693,420
113.3 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 ₩ 450,750
110.7 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti ₩ 733,175
94.1 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY X ₩ 733,175
92.8 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 ₩ 315,186
92.1 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 Nano ₩ 733,175
41.8 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 ₩ 620,205
86.9 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY ₩ 620,205
84.6 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 ₩ 258,701
82.4 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ₩ 286,944
81.0 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK ₩ 1,128,570
80.6 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 ₩ 1,128,570
79.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 480 ₩ 451,880
78.3 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB ₩ 192,049
78.3 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon HD 7990 ₩ 1,128,570
78.1 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X ₩ 484,641
77.8 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti ₩ 789,660
76.9 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 ₩ 190,919
76.7 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN ₩ 1,128,570
76.0 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 ₩ 371,671
75.3 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290X ₩ 620,205
74.4 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390 ₩ 371,671
74.1 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290 ₩ 450,750
70.2 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 ₩ 202,216
69.5 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 ₩ 733,175
64.2 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition ₩ 563,720
58.9 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380X ₩ 258,701
58.6 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 280X ₩ 337,780
58.4 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 ₩ 450,750
56.2 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti ₩ 190,919
54.9 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 ₩ 563,720
53.9 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 ₩ 281,295
52.9 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 ₩ 224,810
52.6 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 ₩ 315,186
52.1 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 ₩ 224,810
51.6 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 ₩ 450,750
50.4 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 ₩ 281,295
47.3 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7950 ₩ 507,235
45.7 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti ₩ 337,780
44.9 FPS

R9 Nano 사이 앉는 RX 590 및 GTX 980 보다 느린 하강 RX 590 의해 4.2 % 및보다 빠른 GTX 980 의해 1.8 %. 여기의 모든 그래픽 카드에 비해 강력한 상대 성능을 제공합니다. 경쟁사 인 GTX 980 에 비해 R9 Nano 는 훨씬 느립니다.

Forza Horizon 4 (2018)

중간 품질

해상도 1920x1080

그래픽 카드 가격 초당 프레임
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti ₩ 462,047
223.3 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X ₩ 1,128,570
215.1 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 ₩ 450,750
208.5 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti ₩ 733,175
205.1 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 ₩ 563,720
200.1 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 ₩ 450,750
196.7 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 ₩ 315,186
173.0 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 ₩ 620,205
168.5 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ₩ 286,944
163.4 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 ₩ 258,701
159.8 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY X ₩ 733,175
159.4 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB ₩ 192,049
156.8 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 ₩ 371,671
150.8 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 Nano ₩ 733,175
72.5 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X ₩ 484,641
138.6 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN ₩ 1,128,570
132.8 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290 ₩ 450,750
130.8 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390 ₩ 371,671
128.9 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 ₩ 190,919
128.9 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 ₩ 202,216
114.8 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti ₩ 789,660
109.8 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 ₩ 733,175
106.5 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380X ₩ 258,701
104.4 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 ₩ 224,810
100.1 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 ₩ 224,810
100.1 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti ₩ 190,919
98.4 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290X ₩ 620,205
98.0 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 ₩ 563,720
98.0 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 ₩ 450,750
93.7 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 ₩ 281,295
87.1 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 ₩ 281,295
86.0 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 ₩ 450,750
83.5 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 ₩ 315,186
80.3 FPS

R9 Nano 사이 앉는 GTX 970 및 R9 390X 보다 느린 하강 GTX 970 의해 0.5 % 및보다 빠른 R9 390X 의해 8.3 %. 여기의 모든 그래픽 카드에 대한 평균 상대 성능이 있습니다. 결과는 실제로 GTX 970 의 결과와 구별 할 수 없습니다. 경쟁사 인 GTX 980 에 비해 R9 Nano 는 훨씬 느립니다.

Cyberpunk 2077 (2020)

중간 품질

해상도 1920x1080

그래픽 카드 가격 초당 프레임
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 ₩ 563,720
118.2 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti ₩ 462,047
117.4 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 ₩ 450,750
115.2 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X ₩ 1,128,570
114.8 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 295X2 ₩ 1,693,420
113.3 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 ₩ 450,750
110.7 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti ₩ 733,175
94.1 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY X ₩ 733,175
92.8 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 ₩ 315,186
92.1 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 Nano ₩ 733,175
41.8 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 ₩ 620,205
86.9 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY ₩ 620,205
84.6 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 ₩ 258,701
82.4 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ₩ 286,944
81.0 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK ₩ 1,128,570
80.6 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 ₩ 1,128,570
79.0 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 480 ₩ 451,880
78.3 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB ₩ 192,049
78.3 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon HD 7990 ₩ 1,128,570
78.1 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X ₩ 484,641
77.8 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti ₩ 789,660
76.9 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 ₩ 190,919
76.7 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN ₩ 1,128,570
76.0 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 ₩ 371,671
75.3 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290X ₩ 620,205
74.4 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390 ₩ 371,671
74.1 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290 ₩ 450,750
70.2 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 ₩ 202,216
69.5 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 ₩ 733,175
64.2 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition ₩ 563,720
58.9 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380X ₩ 258,701
58.6 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 280X ₩ 337,780
58.4 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 ₩ 450,750
56.2 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti ₩ 190,919
54.9 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 ₩ 563,720
53.9 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 ₩ 281,295
52.9 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 ₩ 224,810
52.6 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 ₩ 315,186
52.1 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 ₩ 224,810
51.6 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 ₩ 450,750
50.4 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 ₩ 281,295
47.3 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7950 ₩ 507,235
45.7 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti ₩ 337,780
44.9 FPS

R9 Nano 사이 앉는 RX 590 및 GTX 980 보다 느린 하강 RX 590 의해 4.2 % 및보다 빠른 GTX 980 의해 1.8 %. 여기의 모든 그래픽 카드에 비해 강력한 상대 성능을 제공합니다. 경쟁사 인 GTX 980 에 비해 R9 Nano 는 훨씬 느립니다.

Grand Theft Auto V (2015)

중간 품질

해상도 1920x1080

그래픽 카드 가격 초당 프레임
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti ₩ 462,047
215.3 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 295X2 ₩ 1,693,420
210.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 ₩ 450,750
202.9 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 ₩ 563,720
187.5 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 ₩ 450,750
187.3 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X ₩ 1,128,570
185.2 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti ₩ 733,175
181.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY X ₩ 733,175
163.1 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 ₩ 315,186
156.4 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 ₩ 620,205
155.1 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 Nano ₩ 733,175
71.6 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ₩ 286,944
147.1 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 ₩ 258,701
144.4 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB ₩ 192,049
141.1 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X ₩ 484,641
140.8 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 ₩ 371,671
137.1 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390 ₩ 371,671
135.7 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN ₩ 1,128,570
128.3 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 ₩ 733,175
126.9 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290 ₩ 450,750
126.3 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 ₩ 190,919
125.5 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290X ₩ 620,205
120.3 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 ₩ 202,216
120.3 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti ₩ 789,660
112.9 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380X ₩ 258,701
100.3 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 ₩ 563,720
99.7 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 ₩ 224,810
98.8 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 ₩ 450,750
96.5 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 ₩ 224,810
95.6 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 ₩ 281,295
95.2 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 ₩ 315,186
95.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti ₩ 190,919
88.6 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 ₩ 450,750
86.0 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 ₩ 281,295
85.1 FPS

R9 Nano 사이 앉는 GTX 980 및 GTX 1060 6GB 보다 느린 하강 GTX 980 의해 4.5 % 및보다 빠른 GTX 1060 6GB 의해 0.9 %. 여기의 모든 그래픽 카드에 대한 평균 상대 성능이 있습니다. 경쟁사 인 GTX 980 에 비해 R9 Nano 는 훨씬 느립니다.

Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)

중간 품질

해상도 1920x1080

그래픽 카드 가격 초당 프레임
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 ₩ 563,720
254.2 FPS
2017 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Ti ₩ 462,047
252.7 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 ₩ 450,750
248.0 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X ₩ 1,128,570
247.2 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 295X2 ₩ 1,693,420
244.1 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 ₩ 450,750
238.9 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti ₩ 733,175
204.8 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY X ₩ 733,175
202.1 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 ₩ 315,186
200.9 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 Nano ₩ 733,175
94.3 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 ₩ 620,205
189.8 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY ₩ 620,205
185.2 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 ₩ 258,701
180.5 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ₩ 286,944
177.5 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK ₩ 1,128,570
177.0 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 ₩ 1,128,570
173.4 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 480 ₩ 451,880
172.1 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB ₩ 192,049
172.1 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon HD 7990 ₩ 1,128,570
171.6 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X ₩ 484,641
171.1 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti ₩ 789,660
169.1 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 ₩ 190,919
168.5 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN ₩ 1,128,570
167.3 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 ₩ 371,671
165.6 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290X ₩ 620,205
164.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390 ₩ 371,671
163.3 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290 ₩ 450,750
155.1 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 ₩ 202,216
153.5 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 ₩ 733,175
142.3 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition ₩ 563,720
131.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380X ₩ 258,701
130.6 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 280X ₩ 337,780
129.7 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 ₩ 450,750
124.9 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti ₩ 190,919
122.3 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 ₩ 563,720
120.1 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 ₩ 281,295
118.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 ₩ 224,810
117.6 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 ₩ 315,186
116.4 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 ₩ 224,810
115.2 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 ₩ 450,750
112.9 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 ₩ 281,295
106.3 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7950 ₩ 507,235
102.5 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti ₩ 337,780
101.2 FPS

R9 Nano 사이 앉는 RX 590 및 GTX 980 보다 느린 하강 RX 590 의해 4 % 및보다 빠른 GTX 980 의해 1.8 %. 여기의 모든 그래픽 카드에 비해 강력한 상대 성능을 제공합니다. 경쟁사 인 GTX 980 에 비해 R9 Nano 는 훨씬 느립니다.

설정에서 중간 품질 게임 성능

품질 설정 변경

해상도 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
게임 초당 프레임
2023 Resident Evil 4
27
67.1
2023 A Plague Tale: Requiem
19
48.8
2023 Hogwarts Legacy
17
43.4
2023 The Last of Us Part I
14
34.7
2023 Forspoken
15
39.3
2023 The Callisto Protocol
12
31.6
2023 Dead Space
19
48.8
2023 Baldur's Gate 3
22
56.4
2023 Armored Core VI
22
56.4
2023 Immortals of Aveum
11
28.8
2023 Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart
20
51.6
2023 Remnant II
12
31.6
2023 Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
16
40.7
2023 Atomic Heart
16
40.7
2023 Starfield
9
22.6
2022 Elden Ring
21
51.9
2022 God of War
20
49.6
2022 Overwatch 2
33
83.0
2022 F1 22
23
56.9
2022 Dying Light 2
22
54.4
2022 Total War: Warhammer III
22
54.4
2022 Spider-Man Remastered
33
81.9
2022 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
25
62.0
2021 Forza Horizon 5
20
50.1
2021 Halo Infinite
16
39.9
2021 Battlefield 2042
27
66.6
2021 Hitman 3
28
69.7
2021 Far Cry 6
26
65.7
2021 Guardians of the Galaxy
28
70.9
2020 Watch Dogs: Legion
28
71.3
2020 Assassin's Creed Valhalla
16
41.8
2020 Microsoft Flight Simulator
11
29.1
2020 Valorant
57
140.8
2020 Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
26
65.9
2020 Death Stranding
30
74.1
2020 Marvel's Avengers
21
51.9
2020 Godfall
29
72.5
2020 Cyberpunk 2077
16
41.8
2019 Apex Legends
32
80.8
2019 Anthem
22
56.2
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
31
77.1
2019 Resident Evil 2
38
95.2
2019 Metro Exodus
19
48.8
2019 World War Z
38
94.3
2019 Gears of War 5
27
66.6
2019 F1 2019
32
80.3
2019 GreedFall
30
73.9
2019 Borderlands 3
22
55.2
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
38
94.3
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
17
42.8
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
25
62.5
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
35
87.3
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
18
46.5
2018 Final Fantasy XV
29
72.5
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
24
59.9
2018 Forza Horizon 4
29
72.5
2018 Fallout 76
31
77.1
2018 Hitman 2
25
62.8
2018 Just Cause 4
26
66.1
2018 Monster Hunter: World
28
70.4
2018 Strange Brigade
40
98.6
2018 Battlefield V
30
74.4
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
25
62.8
2017 Destiny 2
43
107.3
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
25
62.8
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
29
73.2
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
35
86.6
2017 For Honor
44
109.4
2017 Project CARS 2
33
82.6
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
39
96.7
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
26
64.9
2016 Hitman
37
91.5
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
32
80.1
2016 The Division
30
73.9
2016 Overwatch
42
104.6
2016 Dishonored 2
25
63.7
2015 DiRT Rally
47
117.6
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
29
71.6
2015 The Witcher 3
27
68.8
2015 Total War: Attila
26
65.7
2015 Rocket League
102
252.8
2015 Need For Speed
37
92.1
2015 Project CARS
36
89.1
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
58
144.6
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
47
116.8
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
35
87.7
2014 Far Cry 4
33
83.7
2014 GRID Autosport
35
88.2
2014 Shadow of Mordor
43
108.2
2014 The Talos Principle
47
117.4
2013 Crysis 3
32
79.2
2013 Battlefield 4
39
96.1
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
76
189.4
2009 League of Legends
123
305.2

해상도 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
게임 초당 프레임
2023 Resident Evil 4
20
51.6
2023 A Plague Tale: Requiem
15
37.7
2023 Hogwarts Legacy
14
34.7
2023 The Last of Us Part I
11
27.6
2023 Forspoken
11
27.6
2023 The Callisto Protocol
9
23.8
2023 Dead Space
14
34.7
2023 Baldur's Gate 3
19
47.3
2023 Armored Core VI
19
47.3
2023 Immortals of Aveum
8
21.0
2023 Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart
15
37.7
2023 Remnant II
9
22.6
2023 Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
12
31.6
2023 Atomic Heart
12
30.5
2023 Starfield
8
20.4
2022 Elden Ring
17
42.6
2022 God of War
17
43.9
2022 Overwatch 2
29
73.2
2022 F1 22
15
37.7
2022 Dying Light 2
15
37.7
2022 Total War: Warhammer III
16
40.7
2022 Spider-Man Remastered
25
62.0
2022 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
17
43.4
2021 Forza Horizon 5
17
44.1
2021 Halo Infinite
14
36.6
2021 Battlefield 2042
19
47.3
2021 Hitman 3
21
52.6
2021 Far Cry 6
20
51.6
2021 Guardians of the Galaxy
21
53.2
2020 Watch Dogs: Legion
20
50.1
2020 Assassin's Creed Valhalla
15
37.2
2020 Microsoft Flight Simulator
10
26.1
2020 Valorant
48
119.9
2020 Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
21
53.7
2020 Death Stranding
24
60.1
2020 Marvel's Avengers
15
39.1
2020 Godfall
21
51.9
2020 Cyberpunk 2077
16
39.6
2019 Apex Legends
25
63.5
2019 Anthem
18
46.2
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
25
62.5
2019 Resident Evil 2
27
68.8
2019 Metro Exodus
15
39.3
2019 World War Z
29
73.0
2019 Gears of War 5
20
51.1
2019 F1 2019
24
60.3
2019 GreedFall
22
56.4
2019 Borderlands 3
16
41.0
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
29
72.0
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
14
36.1
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
20
51.1
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
23
56.9
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
15
38.0
2018 Final Fantasy XV
22
54.9
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
18
44.4
2018 Forza Horizon 4
25
63.7
2018 Fallout 76
32
79.0
2018 Hitman 2
18
44.4
2018 Just Cause 4
20
51.6
2018 Monster Hunter: World
21
52.4
2018 Strange Brigade
29
73.2
2018 Battlefield V
24
60.8
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
21
51.9
2017 Destiny 2
38
95.2
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
20
49.6
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
20
51.1
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
26
66.1
2017 For Honor
28
70.4
2017 Project CARS 2
25
62.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
36
89.1
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
23
58.9
2016 Hitman
30
73.9
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
24
60.6
2016 The Division
23
58.4
2016 Overwatch
31
77.1
2016 Dishonored 2
22
55.9
2015 DiRT Rally
36
90.2
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
22
54.4
2015 The Witcher 3
22
55.7
2015 Total War: Attila
20
49.6
2015 Rocket League
53
130.8
2015 Need For Speed
30
74.6
2015 Project CARS
28
71.3
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
41
102.0
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
39
97.1
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
27
66.6
2014 Far Cry 4
31
77.8
2014 GRID Autosport
36
89.3
2014 Shadow of Mordor
33
83.7
2014 The Talos Principle
37
92.4
2013 Crysis 3
23
56.7
2013 Battlefield 4
28
70.2
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
66
164.4
2009 League of Legends
79
195.5

해상도 3440x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
게임 초당 프레임
2019 Apex Legends
22
55.7
2019 Anthem
15
39.3
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
21
52.9
2019 Resident Evil 2
23
57.1
2019 Metro Exodus
14
35.3
2019 World War Z
25
63.3
2019 Gears of War 5
18
45.7
2019 F1 2019
21
54.2
2019 GreedFall
18
44.7
2019 Borderlands 3
13
34.4
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
25
63.3
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
13
32.2
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
18
45.7
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
21
52.6
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
14
34.7
2018 Final Fantasy XV
19
47.5
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
15
37.2
2018 Forza Horizon 4
23
57.4
2018 Fallout 76
27
68.0
2018 Hitman 2
15
38.3
2018 Just Cause 4
17
43.4
2018 Monster Hunter: World
17
43.1
2018 Strange Brigade
25
62.5
2018 Battlefield V
20
49.9
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
18
46.5
2017 Destiny 2
32
79.7
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
17
43.1
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
17
43.4
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
24
60.8
2017 For Honor
23
58.6
2017 Project CARS 2
24
61.1
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
35
87.7
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
22
56.4
2016 Hitman
26
64.2
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
20
51.6
2016 The Division
20
50.6
2016 Overwatch
26
64.9
2016 Dishonored 2
21
53.9
2015 DiRT Rally
31
78.1
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
18
45.2
2015 The Witcher 3
19
49.1
2015 Total War: Attila
20
50.1
2015 Rocket League
43
107.7
2015 Need For Speed
27
67.8
2015 Project CARS
26
66.1
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
33
83.7
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
35
87.3
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
23
56.7
2014 Far Cry 4
27
66.6
2014 GRID Autosport
32
81.2
2014 Shadow of Mordor
29
72.0
2014 The Talos Principle
32
80.1
2013 Crysis 3
19
47.0
2013 Battlefield 4
26
66.1
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
67
166.4
2009 League of Legends
63
155.9

해상도 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
게임 초당 프레임
2023 Resident Evil 4
16
40.7
2023 A Plague Tale: Requiem
10
25.6
2023 Hogwarts Legacy
10
25.6
2023 The Last of Us Part I
6
16.0
2023 Forspoken
5
14.4
2023 The Callisto Protocol
5
13.1
2023 Dead Space
6
16.0
2023 Baldur's Gate 3
11
28.8
2023 Armored Core VI
11
28.8
2023 Immortals of Aveum
4
11.0
2023 Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart
9
22.6
2023 Remnant II
5
12.4
2023 Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
7
17.3
2023 Atomic Heart
8
20.4
2023 Starfield
5
14.4
2022 Elden Ring
10
26.4
2022 God of War
14
35.3
2022 Overwatch 2
23
58.1
2022 F1 22
11
28.8
2022 Dying Light 2
11
28.8
2022 Total War: Warhammer III
12
31.6
2022 Spider-Man Remastered
18
46.2
2022 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
11
28.8
2021 Forza Horizon 5
14
35.8
2021 Halo Infinite
10
26.7
2021 Battlefield 2042
13
32.7
2021 Hitman 3
14
34.7
2021 Far Cry 6
12
30.5
2021 Guardians of the Galaxy
12
31.6
2020 Watch Dogs: Legion
14
34.7
2020 Assassin's Creed Valhalla
10
26.7
2020 Microsoft Flight Simulator
8
21.3
2020 Valorant
43
107.1
2020 Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
12
31.6
2020 Death Stranding
16
39.6
2020 Marvel's Avengers
9
22.6
2020 Godfall
11
27.9
2020 Cyberpunk 2077
11
27.6
2019 Apex Legends
16
41.2
2019 Anthem
11
27.6
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
14
36.9
2019 Resident Evil 2
15
38.0
2019 Metro Exodus
10
26.7
2019 World War Z
18
46.0
2019 Gears of War 5
14
34.7
2019 F1 2019
16
41.5
2019 GreedFall
10
26.7
2019 Borderlands 3
9
23.5
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
19
47.0
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
10
24.7
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
14
34.7
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
17
42.3
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
11
27.6
2018 Final Fantasy XV
14
34.7
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
10
25.3
2018 Forza Horizon 4
18
44.4
2018 Fallout 76
19
48.6
2018 Hitman 2
11
27.6
2018 Just Cause 4
12
29.9
2018 Monster Hunter: World
11
28.2
2018 Strange Brigade
17
44.1
2018 Battlefield V
13
32.2
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
14
35.8
2017 Destiny 2
21
53.9
2017 PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
12
31.1
2017 Fortnite Battle Royale
12
30.5
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
19
48.8
2017 For Honor
15
39.3
2017 Project CARS 2
21
53.4
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
31
77.1
2016 Ashes of the Singularity
19
47.5
2016 Hitman
18
46.8
2016 Rise of the Tomb Raider
14
36.4
2016 The Division
14
36.4
2016 Overwatch
18
44.4
2016 Dishonored 2
18
46.0
2015 DiRT Rally
22
56.4
2015 Grand Theft Auto V
12
30.2
2015 The Witcher 3
14
36.9
2015 Total War: Attila
18
44.9
2015 Rocket League
28
70.4
2015 Need For Speed
21
53.4
2015 Project CARS
21
53.4
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
21
54.2
2014 Civilization: Beyond Earth
27
67.3
2014 Dragon Age: Inquisition
16
39.9
2014 Far Cry 4
19
47.3
2014 GRID Autosport
25
64.0
2014 Shadow of Mordor
21
51.9
2014 The Talos Principle
23
58.4
2013 Crysis 3
12
31.6
2013 Battlefield 4
22
54.7
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
61
151.2
2009 League of Legends
38
94.3
R9 Nano with Phenom 9600B at 1080p and 중간 품질 settings
R9 Nano with Phenom 9600B at 1440p and 중간 품질 settings
R9 Nano with Phenom 9600B at 4K and 중간 품질 settings

경쟁사와 비교

R9 Nano 사양

R9 Nano Board Design

Board NumberC882
Length6 inches 152 mm
Outputs1x HDMI3x DisplayPort
Power Connectors1x 8-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP175 W

R9 Nano Clock Speeds

GPU Clock1000 MHz
Memory Clock500 MHz 1000 MHz effective

R9 Nano Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationPirate Islands (R9 300)
Launch Price649 USD
ProductionActive
Release DateAug 27th, 2015

R9 Nano Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL2
OpenGL4.5
Shader Model6
Vulkan1.1.82

R9 Nano Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 3.0
Die Size596 mm²
GPU NameFiji
GPU VariantFiji XT CA (215-0862120)
Process Size28 nm
Transistors8,900 million

R9 Nano Memory

Bandwidth512.0 GB/s
Memory Bus4096 bit
Memory Size4096 MB
Memory TypeHBM

R9 Nano Render Config

Compute Units64
ROPs64
Shading Units4096
TMUs256

R9 Nano Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance8,192 GFLOPS (1:1)
FP32 (float) performance8,192 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance512.0 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate64.00 GPixel/s
Texture Rate256.0 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

The AMD Radeon R9 Nano shows that you don’t always have to be the fastest to win the race. Some races are more of a marathon, and it’s more important to pace yourself well. MORE: Best Graphics ...
The Radeon R9 Nano is the fruition of AMD's gamble of integrating stacked high-bandwidth memory (HBM) and a 4,096 SP pixel-grinder into a compact multi-chip module that eliminates the need for external memory chips, freeing up large swathes of PCB area.
The new Radeon R9 Nano is the little brother to the existing AMD Radeon R9 Fury cards – in water-cooled 'X' and air-cooled standard models – and deserves that distinction in more ways than one.
AMD seems to have hit all the cues it set out to with the Radeon R9 Nano. This card is ridiculously tiny in light of other high-end GPUs, its power consumption characteristics are significantly ...
AMD's R9 Nano is a graphics card that serves its (very) niche high-end small form factor market well but its premium pricing makes it unaffordable to many small form factor system builders, and ...
AMD's R9 Nano is a hell of a little graphics card, delivering near-R9 Fury X performance in a compact mini-ITX form-factor. It's also expensive—very expensive—at $650, matching the price of ...
The AMD Radeon R9 Fury Nano is one of the most exciting graphics cards I’ve seen for years and, at only 6in long, it’s also one of the smallest. ... Verdict. AMD’s latest card is one of its ...
While AMD is pegging the Radeon R9 Nano as a luxury card, a component that isn't meant to be about value for money, rather it's all about getting the maximum performance for a small form factor PC ...
With the Radeon R9 Nano at the heart of our test rig, it consumed over 90 fewer watts than the Fury X--AMD's specified power ratings are in-line with our testing.
AMD Radeon R9 Nano Overclocking Results Extra performance with the R9 Nano comes in two distinct areas, overclocking and power management. Interestingly, AMD lets users unlock the power management ...
The R9 Nano is stunningly powerful given its Mini-ITX-friendly form factor, and a true leap ahead for AMD. Just know that this is a specialized component meant for very tight, compact PCs, and ...
As it turns out, AMD's Radeon R9 Nano is a great piece of hardware; there's really nothing like it out there. That’s probably why AMD is setting its price at an eye-popping $649. A lack of ...
The Radeon R9 Nano is AMD's solution for all small-form-factor system builders that want to create a 4K-capable gaming PC in a tiny volume. Thanks to a new approach to power management, the card stays below 200 W at all times, while still delivering excellent framerates.
AMD Radeon R9 Nano - the Digital Foundry verdict The R9 Nano packs an unprecedented amount of rendering power into an absolutely tiny product, and possesses superb build quality.
AMD deserves some serious props for even creating the Radeon R9 Nano in the first place. This pint-sized powerhouse is the latest in a long line of AMD technical innovations that skate to where ...
We’ll have a full suite of Radeon R9 Nano benchmarks recorded in our ultra-high-end graphics test-bed, along with comparison numbers from an array of other high-end GPUs, a little later.
AMD’s itty-bitty Radeon R9 Nano isn’t due to launch until September 10, but a review unit landed on my doorstep today. Sadly, I can’t talk about its performance until then, but an AMD ...
The Radeon R9 Nano is a high-end graphics card by AMD, launched in August 2015. Built on the 28 nm process, and based on the Fiji graphics processor, in its Fiji XT CA variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.
The AMD Radeon R9 Nano finished just behind the Radeon R9 Fury here, but well ahead of the R9 390 or similarly-sized GeForce GTX 970 mini (the Asus GeForce GTX 970 Direct-CU mini to be exact).
As it turns out, AMD's Radeon R9 Nano is a great piece of hardware; there's really nothing like it out there. That’s probably why AMD is setting its price at an eye-popping $649.
Meanwhile at the other end of the spectrum is the Radeon R9 Nano, which sees AMD push the limits on miniaturization and pack Fiji into a card just 6 inches long.

토론 및 의견

귀하의 의견을 공유하십시오
S
Stan 6 years ago
649 $ NOT 1529$ lmao
1 0