HD 6870 品質 i7-975 設定で超品質のベンチマーク

現在 1024 の MB の RAM HD 6870 を使用すると、より近代的なゲームで深刻なメモリ関連のボトルネックを持つことができます。それは最高の負荷温度 HD 6870 が非常に高く、カスタム冷却ソリューションを必要とするかもしれないことを知っておくことが重要です。との間 HD 6870 の Intel Core i7-975 @ 3.33GHz この組み合わせは、多くのゲームで 8% 未満のボトルネックを持っており、FPS の損失を避けるために完璧に一致しています。との間 HD 6870 の Intel Core i7-975 @ 3.33GHz この組み合わせは、FPS の損失を避けるために完璧に一致しています。

現在の価格表の表示

あなたのコメントを共有する 0

AMD Radeon HD 6870

価格

¥ 22,495.0

年

2010

最高記録温度

86C

最大ファンノイズ

59dB

推奨電源

501W

ベンチマーク CPU

Intel Core i7-975 @ 3.33GHz ($179.99)

FPS に対する CPU の影響

+ 0.0 FPS

FPS% の CPU への影響

0.0%

ベンチマークの品質設定

Ultra Quality Settings

平均1080p のパフォーマンス

28.6 FPS

平均1440p パフォーマンス

14.7 FPS

(Ultrawide) 平均1440p パフォーマンス

12.8 FPS

平均4k パフォーマンス

9.2 FPS

メモリ

1 GB

1フレームあたり1080 pのコスト

¥ 945.0

1フレームあたり1440pのコスト

¥ 1,838.0

(Ultrawide) 1フレームあたり1440pのコスト

¥ 2,110.5

1フレームあたり4Kの費用

¥ 2,936.8

シリーズ

HD 6870

Variant

AMD Radeon HD 6870

全体の組み合わせのスコア

Description	Metric	From	To	Weight
The release year of the graphics card. The newer the better technology and performance optimization and driver support.	Year	2016	2019	13
		2015	2016	11
		2014	2015	8
		2013	2014	4
		2007	2013	2
The price of the graphics card. The cheaper the better.	Price	0	250	35
		250	400	30
		400	550	25
		550	650	15
		650	9999	5
Power Supply Wattage required for overall system. The lower the better.	PSU	0	350	4
		350	450	4
		450	550	3
		550	650	2
		650	9999	1
Maximum recorded temperature under load. The lower the better for longer life of the graphics card.	Temp	0	70	2
		70	75	2
		75	80	1
		80	85	1
		85	999	1
Noise Levels under load. The lower the better.	Noise	0	45	2
		45	48	2
		48	50	2
		50	55	1
		55	999	1
Full HD performance at 1080p resolution. The higher the better.	FHD	60	9999	18
		55	60	13
		45	55	11
		35	45	7
		0	35	5
Quad HD performance at 1440p resolution. The higher the better.	QHD	60	9999	10
		55	60	8
		45	55	5
		35	45	4
		0	35	2
4K performance at 2160p resolution. The higher the better.	F4K	60	9999	5
		55	60	4
		45	55	3
		35	45	2
		0	35	1
Current CPU Impact on performance with respect to the highest performing CPU used for benchmark at the time this graphics card was released.	CPU	-5	9999	5
		-7	-5	4
		-10	-7	3
		-15	-10	2
		-9999	-15	1
Graphics card memory (RAM) capacity. The higher the better for higher resolution textures and future demanding games.	MEM	8	9999	5
		4	8	4
		2	4	3
		1	2	2
		0	1	1

		FROM	TO	VERDICT
The overall score is determined based on the calculated weightings for the individual components.	OVERALL SCORE	80	99	Excellent
		70	80	Very Good
		60	70	Good
		40	60	Acceptable
		0	40	Weak

52/100

普通

と比較

CPU の変更

Change Variant To

希望の品質設定

AMD の xx70 カードは常に mid-range 価格で定義されており、特にオーバークロック時に high-end グラフィックスカードの性能を発揮します。 HD 6870 内の TeraScale 2 グラフィックカードを完全にテストするために時間をかけた後、それがトレンドを継続していることは疑いなく言えます。 HD 6870 は HD 6770 よりもはるかに高価で、なんと ¥ 27016.6 かかります。これを元々 ¥ 14582.2 価格で HD 6770 れていた HD 6770 と比較してください。一方、 NVIDIA 最も近い同等のカードである GTX 470 コスト ¥ 39451 。

NVIDIA の最も近いライバルである GTX 470 と比較して、 HD 6870 は 9.2 ％高速でした。

Compare HD 6870 Variants Performance in 超品質

Assassin's Creed Valhalla (2020)

超品質

解像度 1920x1080

年	グラフィックカード	価格	1秒あたりのフレーム数
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760	¥ 28,147	15.3 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 270	¥ 20,234	14.3 FPS
2010	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570	¥ 39,451	12.8 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660	¥ 25,886	12.8 FPS
2010	AMD Radeon HD 6970	¥ 41,712	12.3 FPS
2012	AMD Radeon HD 7850	¥ 28,147	11.5 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost	¥ 19,104	11.4 FPS
2010	AMD Radeon HD 6950	¥ 33,799	10.9 FPS
2011	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti	¥ 28,147	10.6 FPS
2010	AMD Radeon HD 6870	¥ 27,017	9.6 FPS
2010	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470	¥ 39,451	9.3 FPS
2011	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560	¥ 22,495	9.1 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon HD 7790	¥ 16,843	8.9 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti	¥ 16,843	8.9 FPS
2008	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285	¥ 40,581	8.1 FPS
2010	AMD Radeon HD 6850	¥ 20,234	8.0 FPS
2008	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216	¥ 33,799	6.8 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650	¥ 12,321	6.2 FPS
2011	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti	¥ 16,843	6.1 FPS
2008	ATI Radeon HD 4870	¥ 33,799	6.0 FPS
2012	AMD Radeon HD 7750	¥ 12,321	5.8 FPS
2010	NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450	¥ 14,582	4.9 FPS

HD 6870 の間に位置 GTX 560 Ti と GTX 470 よりも遅い立ち下がり、 GTX 560 Ti によって 10.4 ％及びより速い GTX 470 によって 3.2 ここでは、すべてのグラフィックカードに対する平均相対パフォーマンスがあります。 HD 6870 とそのライバルである GTX 470 にはわずかな差があります。

Cyberpunk 2077 (2020)

超品質

解像度 1920x1080

年	グラフィックカード	価格	1秒あたりのフレーム数
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760	¥ 28,147	15.3 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 270	¥ 20,234	14.3 FPS
2010	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570	¥ 39,451	12.8 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660	¥ 25,886	12.8 FPS
2010	AMD Radeon HD 6970	¥ 41,712	12.3 FPS
2012	AMD Radeon HD 7850	¥ 28,147	11.5 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost	¥ 19,104	11.4 FPS
2010	AMD Radeon HD 6950	¥ 33,799	10.9 FPS
2011	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti	¥ 28,147	10.6 FPS
2010	AMD Radeon HD 6870	¥ 27,017	9.6 FPS
2010	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470	¥ 39,451	9.3 FPS
2011	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560	¥ 22,495	9.1 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon HD 7790	¥ 16,843	8.9 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti	¥ 16,843	8.9 FPS
2008	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285	¥ 40,581	8.1 FPS
2010	AMD Radeon HD 6850	¥ 20,234	8.0 FPS
2008	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216	¥ 33,799	6.8 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650	¥ 12,321	6.2 FPS
2011	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti	¥ 16,843	6.1 FPS
2008	ATI Radeon HD 4870	¥ 33,799	6.0 FPS
2012	AMD Radeon HD 7750	¥ 12,321	5.8 FPS
2010	NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450	¥ 14,582	4.9 FPS

Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)

超品質

解像度 1920x1080

年	グラフィックカード	価格	1秒あたりのフレーム数
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760	¥ 28,147	40.9 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon R9 270	¥ 20,234	38.0 FPS
2010	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570	¥ 39,451	34.1 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660	¥ 25,886	34.0 FPS
2010	AMD Radeon HD 6970	¥ 41,712	32.7 FPS
2012	AMD Radeon HD 7850	¥ 28,147	30.7 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost	¥ 19,104	30.5 FPS
2010	AMD Radeon HD 6950	¥ 33,799	29.1 FPS
2011	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti	¥ 28,147	28.3 FPS
2010	AMD Radeon HD 6870	¥ 27,017	25.7 FPS
2010	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470	¥ 39,451	24.8 FPS
2011	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560	¥ 22,495	24.2 FPS
2013	AMD Radeon HD 7790	¥ 16,843	23.7 FPS
2012	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti	¥ 16,843	23.7 FPS
2008	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285	¥ 40,581	21.7 FPS
2010	AMD Radeon HD 6850	¥ 20,234	21.3 FPS
2008	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216	¥ 33,799	18.0 FPS
2013	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650	¥ 12,321	16.5 FPS
2011	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti	¥ 16,843	16.3 FPS
2008	ATI Radeon HD 4870	¥ 33,799	16.1 FPS
2012	AMD Radeon HD 7750	¥ 12,321	15.5 FPS
2010	NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450	¥ 14,582	13.1 FPS

HD 6870 の間に位置 GTX 560 Ti と GTX 470 よりも遅い立ち下がり、 GTX 560 Ti によって 10.1 ％及びより速い GTX 470 によって 3.6 ここでは、すべてのグラフィックカードに対する平均相対パフォーマンスがあります。 HD 6870 とそのライバルである GTX 470 にはわずかな差があります。

設定時の超品質ゲームパフォーマンス

品質設定の変更

解像度 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS

年	ゲーム	1秒あたりのフレーム数
2023	Resident Evil 4	17 19.3
2023	A Plague Tale: Requiem	11 13.1
2023	Hogwarts Legacy	10 11.4
2023	The Last of Us Part I	7 8.8
2023	Forspoken	9 10.2
2023	The Callisto Protocol	7 7.9
2023	Dead Space	11 13.1
2023	Baldur's Gate 3	14 15.6
2023	Armored Core VI	14 15.6
2023	Immortals of Aveum	6 7.0
2023	Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart	12 14.0
2023	Remnant II	7 7.9
2023	Star Wars Jedi: Survivor	9 10.5
2023	Atomic Heart	9 10.5
2023	Starfield	4 5.3
2022	Elden Ring	11 12.5
2022	God of War	10 11.8
2022	Overwatch 2	19 22.0
2022	F1 22	14 15.8
2022	Dying Light 2	13 14.9
2022	Total War: Warhammer III	13 14.9
2022	Spider-Man Remastered	22 24.5
2022	Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II	15 17.5
2021	Forza Horizon 5	10 12.0
2021	Halo Infinite	8 9.1
2021	Battlefield 2042	15 16.8
2021	Hitman 3	18 20.1
2021	Far Cry 6	16 18.7
2021	Guardians of the Galaxy	18 20.5
2020	Watch Dogs: Legion	18 20.7
2020	Assassin's Creed Valhalla	8 9.6
2020	Microsoft Flight Simulator	5 6.3
2020	Valorant	38 42.3
2020	Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War	14 16.6
2020	Death Stranding	17 19.1
2020	Marvel's Avengers	11 12.5
2020	Godfall	16 18.6
2020	Cyberpunk 2077	8 9.6
2019	Apex Legends	16 18.0
2019	Anthem	10 11.6
2019	Far Cry New Dawn	15 17.0
2019	Resident Evil 2	23 26.0
2019	Metro Exodus	10 11.6
2019	World War Z	19 21.3
2019	Gears of War 5	15 16.8
2019	F1 2019	18 21.1
2019	GreedFall	17 19.0
2019	Borderlands 3	12 13.4
2019	Call of Duty Modern Warfare	23 25.7
2019	Red Dead Redemption 2	8 9.9
2019	Need For Speed: Heat	13 15.5
2018	Just Cause 4	15 16.7
2018	Monster Hunter: World	16 18.0
2018	Strange Brigade	24 27.1
2017	Need For Speed: Payback	20 23.1
2017	For Honor	27 30.8
2017	Project CARS 2	19 21.8
2017	Forza Motorsport 7	23 26.5
2016	Dishonored 2	14 15.9
2015	Rocket League	81 90.0
2015	Need For Speed	22 24.9
2015	Project CARS	21 23.9
2015	Rainbow Six Siege	39 43.7
2014	Thief	22 25.2
2013	Bioshock Infinite	39 44.1
2013	Company of Heroes 2	28 32.1
2013	GRID 2	34 37.9
2013	Metro: Last Light	21 23.8
2013	Total War: Rome 2	41 45.6
2013	Battlefield 4	34 37.9
2012	DiRT: Showdown	25 28.7
2012	Far Cry 3	29 32.5
2012	Hitman: Absolution	35 39.0
2012	Sleeping Dogs	38 42.8
2012	Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	55 61.7
2011	DiRT 3	54 60.6
2011	Portal 2	97 108.1
2011	The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim	20 23.2
2011	Batman: Arkham City	45 51.0
2011	Total War: Shogun 2	55 62.1
2011	Battlefield 3	26 28.9
2010	Civilization V	34 38.4
2010	Metro: 2033	30 34.0
2010	Starcraft II	51 57.1
2009	League of Legends	104 115.7
2008	Crysis: Warhead	27 30.4

解像度 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS

年	ゲーム	1秒あたりのフレーム数
2023	Resident Evil 4	11 14.0
2023	A Plague Tale: Requiem	7 9.6
2023	Hogwarts Legacy	7 8.8
2023	The Last of Us Part I	5 6.7
2023	Forspoken	5 6.7
2023	The Callisto Protocol	4 5.6
2023	Dead Space	7 8.8
2023	Baldur's Gate 3	10 12.6
2023	Armored Core VI	10 12.6
2023	Immortals of Aveum	3 4.9
2023	Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart	7 9.6
2023	Remnant II	4 5.3
2023	Star Wars Jedi: Survivor	6 7.9
2023	Atomic Heart	6 7.5
2023	Starfield	3 4.7
2022	Elden Ring	7 9.8
2022	God of War	8 10.2
2022	Overwatch 2	15 18.9
2022	F1 22	7 9.6
2022	Dying Light 2	7 9.6
2022	Total War: Warhammer III	8 10.5
2022	Spider-Man Remastered	14 17.5
2022	Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II	9 11.4
2021	Forza Horizon 5	8 10.3
2021	Halo Infinite	6 8.2
2021	Battlefield 2042	8 11.2
2021	Hitman 3	11 14.4
2021	Far Cry 6	11 14.0
2021	Guardians of the Galaxy	11 14.5
2020	Watch Dogs: Legion	10 13.5
2020	Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6 8.4
2020	Microsoft Flight Simulator	4 5.5
2020	Valorant	27 34.6
2020	Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War	10 13.0
2020	Death Stranding	11 14.9
2020	Marvel's Avengers	7 8.9
2020	Godfall	10 12.5
2020	Cyberpunk 2077	7 9.0
2019	Apex Legends	10 13.4
2019	Anthem	7 9.2
2019	Far Cry New Dawn	10 13.2
2019	Resident Evil 2	14 17.5
2019	Metro Exodus	7 9.0
2019	World War Z	12 15.5
2019	Gears of War 5	9 12.2
2019	F1 2019	12 15.0
2019	GreedFall	10 13.7
2019	Borderlands 3	7 9.4
2019	Call of Duty Modern Warfare	14 18.5
2019	Red Dead Redemption 2	6 8.1
2019	Need For Speed: Heat	9 12.2
2018	Just Cause 4	9 12.3
2018	Monster Hunter: World	10 12.6
2018	Strange Brigade	15 18.9
2017	Need For Speed: Payback	13 16.7
2017	For Honor	14 18.0
2017	Project CARS 2	12 15.4
2017	Forza Motorsport 7	19 23.9
2016	Dishonored 2	10 13.6
2015	Rocket League	30 38.6
2015	Need For Speed	15 19.3
2015	Project CARS	14 18.2
2015	Rainbow Six Siege	22 28.3
2012	Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	41 51.4
2009	League of Legends	51 64.3

解像度 3440x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS

年	ゲーム	1秒あたりのフレーム数
2019	Apex Legends	8 11.4
2019	Anthem	5 7.6
2019	Far Cry New Dawn	8 10.8
2019	Resident Evil 2	10 14.0
2019	Metro Exodus	6 7.9
2019	World War Z	9 13.1
2019	Gears of War 5	8 10.6
2019	F1 2019	9 13.1
2019	GreedFall	7 10.4
2019	Borderlands 3	5 7.7
2019	Call of Duty Modern Warfare	12 15.8
2019	Red Dead Redemption 2	5 7.1
2019	Need For Speed: Heat	8 10.6
2018	Just Cause 4	7 10.0
2018	Monster Hunter: World	7 10.0
2018	Strange Brigade	11 15.6
2017	Need For Speed: Payback	11 15.1
2017	For Honor	10 14.4
2017	Project CARS 2	11 15.1
2017	Forza Motorsport 7	17 23.5
2016	Dishonored 2	9 13.1
2015	Rocket League	22 30.2
2015	Need For Speed	13 17.2
2015	Project CARS	12 16.6
2015	Rainbow Six Siege	16 22.1
2012	Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	39 52.2
2009	League of Legends	36 48.1

解像度 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS

年	ゲーム	1秒あたりのフレーム数
2023	Resident Evil 4	7 10.5
2023	A Plague Tale: Requiem	4 6.1
2023	Hogwarts Legacy	4 6.1
2023	The Last of Us Part I	2 3.5
2023	Forspoken	2 3.2
2023	The Callisto Protocol	1 2.8
2023	Dead Space	2 3.5
2023	Baldur's Gate 3	4 7.0
2023	Armored Core VI	4 7.0
2023	Immortals of Aveum	1 2.3
2023	Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart	3 5.3
2023	Remnant II	1 2.6
2023	Star Wars Jedi: Survivor	2 3.9
2023	Atomic Heart	3 4.7
2023	Starfield	2 3.2
2022	Elden Ring	3 5.6
2022	God of War	5 7.9
2022	Overwatch 2	10 14.3
2022	F1 22	4 7.0
2022	Dying Light 2	4 7.0
2022	Total War: Warhammer III	5 7.9
2022	Spider-Man Remastered	8 12.3
2022	Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II	4 7.0
2021	Forza Horizon 5	5 8.0
2021	Halo Infinite	3 5.7
2021	Battlefield 2042	5 7.2
2021	Hitman 3	6 8.8
2021	Far Cry 6	5 7.5
2021	Guardians of the Galaxy	5 7.9
2020	Watch Dogs: Legion	6 8.8
2020	Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3 5.7
2020	Microsoft Flight Simulator	3 4.4
2020	Valorant	21 30.1
2020	Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War	4 6.9
2020	Death Stranding	6 9.0
2020	Marvel's Avengers	3 4.7
2020	Godfall	4 5.9
2020	Cyberpunk 2077	4 5.9
2019	Apex Legends	5 8.0
2019	Anthem	3 5.0
2019	Far Cry New Dawn	4 7.0
2019	Resident Evil 2	6 8.6
2019	Metro Exodus	3 5.7
2019	World War Z	6 8.9
2019	Gears of War 5	5 7.7
2019	F1 2019	6 9.5
2019	GreedFall	3 5.7
2019	Borderlands 3	3 4.9
2019	Call of Duty Modern Warfare	7 11.1
2019	Red Dead Redemption 2	3 5.1
2019	Need For Speed: Heat	5 7.7
2018	Just Cause 4	4 6.4
2018	Monster Hunter: World	4 6.0
2018	Strange Brigade	7 10.3
2017	Need For Speed: Payback	8 11.6
2017	For Honor	6 9.0
2017	Project CARS 2	9 12.9
2017	Forza Motorsport 7	14 20.0
2016	Dishonored 2	7 10.8
2015	Rocket League	12 18.0
2015	Need For Speed	9 12.9
2015	Project CARS	9 12.9
2015	Rainbow Six Siege	9 13.1
2012	Counter-Strike: Global Offensive	32 46.3
2009	League of Legends	17 25.7

HD 6870 with i7-975 at 1080p and 超品質 settings

HD 6870 with i7-975 at 1440p and 超品質 settings

HD 6870 with i7-975 at 4K and 超品質 settings

競合他社との比較

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
2013 1GB ¥ 5,539
40% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
2013 2GB ¥ 19,104
3% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
2013 2GB ¥ 36,173
25% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
2013 2GB ¥ 20,234
39% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon HD 7790
2013 1GB ¥ 16,843
19% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon R9 270
2013 2GB ¥ 31,086
14% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
2012 1GB ¥ 7,235
6% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
2012 2GB ¥ 8,930
17% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon HD 7750
2012 1GB ¥ 15,826
42% slower

Compare

AMD Radeon HD 7850
2012 2GB ¥ 28,147
18% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
2011 1GB ¥ 22,495
38% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
2011 1GB ¥ 17,295
5% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
2011 1GB ¥ 24,869
9% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
2010 1GB ¥ 22,495
65% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
2010 1.3GB ¥ 33,799
9% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
2010 1.5GB ¥ 56,407
3% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
2010 1.3GB ¥ 39,451
27% faster

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
2010 1.5GB ¥ 45,103
36% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon HD 6950
2010 2GB ¥ 28,260
8% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon HD 6970
2010 2GB ¥ 33,799
21% faster

Compare

AMD Radeon HD 6850
2010 1GB ¥ 22,495
19% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260
2008 0.9GB ¥ 50,755
63% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
2008 0.9GB ¥ 33,799
53% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280
2008 0GB ¥ 73,363
39% slower

Compare

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 285
2008 1GB ¥ 28,147
36% slower

Compare

ATI Radeon HD 4870
2008 0GB ¥ 33,799
65% slower

Compare

HD 6870 仕様

HD 6870 Board Design

Board Number	C222
Length	8.66 inches 220 mm
Outputs	2x DVI1x HDMI2x mini-DisplayPort
Power Connectors	2x 6-pin
Slot Width	Dual-slot
TDP	151 W

HD 6870 Clock Speeds

GPU Clock	900 MHz
Memory Clock	1050 MHz 4200 MHz effective

HD 6870 Graphics Card

Bus Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16
Generation	Northern Islands (HD 6800)
Launch Price	239 USD
Production	End-of-life
Release Date	Oct 21st, 2010

HD 6870 Graphics Features

DirectX	11.2 (11_0)
OpenCL	1.2
OpenGL	4.4
Shader Model	5
Vulkan	N/A

HD 6870 Graphics Processor

Architecture	TeraScale 2
Die Size	255 mm²
GPU Name	Barts
GPU Variant	Barts XT (215-0798000)
Process Size	40 nm
Transistors	1,700 million

HD 6870 Memory

Bandwidth	134.4 GB/s
Memory Bus	256 bit
Memory Size	1024 MB
Memory Type	GDDR5

HD 6870 Render Config

Compute Units	14
ROPs	32
Shading Units	1120
TMUs	56

HD 6870 Theoretical Performance

FP32 (float) performance	2,016 GFLOPS
Pixel Rate	28.80 GPixel/s
Texture Rate	50.40 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

It’s obvious that when Shakespeare penned this famous quip, he was foretelling the arrival of AMD’s Radeon HD 6800-series cards. Wherefore art thou, Radeon 6700?... “What’s in a name?

AMD Radeon HD 6870 - Verdict To some extent it feels that AMD has been a victim of its own success. A case in point is the 5850, a graphics card that has managed to keep it's pricing above the £ ...

Performance Summary: We set out to ascertain two things at the beginning of this project, to see how well a pair of Radeon HD 6870 cards scaled in CrossFire mode using recent drivers and to see ...

The Radeon HD 6850 finds itself in a similar situation. Overall, the Radeon HD 6850 trails the older Radeon HD 5850, but hangs with or outruns a stock GeForce GTX 460 1GB, an overclocked 460 ...

We expect the Radeon HD 6870 to be slightly slower than the 5870, while the Radeon HD 6850 should be slower than the 5850, just don't pay attention to the tricky naming.

The AMD Radeon HD 6870 represents some major improvements in the sub-$250 video card space, but Nvidia solutions can provide a bit more performance for the same price.

The Radeon HD 6870 is slower than Radeon HD 5870. Radeon HD 6850 is slower than Radeon HD 5850. It's confusing, we know, but AMD has what it considers a good explanation for the naming scheme.

Launching today are the first two members of AMD’s HD 6000 series. At the top end we have the Radeon HD 6870, a card utilizing a full-fledged version of AMD’s new Barts GPU.

The Radeon HD 6870 is the larger, more capable member of AMD's new 6800 series lineup (the other newcomer is the Radeon HD 6850). Priced at a respectable $239 (as of October 21, 2010), this ...

The Radeon HD 6870 has a small memory bandwidth advantage at 134.4 GB/s, versus the Radeon HD 5850 at 128GB/s. If you like, go here for a look at the previous generation architecture side-by-side ...