GTS 450 品質 Phenom 9950 設定で低品質のベンチマーク

は GTS 450 、予算の PC ビルドと少ない厳しいゲームに適しています。現在 1024 の MB の RAM GTS 450 を使用すると、より近代的なゲームで深刻なメモリ関連のボトルネックを持つことができます。との間 GTS 450 の AMD Phenom 9950 Quad-Core この組み合わせは、多くのゲームで 8% 未満のボトルネックを持っており、FPS の損失を避けるために完璧に一致しています。との間 GTS 450 の AMD Phenom 9950 Quad-Core この組み合わせは、FPS の損失を避けるために完璧に一致しています。

現在の価格表の表示

あなたのコメントを共有する 0

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450

価格

¥ 22,495.0

年

2010

最高記録温度

73C

最大ファンノイズ

40.3dB

推奨電源

456W

ベンチマーク CPU

AMD Phenom 9950 Quad-Core ($179.98)

FPS に対する CPU の影響

-2.5 FPS

FPS% の CPU への影響

-20.0%

ベンチマークの品質設定

Low Quality Settings

平均1080p のパフォーマンス

65.1 FPS

平均1440p パフォーマンス

37.7 FPS

(Ultrawide) 平均1440p パフォーマンス

33.6 FPS

平均4k パフォーマンス

25.5 FPS

メモリ

1 GB

1フレームあたり1080 pのコスト

¥ 1,215.2

1フレームあたり1440pのコスト

¥ 2,352.4

(Ultrawide) 1フレームあたり1440pのコスト

¥ 2,700.5

1フレームあたり4Kの費用

¥ 3,739.4

シリーズ

GTS 450

Variant

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450

全体の組み合わせのスコア

Description	Metric	From	To	Weight
The release year of the graphics card. The newer the better technology and performance optimization and driver support.	Year	2016	2019	13
		2015	2016	11
		2014	2015	8
		2013	2014	4
		2007	2013	2
The price of the graphics card. The cheaper the better.	Price	0	250	35
		250	400	30
		400	550	25
		550	650	15
		650	9999	5
Power Supply Wattage required for overall system. The lower the better.	PSU	0	350	4
		350	450	4
		450	550	3
		550	650	2
		650	9999	1
Maximum recorded temperature under load. The lower the better for longer life of the graphics card.	Temp	0	70	2
		70	75	2
		75	80	1
		80	85	1
		85	999	1
Noise Levels under load. The lower the better.	Noise	0	45	2
		45	48	2
		48	50	2
		50	55	1
		55	999	1
Full HD performance at 1080p resolution. The higher the better.	FHD	60	9999	18
		55	60	13
		45	55	11
		35	45	7
		0	35	5
Quad HD performance at 1440p resolution. The higher the better.	QHD	60	9999	10
		55	60	8
		45	55	5
		35	45	4
		0	35	2
4K performance at 2160p resolution. The higher the better.	F4K	60	9999	5
		55	60	4
		45	55	3
		35	45	2
		0	35	1
Current CPU Impact on performance with respect to the highest performing CPU used for benchmark at the time this graphics card was released.	CPU	-5	9999	5
		-7	-5	4
		-10	-7	3
		-15	-10	2
		-9999	-15	1
Graphics card memory (RAM) capacity. The higher the better for higher resolution textures and future demanding games.	MEM	8	9999	5
		4	8	4
		2	4	3
		1	2	2
		0	1	1

		FROM	TO	VERDICT
The overall score is determined based on the calculated weightings for the individual components.	OVERALL SCORE	80	99	Excellent
		70	80	Very Good
		60	70	Good
		40	60	Acceptable
		0	40	Weak

69/100

よし

と比較

CPU の変更

Change Variant To

希望の品質設定

GTX 460 は、最新の Fermi セットのグラフィックカードの entry-level フラッグシップかもしれませんが、その価格により、ほとんどの budget PCゲーマーの手の届かないところにあります。一方、 GTS 450 は ¥ 14582.2 値札で手頃な価格に近づいています。 NVIDIA の xx50 カードは常に budget 価格で定義されており、特にオーバークロック時に entry-level グラフィックスカードの性能を発揮します。 GTS 450 内の Fermi グラフィックカードを完全にテストするために時間をかけた後、それがトレンドを継続していることは疑いなく言えます。

Compare GTS 450 Variants Performance in 低品質

Assassin's Creed Valhalla (2020)

低品質

解像度 1920x1080

年	グラフィックカード	価格	1秒あたりのフレーム数
2008	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285	¥ 40,581	47.1 FPS
2008	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216	¥ 33,799	40.7 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650	¥ 12,321	37.7 FPS
2011	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti	¥ 16,843	37.2 FPS
2008	ATI Radeon HD 4870	¥ 33,799	36.7 FPS
2012	AMD Radeon HD 7750	¥ 12,321	35.7 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R7 250	¥ 10,061	33.6 FPS
2010	NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450	¥ 14,582	24.4 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GT 640	¥ 11,191	25.0 FPS

GTS 450 の間に位置 R7 250 と GT 640 よりも遅い立ち下がり、 R7 250 によって 8.5 ％及びより速い GT 640 によって 24 ここでは、すべてのグラフィックカードに対して平均以下の相対的なパフォーマンスがあります。

Cyberpunk 2077 (2020)

低品質

解像度 1920x1080

年	グラフィックカード	価格	1秒あたりのフレーム数
2008	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285	¥ 40,581	47.1 FPS
2008	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216	¥ 33,799	40.7 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650	¥ 12,321	37.7 FPS
2011	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti	¥ 16,843	37.2 FPS
2008	ATI Radeon HD 4870	¥ 33,799	36.7 FPS
2012	AMD Radeon HD 7750	¥ 12,321	35.7 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R7 250	¥ 10,061	33.6 FPS
2010	NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450	¥ 14,582	24.4 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GT 640	¥ 11,191	25.0 FPS

Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)

低品質

解像度 1920x1080

年	グラフィックカード	価格	1秒あたりのフレーム数
2008	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285	¥ 40,581	104.8 FPS
2008	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216	¥ 33,799	90.3 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650	¥ 12,321	84.2 FPS
2011	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti	¥ 16,843	83.4 FPS
2008	ATI Radeon HD 4870	¥ 33,799	82.6 FPS
2012	AMD Radeon HD 7750	¥ 12,321	80.1 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R7 250	¥ 10,061	75.9 FPS
2010	NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450	¥ 14,582	55.6 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GT 640	¥ 11,191	56.1 FPS

GTS 450 の間に位置 R7 250 と GT 640 よりも遅い立ち下がり、 R7 250 によって 8.6 ％及びより速い GT 640 によって 24.7 ここでは、すべてのグラフィックカードに対して平均以下の相対的なパフォーマンスがあります。このゲームでの GTS 450 のパフォーマンスは、60fpsのマーク付近に留まります。

設定時の低品質ゲームパフォーマンス

品質設定の変更

解像度 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS

年	ゲーム	1秒あたりのフレーム数
2023	Resident Evil 4	33 43.7
2023	A Plague Tale: Requiem	24 32.0
2023	Hogwarts Legacy	21 28.3
2023	The Last of Us Part I	17 22.7
2023	Forspoken	19 25.5
2023	The Callisto Protocol	15 20.4
2023	Dead Space	24 32.0
2023	Baldur's Gate 3	27 36.7
2023	Armored Core VI	27 36.7
2023	Immortals of Aveum	14 18.7
2023	Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart	25 33.6
2023	Remnant II	15 20.4
2023	Star Wars Jedi: Survivor	19 26.1
2023	Atomic Heart	19 26.1
2023	Starfield	10 14.4
2022	Elden Ring	22 30.4
2022	God of War	21 28.8
2022	Overwatch 2	37 49.0
2022	F1 22	27 36.7
2022	Dying Light 2	26 35.2
2022	Total War: Warhammer III	26 35.2
2022	Spider-Man Remastered	40 53.3
2022	Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II	30 40.2
2021	Forza Horizon 5	22 29.4
2021	Halo Infinite	18 23.9
2021	Battlefield 2042	29 39.2
2021	Hitman 3	34 45.2
2021	Far Cry 6	32 42.7
2021	Guardians of the Galaxy	34 46.1
2020	Watch Dogs: Legion	34 46.1
2020	Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18 24.4
2020	Microsoft Flight Simulator	12 16.9
2020	Valorant	62 83.0
2020	Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War	28 38.2
2020	Death Stranding	33 43.7
2020	Marvel's Avengers	22 30.4
2020	Godfall	32 42.7
2020	Cyberpunk 2077	18 24.4
2019	Apex Legends	30 40.7
2019	Anthem	21 28.3
2019	Far Cry New Dawn	29 38.7
2019	Resident Evil 2	42 56.1
2019	Metro Exodus	21 28.8
2019	World War Z	35 47.6
2019	Gears of War 5	29 39.2
2019	F1 2019	35 47.6
2019	GreedFall	32 43.2
2019	Borderlands 3	24 32.0
2019	Call of Duty Modern Warfare	41 55.6
2019	Red Dead Redemption 2	18 25.0
2019	Need For Speed: Heat	27 36.7
2018	Just Cause 4	29 38.7
2018	Monster Hunter: World	31 41.2
2018	Strange Brigade	43 57.9
2017	Need For Speed: Payback	38 50.9
2017	For Honor	48 64.6
2017	Project CARS 2	36 48.5
2017	Forza Motorsport 7	43 57.0
2016	Dishonored 2	28 37.2
2015	Rocket League	114 151.0
2015	Need For Speed	40 54.2
2015	Project CARS	39 52.3
2015	Rainbow Six Siege	64 85.5
2013	Bioshock Infinite	79 105.2
2013	GRID 2	124 164.9
2013	Total War: Rome 2	108 144.2
2012	Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	84 112.4
2011	Portal 2	147 195.6
2009	League of Legends	138 183.0
2008	Crysis: Warhead	73 96.7

解像度 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS

年	ゲーム	1秒あたりのフレーム数
2023	Resident Evil 4	25 33.6
2023	A Plague Tale: Requiem	18 24.4
2023	Hogwarts Legacy	17 22.7
2023	The Last of Us Part I	13 18.1
2023	Forspoken	13 18.1
2023	The Callisto Protocol	11 15.0
2023	Dead Space	17 22.7
2023	Baldur's Gate 3	22 30.4
2023	Armored Core VI	22 30.4
2023	Immortals of Aveum	10 13.8
2023	Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart	18 24.4
2023	Remnant II	10 14.4
2023	Star Wars Jedi: Survivor	15 20.4
2023	Atomic Heart	14 19.8
2023	Starfield	9 13.2
2022	Elden Ring	18 25.0
2022	God of War	19 25.5
2022	Overwatch 2	32 43.2
2022	F1 22	18 24.4
2022	Dying Light 2	18 24.4
2022	Total War: Warhammer III	19 26.1
2022	Spider-Man Remastered	30 40.2
2022	Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II	21 28.3
2021	Forza Horizon 5	19 25.5
2021	Halo Infinite	16 21.6
2021	Battlefield 2042	20 27.7
2021	Hitman 3	25 34.1
2021	Far Cry 6	25 33.6
2021	Guardians of the Galaxy	26 34.6
2020	Watch Dogs: Legion	24 32.5
2020	Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16 21.6
2020	Microsoft Flight Simulator	11 15.0
2020	Valorant	53 70.8
2020	Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War	23 31.5
2020	Death Stranding	26 35.2
2020	Marvel's Avengers	17 22.7
2020	Godfall	22 30.4
2020	Cyberpunk 2077	17 23.3
2019	Apex Legends	24 32.0
2019	Anthem	17 23.3
2019	Far Cry New Dawn	23 31.5
2019	Resident Evil 2	30 40.2
2019	Metro Exodus	17 23.3
2019	World War Z	27 36.7
2019	Gears of War 5	22 29.9
2019	F1 2019	26 35.2
2019	GreedFall	24 33.1
2019	Borderlands 3	18 23.9
2019	Call of Duty Modern Warfare	31 42.2
2019	Red Dead Redemption 2	15 21.0
2019	Need For Speed: Heat	22 29.9
2018	Just Cause 4	22 30.4
2018	Monster Hunter: World	22 30.4
2018	Strange Brigade	32 43.2
2017	Need For Speed: Payback	29 38.7
2017	For Honor	31 41.2
2017	Project CARS 2	27 36.7
2017	Forza Motorsport 7	39 52.3
2016	Dishonored 2	24 32.5
2015	Rocket League	58 77.2
2015	Need For Speed	33 43.7
2015	Project CARS	31 41.7
2015	Rainbow Six Siege	45 60.2
2012	Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	73 97.5
2009	League of Legends	87 116.1

解像度 3440x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS

年	ゲーム	1秒あたりのフレーム数
2019	Apex Legends	20 27.7
2019	Anthem	14 19.8
2019	Far Cry New Dawn	20 26.6
2019	Resident Evil 2	25 33.6
2019	Metro Exodus	15 20.4
2019	World War Z	24 32.0
2019	Gears of War 5	20 26.6
2019	F1 2019	23 31.5
2019	GreedFall	19 26.1
2019	Borderlands 3	14 19.8
2019	Call of Duty Modern Warfare	27 36.7
2019	Red Dead Redemption 2	14 18.7
2019	Need For Speed: Heat	20 26.6
2018	Just Cause 4	19 25.5
2018	Monster Hunter: World	19 25.5
2018	Strange Brigade	27 36.7
2017	Need For Speed: Payback	26 35.7
2017	For Honor	26 34.6
2017	Project CARS 2	27 36.2
2017	Forza Motorsport 7	39 51.9
2016	Dishonored 2	23 31.5
2015	Rocket League	47 63.3
2015	Need For Speed	30 39.7
2015	Project CARS	29 38.7
2015	Rainbow Six Siege	37 49.0
2012	Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	74 98.6
2009	League of Legends	69 92.3

解像度 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS

年	ゲーム	1秒あたりのフレーム数
2023	Resident Evil 4	18 26.1
2023	A Plague Tale: Requiem	11 16.3
2023	Hogwarts Legacy	11 16.3
2023	The Last of Us Part I	7 10.6
2023	Forspoken	6 9.3
2023	The Callisto Protocol	6 8.6
2023	Dead Space	7 10.6
2023	Baldur's Gate 3	13 18.7
2023	Armored Core VI	13 18.7
2023	Immortals of Aveum	5 7.2
2023	Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart	10 14.4
2023	Remnant II	5 7.9
2023	Star Wars Jedi: Survivor	7 11.3
2023	Atomic Heart	9 13.2
2023	Starfield	6 9.3
2022	Elden Ring	10 15.7
2022	God of War	14 20.4
2022	Overwatch 2	23 34.1
2022	F1 22	13 18.7
2022	Dying Light 2	13 18.7
2022	Total War: Warhammer III	14 20.4
2022	Spider-Man Remastered	20 29.9
2022	Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II	13 18.7
2021	Forza Horizon 5	14 21.0
2021	Halo Infinite	10 15.7
2021	Battlefield 2042	13 19.3
2021	Hitman 3	15 22.7
2021	Far Cry 6	13 19.8
2021	Guardians of the Galaxy	14 20.4
2020	Watch Dogs: Legion	15 22.7
2020	Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10 15.7
2020	Microsoft Flight Simulator	8 12.5
2020	Valorant	44 63.3
2020	Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War	12 18.1
2020	Death Stranding	16 23.3
2020	Marvel's Avengers	9 13.2
2020	Godfall	11 16.3
2020	Cyberpunk 2077	11 16.3
2019	Apex Legends	14 20.4
2019	Anthem	9 13.8
2019	Far Cry New Dawn	12 18.1
2019	Resident Evil 2	15 22.2
2019	Metro Exodus	10 15.7
2019	World War Z	16 23.3
2019	Gears of War 5	13 19.8
2019	F1 2019	16 23.9
2019	GreedFall	10 15.7
2019	Borderlands 3	9 13.8
2019	Call of Duty Modern Warfare	19 27.2
2019	Red Dead Redemption 2	10 14.4
2019	Need For Speed: Heat	13 19.8
2018	Just Cause 4	12 17.5
2018	Monster Hunter: World	11 16.3
2018	Strange Brigade	17 25.5
2017	Need For Speed: Payback	20 28.8
2017	For Honor	16 23.3
2017	Project CARS 2	22 31.5
2017	Forza Motorsport 7	31 45.2
2016	Dishonored 2	19 27.2
2015	Rocket League	28 41.2
2015	Need For Speed	22 31.5
2015	Project CARS	22 31.5
2015	Rainbow Six Siege	22 32.0
2012	Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	62 89.5
2009	League of Legends	38 55.6

GTS 450 with Phenom 9950 at 1080p and 低品質 settings

GTS 450 with Phenom 9950 at 1440p and 低品質 settings

GTS 450 with Phenom 9950 at 4K and 低品質 settings

競合他社との比較

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
2013 1GB ¥ 5,539
27% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon R7 250
2013 1GB ¥ 10,739
3% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GT 640
2012 2GB ¥ 8,930
35% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon HD 7750
2012 1GB ¥ 15,826
25% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
2011 1GB ¥ 22,495
29% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
2008 0.9GB ¥ 50,755
3% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
2008 0.9GB ¥ 33,799
14% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280
2008 0GB ¥ 73,363
28% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
2008 1GB ¥ 28,147
31% faster

Compare

ATI Radeon HD 4870
2008 0GB ¥ 33,799
1% faster

Compare

GTS 450 仕様

GTS 450 Board Design

Board Number	P1060
Length	8.25 inches 210 mm
Outputs	2x DVI1x mini-HDMI
Power Connectors	1x 6-pin
Slot Width	Dual-slot
TDP	106 W

GTS 450 Clock Speeds

GPU Clock	783 MHz
Memory Clock	902 MHz 3608 MHz effective
Shader Clock	1566 MHz

GTS 450 Graphics Card

Bus Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16
Generation	GeForce 400
Launch Price	129 USD
Production	End-of-life
Release Date	Sep 13th, 2010

GTS 450 Graphics Features

CUDA	2.1
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL	1.1
OpenGL	4.6
Shader Model	5.1
Vulkan	N/A

GTS 450 Graphics Processor

Architecture	Fermi
Die Size	238 mm²
GPU Name	GF106
GPU Variant	GF106-250-KA-A1
Process Size	40 nm
Transistors	1,170 million

GTS 450 Memory

Bandwidth	57.73 GB/s
Memory Bus	128 bit
Memory Size	1024 MB
Memory Type	GDDR5

GTS 450 Render Config

ROPs	16
SM Count	4
Shading Units	192
TMUs	32

GTS 450 Theoretical Performance

FP32 (float) performance	601.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance	50.11 GFLOPS (1:12)
Pixel Rate	6.264 GPixel/s
Texture Rate	25.06 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

Performance Summary: NVIDIA’s new GeForce GTS 450 is decent performer overall. In our testing, the reference GeForce GTS 450 typically performed about on-par with or somewhat lower than the ...

NVIDIA plans to change that today with the release of the new GeForce GTS 450. As the GTS moniker denotes, the GeForce GTS 450 is targeted at the mainstream market.

Conclusion. So here’s the deal. For the most part, Nvidia’s GeForce GTS 450 does what the company says it’s supposed to. It generally lands in between the Radeon HD 5770 and 5750 performance ...

The big problem for the Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 is the fact the HD 5770 is still on the market for the same price, and that last-gen DirectX11 GPU is still one of the best budget cards around.

Nvidia GeForce GTS 450 Review. Written by bit-tech Staff ... Conclusion Stock models of the GTS 450 are set to launch at £110, with overclocked cards costing upwards of £135. This pitches the ...

¹ GeForce GTS 450 has more than 2 times faster FPS versus Radeon HD 5750 in Microsoft DirectX 11 SDK subd11 tessellation test with maximum tessellation level set. ² StarCraft performance measured on GeForce GTS 450 vs. Radeon HD 5750 at 16x10 4xAA/16xAF.

At the heart of the GTS 450 is the GF106 GPU, which is probably not one of NVIDIA’s best-kept secrets. Traditionally GPUs launch in desktop products first before getting the mobile treatment ...

2 Performance do StarCraft medida no GeForce GTS 450 vs. Radeon HD 5750 a 16x10 4xAA/16xAF. Suporte ao Microsoft DirectX 11 GPU DirectX 11 com suporte a Shader Model 5.0, projetada para performance ultrarrápida no novo recurso gráfico da API e tesselação acelerada por GPU.

The GTS 450 is the most basic Fermi GPU yet, with only one GPC (Graphics Processing Cluster) comprising four SMs (Streaming Multiprocessors) – think of it as essentially half of a GTX 460, which ...

Today NVIDIA released their new GeForce GTS 450. We take two of these cards for a spin and check whether SLI is an option worth pursuing. In addition to testing at the reference design clocks we also test at 875/1000 which represents two factory overclocked cards in SLI.