GTS 450 品質 Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 設定で低品質のベンチマーク

は GTS 450 、予算の PC ビルドと少ない厳しいゲームに適しています。現在 1024 の MB の RAM GTS 450 を使用すると、より近代的なゲームで深刻なメモリ関連のボトルネックを持つことができます。との間 GTS 450 の AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X この組み合わせは、多くのゲームで 8% 未満のボトルネックを持っており、FPS の損失を避けるために完璧に一致しています。との間 GTS 450 の AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X この組み合わせは、FPS の損失を避けるために完璧に一致しています。

現在の価格表の表示

GTS 450 品質 Ryzen Threadripper 1900X 設定で低品質のベンチマーク

あなたのコメントを共有する 0

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450

価格

¥ 22,495.0

年

2010

最高記録温度

73C

最大ファンノイズ

40.3dB

推奨電源

456W

ベンチマーク CPU

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X ($349.99)

FPS に対する CPU の影響

+ 1.5 FPS

FPS% の CPU への影響

+ 10.0%

ベンチマークの品質設定

Low Quality Settings

平均1080p のパフォーマンス

82.2 FPS

平均1440p パフォーマンス

48.1 FPS

(Ultrawide) 平均1440p パフォーマンス

42.2 FPS

平均4k パフォーマンス

32.0 FPS

メモリ

1 GB

1フレームあたり1080 pのコスト

¥ 911.1

1フレームあたり1440pのコスト

¥ 1,756.6

(Ultrawide) 1フレームあたり1440pのコスト

¥ 2,053.9

1フレームあたり4Kの費用

¥ 2,858.8

シリーズ

GTS 450

Variant

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450

全体の組み合わせのスコア

Description	Metric	From	To	Weight
The release year of the graphics card. The newer the better technology and performance optimization and driver support.	Year	2016	2019	13
		2015	2016	11
		2014	2015	8
		2013	2014	4
		2007	2013	2
The price of the graphics card. The cheaper the better.	Price	0	250	35
		250	400	30
		400	550	25
		550	650	15
		650	9999	5
Power Supply Wattage required for overall system. The lower the better.	PSU	0	350	4
		350	450	4
		450	550	3
		550	650	2
		650	9999	1
Maximum recorded temperature under load. The lower the better for longer life of the graphics card.	Temp	0	70	2
		70	75	2
		75	80	1
		80	85	1
		85	999	1
Noise Levels under load. The lower the better.	Noise	0	45	2
		45	48	2
		48	50	2
		50	55	1
		55	999	1
Full HD performance at 1080p resolution. The higher the better.	FHD	60	9999	18
		55	60	13
		45	55	11
		35	45	7
		0	35	5
Quad HD performance at 1440p resolution. The higher the better.	QHD	60	9999	10
		55	60	8
		45	55	5
		35	45	4
		0	35	2
4K performance at 2160p resolution. The higher the better.	F4K	60	9999	5
		55	60	4
		45	55	3
		35	45	2
		0	35	1
Current CPU Impact on performance with respect to the highest performing CPU used for benchmark at the time this graphics card was released.	CPU	-5	9999	5
		-7	-5	4
		-10	-7	3
		-15	-10	2
		-9999	-15	1
Graphics card memory (RAM) capacity. The higher the better for higher resolution textures and future demanding games.	MEM	8	9999	5
		4	8	4
		2	4	3
		1	2	2
		0	1	1

		FROM	TO	VERDICT
The overall score is determined based on the calculated weightings for the individual components.	OVERALL SCORE	80	99	Excellent
		70	80	Very Good
		60	70	Good
		40	60	Acceptable
		0	40	Weak

70/100

非常にいいです

と比較

CPU の変更

Change Variant To

希望の品質設定

GTX 460 は、最新の Fermi セットのグラフィックカードの entry-level フラッグシップかもしれませんが、その価格により、ほとんどの budget PCゲーマーの手の届かないところにあります。一方、 GTS 450 は ¥ 14582.2 値札で手頃な価格に近づいています。 NVIDIA の xx50 カードは常に budget 価格で定義されており、特にオーバークロック時に entry-level グラフィックスカードの性能を発揮します。 GTS 450 内の Fermi グラフィックカードを完全にテストするために時間をかけた後、それがトレンドを継続していることは疑いなく言えます。

Compare GTS 450 Variants Performance in 低品質

Assassin's Creed Valhalla (2020)

低品質

解像度 1920x1080

年	グラフィックカード	価格	1秒あたりのフレーム数
2008	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285	¥ 40,581	47.1 FPS
2008	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216	¥ 33,799	40.7 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650	¥ 12,321	37.7 FPS
2011	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti	¥ 16,843	37.2 FPS
2008	ATI Radeon HD 4870	¥ 33,799	36.7 FPS
2012	AMD Radeon HD 7750	¥ 12,321	35.7 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R7 250	¥ 10,061	33.6 FPS
2010	NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450	¥ 14,582	34.1 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GT 640	¥ 11,191	25.0 FPS

GTS 450 の間に位置 R7 250 と GT 640 よりも遅い立ち下がり、 R7 250 によって 8.5 ％及びより速い GT 640 によって 24 ここでは、すべてのグラフィックカードに対して平均以下の相対的なパフォーマンスがあります。

Cyberpunk 2077 (2020)

低品質

解像度 1920x1080

年	グラフィックカード	価格	1秒あたりのフレーム数
2008	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285	¥ 40,581	47.1 FPS
2008	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216	¥ 33,799	40.7 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650	¥ 12,321	37.7 FPS
2011	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti	¥ 16,843	37.2 FPS
2008	ATI Radeon HD 4870	¥ 33,799	36.7 FPS
2012	AMD Radeon HD 7750	¥ 12,321	35.7 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R7 250	¥ 10,061	33.6 FPS
2010	NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450	¥ 14,582	34.1 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GT 640	¥ 11,191	25.0 FPS

Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)

低品質

解像度 1920x1080

年	グラフィックカード	価格	1秒あたりのフレーム数
2008	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285	¥ 40,581	104.8 FPS
2008	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216	¥ 33,799	90.3 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650	¥ 12,321	84.2 FPS
2011	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti	¥ 16,843	83.4 FPS
2008	ATI Radeon HD 4870	¥ 33,799	82.6 FPS
2012	AMD Radeon HD 7750	¥ 12,321	80.1 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R7 250	¥ 10,061	75.9 FPS
2010	NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450	¥ 14,582	76.3 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GT 640	¥ 11,191	56.1 FPS

GTS 450 の間に位置 R7 250 と GT 640 よりも遅い立ち下がり、 R7 250 によって 8.6 ％及びより速い GT 640 によって 24.7 ここでは、すべてのグラフィックカードに対して平均以下の相対的なパフォーマンスがあります。

設定時の低品質ゲームパフォーマンス

品質設定の変更

解像度 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS

年	ゲーム	1秒あたりのフレーム数
2023	Resident Evil 4	54 60.2
2023	A Plague Tale: Requiem	39 44.2
2023	Hogwarts Legacy	35 39.2
2023	The Last of Us Part I	28 31.5
2023	Forspoken	32 35.7
2023	The Callisto Protocol	25 28.8
2023	Dead Space	39 44.2
2023	Baldur's Gate 3	45 50.5
2023	Armored Core VI	45 50.5
2023	Immortals of Aveum	23 26.1
2023	Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart	41 46.1
2023	Remnant II	25 28.8
2023	Star Wars Jedi: Survivor	32 36.2
2023	Atomic Heart	32 36.2
2023	Starfield	18 20.4
2022	Elden Ring	38 42.2
2022	God of War	36 40.2
2022	Overwatch 2	60 67.3
2022	F1 22	45 50.9
2022	Dying Light 2	44 49.0
2022	Total War: Warhammer III	44 49.0
2022	Spider-Man Remastered	66 73.3
2022	Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II	50 55.6
2021	Forza Horizon 5	36 40.7
2021	Halo Infinite	29 32.5
2021	Battlefield 2042	48 54.2
2021	Hitman 3	56 62.4
2021	Far Cry 6	52 58.8
2021	Guardians of the Galaxy	56 63.3
2020	Watch Dogs: Legion	57 63.7
2020	Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30 34.1
2020	Microsoft Flight Simulator	21 23.9
2020	Valorant	101 113.1
2020	Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War	47 53.3
2020	Death Stranding	54 60.2
2020	Marvel's Avengers	38 42.2
2020	Godfall	52 58.8
2020	Cyberpunk 2077	30 34.1
2019	Apex Legends	50 56.1
2019	Anthem	35 39.2
2019	Far Cry New Dawn	48 53.7
2019	Resident Evil 2	69 76.7
2019	Metro Exodus	35 39.7
2019	World War Z	58 65.5
2019	Gears of War 5	48 54.2
2019	F1 2019	58 65.1
2019	GreedFall	53 59.7
2019	Borderlands 3	40 44.7
2019	Call of Duty Modern Warfare	68 76.3
2019	Red Dead Redemption 2	31 34.6
2019	Need For Speed: Heat	45 50.5
2018	Just Cause 4	48 53.7
2018	Monster Hunter: World	51 57.0
2018	Strange Brigade	71 79.7
2017	Need For Speed: Payback	62 69.9
2017	For Honor	79 88.3
2017	Project CARS 2	60 66.8
2017	Forza Motorsport 7	70 78.0
2016	Dishonored 2	46 51.4
2015	Rocket League	182 203.1
2015	Need For Speed	66 74.2
2015	Project CARS	64 72.0
2015	Rainbow Six Siege	104 116.5
2013	Bioshock Infinite	128 142.5
2013	GRID 2	198 220.9
2013	Total War: Rome 2	174 194.1
2012	Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	137 152.3
2011	Portal 2	234 260.4
2009	League of Legends	219 244.3
2008	Crysis: Warhead	117 131.0

解像度 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS

年	ゲーム	1秒あたりのフレーム数
2023	Resident Evil 4	35 44.2
2023	A Plague Tale: Requiem	26 32.5
2023	Hogwarts Legacy	24 30.4
2023	The Last of Us Part I	19 23.9
2023	Forspoken	19 23.9
2023	The Callisto Protocol	16 20.4
2023	Dead Space	24 30.4
2023	Baldur's Gate 3	32 40.7
2023	Armored Core VI	32 40.7
2023	Immortals of Aveum	14 18.1
2023	Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart	26 32.5
2023	Remnant II	15 19.8
2023	Star Wars Jedi: Survivor	21 27.2
2023	Atomic Heart	20 26.1
2023	Starfield	13 17.5
2022	Elden Ring	26 33.1
2022	God of War	27 34.1
2022	Overwatch 2	45 56.5
2022	F1 22	26 32.5
2022	Dying Light 2	26 32.5
2022	Total War: Warhammer III	27 34.6
2022	Spider-Man Remastered	42 53.3
2022	Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II	29 37.2
2021	Forza Horizon 5	27 34.1
2021	Halo Infinite	22 28.3
2021	Battlefield 2042	29 36.7
2021	Hitman 3	36 45.2
2021	Far Cry 6	35 44.2
2021	Guardians of the Galaxy	36 45.7
2020	Watch Dogs: Legion	34 43.2
2020	Assassin's Creed Valhalla	23 28.8
2020	Microsoft Flight Simulator	16 20.4
2020	Valorant	74 92.7
2020	Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War	33 41.7
2020	Death Stranding	37 46.6
2020	Marvel's Avengers	24 30.4
2020	Godfall	32 40.7
2020	Cyberpunk 2077	24 31.0
2019	Apex Legends	33 42.2
2019	Anthem	24 31.0
2019	Far Cry New Dawn	33 41.7
2019	Resident Evil 2	42 53.3
2019	Metro Exodus	24 31.0
2019	World War Z	39 49.0
2019	Gears of War 5	31 39.7
2019	F1 2019	37 46.6
2019	GreedFall	34 43.7
2019	Borderlands 3	25 32.0
2019	Call of Duty Modern Warfare	44 55.6
2019	Red Dead Redemption 2	22 27.7
2019	Need For Speed: Heat	31 39.7
2018	Just Cause 4	32 40.2
2018	Monster Hunter: World	32 40.7
2018	Strange Brigade	45 56.5
2017	Need For Speed: Payback	41 51.4
2017	For Honor	43 54.7
2017	Project CARS 2	38 48.1
2017	Forza Motorsport 7	55 69.0
2016	Dishonored 2	34 43.2
2015	Rocket League	81 101.4
2015	Need For Speed	46 57.9
2015	Project CARS	44 55.1
2015	Rainbow Six Siege	63 78.8
2012	Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	101 127.0
2009	League of Legends	120 151.0

解像度 3440x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS

年	ゲーム	1秒あたりのフレーム数
2019	Apex Legends	27 36.7
2019	Anthem	19 26.1
2019	Far Cry New Dawn	26 35.2
2019	Resident Evil 2	33 44.2
2019	Metro Exodus	20 27.2
2019	World War Z	31 41.7
2019	Gears of War 5	26 35.2
2019	F1 2019	31 41.2
2019	GreedFall	26 34.6
2019	Borderlands 3	20 26.6
2019	Call of Duty Modern Warfare	36 48.5
2019	Red Dead Redemption 2	18 25.0
2019	Need For Speed: Heat	26 35.2
2018	Just Cause 4	25 33.6
2018	Monster Hunter: World	25 33.6
2018	Strange Brigade	36 48.1
2017	Need For Speed: Payback	35 47.1
2017	For Honor	34 45.7
2017	Project CARS 2	36 47.6
2017	Forza Motorsport 7	51 67.7
2016	Dishonored 2	31 41.2
2015	Rocket League	63 83.0
2015	Need For Speed	39 52.3
2015	Project CARS	38 50.9
2015	Rainbow Six Siege	49 64.6
2012	Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	97 127.8
2009	League of Legends	91 119.8

解像度 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS

年	ゲーム	1秒あたりのフレーム数
2023	Resident Evil 4	23 34.1
2023	A Plague Tale: Requiem	15 21.6
2023	Hogwarts Legacy	15 21.6
2023	The Last of Us Part I	9 13.8
2023	Forspoken	8 12.5
2023	The Callisto Protocol	7 11.3
2023	Dead Space	9 13.8
2023	Baldur's Gate 3	17 25.0
2023	Armored Core VI	17 25.0
2023	Immortals of Aveum	6 9.9
2023	Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart	13 19.3
2023	Remnant II	7 10.6
2023	Star Wars Jedi: Survivor	10 15.0
2023	Atomic Heart	12 17.5
2023	Starfield	8 12.5
2022	Elden Ring	14 20.4
2022	God of War	19 27.2
2022	Overwatch 2	31 44.7
2022	F1 22	17 25.0
2022	Dying Light 2	17 25.0
2022	Total War: Warhammer III	19 27.2
2022	Spider-Man Remastered	27 39.2
2022	Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II	17 25.0
2021	Forza Horizon 5	19 27.7
2021	Halo Infinite	14 20.4
2021	Battlefield 2042	17 25.5
2021	Hitman 3	20 29.9
2021	Far Cry 6	18 26.1
2021	Guardians of the Galaxy	19 27.2
2020	Watch Dogs: Legion	20 29.9
2020	Assassin's Creed Valhalla	14 20.4
2020	Microsoft Flight Simulator	11 16.3
2020	Valorant	57 82.2
2020	Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War	17 24.4
2020	Death Stranding	21 30.4
2020	Marvel's Avengers	12 17.5
2020	Godfall	14 21.0
2020	Cyberpunk 2077	14 21.0
2019	Apex Legends	19 27.2
2019	Anthem	12 18.1
2019	Far Cry New Dawn	17 24.4
2019	Resident Evil 2	20 29.4
2019	Metro Exodus	14 20.4
2019	World War Z	21 30.4
2019	Gears of War 5	18 26.6
2019	F1 2019	22 31.5
2019	GreedFall	14 20.4
2019	Borderlands 3	12 18.1
2019	Call of Duty Modern Warfare	25 36.2
2019	Red Dead Redemption 2	13 18.7
2019	Need For Speed: Heat	18 26.6
2018	Just Cause 4	16 23.3
2018	Monster Hunter: World	15 21.6
2018	Strange Brigade	23 33.6
2017	Need For Speed: Payback	26 37.7
2017	For Honor	21 30.4
2017	Project CARS 2	28 41.2
2017	Forza Motorsport 7	41 59.3
2016	Dishonored 2	24 35.7
2015	Rocket League	37 54.2
2015	Need For Speed	28 41.2
2015	Project CARS	28 41.2
2015	Rainbow Six Siege	29 41.7
2012	Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	81 116.1
2009	League of Legends	50 72.5

GTS 450 with Ryzen Threadripper 1900X at 1080p and 低品質 settings

GTS 450 with Ryzen Threadripper 1900X at 1440p and 低品質 settings

GTS 450 with Ryzen Threadripper 1900X at 4K and 低品質 settings

競合他社との比較

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
2013 1GB ¥ 5,539
27% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon R7 250
2013 1GB ¥ 10,739
3% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
2012 2GB ¥ 8,930
35% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon HD 7750
2012 1GB ¥ 15,826
25% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
2011 1GB ¥ 22,495
29% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
2008 0.9GB ¥ 50,755
3% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
2008 0.9GB ¥ 33,799
14% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280
2008 0GB ¥ 73,363
28% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
2008 1GB ¥ 28,147
31% faster

Compare

ATI Radeon HD 4870
2008 0GB ¥ 33,799
1% faster

Compare

GTS 450 仕様

GTS 450 Board Design

Board Number	P1060
Length	8.25 inches 210 mm
Outputs	2x DVI1x mini-HDMI
Power Connectors	1x 6-pin
Slot Width	Dual-slot
TDP	106 W

GTS 450 Clock Speeds

GPU Clock	783 MHz
Memory Clock	902 MHz 3608 MHz effective
Shader Clock	1566 MHz

GTS 450 Graphics Card

Bus Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16
Generation	GeForce 400
Launch Price	129 USD
Production	End-of-life
Release Date	Sep 13th, 2010

GTS 450 Graphics Features

CUDA	2.1
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	1.1
OpenGL	4.6
Shader Model	5.1
Vulkan	N/A

GTS 450 Graphics Processor

Architecture	Fermi
Die Size	238 mm²
GPU Name	GF106
GPU Variant	GF106-250-KA-A1
Process Size	40 nm
Transistors	1,170 million

GTS 450 Memory

Bandwidth	57.73 GB/s
Memory Bus	128 bit
Memory Size	1024 MB
Memory Type	GDDR5

GTS 450 Render Config

ROPs	16
SM Count	4
Shading Units	192
TMUs	32

GTS 450 Theoretical Performance

FP32 (float) performance	601.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance	50.11 GFLOPS (1:12)
Pixel Rate	6.264 GPixel/s
Texture Rate	25.06 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

Performance Summary: NVIDIA’s new GeForce GTS 450 is decent performer overall. In our testing, the reference GeForce GTS 450 typically performed about on-par with or somewhat lower than the ...

NVIDIA plans to change that today with the release of the new GeForce GTS 450. As the GTS moniker denotes, the GeForce GTS 450 is targeted at the mainstream market.

Conclusion. So here’s the deal. For the most part, Nvidia’s GeForce GTS 450 does what the company says it’s supposed to. It generally lands in between the Radeon HD 5770 and 5750 performance ...

The big problem for the Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 is the fact the HD 5770 is still on the market for the same price, and that last-gen DirectX11 GPU is still one of the best budget cards around.

Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 Review. Written by bit-tech Staff ... Conclusion Stock models of the GTS 450 are set to launch at £110, with overclocked cards costing upwards of £135. This pitches the ...

¹ GeForce GTS 450 has more than 2 times faster FPS versus Radeon HD 5750 in Microsoft DirectX 11 SDK subd11 tessellation test with maximum tessellation level set. ² StarCraft performance measured on GeForce GTS 450 vs. Radeon HD 5750 at 16x10 4xAA/16xAF.

At the heart of the GTS 450 is the GF106 GPU, which is probably not one of NVIDIA’s best-kept secrets. Traditionally GPUs launch in desktop products first before getting the mobile treatment ...

2 Performance do StarCraft medida no GeForce GTS 450 vs. Radeon HD 5750 a 16x10 4xAA/16xAF. Suporte ao Microsoft DirectX 11 GPU DirectX 11 com suporte a Shader Model 5.0, projetada para performance ultrarrápida no novo recurso gráfico da API e tesselação acelerada por GPU.

The GTS 450 is the most basic Fermi GPU yet, with only one GPC (Graphics Processing Cluster) comprising four SMs (Streaming Multiprocessors) – think of it as essentially half of a GTX 460, which ...

Today NVIDIA released their new GeForce GTS 450. We take two of these cards for a spin and check whether SLI is an option worth pursuing. In addition to testing at the reference design clocks we also test at 875/1000 which represents two factory overclocked cards in SLI.