RX 480 品質 i7-6700K 設定で超品質のベンチマーク

大部分は、まだ現代的 RX 480 なゲームをプレイすることが可能ですが、それらの高いフレームレートを維持するための設定を減らす必要があります。グラフィックの品質設定を超または高に近づけることが重要である場合、アップグレードにはいくつかのオプションがあります。メモリ RX 480 の面では、の 8192 MB の RAM は、現代のゲームのための十分以上であり、任意のボトルネックを引き起こすことはありません。

現在の価格表の表示

あなたのコメントを共有する 303

AMD Radeon RX 480

価格

¥ 45,103.0

年

2016

最高記録温度

77C

最大ファンノイズ

51dB

推奨電源

500W

ベンチマーク CPU

Intel Core i7-6700K @ 4.00GHz ($334.99)

FPS に対する CPU の影響

+ 0.0 FPS

FPS% の CPU への影響

0.0%

ベンチマークの品質設定

Ultra Quality Settings

平均1080p のパフォーマンス

59.8 FPS

平均1440p パフォーマンス

44.6 FPS

(Ultrawide) 平均1440p パフォーマンス

38.5 FPS

平均4k パフォーマンス

27.4 FPS

メモリ

8 GB

1フレームあたり1080 pのコスト

¥ 756.2

1フレームあたり1440pのコスト

¥ 1,014.0

(Ultrawide) 1フレームあたり1440pのコスト

¥ 1,174.5

1フレームあたり4Kの費用

¥ 1,650.4

シリーズ

RX 480

Variant

AMD Radeon RX 480

全体の組み合わせのスコア

Description	Metric	From	To	Weight
The release year of the graphics card. The newer the better technology and performance optimization and driver support.	Year	2016	2019	13
		2015	2016	11
		2014	2015	8
		2013	2014	4
		2007	2013	2
The price of the graphics card. The cheaper the better.	Price	0	250	35
		250	400	30
		400	550	25
		550	650	15
		650	9999	5
Power Supply Wattage required for overall system. The lower the better.	PSU	0	350	4
		350	450	4
		450	550	3
		550	650	2
		650	9999	1
Maximum recorded temperature under load. The lower the better for longer life of the graphics card.	Temp	0	70	2
		70	75	2
		75	80	1
		80	85	1
		85	999	1
Noise Levels under load. The lower the better.	Noise	0	45	2
		45	48	2
		48	50	2
		50	55	1
		55	999	1
Full HD performance at 1080p resolution. The higher the better.	FHD	60	9999	18
		55	60	13
		45	55	11
		35	45	7
		0	35	5
Quad HD performance at 1440p resolution. The higher the better.	QHD	60	9999	10
		55	60	8
		45	55	5
		35	45	4
		0	35	2
4K performance at 2160p resolution. The higher the better.	F4K	60	9999	5
		55	60	4
		45	55	3
		35	45	2
		0	35	1
Current CPU Impact on performance with respect to the highest performing CPU used for benchmark at the time this graphics card was released.	CPU	-5	9999	5
		-7	-5	4
		-10	-7	3
		-15	-10	2
		-9999	-15	1
Graphics card memory (RAM) capacity. The higher the better for higher resolution textures and future demanding games.	MEM	8	9999	5
		4	8	4
		2	4	3
		1	2	2
		0	1	1

		FROM	TO	VERDICT
The overall score is determined based on the calculated weightings for the individual components.	OVERALL SCORE	80	99	Excellent
		70	80	Very Good
		60	70	Good
		40	60	Acceptable
		0	40	Weak

68/100

よし

と比較

CPU の変更

Change Variant To

希望の品質設定

AMD の xx80 カードは常に mid-range 価格で定義されており、特にオーバークロック時に high-end グラフィックスカードの性能を発揮します。 RX 480 内の GCN 4.0 グラフィックカードを完全にテストするために時間をかけた後、それがトレンドを継続していることは疑いなく言えます。 RX 480 は R9 380 よりもはるかに高価で、なんと ¥ 45216 かかります。これを元々 ¥ 22495, ¥ 25886.2 価格で R9 380, AMD Radeon R9 380X れていた R9 380, AMD Radeon R9 380X と比較してください。一方、 NVIDIA 最も近い同等のカードである GTX 970 コスト ¥ 37190.2 。

仕様の仕様として、この RX 480 51.8 ％fpsを誇ることで、直接の前身である R9 380 飛躍させます。 RX 480 は 8 R9 380 の 2 GBビデオメモリと比較して 8 GB RAMがあります。

合成ベンチマークでは、 RX 480 は R9 380, AMD Radeon R9 380X を R9 380, AMD Radeon R9 380X 、驚くべきことに R9 390 をも R9 390 ています。幸いなことに、ゲームのパフォーマンスは非常に印象的でした。 RX 480 は、一貫して R9 380, AMD Radeon R9 380X よりも優れたフレームレートの増加を実現し、アップグレードを正当化します。

NVIDIA の最も近いライバルである GTX 970 と比較して、 RX 480 は -3.9 ％遅くなりました。以下のために 1080p Full HD 、我々はプレーすることができました Spider-Man Remastered, F1 2019, Apex Legends, Overwatch 2, Battlefield V で 62 にfpsの 65 FPSとの周りに浮かんでフレームレートを保持 63 FPSを。

以下のために 1440p Quad HD 、我々はプレーすることができました World War Z, Fallout 76, Valorant で 62 にfpsの 101 FPSとの周りに浮かんでフレームレートを保持 75 FPSを。以下のために 2160p 4K 、我々はプレーすることができました Valorant で 88 にfpsの 88 FPSとの周りに浮かんでフレームレートを保持 88 FPSを。

Compare RX 480 Variants Performance in 超品質

Assassin's Creed Valhalla (2020)

超品質

解像度 1920x1080

年	グラフィックカード	価格	1秒あたりのフレーム数
2019	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660	¥ 24,869	41.3 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti	¥ 73,363	35.2 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 FURY X	¥ 73,363	34.6 FPS
2018	AMD Radeon RX 590	¥ 31,538	34.3 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 Nano	¥ 73,363	32.6 FPS
2019	AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB	¥ 22,495	31.9 FPS
2014	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980	¥ 62,059	31.9 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 FURY	¥ 62,059	30.9 FPS
2019	AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB	¥ 19,104	30.0 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX 580	¥ 25,886	29.9 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	¥ 18,086	29.6 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB	¥ 28,712	29.3 FPS
2016	AMD Radeon RX 480	¥ 45,216	28.1 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB	¥ 19,217	28.1 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 390X	¥ 48,494	27.9 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti	¥ 79,015	27.5 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX 570	¥ 19,104	27.4 FPS
2014	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970	¥ 37,190	26.8 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 290X	¥ 62,059	26.4 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 390	¥ 37,190	26.3 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650	¥ 16,843	26.3 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 290	¥ 45,103	24.6 FPS
2016	AMD Radeon RX 470	¥ 20,234	24.3 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780	¥ 73,363	22.1 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 380X	¥ 25,886	19.8 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 280X	¥ 33,799	19.7 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770	¥ 45,103	18.8 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti	¥ 19,104	18.3 FPS
2014	AMD Radeon R9 285	¥ 28,147	17.5 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 380	¥ 22,495	17.4 FPS
2014	AMD Radeon R9 280	¥ 31,538	17.2 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960	¥ 22,495	17.0 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760	¥ 28,147	15.3 FPS
2018	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050	¥ 19,104	14.6 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 270	¥ 20,234	14.3 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950	¥ 17,973	13.8 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX 560	¥ 11,191	12.7 FPS

RX 480 の間に位置 GTX 1060 6GB と GTX 1060 3GB よりも遅い立ち下がり、 GTX 1060 6GB によって 4.3 ％及びより速い GTX 1060 3GB によって 0 ここでは、すべてのグラフィックカードに対する平均相対パフォーマンスがあります。 RX 480 とそのライバルである GTX 970 にはわずかな差があります。さらに、 RX 480 は R9 380 よりもかなり余裕を R9 380 高速 R9 380 。

Cyberpunk 2077 (2020)

超品質

解像度 1920x1080

年	グラフィックカード	価格	1秒あたりのフレーム数
2019	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660	¥ 24,869	41.3 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti	¥ 73,363	35.2 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 FURY X	¥ 73,363	34.6 FPS
2018	AMD Radeon RX 590	¥ 31,538	34.3 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 Nano	¥ 73,363	32.6 FPS
2019	AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB	¥ 22,495	31.9 FPS
2014	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980	¥ 62,059	31.9 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 FURY	¥ 62,059	30.9 FPS
2019	AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB	¥ 19,104	30.0 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX 580	¥ 25,886	29.9 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	¥ 18,086	29.6 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB	¥ 28,712	29.3 FPS
2016	AMD Radeon RX 480	¥ 45,216	28.1 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB	¥ 19,217	28.1 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 390X	¥ 48,494	27.9 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti	¥ 79,015	27.5 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX 570	¥ 19,104	27.4 FPS
2014	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970	¥ 37,190	26.8 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 290X	¥ 62,059	26.4 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 390	¥ 37,190	26.3 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650	¥ 16,843	26.3 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 290	¥ 45,103	24.6 FPS
2016	AMD Radeon RX 470	¥ 20,234	24.3 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780	¥ 73,363	22.1 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 380X	¥ 25,886	19.8 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 280X	¥ 33,799	19.7 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770	¥ 45,103	18.8 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti	¥ 19,104	18.3 FPS
2014	AMD Radeon R9 285	¥ 28,147	17.5 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 380	¥ 22,495	17.4 FPS
2014	AMD Radeon R9 280	¥ 31,538	17.2 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960	¥ 22,495	17.0 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760	¥ 28,147	15.3 FPS
2018	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050	¥ 19,104	14.6 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 270	¥ 20,234	14.3 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950	¥ 17,973	13.8 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX 560	¥ 11,191	12.7 FPS

Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)

超品質

解像度 1920x1080

年	グラフィックカード	価格	1秒あたりのフレーム数
2019	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660	¥ 24,869	110.0 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER	¥ 18,086	94.5 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti	¥ 73,363	93.8 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 FURY X	¥ 73,363	92.2 FPS
2018	AMD Radeon RX 590	¥ 31,538	91.5 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 Nano	¥ 73,363	87.0 FPS
2014	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980	¥ 62,059	85.0 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 FURY	¥ 62,059	82.4 FPS
2019	AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB	¥ 22,495	82.4 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX 580	¥ 25,886	79.7 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB	¥ 28,712	78.0 FPS
2016	AMD Radeon RX 480	¥ 45,216	75.0 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB	¥ 19,217	75.0 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 390X	¥ 48,494	74.4 FPS
2019	AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB	¥ 19,104	73.4 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti	¥ 79,015	73.3 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX 570	¥ 19,104	73.0 FPS
2014	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970	¥ 37,190	71.4 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 290X	¥ 62,059	70.5 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 390	¥ 37,190	70.1 FPS
2019	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650	¥ 16,843	70.0 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 290	¥ 45,103	65.7 FPS
2016	AMD Radeon RX 470	¥ 20,234	64.8 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780	¥ 73,363	58.9 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 380X	¥ 25,886	52.9 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 280X	¥ 33,799	52.4 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770	¥ 45,103	50.0 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti	¥ 19,104	48.7 FPS
2014	AMD Radeon R9 285	¥ 28,147	46.6 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 380	¥ 22,495	46.4 FPS
2014	AMD Radeon R9 280	¥ 31,538	45.8 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960	¥ 22,495	45.2 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760	¥ 28,147	40.9 FPS
2018	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050	¥ 19,104	39.0 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 270	¥ 20,234	38.0 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950	¥ 17,973	36.8 FPS
2017	AMD Radeon RX 560	¥ 11,191	33.9 FPS

RX 480 の間に位置 GTX 1060 6GB と GTX 1060 3GB よりも遅い立ち下がり、 GTX 1060 6GB によって 4 ％及びより速い GTX 1060 3GB によって 0 ここでは、すべてのグラフィックカードに対する平均相対パフォーマンスがあります。 RX 480 とそのライバルである GTX 970 にはわずかな差があります。さらに、 RX 480 は R9 380 よりもかなり余裕を R9 380 高速 R9 380 。

設定時の超品質ゲームパフォーマンス

品質設定の変更

解像度 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS

年	ゲーム	1秒あたりのフレーム数
2023	Resident Evil 4	43 48.3
2023	A Plague Tale: Requiem	29 33.0
2023	Hogwarts Legacy	25 28.6
2023	The Last of Us Part I	19 22.0
2023	Forspoken	22 25.5
2023	The Callisto Protocol	17 19.8
2023	Dead Space	29 33.0
2023	Baldur's Gate 3	35 39.1
2023	Armored Core VI	35 39.1
2023	Immortals of Aveum	15 17.6
2023	Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart	31 35.1
2023	Remnant II	17 19.8
2023	Star Wars Jedi: Survivor	23 26.4
2023	Atomic Heart	23 26.4
2023	Starfield	11 13.2
2022	Elden Ring	32 36.4
2022	God of War	31 34.5
2022	Overwatch 2	57 64.1
2022	F1 22	35 39.5
2022	Dying Light 2	33 37.3
2022	Total War: Warhammer III	33 37.3
2022	Spider-Man Remastered	55 61.5
2022	Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II	39 43.9
2021	Forza Horizon 5	31 34.9
2021	Halo Infinite	23 26.6
2021	Battlefield 2042	44 49.1
2021	Hitman 3	45 50.5
2021	Far Cry 6	42 47.0
2021	Guardians of the Galaxy	46 51.4
2020	Watch Dogs: Legion	46 51.8
2020	Assassin's Creed Valhalla	25 28.1
2020	Microsoft Flight Simulator	16 18.4
2020	Valorant	111 123.4
2020	Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War	43 48.4
2020	Death Stranding	50 55.9
2020	Marvel's Avengers	32 36.4
2020	Godfall	48 54.4
2020	Cyberpunk 2077	25 28.1
2019	Apex Legends	56 63.0
2019	Anthem	36 40.6
2019	Far Cry New Dawn	53 59.5
2019	Resident Evil 2	68 75.8
2019	Metro Exodus	30 33.7
2019	World War Z	76 85.0
2019	Gears of War 5	44 49.1
2019	F1 2019	55 61.6
2019	GreedFall	49 55.5
2019	Borderlands 3	35 39.0
2019	Call of Duty Modern Warfare	67 75.0
2019	Red Dead Redemption 2	26 28.9
2019	Need For Speed: Heat	40 45.4
2018	Call of Duty: Black Ops 4	75 84.0
2018	Assassin's Creed Odyssey	29 33.0
2018	Final Fantasy XV	51 57.0
2018	Shadow of the Tomb Raider	48 54.0
2018	Just Cause 4	43 48.7
2018	Monster Hunter: World	47 52.5
2018	Strange Brigade	71 79.1
2018	Battlefield V	58 65.0
2017	Assassin's Creed Origins	42 47.0
2017	Destiny 2	81 91.0
2017	Need For Speed: Payback	60 67.5
2017	For Honor	81 90.0
2017	Project CARS 2	57 63.7
2017	Forza Motorsport 7	69 77.2
2016	Dishonored 2	41 46.5
2015	Rocket League	236 262.5
2015	Need For Speed	65 72.7
2015	Project CARS	62 69.7
2015	Rainbow Six Siege	114 127.5
2012	Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	162 180.0
2009	League of Legends	303 337.5

解像度 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS

年	ゲーム	1秒あたりのフレーム数
2023	Resident Evil 4	28 35.1
2023	A Plague Tale: Requiem	19 24.2
2023	Hogwarts Legacy	17 22.0
2023	The Last of Us Part I	13 16.7
2023	Forspoken	13 16.7
2023	The Callisto Protocol	11 14.1
2023	Dead Space	17 22.0
2023	Baldur's Gate 3	25 31.6
2023	Armored Core VI	25 31.6
2023	Immortals of Aveum	9 12.3
2023	Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart	19 24.2
2023	Remnant II	10 13.2
2023	Star Wars Jedi: Survivor	15 19.8
2023	Atomic Heart	15 18.9
2023	Starfield	9 11.9
2022	Elden Ring	22 28.7
2022	God of War	23 29.6
2022	Overwatch 2	44 55.1
2022	F1 22	19 24.2
2022	Dying Light 2	19 24.2
2022	Total War: Warhammer III	21 26.4
2022	Spider-Man Remastered	35 43.9
2022	Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II	22 28.6
2021	Forza Horizon 5	24 30.0
2021	Halo Infinite	19 24.0
2021	Battlefield 2042	26 32.6
2021	Hitman 3	28 36.0
2021	Far Cry 6	28 35.1
2021	Guardians of the Galaxy	29 36.5
2020	Watch Dogs: Legion	27 33.8
2020	Assassin's Creed Valhalla	19 24.4
2020	Microsoft Flight Simulator	12 16.1
2020	Valorant	80 100.9
2020	Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War	30 37.9
2020	Death Stranding	34 43.4
2020	Marvel's Avengers	20 25.9
2020	Godfall	29 36.4
2020	Cyberpunk 2077	21 26.3
2019	Apex Legends	37 46.9
2019	Anthem	25 32.2
2019	Far Cry New Dawn	36 46.2
2019	Resident Evil 2	40 51.0
2019	Metro Exodus	20 26.2
2019	World War Z	49 62.0
2019	Gears of War 5	28 35.6
2019	F1 2019	34 43.6
2019	GreedFall	32 40.1
2019	Borderlands 3	21 27.4
2019	Call of Duty Modern Warfare	43 54.0
2019	Red Dead Redemption 2	18 23.6
2019	Need For Speed: Heat	28 35.6
2018	Call of Duty: Black Ops 4	42 53.0
2018	Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20 26.0
2018	Final Fantasy XV	32 40.0
2018	Shadow of the Tomb Raider	28 35.0
2018	Fallout 76	50 63.0
2018	Just Cause 4	28 36.0
2018	Monster Hunter: World	29 36.7
2018	Strange Brigade	44 55.1
2018	Battlefield V	36 46.0
2017	Assassin's Creed Origins	24 31.0
2017	Destiny 2	62 78.0
2017	Need For Speed: Payback	38 48.7
2017	For Honor	42 52.5
2017	Project CARS 2	36 45.0
2017	Forza Motorsport 7	55 69.7
2016	Dishonored 2	31 39.7
2015	Rocket League	90 112.5
2015	Need For Speed	44 56.2
2015	Project CARS	42 53.3
2015	Rainbow Six Siege	66 82.5
2012	Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	120 150.0
2009	League of Legends	150 187.5

解像度 3440x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS

年	ゲーム	1秒あたりのフレーム数
2019	Apex Legends	30 40.1
2019	Anthem	20 26.6
2019	Far Cry New Dawn	28 37.8
2019	Resident Evil 2	30 40.7
2019	Metro Exodus	17 22.8
2019	World War Z	39 52.3
2019	Gears of War 5	23 31.1
2019	F1 2019	29 38.2
2019	GreedFall	23 30.3
2019	Borderlands 3	16 22.3
2019	Call of Duty Modern Warfare	35 46.1
2019	Red Dead Redemption 2	15 20.7
2019	Need For Speed: Heat	23 31.1
2018	Call of Duty: Black Ops 4	33 44.4
2018	Assassin's Creed Odyssey	17 23.5
2018	Final Fantasy XV	25 34.2
2018	Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21 28.9
2018	Fallout 76	39 52.4
2018	Just Cause 4	22 29.3
2018	Monster Hunter: World	22 29.1
2018	Strange Brigade	34 45.5
2018	Battlefield V	30 40.1
2017	Assassin's Creed Origins	22 29.4
2017	Destiny 2	47 62.6
2017	Need For Speed: Payback	33 44.1
2017	For Honor	31 42.1
2017	Project CARS 2	33 44.1
2017	Forza Motorsport 7	52 68.6
2016	Dishonored 2	28 38.1
2015	Rocket League	67 88.3
2015	Need For Speed	38 50.1
2015	Project CARS	36 48.6
2015	Rainbow Six Siege	49 64.6
2012	Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	115 152.5
2009	League of Legends	106 140.4

解像度 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS

年	ゲーム	1秒あたりのフレーム数
2023	Resident Evil 4	18 26.4
2023	A Plague Tale: Requiem	10 15.4
2023	Hogwarts Legacy	10 15.4
2023	The Last of Us Part I	6 8.8
2023	Forspoken	5 7.9
2023	The Callisto Protocol	4 7.0
2023	Dead Space	6 8.8
2023	Baldur's Gate 3	12 17.6
2023	Armored Core VI	12 17.6
2023	Immortals of Aveum	3 5.7
2023	Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart	9 13.2
2023	Remnant II	4 6.6
2023	Star Wars Jedi: Survivor	6 9.7
2023	Atomic Heart	8 11.9
2023	Starfield	5 7.9
2022	Elden Ring	11 16.4
2022	God of War	16 23.0
2022	Overwatch 2	29 41.6
2022	F1 22	12 17.6
2022	Dying Light 2	12 17.6
2022	Total War: Warhammer III	13 19.8
2022	Spider-Man Remastered	21 30.8
2022	Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II	12 17.6
2021	Forza Horizon 5	16 23.3
2021	Halo Infinite	11 16.5
2021	Battlefield 2042	14 21.0
2021	Hitman 3	15 22.0
2021	Far Cry 6	13 18.9
2021	Guardians of the Galaxy	13 19.8
2020	Watch Dogs: Legion	15 22.0
2020	Assassin's Creed Valhalla	11 16.5
2020	Microsoft Flight Simulator	8 12.8
2020	Valorant	61 87.8
2020	Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War	14 20.3
2020	Death Stranding	18 26.3
2020	Marvel's Avengers	9 13.6
2020	Godfall	12 17.3
2020	Cyberpunk 2077	12 17.2
2019	Apex Legends	19 28.0
2019	Anthem	12 17.5
2019	Far Cry New Dawn	17 24.5
2019	Resident Evil 2	17 25.1
2019	Metro Exodus	11 16.5
2019	World War Z	24 35.7
2019	Gears of War 5	15 22.5
2019	F1 2019	19 27.8
2019	GreedFall	11 16.5
2019	Borderlands 3	10 14.3
2019	Call of Duty Modern Warfare	22 32.2
2019	Red Dead Redemption 2	10 15.0
2019	Need For Speed: Heat	15 22.5
2018	Call of Duty: Black Ops 4	21 30.0
2018	Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12 18.0
2018	Final Fantasy XV	16 24.0
2018	Shadow of the Tomb Raider	13 19.0
2018	Fallout 76	24 35.0
2018	Just Cause 4	13 18.8
2018	Monster Hunter: World	12 17.6
2018	Strange Brigade	21 30.0
2018	Battlefield V	20 29.0
2017	Assassin's Creed Origins	16 24.0
2017	Destiny 2	27 39.0
2017	Need For Speed: Payback	23 33.7
2017	For Honor	18 26.2
2017	Project CARS 2	26 37.5
2017	Forza Motorsport 7	40 58.5
2016	Dishonored 2	22 31.5
2015	Rocket League	36 52.5
2015	Need For Speed	26 37.5
2015	Project CARS	26 37.5
2015	Rainbow Six Siege	26 38.2
2012	Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	94 135.0
2009	League of Legends	52 75.0

RX 480 with i7-6700K at 1080p and 超品質 settings

RX 480 with i7-6700K at 1440p and 超品質 settings

RX 480 with i7-6700K at 4K and 超品質 settings

競合他社との比較

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
2019 6GB ¥ 24,869
36% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
2019 4GB ¥ 16,843
5% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
2019 4GB ¥ 18,086
20% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB
2019 8GB ¥ 22,495
21% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT 4GB
2019 4GB ¥ 19,104
10% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
2018 3GB ¥ 14,582
57% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon RX 590
2018 8GB ¥ 24,191
30% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon RX 560
2017 4GB ¥ 11,191
65% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon RX 570
2017 4GB ¥ 13,904
0% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon RX 580
2017 8GB ¥ 17,069
18% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon RX 470
2016 4GB ¥ 38,660
12% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
2016 4GB ¥ 14,582
41% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
2016 6GB ¥ 17,973
11% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB
2016 3GB ¥ 19,217
6% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
2015 2GB ¥ 10,061
66% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
2015 2GB ¥ 10,061
45% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
2015 6GB ¥ 69,972
34% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 380X
2015 4GB ¥ 25,886
30% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 380
2015 2GB ¥ 33,799
41% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 390
2015 8GB ¥ 52,564
0% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 390X
2015 8GB ¥ 55,955
7% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 FURY
2015 4GB ¥ 62,059
10% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 FURY X
2015 4GB ¥ 73,363
26% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 Nano
2015 4GB ¥ 172,838
17% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK
2014 6GB ¥ 112,927
11% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
2014 4GB ¥ 28,147
21% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
2014 4GB ¥ 50,755
4% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 280
2014 3GB ¥ 39,564
43% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 285
2014 2GB ¥ 42,955
41% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
2013 2GB ¥ 36,173
47% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
2013 3GB ¥ 46,346
1% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN
2013 6GB ¥ 73,476
12% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
2013 3GB ¥ 40,129
7% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
2013 2GB ¥ 20,234
34% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon HD 7990
2013 3GB ¥ 112,927
21% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 290
2013 4GB ¥ 35,042
4% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 280X
2013 3GB ¥ 39,564
25% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 290X
2013 4GB ¥ 45,103
2% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 270
2013 2GB ¥ 31,086
58% slower

Compare

RX 480 仕様

RX 480 Board Design

Board Number	C940, D009-01
Length	9.5 inches 241 mm
Outputs	1x HDMI3x DisplayPort
Power Connectors	1x 6-pin
Slot Width	Dual-slot
TDP	150 W

RX 480 Clock Speeds

Boost Clock	1266 MHz
GPU Clock	1120 MHz
Memory Clock	2000 MHz 8000 MHz effective

RX 480 Graphics Card

Bus Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16
Generation	Arctic Islands (RX 400)
Launch Price	229 USD
Production	Active
Release Date	Jun 29th, 2016

RX 480 Graphics Features

DirectX	12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL	2
OpenGL	4.5
Shader Model	6
Vulkan	1.1.82

RX 480 Graphics Processor

Architecture	GCN 4.0
Die Size	244 mm²
GPU Name	Ellesmere
GPU Variant	Polaris 10 XT (215-0876184)
Process Size	14 nm
Transistors	5,700 million

RX 480 Memory

Bandwidth	256.0 GB/s
Memory Bus	256 bit
Memory Size	8192 MB
Memory Type	GDDR5

RX 480 Render Config

Compute Units	36
ROPs	32
Shading Units	2304
TMUs	144

RX 480 Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance	5,834 GFLOPS (1:1)
FP32 (float) performance	5,834 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance	364.6 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate	40.51 GPixel/s
Texture Rate	182.3 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

Conclusion. AMD says it’s going after that chunk of the market buying $100 to $300 graphics cards—84% of gamers, according to its internal data.

The Radeon RX 480 ($175 - $250 on Amazon) / (£189.39 on Amazon UK) is a watershed GPU for AMD, as it marks the arrival of the company’s all-new and much-anticipated Polaris architecture; it’s ...

Today, AMD is introducing their new 14 nanometer Polaris architecture. The first card we are reviewing is the Radeon RX 480, a highly affordable 8 GB card that sets out to shatter current price-to-performance ratios. In terms of performance, you can expect speeds between the GTX 980 and GTX 970.

Nvidia grabbed recent headlines with its flagship GPU launches, but AMD stole some of that thunder with the new Radeon RX 480. The red team has made bold claims about its new card, saying that it ...

AMD Radeon RX 480 review: Redefining what's possible with a $200 graphics card The $200 Radeon RX 480 is the first graphics card built around AMD's 14nm Polaris GPU, and it changes the game.

AMD Radeon RX 480 specs. Based on the new Polaris 10 graphics core, this is the first 14nm FinFET product produced by AMD. It features 36 compute units in total and boost clocks max to 1266MHz ...

AMD's Radeon RX 480 brings high-end graphics to the masses for just $200 The move to 14nm FinFET technology will let AMD's new $200 Radeon tango with the GTX 980 and Radeon R9 390X.

The AMD Radeon RX 480 is expected to feature graphics performance levels between the GeForce GTX 970 and GeForce GTX 980 graphics card so we can expect some decent numbers from this cost effective ...

This was the AMD Radeon RX 480's last chance to shine, and the card certainly did, nearly tripling the score of the GeForce GTX 960 at 1440p (2,560x1,440 resolution), pulling well ahead of the GTX ...

グラフィックカードを購入する前に考慮すべきこと

新しいグラフィックカードを購入してシステムをアップグレードすることを計画していた場合。それから考慮すべきいくつかの重要な要素があります。

解像度と品質：ゲームパフォーマンスへの影響

ゲームのパフォーマンスに影響するものは何ですか？明快さまたは詳細？

PCゲームにおけるUltra VS高品質設定

各プレイヤーは、PCゲームの理想的な設定について異なる考え方を持っています。しかし、ほとんどの場合、高品質のグラフィック構成を選択するのが良い方法です。

CPUやGPUのボトルネックとは何ですか？

あなたは突然のフレームドロップを受けていますか？ボトルネックがあるかもしれません。

私にとって許容できるFPS速度は？

ゲームによっては、それでも低いフレームレートで素晴らしいニンニクを楽しむことができます。

GPU Hierarchy

GPU Compare

CPU Compare

Gaming Laptops

Gaming Monitors

Gaming Headsets

議論とコメント

あなたのコメントを共有する

hammerlogger 7 years ago

i3 6100 rx480 or i5 6500 r9 380xWhich of them is the Better Combo For 900p Gaming?Thnx

0 0

endnotetokahee 7 years ago

For 900p? Both are overkill!As a gaming setup, the i3+480 will consistently beat the i5 and 380x by a huge margin in most games

0 0

acutenesspace 7 years ago

RX 480 4GB or RX 470 8GBI'm looking at the msi gaming X 480 and armor OC 470

0 0

cloodcraniac 7 years ago

It's a tough one. The RX 470 is close to the RX 480 performance wise and some games do benefit from high VRAM. For example, I'm playing Forza Motorsport 6: Apex at ultra settings and it really requires 8GB of VRAM for a stutter-free experience on that render setting. I always had problems with Forza Motorsport 6 as it really uses loads of VRAM when playing, my experience has been a lot better since moving to an 8GB graphics card in general. However, most games will be fine with 4GB VRAM and in those games the RX 480 4GB will be easily outperforming the RX 470 8GB.

0 0

astonishedtanning 7 years ago

RX 480 same PCB as 580I'm wondering if the reference PCB in the RX480 is the same as the one the 580?

0 0

pedometeraustin 7 years ago

Each manufacter probably makes small changes to the printed circuit board. Why do you want to know about the PCB? You can flash the bios of the rx480 to make it a 580.https://www.hardocp.com/news/2017/04/24/how_to_flash_your_rx_480_580_stepbystep

0 0

craftyking 7 years ago

RX 470 OC vs RX 480 stock vs r9 390 stocklooking to buy a new gpu. where i live, the 480 is around 110 usd more than the 470

0 0

cookeroxidize 7 years ago

The 480 is the best card and the best deal, just avoid Gigabyte this time around as they've been having problems with cooling the 480. I'd go for something from XFX or MSI. Unless you can get the 390 for under $150 from a trusted friend that hasn't beaten it to death for months in a mining rig then there's really no reason to buy a 390.

0 0

cleaversculling 7 years ago

Rx 480 4gb vs rx 470 8gbHi.i wanted to buy one these 2 card.but im strugle.btw the price is same in my country..

0 0

firefoxbarnaby 7 years ago

The difference in performance between a 470 and a 480 of equal memory can be closed by overclocking the 470 by approximately 10%, which is more than doable on an air-cooled solution.The biggest impacts RAM has on card performance is for handling high-res textures and AA. More available video RAM means your card can handle higher-memory textures, and use better AA options. For any game you can buy today, a 4GB card is more than enough, but once 1440p and 4k resolutions become more prevalant, you're gonna want those extra 4GB.For your comparison, I would recommend the 470. The 480 is only a better card if both price and RAM are equal, otherwise the biggest thing the 480 gives you is more overclocking room. Personally, I would only consider a 480 if I had a water-cooling solution to implement on it so I could overclock the piss out of it.

0 0

RX 480 品質 i7-6700K 設定で 超品質 のベンチマーク

Assassin's Creed Valhalla (2020)

超品質

解像 度 1920x1080

Cyberpunk 2077 (2020)

超品質

解像 度 1920x1080

Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)

超品質

解像 度 1920x1080

設定時の 超品質 ゲームパフォーマンス

品質設定の変更

解像 度 1920x1080

解像 度 2560x1440

解像 度 3440x1440

解像 度 3840x2160

競合他社との比較

RX 480 仕様

RX 480 Board Design

RX 480 Clock Speeds

RX 480 Graphics Card

RX 480 Graphics Features

RX 480 Graphics Processor

RX 480 Memory

RX 480 Render Config

RX 480 Theoretical Performance

Critics Reviews

グラフィックカードを購入する前に考慮すべきこと

解像度と品質：ゲームパフォーマンスへの影響

PCゲームにおけるUltra VS高品質設定

CPUやGPUのボトルネックとは何ですか？

私にとって許容できるFPS速度は？

GPU Hierarchy

GPU Compare

CPU Compare

Gaming Laptops

Gaming Monitors

Gaming Headsets

議論とコメント

あなたのコメントを共有する

RX 480 品質 i7-6700K 設定で超品質のベンチマーク

解像度 1920x1080

解像度 1920x1080

解像度 1920x1080

設定時の超品質ゲームパフォーマンス

解像度 1920x1080

解像度 2560x1440

解像度 3440x1440

解像度 3840x2160