R9 Nano dengan Phenom 8650 benchmark di Kualitas tinggi pengaturan kualitas
Pada 1440p, R9 Nano dapat hit 50-60 fps pada hampir semua di ultra, hanya tanpa antialiasing, kurang ambient kemacetan dan bayang-bayang berbalik turun. Kombinasi antara R9 Nano dan AMD Phenom 8650 Triple-Core akan menyebabkan kemacetan yang serius di banyak permainan dan menyebabkan parah kehilangan FPS. Memutuskan apakah akan menginvestasikan begitu banyak uang di high-end GPU seperti R9 Nano membutuhkan pemikiran yang cermat. Dengan arus 4096 MB RAM, R9 Nano dapat memiliki sangat sedikit kemacetan yang berhubungan dengan memori dalam permainan yang lebih modern.
The release year of the graphics card. The newer the better technology and performance optimization and
driver support.
Year
2016
2019
13
2015
2016
11
2014
2015
8
2013
2014
4
2007
2013
2
The price of the graphics card. The cheaper the better.
Price
0
250
35
250
400
30
400
550
25
550
650
15
650
9999
5
Power Supply Wattage required for overall system. The lower the better.
PSU
0
350
4
350
450
4
450
550
3
550
650
2
650
9999
1
Maximum recorded temperature under load. The lower the better for longer life of the graphics card.
Temp
0
70
2
70
75
2
75
80
1
80
85
1
85
999
1
Noise Levels under load. The lower the better.
Noise
0
45
2
45
48
2
48
50
2
50
55
1
55
999
1
Full HD performance at 1080p resolution. The higher the better.
FHD
60
9999
18
55
60
13
45
55
11
35
45
7
0
35
5
Quad HD performance at 1440p resolution. The higher the better.
QHD
60
9999
10
55
60
8
45
55
5
35
45
4
0
35
2
4K performance at 2160p resolution. The higher the better.
F4K
60
9999
5
55
60
4
45
55
3
35
45
2
0
35
1
Current CPU Impact on performance with respect to the highest performing CPU used for benchmark at the
time this graphics card was released.
CPU
-5
9999
5
-7
-5
4
-10
-7
3
-15
-10
2
-9999
-15
1
Graphics card memory (RAM) capacity. The higher the better for higher resolution textures and future
demanding games.
MEM
8
9999
5
4
8
4
2
4
3
1
2
2
0
1
1
FROM
TO
VERDICT
The overall score is determined based on the calculated weightings for the individual components.
OVERALL SCORE
80
99
Excellent
70
80
Very Good
60
70
Good
40
60
Acceptable
0
40
Weak
49/100
Dapat diterima
R9 Nano jauh lebih mahal daripada R9 390 karena harganya ₨ 9462647.2 kekalahan. Bandingkan ini dengan R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 390X, yang awalnya dengan harga ₨ 4796935.2, ₨ 6254970.2. Sementara itu, NVIDIA kartu setara terdekat adalah GTX 980 yang harganya ₨ 8004612.2. Spec untuk spec, R9 Nano melompati pendahulunya langsung, R9 390, dengan membual 19.1 % lebih banyak fps.
Untungnya, performa game cukup mengesankan. R9 Nano secara konsisten menghasilkan peningkatan frame rate yang luar biasa selama R9 390, AMD Radeon R9 390X dan itu benar-benar membenarkan peningkatan. Dibandingkan dengan saingan terdekat NVIDIA, GTX 980, R9 Nano adalah -3.7 % lebih lambat.
Untuk 1080p Full HD, kami dapat memainkan Hitman 3, Monster Hunter: World, Guardians of the Galaxy, Watch Dogs: Legion, Final Fantasy XV di 60 fps hingga 63 fps dan menjaga frame rate tetap di sekitar 61 fps. Untuk 1440p Quad HD, kami dapat memainkan Call of Duty Modern Warfare, World War Z, Overwatch 2, Strange Brigade, Fallout 76 di 63 fps hingga 70 fps dan menjaga frame rate tetap di sekitar 65 fps.
Untuk 2160p 4K, kami dapat memainkan Valorant di 102 fps hingga 102 fps dan menjaga frame rate tetap di sekitar 102 fps.
R9 Nano berada di antara RX 590 dan GTX 980 , jatuh lebih lambat dari RX 590 oleh 4.5 % dan lebih cepat dari GTX 980 oleh 1.9 %. Ini memiliki kinerja relatif yang kuat terhadap setiap kartu grafis di sini. Terhadap saingannya - GTX 980 , R9 Nano jauh lebih lambat.
R9 Nano berada di antara GTX 970 dan R9 390X , jatuh lebih lambat dari GTX 970 oleh 0.5 % dan lebih cepat dari R9 390X oleh 8.9 %. Ini memiliki kinerja relatif rata-rata terhadap setiap kartu grafis di sini. Hasilnya sebenarnya tidak bisa dibedakan dengan hasil dari GTX 970 . Terhadap saingannya - GTX 980 , R9 Nano jauh lebih lambat.
R9 Nano berada di antara RX 590 dan GTX 980 , jatuh lebih lambat dari RX 590 oleh 4.5 % dan lebih cepat dari GTX 980 oleh 1.9 %. Ini memiliki kinerja relatif yang kuat terhadap setiap kartu grafis di sini. Terhadap saingannya - GTX 980 , R9 Nano jauh lebih lambat.
R9 Nano berada di antara GTX 980 dan GTX 1060 6GB , jatuh lebih lambat dari GTX 980 oleh 4.9 % dan lebih cepat dari GTX 1060 6GB oleh 1 %. Ini memiliki kinerja relatif rata-rata terhadap setiap kartu grafis di sini. Terhadap saingannya - GTX 980 , R9 Nano jauh lebih lambat.
R9 Nano berada di antara RX 590 dan GTX 980 , jatuh lebih lambat dari RX 590 oleh 4.3 % dan lebih cepat dari GTX 980 oleh 2 %. Ini memiliki kinerja relatif yang kuat terhadap setiap kartu grafis di sini. Kinerja R9 Nano dalam game ini berkisar sekitar 60fps. Terhadap saingannya - GTX 980 , R9 Nano jauh lebih lambat.
The AMD Radeon R9 Nano shows that you don’t always have to be the fastest to win the race. Some races are more of a marathon, and it’s more important to pace yourself well. MORE: Best Graphics ...
The Radeon R9 Nano is the fruition of AMD's gamble of integrating stacked high-bandwidth memory (HBM) and a 4,096 SP pixel-grinder into a compact multi-chip module that eliminates the need for external memory chips, freeing up large swathes of PCB area.
The new Radeon R9 Nano is the little brother to the existing AMD Radeon R9 Fury cards – in water-cooled 'X' and air-cooled standard models – and deserves that distinction in more ways than one.
AMD seems to have hit all the cues it set out to with the Radeon R9 Nano. This card is ridiculously tiny in light of other high-end GPUs, its power consumption characteristics are significantly ...
AMD's R9 Nano is a graphics card that serves its (very) niche high-end small form factor market well but its premium pricing makes it unaffordable to many small form factor system builders, and ...
AMD's R9 Nano is a hell of a little graphics card, delivering near-R9 Fury X performance in a compact mini-ITX form-factor. It's also expensive—very expensive—at $650, matching the price of ...
The AMD Radeon R9 Fury Nano is one of the most exciting graphics cards I’ve seen for years and, at only 6in long, it’s also one of the smallest. ... Verdict. AMD’s latest card is one of its ...
While AMD is pegging the Radeon R9 Nano as a luxury card, a component that isn't meant to be about value for money, rather it's all about getting the maximum performance for a small form factor PC ...
With the Radeon R9 Nano at the heart of our test rig, it consumed over 90 fewer watts than the Fury X--AMD's specified power ratings are in-line with our testing.
AMD Radeon R9 Nano Overclocking Results Extra performance with the R9 Nano comes in two distinct areas, overclocking and power management. Interestingly, AMD lets users unlock the power management ...
The R9 Nano is stunningly powerful given its Mini-ITX-friendly form factor, and a true leap ahead for AMD. Just know that this is a specialized component meant for very tight, compact PCs, and ...
As it turns out, AMD's Radeon R9 Nano is a great piece of hardware; there's really nothing like it out there. That’s probably why AMD is setting its price at an eye-popping $649. A lack of ...
The Radeon R9 Nano is AMD's solution for all small-form-factor system builders that want to create a 4K-capable gaming PC in a tiny volume. Thanks to a new approach to power management, the card stays below 200 W at all times, while still delivering excellent framerates.
AMD Radeon R9 Nano - the Digital Foundry verdict The R9 Nano packs an unprecedented amount of rendering power into an absolutely tiny product, and possesses superb build quality.
AMD deserves some serious props for even creating the Radeon R9 Nano in the first place. This pint-sized powerhouse is the latest in a long line of AMD technical innovations that skate to where ...
We’ll have a full suite of Radeon R9 Nano benchmarks recorded in our ultra-high-end graphics test-bed, along with comparison numbers from an array of other high-end GPUs, a little later.
AMD’s itty-bitty Radeon R9 Nano isn’t due to launch until September 10, but a review unit landed on my doorstep today. Sadly, I can’t talk about its performance until then, but an AMD ...
The Radeon R9 Nano is a high-end graphics card by AMD, launched in August 2015. Built on the 28 nm process, and based on the Fiji graphics processor, in its Fiji XT CA variant, the card supports DirectX 12.0.
The AMD Radeon R9 Nano finished just behind the Radeon R9 Fury here, but well ahead of the R9 390 or similarly-sized GeForce GTX 970 mini (the Asus GeForce GTX 970 Direct-CU mini to be exact).
As it turns out, AMD's Radeon R9 Nano is a great piece of hardware; there's really nothing like it out there. That’s probably why AMD is setting its price at an eye-popping $649.
Meanwhile at the other end of the spectrum is the Radeon R9 Nano, which sees AMD push the limits on miniaturization and pack Fiji into a card just 6 inches long.
Apa yang Perlu Dipertimbangkan Sebelum Membeli Kartu Grafis
Jika Anda telah berencana untuk meningkatkan sistem Anda dengan membeli kartu grafis baru. Lalu ada beberapa faktor penting untuk dipertimbangkan.
Resolusi VS Kualitas: Dampak pada Kinerja Game
Apa yang memengaruhi kinerja game? Kejelasan atau Detail?
Pengaturan Kualitas Tinggi Ultra VS di Game PC
Setiap pemain memiliki gagasan berbeda tentang pengaturan ideal untuk game PC. Tetapi dalam kebanyakan kasus, memilih untuk konfigurasi grafis berkualitas tinggi adalah cara untuk pergi.
Apa yang dimaksud dengan bottleneck CPU atau GPU?
Apakah Anda mendapatkan tetes bingkai mendadak? Anda mungkin mengalami hambatan.
Berapa kecepatan FPS yang bisa saya terima?
Untuk beberapa gim, Anda masih bisa menikmati garphics hebat dengan frame rate lebih rendah.
GPU Hierarchy
GPU Compare
CPU Compare
Gaming Laptops
Gaming Monitors
Gaming Headsets
Diskusi dan Komentar
Bagikan Komentar Anda