R9 FURY 品質 i7-4790K 設定で 超品質 のベンチマーク

1440p では R9 FURY 、アンチエイリアシング、以下のアンビエントオクルージョンなしで、ウルトラでかなり多くのすべてに 50-60 fps を打つことができると影を断った。 それは、 R9 FURY 非常にパワー空腹カードであり、まともな電源ユニットを必要とすることは注目に値する。 現在 4096 の MB の RAM R9 FURY を使用すると、より近代的なゲームで非常に少ないメモリ関連のボトルネックを持つことができます。

 R9 FURY 品質 i7-4790K 設定で 超品質 のベンチマーク
AMD Radeon R9 FURY
価格 ¥ 62,059.0
2015
最高記録温度 C
最大ファンノイズ dB
推奨電源 625W
ベンチマーク CPU Intel Core i7-4790K @ 4.00GHz ($306.99)
FPS に対する CPU の影響 + 0.0 FPS
FPS% の CPU への影響 0.0%
ベンチマークの品質設定 Ultra Quality Settings
平均1080p のパフォーマンス 66.0 FPS
平均1440p パフォーマンス 49.7 FPS
(Ultrawide) 平均1440p パフォーマンス 42.7 FPS
平均4k パフォーマンス 30.1 FPS
メモリ 4 GB
1フレームあたり1080 pのコスト ¥ 940.5
1フレームあたり1440pのコスト ¥ 1,249.1
(Ultrawide) 1フレームあたり1440pのコスト ¥ 1,453.7
1フレームあたり4Kの費用 ¥ 2,061.8
シリーズ R9 FURY
Variant AMD Radeon R9 FURY
全体の組み合わせのスコア 68/100 よし

良いニュースは、 R9 FURY X リリースにより、 R9 FURY の価格がさらに値引きされることです。 R9 FURY は R9 390 よりもはるかに高価で、なんと ¥ 62059 かかります。これを元々 ¥ 37190.2, ¥ 48494.2 価格で R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 390X れていた R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 390X と比較してください。一方、 NVIDIA 最も近い同等のカードである GTX 980 コスト ¥ 62059 。

仕様の仕様として、この R9 FURY 10.7 %fpsを誇ることで、直接の前身である R9 390 飛躍させます。 幸いなことに、ゲームのパフォーマンスは非常に印象的でした。 R9 FURY は、一貫して R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 390X よりも優れたフレームレートの増加を実現し、アップグレードを正当化します。

NVIDIA の最も近いライバルである GTX 980 と比較して、 R9 FURY は -10.4 %遅くなりました。 以下のために 1080p Full HD 、我々はプレーすることができました GreedFall, Death Stranding, Final Fantasy XV, F1 2019, Spider-Man Remastered で 61 にfpsの 68 FPSと の周りに浮かんでフレームレートを保持 65 FPSを。

以下のために 1440p Quad HD 、我々はプレーすることができました Overwatch 2, Strange Brigade, World War Z, Battlefield V, Fallout 76 で 61 にfpsの 72 FPSと の周りに浮かんでフレームレートを保持 65 FPSを。 以下のために 2160p 4K 、我々はプレーすることができました Valorant で 96 にfpsの 96 FPSと の周りに浮かんでフレームレートを保持 96 FPSを。

Assassin's Creed Valhalla (2020)

超品質

解像 度 1920x1080

グラフィックカード 価格 1秒あたりのフレーム数
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 ¥ 45,103
45.2 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X ¥ 112,927
45.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 ¥ 45,103
43.0 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti ¥ 73,363
35.2 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY X ¥ 73,363
34.6 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 ¥ 31,538
34.3 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 Nano ¥ 73,363
32.6 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 ¥ 62,059
31.9 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY ¥ 62,059
30.9 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 ¥ 25,886
29.9 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ¥ 28,712
29.3 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK ¥ 112,927
29.1 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 ¥ 112,927
28.4 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 480 ¥ 45,216
28.1 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB ¥ 19,217
28.1 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon HD 7990 ¥ 112,927
28.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X ¥ 48,494
27.9 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti ¥ 79,015
27.5 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 ¥ 19,104
27.4 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN ¥ 112,927
27.1 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 ¥ 37,190
26.8 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290X ¥ 62,059
26.4 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390 ¥ 37,190
26.3 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290 ¥ 45,103
24.6 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 ¥ 20,234
24.3 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 ¥ 73,363
22.1 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition ¥ 56,407
19.9 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380X ¥ 25,886
19.8 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 280X ¥ 33,799
19.7 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 ¥ 45,103
18.8 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti ¥ 19,104
18.3 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 ¥ 56,407
17.9 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 ¥ 28,147
17.5 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 ¥ 22,495
17.4 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 ¥ 31,538
17.2 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 ¥ 22,495
17.0 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 ¥ 45,103
16.5 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 ¥ 28,147
15.3 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7950 ¥ 50,755
14.7 FPS
2018 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 ¥ 19,104
14.6 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti ¥ 33,799
14.4 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 ¥ 25,886
12.8 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7850 ¥ 28,147
11.5 FPS

R9 FURY の間に位置 GTX 980 と RX 580 よりも遅い立ち下がり、 GTX 980 によって 3.2 %及びより速い RX 580 によって 3.3 ここでは、すべてのグラフィックカードに対して強力な相対パフォーマンスを備えています。 さらに、 R9 FURY は R9 390 よりもかなり余裕を R9 390 高速 R9 390 。

Cyberpunk 2077 (2020)

超品質

解像 度 1920x1080

グラフィックカード 価格 1秒あたりのフレーム数
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 ¥ 45,103
45.2 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X ¥ 112,927
45.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 ¥ 45,103
43.0 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti ¥ 73,363
35.2 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY X ¥ 73,363
34.6 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 ¥ 31,538
34.3 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 Nano ¥ 73,363
32.6 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 ¥ 62,059
31.9 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY ¥ 62,059
30.9 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 ¥ 25,886
29.9 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ¥ 28,712
29.3 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK ¥ 112,927
29.1 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 ¥ 112,927
28.4 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 480 ¥ 45,216
28.1 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB ¥ 19,217
28.1 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon HD 7990 ¥ 112,927
28.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X ¥ 48,494
27.9 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti ¥ 79,015
27.5 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 ¥ 19,104
27.4 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN ¥ 112,927
27.1 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 ¥ 37,190
26.8 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290X ¥ 62,059
26.4 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390 ¥ 37,190
26.3 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290 ¥ 45,103
24.6 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 ¥ 20,234
24.3 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 ¥ 73,363
22.1 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition ¥ 56,407
19.9 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380X ¥ 25,886
19.8 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 280X ¥ 33,799
19.7 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 ¥ 45,103
18.8 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti ¥ 19,104
18.3 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 ¥ 56,407
17.9 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 ¥ 28,147
17.5 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 ¥ 22,495
17.4 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 ¥ 31,538
17.2 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 ¥ 22,495
17.0 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 ¥ 45,103
16.5 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 ¥ 28,147
15.3 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7950 ¥ 50,755
14.7 FPS
2018 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 ¥ 19,104
14.6 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti ¥ 33,799
14.4 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 ¥ 25,886
12.8 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7850 ¥ 28,147
11.5 FPS

R9 FURY の間に位置 GTX 980 と RX 580 よりも遅い立ち下がり、 GTX 980 によって 3.2 %及びより速い RX 580 によって 3.3 ここでは、すべてのグラフィックカードに対して強力な相対パフォーマンスを備えています。 さらに、 R9 FURY は R9 390 よりもかなり余裕を R9 390 高速 R9 390 。

Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)

超品質

解像 度 1920x1080

グラフィックカード 価格 1秒あたりのフレーム数
2017 AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 ¥ 45,103
120.5 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X ¥ 112,927
120.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 ¥ 45,103
114.7 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti ¥ 73,363
93.8 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY X ¥ 73,363
92.2 FPS
2018 AMD Radeon RX 590 ¥ 31,538
91.5 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 Nano ¥ 73,363
87.0 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 ¥ 62,059
85.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 FURY ¥ 62,059
82.4 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 580 ¥ 25,886
79.7 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB ¥ 28,712
78.0 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN BLACK ¥ 112,927
77.7 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 ¥ 112,927
75.7 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 480 ¥ 45,216
75.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3GB ¥ 19,217
75.0 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon HD 7990 ¥ 112,927
74.7 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390X ¥ 48,494
74.4 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti ¥ 79,015
73.3 FPS
2017 AMD Radeon RX 570 ¥ 19,104
73.0 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN ¥ 112,927
72.3 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 ¥ 37,190
71.4 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290X ¥ 62,059
70.5 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 390 ¥ 37,190
70.1 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 290 ¥ 45,103
65.7 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 470 ¥ 20,234
64.8 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 ¥ 73,363
58.9 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7970 GHz Edition ¥ 56,407
53.1 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380X ¥ 25,886
52.9 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 280X ¥ 33,799
52.4 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 ¥ 45,103
50.0 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti ¥ 19,104
48.7 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 ¥ 56,407
47.6 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 ¥ 28,147
46.6 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 ¥ 22,495
46.4 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 ¥ 31,538
45.8 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 ¥ 22,495
45.2 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 ¥ 45,103
44.1 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 ¥ 28,147
40.9 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7950 ¥ 50,755
39.1 FPS
2018 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 ¥ 19,104
39.0 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti ¥ 33,799
38.5 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 ¥ 25,886
34.0 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7850 ¥ 28,147
30.7 FPS

R9 FURY の間に位置 GTX 980 と RX 580 よりも遅い立ち下がり、 GTX 980 によって 3.2 %及びより速い RX 580 によって 3.4 ここでは、すべてのグラフィックカードに対して強力な相対パフォーマンスを備えています。 さらに、 R9 FURY は R9 390 よりもかなり余裕を R9 390 高速 R9 390 。

設定時の 超品質 ゲームパフォーマンス

品質設定の変更

解像 度 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
ゲーム 1秒あたりのフレーム数
2023 Resident Evil 4
48
53.5
2023 A Plague Tale: Requiem
32
36.5
2023 Hogwarts Legacy
28
31.6
2023 The Last of Us Part I
21
24.3
2023 Forspoken
25
28.2
2023 The Callisto Protocol
19
21.9
2023 Dead Space
32
36.5
2023 Baldur's Gate 3
38
43.3
2023 Armored Core VI
38
43.3
2023 Immortals of Aveum
17
19.4
2023 Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart
35
38.9
2023 Remnant II
19
21.9
2023 Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
26
29.2
2023 Atomic Heart
26
29.2
2023 Starfield
13
14.6
2022 Elden Ring
36
40.0
2022 God of War
34
37.9
2022 Overwatch 2
63
70.5
2022 F1 22
39
43.7
2022 Dying Light 2
37
41.3
2022 Total War: Warhammer III
37
41.3
2022 Spider-Man Remastered
61
68.0
2022 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
43
48.6
2021 Forza Horizon 5
34
38.3
2021 Halo Infinite
26
29.3
2021 Battlefield 2042
48
54.0
2021 Hitman 3
50
55.9
2021 Far Cry 6
46
52.0
2021 Guardians of the Galaxy
51
56.9
2020 Watch Dogs: Legion
51
57.3
2020 Assassin's Creed Valhalla
27
30.9
2020 Microsoft Flight Simulator
18
20.2
2020 Valorant
121
135.5
2020 Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
47
53.1
2020 Death Stranding
55
61.4
2020 Marvel's Avengers
36
40.0
2020 Godfall
53
59.7
2020 Cyberpunk 2077
27
30.9
2019 Apex Legends
64
72.0
2019 Anthem
41
46.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
61
68.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
74
83.2
2019 Metro Exodus
33
37.1
2019 World War Z
81
91.0
2019 Gears of War 5
48
54.0
2019 F1 2019
60
67.7
2019 GreedFall
54
61.0
2019 Borderlands 3
38
42.8
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
74
82.4
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
28
31.7
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
44
49.9
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
76
85.0
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
34
38.0
2018 Final Fantasy XV
58
65.0
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
45
51.0
2018 Just Cause 4
48
53.6
2018 Monster Hunter: World
51
57.7
2018 Strange Brigade
78
86.9
2018 Battlefield V
74
83.0
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
49
55.0
2017 Destiny 2
94
105.0
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
66
74.2
2017 For Honor
89
98.9
2017 Project CARS 2
63
70.0
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
76
84.9
2016 Dishonored 2
45
51.1
2015 Rocket League
259
288.4
2015 Need For Speed
71
79.9
2015 Project CARS
68
76.6
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
126
140.1
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
178
197.8
2009 League of Legends
333
370.8

解像 度 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
ゲーム 1秒あたりのフレーム数
2023 Resident Evil 4
31
38.9
2023 A Plague Tale: Requiem
21
26.7
2023 Hogwarts Legacy
19
24.3
2023 The Last of Us Part I
14
18.5
2023 Forspoken
14
18.5
2023 The Callisto Protocol
12
15.6
2023 Dead Space
19
24.3
2023 Baldur's Gate 3
28
35.0
2023 Armored Core VI
28
35.0
2023 Immortals of Aveum
10
13.6
2023 Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart
21
26.7
2023 Remnant II
11
14.6
2023 Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
17
21.9
2023 Atomic Heart
16
20.9
2023 Starfield
10
13.1
2022 Elden Ring
25
31.6
2022 God of War
26
32.5
2022 Overwatch 2
48
60.6
2022 F1 22
21
26.7
2022 Dying Light 2
21
26.7
2022 Total War: Warhammer III
23
29.2
2022 Spider-Man Remastered
38
48.6
2022 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
25
31.6
2021 Forza Horizon 5
26
33.0
2021 Halo Infinite
21
26.4
2021 Battlefield 2042
28
35.8
2021 Hitman 3
31
39.9
2021 Far Cry 6
31
38.9
2021 Guardians of the Galaxy
32
40.3
2020 Watch Dogs: Legion
29
37.4
2020 Assassin's Creed Valhalla
21
26.8
2020 Microsoft Flight Simulator
14
17.7
2020 Valorant
88
110.8
2020 Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
33
41.6
2020 Death Stranding
38
47.6
2020 Marvel's Avengers
22
28.4
2020 Godfall
32
40.0
2020 Cyberpunk 2077
23
28.8
2019 Apex Legends
42
53.6
2019 Anthem
29
36.8
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
42
52.8
2019 Resident Evil 2
44
56.0
2019 Metro Exodus
23
28.8
2019 World War Z
53
66.4
2019 Gears of War 5
31
39.1
2019 F1 2019
38
48.0
2019 GreedFall
35
44.1
2019 Borderlands 3
24
30.1
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
47
59.3
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
20
26.0
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
31
39.1
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
40
50.0
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
24
30.0
2018 Final Fantasy XV
36
46.0
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
28
36.0
2018 Fallout 76
57
72.0
2018 Just Cause 4
31
39.6
2018 Monster Hunter: World
32
40.4
2018 Strange Brigade
48
60.6
2018 Battlefield V
53
67.0
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
35
44.0
2017 Destiny 2
72
90.0
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
42
53.6
2017 For Honor
46
57.7
2017 Project CARS 2
39
49.4
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
61
76.6
2016 Dishonored 2
34
43.7
2015 Rocket League
98
123.6
2015 Need For Speed
49
61.8
2015 Project CARS
46
58.5
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
72
90.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
131
164.8
2009 League of Legends
164
206.0

解像 度 3440x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
ゲーム 1秒あたりのフレーム数
2019 Apex Legends
34
45.8
2019 Anthem
23
30.4
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
32
43.2
2019 Resident Evil 2
33
44.7
2019 Metro Exodus
19
25.1
2019 World War Z
42
56.0
2019 Gears of War 5
25
34.1
2019 F1 2019
31
42.0
2019 GreedFall
25
33.3
2019 Borderlands 3
18
24.5
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
38
50.7
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
17
22.7
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
25
34.1
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
34
44.9
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
20
27.3
2018 Final Fantasy XV
29
39.1
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
21
28.9
2018 Fallout 76
45
59.9
2018 Just Cause 4
24
32.2
2018 Monster Hunter: World
24
32.0
2018 Strange Brigade
38
50.1
2018 Battlefield V
37
49.8
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
29
38.5
2017 Destiny 2
54
72.2
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
36
48.5
2017 For Honor
35
46.3
2017 Project CARS 2
36
48.5
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
57
75.4
2016 Dishonored 2
31
41.9
2015 Rocket League
73
97.0
2015 Need For Speed
41
55.1
2015 Project CARS
40
53.3
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
53
70.9
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
127
167.5
2009 League of Legends
117
154.3

解像 度 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
ゲーム 1秒あたりのフレーム数
2023 Resident Evil 4
20
29.2
2023 A Plague Tale: Requiem
11
17.0
2023 Hogwarts Legacy
11
17.0
2023 The Last of Us Part I
6
9.7
2023 Forspoken
6
8.7
2023 The Callisto Protocol
5
7.8
2023 Dead Space
6
9.7
2023 Baldur's Gate 3
13
19.4
2023 Armored Core VI
13
19.4
2023 Immortals of Aveum
4
6.3
2023 Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart
10
14.6
2023 Remnant II
5
7.3
2023 Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
7
10.7
2023 Atomic Heart
9
13.1
2023 Starfield
6
8.7
2022 Elden Ring
12
18.0
2022 God of War
17
25.3
2022 Overwatch 2
31
45.7
2022 F1 22
13
19.4
2022 Dying Light 2
13
19.4
2022 Total War: Warhammer III
15
21.9
2022 Spider-Man Remastered
23
34.0
2022 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
13
19.4
2021 Forza Horizon 5
17
25.5
2021 Halo Infinite
12
18.1
2021 Battlefield 2042
16
23.1
2021 Hitman 3
17
24.3
2021 Far Cry 6
14
20.9
2021 Guardians of the Galaxy
15
21.9
2020 Watch Dogs: Legion
17
24.3
2020 Assassin's Creed Valhalla
12
18.1
2020 Microsoft Flight Simulator
9
14.0
2020 Valorant
67
96.4
2020 Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
15
22.2
2020 Death Stranding
20
28.9
2020 Marvel's Avengers
10
14.9
2020 Godfall
13
19.0
2020 Cyberpunk 2077
13
19.0
2019 Apex Legends
22
32.0
2019 Anthem
14
20.0
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
19
28.0
2019 Resident Evil 2
19
27.6
2019 Metro Exodus
12
18.1
2019 World War Z
26
38.2
2019 Gears of War 5
17
24.7
2019 F1 2019
21
30.5
2019 GreedFall
12
18.1
2019 Borderlands 3
10
15.7
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
24
35.4
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
11
16.5
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
17
24.7
2018 Call of Duty: Black Ops 4
23
34.0
2018 Assassin's Creed Odyssey
14
21.0
2018 Final Fantasy XV
18
27.0
2018 Shadow of the Tomb Raider
12
18.0
2018 Fallout 76
28
40.0
2018 Just Cause 4
14
20.6
2018 Monster Hunter: World
13
19.4
2018 Strange Brigade
23
33.0
2018 Battlefield V
18
26.0
2017 Assassin's Creed Origins
19
28.0
2017 Destiny 2
31
45.0
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
25
37.1
2017 For Honor
20
28.8
2017 Project CARS 2
28
41.2
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
45
64.3
2016 Dishonored 2
24
34.6
2015 Rocket League
40
57.7
2015 Need For Speed
28
41.2
2015 Project CARS
28
41.2
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
29
42.0
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
103
148.3
2009 League of Legends
57
82.4
R9 FURY with i7-4790K at 1080p and 超品質 settings
R9 FURY with i7-4790K at 1440p and 超品質 settings
R9 FURY with i7-4790K at 4K and 超品質 settings

競合他社との比較

R9 FURY 仕様

R9 FURY Board Design

Board NumberC88003
Outputs1x HDMI3x DisplayPort
Power Connectors2x 8-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP275 W

R9 FURY Clock Speeds

GPU Clock1000 MHz
Memory Clock500 MHz 1000 MHz effective

R9 FURY Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationPirate Islands (R9 300)
Launch Price549 USD
ProductionActive
Release DateJul 10th, 2015

R9 FURY Graphics Features

DirectX12.0 (12_0)
OpenCL2
OpenGL4.5
Shader Model6
Vulkan1.1.82

R9 FURY Graphics Processor

ArchitectureGCN 3.0
Die Size596 mm²
GPU NameFiji
GPU VariantFiji PRO CB (215-0862046)
Process Size28 nm
Transistors8,900 million

R9 FURY Memory

Bandwidth512.0 GB/s
Memory Bus4096 bit
Memory Size4096 MB
Memory TypeHBM

R9 FURY Render Config

Compute Units56
ROPs64
Shading Units3584
TMUs224

R9 FURY Theoretical Performance

FP16 (half) performance7,168 GFLOPS (1:1)
FP32 (float) performance7,168 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance448.0 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate64.00 GPixel/s
Texture Rate224.0 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

Conclusion. AMD is putting reviewers in a tough spot with Fury. On one hand, the Fiji GPU with HBM is a remarkable feat of engineering. HBM is only in its infancy, but the technology already shows ...
The AMD Radeon R9 Fury Nano is one of the most exciting graphics cards I’ve seen for years and, at only 6in long, it’s also one of the smallest. ... Verdict. AMD’s latest card is one of its ...
Conclusion: Fiji delivers, but also faces formidable competition. Unfortunately we are bringing you our Radeon R9 Fury X review a week late. AMD had limited samples ready for the release and only ...
Verdict. If AMD and Nvidia’s flagship cards are too expensive then the AMD Radeon R9 Fury is a good option for high-end gameplay. Be warned, though – its power consumption is high. ...
AMD Radeon R9 Fury: the Digital Foundry verdict If you're looking for the cheapest single-chip GPU that can run a good proportion of games well at 4K resolution, the Radeon R9 Fury is a quality ...
Last week, AMD lifted the veil in its Radeon R7 and R9 300 series of products and publicly demoed its latest flagship, the Radeon R9 Fury X, at a small venue adjacent to E3. While the Radeon R7 ...
The R9 Fury X's power consumption is a real achievement by AMD. Given what we had seen in the past by the Radeon R9 290X and R9 390X, we had just naturally assumed that the Fury X would use a lot ...
The AMD Radeon R9 Fury X also supports the Asynchronous Shader technology AMD talked about recently. Asynchronous Shaders are a feature of new or next-gen APIs like DirectX 12, Vulkan, and AMD’s ...
AMD's Radeon R9 Fury X is released today, introducing HBM memory for graphics cards. The new card is built around a watercooled Fiji GPU, which enabled AMD to design a very compact card that will fit into many small-form-factor cases. Gaming performance at 4K is good and roughly matches the GTX 980 Ti.
In our review of AMD’s Radeon R9 Fury, we discovered that the Fury X’s air-cooled sibling packs a performance punch that justifies its competitive price tag. In fact, it punishes Nvidia’s ...
Radeon R9 Fury X specs. The Fiji processor in the R9 Fury X is based on AMD's third generation GCN architecture, previously found in the R9 295/380, and codenamed Tonga.
While AMD introduced its highly anticipated Radeon R9 Fury X in June, we’re taking a deeper look at its power consumption and pump noise. Since we were able to procure our own retail board, we ...
The Fury X uses an all-new chunk of silicon dubbed Fiji, as opposed to the die in the Radeon R9 290X, which was called Hawaii. Fiji is the beefiest GPU AMD has ever crafted, and it sports a ...
AMD says the Fury X is a reference design only, though the air-cooled Radeon R9 Fury scheduled for a July 14 release will have vendor-customized designs available.
Catching up to the present, this month marks an important occasion for AMD with the launch of their new flagship GPU, Fiji, and the flagship video card based on it, the Radeon R9 Fury X.
AMD's Radeon R9 Fury X is released today, introducing HBM memory for graphics cards. The new card is built around a watercooled Fiji GPU, which enabled AMD to design a very compact card that will fit into many small-form-factor cases. Gaming performance at 4K is good and roughly matches the GTX 980 Ti.
A bit over two weeks ago AMD launched their new flagship video card, the Radeon R9 Fury X.Based on the company’s new Fiji GPU, the R9 Fury X brought with it significant performance improvements ...
AMD does find itself in a somewhat strange position, what with arming Radeon R9 390X and 390 with 8GB and all. Still, we just don’t think the flagship’s halved capacity is much of a handicap.
Reference AMD Radeon R9 Fury specs. ... Of course, as Fiji is AMD’s latest and greatest GPU, the Nitro R9 Fury also supports AMD’s latest and greatest software features, like FreeSync, Virtual ...

議論とコメント

あなたのコメントを共有する