R9 270 品質 i7-3770K 設定で超品質のベンチマーク

現在 2048 の MB の RAM R9 270 を使用すると、より近代的なゲームで深刻なメモリ関連のボトルネックを持つことができます。との間 R9 270 の Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz この組み合わせは、多くのゲームで 8% 未満のボトルネックを持っており、FPS の損失を避けるために完璧に一致しています。との間 R9 270 の Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz この組み合わせは、FPS の損失を避けるために完璧に一致しています。現在 2048 の MB の RAM R9 270 を使用すると、より近代的なゲームで非常に少ないメモリ関連のボトルネックを持つことができます。

現在の価格表の表示

あなたのコメントを共有する 0

AMD Radeon R9 270

価格

¥ 31,086.0

年

2013

最高記録温度

66C

最大ファンノイズ

48.3dB

推奨電源

500W

ベンチマーク CPU

Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50GHz ($248.98)

FPS に対する CPU の影響

+ 0.0 FPS

FPS% の CPU への影響

0.0%

ベンチマークの品質設定

Ultra Quality Settings

平均1080p のパフォーマンス

32.8 FPS

平均1440p パフォーマンス

21.9 FPS

(Ultrawide) 平均1440p パフォーマンス

19.0 FPS

平均4k パフォーマンス

13.7 FPS

メモリ

2 GB

1フレームあたり1080 pのコスト

¥ 617.2

1フレームあたり1440pのコスト

¥ 923.5

(Ultrawide) 1フレームあたり1440pのコスト

¥ 1,064.8

1フレームあたり4Kの費用

¥ 1,477.4

シリーズ

R9 270

Variant

AMD Radeon R9 270

全体の組み合わせのスコア

Description	Metric	From	To	Weight
The release year of the graphics card. The newer the better technology and performance optimization and driver support.	Year	2016	2019	13
		2015	2016	11
		2014	2015	8
		2013	2014	4
		2007	2013	2
The price of the graphics card. The cheaper the better.	Price	0	250	35
		250	400	30
		400	550	25
		550	650	15
		650	9999	5
Power Supply Wattage required for overall system. The lower the better.	PSU	0	350	4
		350	450	4
		450	550	3
		550	650	2
		650	9999	1
Maximum recorded temperature under load. The lower the better for longer life of the graphics card.	Temp	0	70	2
		70	75	2
		75	80	1
		80	85	1
		85	999	1
Noise Levels under load. The lower the better.	Noise	0	45	2
		45	48	2
		48	50	2
		50	55	1
		55	999	1
Full HD performance at 1080p resolution. The higher the better.	FHD	60	9999	18
		55	60	13
		45	55	11
		35	45	7
		0	35	5
Quad HD performance at 1440p resolution. The higher the better.	QHD	60	9999	10
		55	60	8
		45	55	5
		35	45	4
		0	35	2
4K performance at 2160p resolution. The higher the better.	F4K	60	9999	5
		55	60	4
		45	55	3
		35	45	2
		0	35	1
Current CPU Impact on performance with respect to the highest performing CPU used for benchmark at the time this graphics card was released.	CPU	-5	9999	5
		-7	-5	4
		-10	-7	3
		-15	-10	2
		-9999	-15	1
Graphics card memory (RAM) capacity. The higher the better for higher resolution textures and future demanding games.	MEM	8	9999	5
		4	8	4
		2	4	3
		1	2	2
		0	1	1

		FROM	TO	VERDICT
The overall score is determined based on the calculated weightings for the individual components.	OVERALL SCORE	80	99	Excellent
		70	80	Very Good
		60	70	Good
		40	60	Acceptable
		0	40	Weak

51/100

普通

と比較

CPU の変更

Change Variant To

希望の品質設定

R9 280 は、最新の GCN 1.0 セットのグラフィックカードの high-end フラッグシップかもしれませんが、その価格により、ほとんどの mid-range PCゲーマーの手の届かないところにあります。一方、 R9 270 は ¥ 20234.2 値札で手頃な価格に近づいています。 AMD の xx70 カードは常に mid-range 価格で定義されており、特にオーバークロック時に high-end グラフィックスカードの性能を発揮します。 R9 270 内の GCN 1.0 グラフィックカードを完全にテストするために時間をかけた後、それがトレンドを継続していることは疑いなく言えます。

NVIDIA の最も近いライバルである GTX 660 Ti と比較して、 R9 270 は -24.2 ％遅くなりました。以下のために 1080p Full HD 、我々はプレーすることができました Valorant で 63 にfpsの 63 FPSとの周りに浮かんでフレームレートを保持 63 FPSを。

Compare R9 270 Variants Performance in 超品質

Assassin's Creed Valhalla (2020)

超品質

解像度 1920x1080

年	グラフィックカード	価格	1秒あたりのフレーム数
2015	AMD Radeon R9 380X	¥ 25,886	19.8 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 280X	¥ 33,799	19.7 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770	¥ 45,103	18.8 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti	¥ 19,104	18.3 FPS
2014	AMD Radeon R9 285	¥ 28,147	17.5 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 380	¥ 22,495	17.4 FPS
2014	AMD Radeon R9 280	¥ 31,538	17.2 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960	¥ 22,495	17.0 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670	¥ 45,103	16.5 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760	¥ 28,147	15.3 FPS
2016	AMD Radeon RX 460	¥ 15,826	14.9 FPS
2012	AMD Radeon HD 7950	¥ 50,755	14.7 FPS
2010	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580	¥ 56,407	14.5 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti	¥ 33,799	14.4 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 270	¥ 20,234	14.3 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950	¥ 17,973	13.8 FPS
2010	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570	¥ 39,451	12.8 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660	¥ 25,886	12.8 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R7 370	¥ 16,843	12.7 FPS
2014	AMD Radeon R7 265	¥ 16,843	12.5 FPS
2010	AMD Radeon HD 6970	¥ 41,712	12.3 FPS
2010	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480	¥ 56,407	11.7 FPS
2012	AMD Radeon HD 7850	¥ 28,147	11.5 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost	¥ 19,104	11.4 FPS
2010	AMD Radeon HD 6950	¥ 33,799	10.9 FPS
2014	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti	¥ 16,843	10.9 FPS
2011	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti	¥ 28,147	10.6 FPS
2010	AMD Radeon HD 6870	¥ 27,017	9.6 FPS
2010	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470	¥ 39,451	9.3 FPS
2011	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560	¥ 22,495	9.1 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon HD 7790	¥ 16,843	8.9 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti	¥ 16,843	8.9 FPS
2010	AMD Radeon HD 6850	¥ 20,234	8.0 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650	¥ 12,321	6.2 FPS
2011	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti	¥ 16,843	6.1 FPS
2012	AMD Radeon HD 7750	¥ 12,321	5.8 FPS

R9 270 の間に位置 GTX 660 Ti と GTX 950 よりも遅い立ち下がり、 GTX 660 Ti によって 0.7 ％及びより速い GTX 950 によって 3.6 ここでは、すべてのグラフィックカードに対する平均相対パフォーマンスがあります。その結果は、実際には GTX 660 Ti 結果と区別できません。 R9 270 とそのライバルである GTX 660 Ti にはわずかな差があります。

Cyberpunk 2077 (2020)

超品質

解像度 1920x1080

年	グラフィックカード	価格	1秒あたりのフレーム数
2015	AMD Radeon R9 380X	¥ 25,886	19.8 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 280X	¥ 33,799	19.7 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770	¥ 45,103	18.8 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti	¥ 19,104	18.3 FPS
2014	AMD Radeon R9 285	¥ 28,147	17.5 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 380	¥ 22,495	17.4 FPS
2014	AMD Radeon R9 280	¥ 31,538	17.2 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960	¥ 22,495	17.0 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670	¥ 45,103	16.5 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760	¥ 28,147	15.3 FPS
2016	AMD Radeon RX 460	¥ 15,826	14.9 FPS
2012	AMD Radeon HD 7950	¥ 50,755	14.7 FPS
2010	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580	¥ 56,407	14.5 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti	¥ 33,799	14.4 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 270	¥ 20,234	14.3 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950	¥ 17,973	13.8 FPS
2010	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570	¥ 39,451	12.8 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660	¥ 25,886	12.8 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R7 370	¥ 16,843	12.7 FPS
2014	AMD Radeon R7 265	¥ 16,843	12.5 FPS
2010	AMD Radeon HD 6970	¥ 41,712	12.3 FPS
2010	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480	¥ 56,407	11.7 FPS
2012	AMD Radeon HD 7850	¥ 28,147	11.5 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost	¥ 19,104	11.4 FPS
2010	AMD Radeon HD 6950	¥ 33,799	10.9 FPS
2014	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti	¥ 16,843	10.9 FPS
2011	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti	¥ 28,147	10.6 FPS
2010	AMD Radeon HD 6870	¥ 27,017	9.6 FPS
2010	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470	¥ 39,451	9.3 FPS
2011	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560	¥ 22,495	9.1 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon HD 7790	¥ 16,843	8.9 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti	¥ 16,843	8.9 FPS
2010	AMD Radeon HD 6850	¥ 20,234	8.0 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650	¥ 12,321	6.2 FPS
2011	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti	¥ 16,843	6.1 FPS
2012	AMD Radeon HD 7750	¥ 12,321	5.8 FPS

Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)

超品質

解像度 1920x1080

年	グラフィックカード	価格	1秒あたりのフレーム数
2015	AMD Radeon R9 380X	¥ 25,886	52.9 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 280X	¥ 33,799	52.4 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770	¥ 45,103	50.0 FPS
2016	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti	¥ 19,104	48.7 FPS
2014	AMD Radeon R9 285	¥ 28,147	46.6 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R9 380	¥ 22,495	46.4 FPS
2014	AMD Radeon R9 280	¥ 31,538	45.8 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960	¥ 22,495	45.2 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670	¥ 45,103	44.1 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760	¥ 28,147	40.9 FPS
2016	AMD Radeon RX 460	¥ 15,826	39.7 FPS
2012	AMD Radeon HD 7950	¥ 50,755	39.1 FPS
2010	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580	¥ 56,407	38.7 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti	¥ 33,799	38.5 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 270	¥ 20,234	38.0 FPS
2015	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950	¥ 17,973	36.8 FPS
2010	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570	¥ 39,451	34.1 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660	¥ 25,886	34.0 FPS
2015	AMD Radeon R7 370	¥ 16,843	33.9 FPS
2014	AMD Radeon R7 265	¥ 16,843	33.3 FPS
2010	AMD Radeon HD 6970	¥ 41,712	32.7 FPS
2010	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480	¥ 56,407	31.2 FPS
2012	AMD Radeon HD 7850	¥ 28,147	30.7 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost	¥ 19,104	30.5 FPS
2010	AMD Radeon HD 6950	¥ 33,799	29.1 FPS
2014	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti	¥ 16,843	29.0 FPS
2011	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti	¥ 28,147	28.3 FPS
2010	AMD Radeon HD 6870	¥ 27,017	25.7 FPS
2010	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470	¥ 39,451	24.8 FPS
2011	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560	¥ 22,495	24.2 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon HD 7790	¥ 16,843	23.7 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti	¥ 16,843	23.7 FPS
2010	AMD Radeon HD 6850	¥ 20,234	21.3 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650	¥ 12,321	16.5 FPS
2011	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti	¥ 16,843	16.3 FPS
2012	AMD Radeon HD 7750	¥ 12,321	15.5 FPS

R9 270 の間に位置 GTX 660 Ti と GTX 950 よりも遅い立ち下がり、 GTX 660 Ti によって 1.3 ％及びより速い GTX 950 によって 3.3 ここでは、すべてのグラフィックカードに対する平均相対パフォーマンスがあります。その結果は、実際には GTX 660 Ti 結果と区別できません。 R9 270 とそのライバルである GTX 660 Ti にはわずかな差があります。

設定時の超品質ゲームパフォーマンス

品質設定の変更

解像度 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS

年	ゲーム	1秒あたりのフレーム数
2023	Resident Evil 4	22 25.1
2023	A Plague Tale: Requiem	15 17.1
2023	Hogwarts Legacy	13 14.8
2023	The Last of Us Part I	10 11.4
2023	Forspoken	11 13.2
2023	The Callisto Protocol	9 10.3
2023	Dead Space	15 17.1
2023	Baldur's Gate 3	18 20.3
2023	Armored Core VI	18 20.3
2023	Immortals of Aveum	8 9.1
2023	Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart	16 18.2
2023	Remnant II	9 10.3
2023	Star Wars Jedi: Survivor	12 13.7
2023	Atomic Heart	12 13.7
2023	Starfield	6 6.8
2022	Elden Ring	16 18.4
2022	God of War	15 17.5
2022	Overwatch 2	29 32.5
2022	F1 22	18 20.5
2022	Dying Light 2	17 19.4
2022	Total War: Warhammer III	17 19.4
2022	Spider-Man Remastered	28 31.9
2022	Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II	20 22.8
2021	Forza Horizon 5	15 17.7
2021	Halo Infinite	12 13.5
2021	Battlefield 2042	22 24.9
2021	Hitman 3	23 26.2
2021	Far Cry 6	21 24.4
2021	Guardians of the Galaxy	24 26.7
2020	Watch Dogs: Legion	24 26.9
2020	Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12 14.3
2020	Microsoft Flight Simulator	8 9.3
2020	Valorant	56 62.5
2020	Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War	22 24.5
2020	Death Stranding	25 28.3
2020	Marvel's Avengers	16 18.4
2020	Godfall	24 27.6
2020	Cyberpunk 2077	12 14.3
2019	Apex Legends	24 27.0
2019	Anthem	15 17.4
2019	Far Cry New Dawn	22 25.5
2019	Resident Evil 2	34 38.4
2019	Metro Exodus	15 17.1
2019	World War Z	34 38.0
2019	Gears of War 5	22 24.9
2019	F1 2019	28 31.2
2019	GreedFall	25 28.1
2019	Borderlands 3	17 19.8
2019	Call of Duty Modern Warfare	34 38.0
2019	Red Dead Redemption 2	13 14.6
2019	Need For Speed: Heat	20 23.0
2018	Just Cause 4	22 24.7
2018	Monster Hunter: World	23 26.6
2018	Strange Brigade	36 40.1
2017	Need For Speed: Payback	30 34.2
2017	For Honor	41 45.6
2017	Project CARS 2	29 32.3
2017	Forza Motorsport 7	35 39.1
2016	Dishonored 2	21 23.6
2015	Rocket League	119 133.0
2015	Need For Speed	33 36.9
2015	Project CARS	31 35.3
2015	Rainbow Six Siege	58 64.6
2013	Bioshock Infinite	45 51.1
2013	Company of Heroes 2	30 34.1
2013	Crysis 3	39 43.5
2013	GRID 2	57 63.7
2013	Metro: Last Light	33 36.7
2013	Total War: Rome 2	33 36.7
2013	Battlefield 4	34 38.8
2012	Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	82 91.2
2011	Battlefield 3	45 50.2
2009	League of Legends	153 171.0
2008	Crysis: Warhead	40 45.3

解像度 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS

年	ゲーム	1秒あたりのフレーム数
2023	Resident Evil 4	14 18.2
2023	A Plague Tale: Requiem	10 12.5
2023	Hogwarts Legacy	9 11.4
2023	The Last of Us Part I	6 8.7
2023	Forspoken	6 8.7
2023	The Callisto Protocol	5 7.3
2023	Dead Space	9 11.4
2023	Baldur's Gate 3	13 16.4
2023	Armored Core VI	13 16.4
2023	Immortals of Aveum	5 6.4
2023	Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart	10 12.5
2023	Remnant II	5 6.8
2023	Star Wars Jedi: Survivor	8 10.3
2023	Atomic Heart	7 9.8
2023	Starfield	4 6.2
2022	Elden Ring	11 14.6
2022	God of War	12 15.0
2022	Overwatch 2	22 27.9
2022	F1 22	10 12.5
2022	Dying Light 2	10 12.5
2022	Total War: Warhammer III	10 13.7
2022	Spider-Man Remastered	18 22.8
2022	Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II	11 14.8
2021	Forza Horizon 5	12 15.2
2021	Halo Infinite	9 12.2
2021	Battlefield 2042	13 16.5
2021	Hitman 3	14 18.7
2021	Far Cry 6	14 18.2
2021	Guardians of the Galaxy	15 18.9
2020	Watch Dogs: Legion	14 17.6
2020	Assassin's Creed Valhalla	9 12.4
2020	Microsoft Flight Simulator	6 8.2
2020	Valorant	40 51.1
2020	Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War	15 19.2
2020	Death Stranding	17 22.0
2020	Marvel's Avengers	10 13.1
2020	Godfall	14 18.4
2020	Cyberpunk 2077	10 13.3
2019	Apex Legends	16 20.1
2019	Anthem	11 13.8
2019	Far Cry New Dawn	15 19.8
2019	Resident Evil 2	20 25.8
2019	Metro Exodus	10 13.3
2019	World War Z	22 27.7
2019	Gears of War 5	14 18.1
2019	F1 2019	17 22.1
2019	GreedFall	16 20.3
2019	Borderlands 3	11 13.9
2019	Call of Duty Modern Warfare	21 27.4
2019	Red Dead Redemption 2	9 12.0
2019	Need For Speed: Heat	14 18.1
2018	Just Cause 4	14 18.2
2018	Monster Hunter: World	14 18.6
2018	Strange Brigade	22 27.9
2017	Need For Speed: Payback	19 24.7
2017	For Honor	21 26.6
2017	Project CARS 2	18 22.8
2017	Forza Motorsport 7	28 35.3
2016	Dishonored 2	16 20.1
2015	Rocket League	45 57.0
2015	Need For Speed	22 28.5
2015	Project CARS	21 27.0
2015	Rainbow Six Siege	33 41.8
2012	Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	60 76.0
2009	League of Legends	76 95.0

解像度 3440x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS

年	ゲーム	1秒あたりのフレーム数
2019	Apex Legends	13 17.2
2019	Anthem	8 11.4
2019	Far Cry New Dawn	12 16.2
2019	Resident Evil 2	15 20.6
2019	Metro Exodus	8 11.6
2019	World War Z	17 23.4
2019	Gears of War 5	12 15.8
2019	F1 2019	14 19.4
2019	GreedFall	11 15.4
2019	Borderlands 3	8 11.3
2019	Call of Duty Modern Warfare	17 23.4
2019	Red Dead Redemption 2	7 10.5
2019	Need For Speed: Heat	12 15.8
2018	Just Cause 4	11 14.8
2018	Monster Hunter: World	11 14.7
2018	Strange Brigade	17 23.1
2017	Need For Speed: Payback	17 22.4
2017	For Honor	16 21.3
2017	Project CARS 2	17 22.4
2017	Forza Motorsport 7	26 34.7
2016	Dishonored 2	14 19.3
2015	Rocket League	33 44.7
2015	Need For Speed	19 25.4
2015	Project CARS	18 24.6
2015	Rainbow Six Siege	24 32.7
2012	Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	58 77.3
2009	League of Legends	54 71.2

解像度 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS

年	ゲーム	1秒あたりのフレーム数
2023	Resident Evil 4	9 13.7
2023	A Plague Tale: Requiem	5 8.0
2023	Hogwarts Legacy	5 8.0
2023	The Last of Us Part I	3 4.6
2023	Forspoken	2 4.1
2023	The Callisto Protocol	2 3.6
2023	Dead Space	3 4.6
2023	Baldur's Gate 3	6 9.1
2023	Armored Core VI	6 9.1
2023	Immortals of Aveum	2 3.0
2023	Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart	4 6.8
2023	Remnant II	2 3.4
2023	Star Wars Jedi: Survivor	3 5.0
2023	Atomic Heart	4 6.2
2023	Starfield	2 4.1
2022	Elden Ring	5 8.3
2022	God of War	8 11.7
2022	Overwatch 2	14 21.1
2022	F1 22	6 9.1
2022	Dying Light 2	6 9.1
2022	Total War: Warhammer III	7 10.3
2022	Spider-Man Remastered	11 16.0
2022	Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II	6 9.1
2021	Forza Horizon 5	8 11.8
2021	Halo Infinite	5 8.4
2021	Battlefield 2042	7 10.6
2021	Hitman 3	7 11.4
2021	Far Cry 6	6 9.8
2021	Guardians of the Galaxy	7 10.3
2020	Watch Dogs: Legion	7 11.4
2020	Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5 8.4
2020	Microsoft Flight Simulator	4 6.5
2020	Valorant	31 44.5
2020	Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War	7 10.3
2020	Death Stranding	9 13.3
2020	Marvel's Avengers	4 6.9
2020	Godfall	6 8.8
2020	Cyberpunk 2077	6 8.7
2019	Apex Legends	8 12.0
2019	Anthem	5 7.5
2019	Far Cry New Dawn	7 10.5
2019	Resident Evil 2	8 12.7
2019	Metro Exodus	5 8.4
2019	World War Z	11 16.0
2019	Gears of War 5	7 11.4
2019	F1 2019	9 14.1
2019	GreedFall	5 8.4
2019	Borderlands 3	5 7.2
2019	Call of Duty Modern Warfare	11 16.3
2019	Red Dead Redemption 2	5 7.6
2019	Need For Speed: Heat	7 11.4
2018	Just Cause 4	6 9.5
2018	Monster Hunter: World	6 8.9
2018	Strange Brigade	10 15.2
2017	Need For Speed: Payback	11 17.1
2017	For Honor	9 13.3
2017	Project CARS 2	13 19.0
2017	Forza Motorsport 7	20 29.6
2016	Dishonored 2	11 16.0
2015	Rocket League	18 26.6
2015	Need For Speed	13 19.0
2015	Project CARS	13 19.0
2015	Rainbow Six Siege	13 19.4
2012	Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	47 68.4
2009	League of Legends	26 38.0

R9 270 with i7-3770K at 1080p and 超品質 settings

R9 270 with i7-3770K at 1440p and 超品質 settings

R9 270 with i7-3770K at 4K and 超品質 settings

競合他社との比較

AMD Radeon RX 460
2016 4GB ¥ 15,826
17% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
2016 4GB ¥ 14,582
18% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
2015 2GB ¥ 10,061
9% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
2015 2GB ¥ 10,061
15% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon R7 370
2015 2GB ¥ 22,834
11% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 380X
2015 4GB ¥ 25,886
30% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 380
2015 2GB ¥ 33,799
18% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
2014 2GB ¥ 31,538
24% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon R7 265
2014 2GB ¥ 16,843
13% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 280
2014 3GB ¥ 39,564
16% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 285
2014 2GB ¥ 42,955
19% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
2013 1GB ¥ 5,539
53% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
2013 2GB ¥ 19,104
11% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
2013 2GB ¥ 36,173
12% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
2013 2GB ¥ 20,234
26% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon HD 7790
2013 1GB ¥ 16,843
32% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 280X
2013 3GB ¥ 39,564
34% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
2012 1GB ¥ 7,235
20% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
2012 2GB ¥ 8,930
3% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
2012 2GB ¥ 33,799
28% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
2012 2GB ¥ 8,930
39% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon HD 7750
2012 1GB ¥ 15,826
55% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon HD 7950
2012 3GB ¥ 16,843
30% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon HD 7850
2012 2GB ¥ 28,147
4% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
2011 1GB ¥ 22,495
51% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
2011 1GB ¥ 17,295
18% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
2011 1GB ¥ 24,869
4% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
2010 1.3GB ¥ 33,799
22% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
2010 1.5GB ¥ 56,407
17% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
2010 1.3GB ¥ 39,451
13% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
2010 1.5GB ¥ 45,103
23% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon HD 6870
2010 1GB ¥ 22,495
14% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon HD 6950
2010 2GB ¥ 28,260
6% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon HD 6970
2010 2GB ¥ 33,799
7% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon HD 6850
2010 1GB ¥ 22,495
32% slower

Compare

R9 270 仕様

R9 270 Board Design

Board Number	C630, C631, C632
Length	8.28 inches 210 mm
Outputs	2x DVI1x HDMI1x DisplayPort
Power Connectors	1x 6-pin
Slot Width	Dual-slot
TDP	150 W

R9 270 Clock Speeds

Boost Clock	925 MHz
GPU Clock	900 MHz
Memory Clock	1400 MHz 5600 MHz effective

R9 270 Graphics Card

Bus Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16
Generation	Volcanic Islands (R9 200)
Launch Price	179 USD
Production	End-of-life
Release Date	Nov 13th, 2013

R9 270 Graphics Features

DirectX	12.0 (11_1)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.5
Shader Model	5.1
Vulkan	1.1.77

R9 270 Graphics Processor

Architecture	GCN 1.0
Die Size	212 mm²
GPU Name	Curacao
GPU Variant	Curacao PRO (215-0848000)
Process Size	28 nm
Transistors	2,800 million

R9 270 Memory

Bandwidth	179.2 GB/s
Memory Bus	256 bit
Memory Size	2048 MB
Memory Type	GDDR5

R9 270 Render Config

Compute Units	20
ROPs	32
Shading Units	1280
TMUs	80

R9 270 Theoretical Performance

FP32 (float) performance	2,368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance	148.0 GFLOPS (1:16)
Pixel Rate	29.60 GPixel/s
Texture Rate	74.00 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

Performance Analysis At stock speeds, the R9 270 is on par with the GTX 660 and HD 7870 in Battlefield 3 but 4fps behind the R9 270X, with PowerColor's overclock reducing this gap to 2fps.

The lack of TrueAudio on the R9 280X and R9 270X is definitely an issue, especially if the technology takes off and buyers cotton on to it being "available on AMD's latest graphics cards".

The R9 270 is an excellent little graphics card that provides an enviable combination of low price with good framerates along with a free copy of Battlefield 4.

AMD's new Radeon R9 270X matches last generation's HD 7950 in performance while still coming at an attractive $200 price point. We were a bit disappointed by the reference-design cooler, but board partners will soon release their own designs with custom heatsinks that will perform better.

The AMD Radeon R9 270X is a great GPU for those who can't afford luxury models but want strong 1080p performance.

AMD packages up another sub-$200 graphics card, this time calling it the Radeon R9 270. We expected a Radeon HD 7850 replacement, but received something quite different. Is it a worthwhile step up ...

The AMD Radeon R9 270X & R9 270 Review: Feat. Asus & HIS ... The Radeon R9 270 series is composed of two products, the 270X and the 270, with the X indicating the higher performing part in AMD’s ...

The Radeon R9 270 was a mid-range graphics card by AMD, launched in November 2013. Built on the 28 nm process, and based on the Curacao graphics processor, in its Curacao PRO variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.