GTX 650 Ti Boost benchmark with i5-3450S 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K benchmarks at Medium Quality

With current 2048 MB RAM, the GTX 650 Ti Boost can have serious memory-related bottlenecks in more modern games. This combination between GTX 650 Ti Boost and Intel Core i5-3450S @ 2.80GHz has less than 8% bottleneck in many games and is perfect match to avoid FPS loss. This combination between GTX 650 Ti Boost and Intel Core i5-3450S @ 2.80GHz is a perfect match to avoid FPS loss. With current 2048 MB RAM, the GTX 650 Ti Boost can have very few memory-related bottlenecks in more modern games.

View Current Price List

GTX 650 Ti Boost Summary GTX 650 Ti Boost Competitors GTX 650 Ti Boost Review and Analysis GTX 650 Ti Boost Specifications
GTX 650 Ti Boost 1080p Benchmarks GTX 650 Ti Boost 1440p Benchmarks GTX 650 Ti Boost Ultrawide 1440p Benchmarks GTX 650 Ti Boost 4K Benchmarks
GTX 650 Ti Boost Prices GTX 650 Ti Boost Variants GTX 650 Ti Boost Mining Profitability
GTX 650 Ti Boost benchmark with i5-3450S 1080p, 1440p, Ultrawide, 4K benchmarks at Medium Quality
Share Your Comments 0
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Price $ 169.0
Year 2013
Maximum Recorded Temperature 77C
Max Fan Noise 47.4dB
Recommended Power Supply 484W
Benchmark CPU Intel Core i5-3450S @ 2.80GHz ($99.99)
CPU Impact on FPS -3.0 FPS
CPU Impact on FPS % -10.0%
Benchmark Quality Settings Medium Quality Settings
Average 1080p Performance 74.8 FPS
Average 1440p Performance 49.1 FPS
(Ultrawide) Average 1440p Performance 43.6 FPS
Average 4K Performance 33.0 FPS
Memory 2 GB
1080p Cost Per Frame $ 6.4
1440p Cost Per Frame $ 10.6
(Ultrawide) 1440p Cost Per Frame $ 12.2
4K Cost Per Frame $ 16.9
Series GTX 650 Ti Boost
Variant NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost
Overall Combination Score 71/100 Very Good

The GTX 660 might be the entry-level flagship of the latest Kepler set of graphics cards, but their prices keep them out of the reach of most budget PC gamers. On the other hand, the GTX 650 Ti Boost is closer to being reasonably affordable at a price tag of $ 169. NVIDIA ’s xx50 cards have always been defined by budget prices with performance that knocks on the door of entry-level graphics cards – especially when overclocked. After taking the time to fully test the Kepler graphics card inside the GTX 650 Ti Boost, we can say without a doubt that it continues the trend.

Spec for spec, this GTX 650 Ti Boost leapfrogs its direct predecessor, the GTX 550 Ti, by boasting 51.3 % more fps. The GTX 650 Ti Boost has 2 GB RAM compared to the GTX 550 Ti 's 1 GB video memory.

In our synthetic benchmarks, the GTX 650 Ti Boost blows past the GTX 550 Ti and, amazingly, even the GTX 560 as well. Fortunately, gaming performance was quite impressive. The GTX 650 Ti Boost consistently delivers great frame rate increases over the GTX 550 Ti and it really justifies an upgrade.

Compared to its AMD 's closest rival, HD 7850, the GTX 650 Ti Boost was -13.5 % slower.

Compare GTX 650 Ti Boost Variants Performance in Medium Quality

Assassin's Creed Valhalla (2020)

Medium Quality

Resolution 1920x1080

Year Graphics Card Price Frames Per Second
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380X $ 229
58.6 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti $ 169
54.9 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 $ 249
52.9 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 $ 199
52.6 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 $ 279
52.1 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 $ 199
51.6 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 $ 249
47.3 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 460 $ 140
46.2 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti $ 299
44.9 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 270 $ 179
44.7 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 $ 159
43.4 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 $ 229
40.7 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R7 370 $ 149
40.4 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R7 265 $ 149
39.9 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7850 $ 249
37.2 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost $ 169
33.3 FPS
2010 AMD Radeon HD 6950 $ 299
35.5 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti $ 149
35.5 FPS
2011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti $ 249
34.7 FPS
2010 AMD Radeon HD 6870 $ 239
31.9 FPS
2011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 $ 199
30.5 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon HD 7790 $ 149
29.9 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti $ 149
29.9 FPS
2010 AMD Radeon HD 6850 $ 179
27.3 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 $ 109
22.0 FPS
2011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti $ 149
21.7 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7750 $ 109
20.7 FPS

The GTX 650 Ti Boost sits between the HD 7850 and the HD 6950, falling slower than HD 7850 by 0.7% and faster than HD 6950 by 3.9%. It has an average relative performance against every graphics card here. Its results are actually indistinguishable from those of the HD 7850. In addition, the GTX 650 Ti Boost was also faster than the GTX 550 Ti by a good margin. Compared to its higher sibling, the GTX 650 Ti Boost was much slower than the GTX 660 by more than 20%.

Cyberpunk 2077 (2020)

Medium Quality

Resolution 1920x1080

Year Graphics Card Price Frames Per Second
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380X $ 229
58.6 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti $ 169
54.9 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 $ 249
52.9 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 $ 199
52.6 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 $ 279
52.1 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 $ 199
51.6 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 $ 249
47.3 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 460 $ 140
46.2 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti $ 299
44.9 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 270 $ 179
44.7 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 $ 159
43.4 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 $ 229
40.7 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R7 370 $ 149
40.4 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R7 265 $ 149
39.9 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7850 $ 249
37.2 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost $ 169
33.3 FPS
2010 AMD Radeon HD 6950 $ 299
35.5 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti $ 149
35.5 FPS
2011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti $ 249
34.7 FPS
2010 AMD Radeon HD 6870 $ 239
31.9 FPS
2011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 $ 199
30.5 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon HD 7790 $ 149
29.9 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti $ 149
29.9 FPS
2010 AMD Radeon HD 6850 $ 179
27.3 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 $ 109
22.0 FPS
2011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti $ 149
21.7 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7750 $ 109
20.7 FPS

The GTX 650 Ti Boost sits between the HD 7850 and the HD 6950, falling slower than HD 7850 by 0.7% and faster than HD 6950 by 3.9%. It has an average relative performance against every graphics card here. Its results are actually indistinguishable from those of the HD 7850. In addition, the GTX 650 Ti Boost was also faster than the GTX 550 Ti by a good margin. Compared to its higher sibling, the GTX 650 Ti Boost was much slower than the GTX 660 by more than 20%.

Call of Duty Modern Warfare (2019)

Medium Quality

Resolution 1920x1080

Year Graphics Card Price Frames Per Second
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380X $ 229
130.6 FPS
2016 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti $ 169
122.3 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 285 $ 249
118.0 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R9 380 $ 199
117.6 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R9 280 $ 279
116.4 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 $ 199
115.2 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 $ 249
106.3 FPS
2016 AMD Radeon RX 460 $ 140
103.7 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti $ 299
101.2 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon R9 270 $ 179
100.1 FPS
2015 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 $ 159
97.6 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 $ 229
91.5 FPS
2015 AMD Radeon R7 370 $ 149
91.3 FPS
2014 AMD Radeon R7 265 $ 149
89.9 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7850 $ 249
84.2 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost $ 169
76.0 FPS
2010 AMD Radeon HD 6950 $ 299
80.6 FPS
2014 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti $ 149
80.3 FPS
2011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti $ 249
78.7 FPS
2010 AMD Radeon HD 6870 $ 239
72.7 FPS
2011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 $ 199
69.2 FPS
2013 AMD Radeon HD 7790 $ 149
68.0 FPS
2012 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti $ 149
68.0 FPS
2010 AMD Radeon HD 6850 $ 179
62.3 FPS
2013 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 $ 109
50.4 FPS
2011 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti $ 149
49.9 FPS
2012 AMD Radeon HD 7750 $ 109
47.8 FPS

The GTX 650 Ti Boost sits between the HD 7850 and the HD 6950, falling slower than HD 7850 by 0.5% and faster than HD 6950 by 3.9%. It has an average relative performance against every graphics card here. Its results are actually indistinguishable from those of the HD 7850. In addition, the GTX 650 Ti Boost was also faster than the GTX 550 Ti by a good margin.

Game Performance at Medium Quality settings

Change Quality Settings
Ultra Quality High Quality Medium Quality Low Quality

Resolution 1920x1080

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2023 Resident Evil 4
50
56.7
2023 A Plague Tale: Requiem
36
41.2
2023 Hogwarts Legacy
32
36.6
2023 The Last of Us Part I
25
29.1
2023 Forspoken
29
33.0
2023 The Callisto Protocol
23
26.7
2023 Dead Space
36
41.2
2023 Baldur's Gate 3
42
47.5
2023 Armored Core VI
42
47.5
2023 Immortals of Aveum
21
24.1
2023 Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart
38
43.6
2023 Remnant II
23
26.7
2023 Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
30
34.1
2023 Atomic Heart
30
34.1
2023 Starfield
16
18.9
2022 Elden Ring
37
41.8
2022 God of War
35
39.6
2022 Overwatch 2
59
66.9
2022 F1 22
42
48.1
2022 Dying Light 2
40
45.7
2022 Total War: Warhammer III
40
45.7
2022 Spider-Man Remastered
61
69.5
2022 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
46
52.4
2021 Forza Horizon 5
35
40.2
2021 Halo Infinite
28
31.9
2021 Battlefield 2042
47
53.7
2021 Hitman 3
52
58.9
2021 Far Cry 6
49
55.4
2021 Guardians of the Galaxy
53
59.9
2020 Watch Dogs: Legion
53
60.1
2020 Assassin's Creed Valhalla
29
33.3
2020 Microsoft Flight Simulator
20
23.5
2020 Valorant
101
114.0
2020 Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
47
52.9
2020 Death Stranding
52
59.6
2020 Marvel's Avengers
37
41.8
2020 Godfall
51
58.1
2020 Cyberpunk 2077
29
33.3
2019 Apex Legends
61
68.8
2019 Anthem
42
47.8
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
58
65.7
2019 Resident Evil 2
68
76.7
2019 Metro Exodus
34
39.1
2019 World War Z
57
65.2
2019 Gears of War 5
47
53.7
2019 F1 2019
57
64.7
2019 GreedFall
52
59.4
2019 Borderlands 3
39
44.1
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
67
76.0
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
30
34.1
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
44
50.1
2018 Just Cause 4
47
53.2
2018 Monster Hunter: World
50
56.4
2018 Strange Brigade
70
79.4
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
61
69.7
2017 For Honor
78
88.2
2017 Project CARS 2
59
66.4
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
69
77.8
2016 Dishonored 2
45
51.1
2015 Rocket League
183
206.6
2015 Need For Speed
65
74.1
2015 Project CARS
63
71.6
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
103
116.8
2013 Bioshock Infinite
102
115.0
2013 Company of Heroes 2
49
56.2
2013 Crysis 3
87
98.0
2013 GRID 2
96
109.0
2013 Metro: Last Light
68
77.1
2013 Total War: Rome 2
61
69.2
2013 Battlefield 4
97
109.4
2012 DiRT: Showdown
81
91.9
2012 Far Cry 3
81
92.1
2012 Hitman: Absolution
101
114.0
2012 Sleeping Dogs
99
111.9
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
136
154.0
2011 Total War: Shogun 2
73
82.8
2011 Battlefield 3
96
108.8
2010 Civilization V
111
124.9
2009 League of Legends
222
250.3
2008 Crysis: Warhead
77
87.7

Resolution 2560x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2023 Resident Evil 4
34
43.6
2023 A Plague Tale: Requiem
25
31.6
2023 Hogwarts Legacy
23
29.1
2023 The Last of Us Part I
18
23.2
2023 Forspoken
18
23.2
2023 The Callisto Protocol
15
19.8
2023 Dead Space
23
29.1
2023 Baldur's Gate 3
31
39.6
2023 Armored Core VI
31
39.6
2023 Immortals of Aveum
14
17.9
2023 Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart
25
31.6
2023 Remnant II
15
18.9
2023 Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
21
26.7
2023 Atomic Heart
20
25.8
2023 Starfield
13
17.3
2022 Elden Ring
27
34.1
2022 God of War
27
35.0
2022 Overwatch 2
47
58.9
2022 F1 22
25
31.6
2022 Dying Light 2
25
31.6
2022 Total War: Warhammer III
27
34.1
2022 Spider-Man Remastered
41
52.4
2022 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
29
36.6
2021 Forza Horizon 5
28
35.3
2021 Halo Infinite
23
29.3
2021 Battlefield 2042
30
38.0
2021 Hitman 3
35
44.4
2021 Far Cry 6
34
43.6
2021 Guardians of the Galaxy
35
44.9
2020 Watch Dogs: Legion
33
42.0
2020 Assassin's Creed Valhalla
23
29.6
2020 Microsoft Flight Simulator
16
21.0
2020 Valorant
77
96.7
2020 Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
34
43.1
2020 Death Stranding
38
48.1
2020 Marvel's Avengers
24
31.1
2020 Godfall
33
41.8
2020 Cyberpunk 2077
25
31.6
2019 Apex Legends
43
53.9
2019 Anthem
31
39.3
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
42
53.2
2019 Resident Evil 2
44
55.2
2019 Metro Exodus
25
31.6
2019 World War Z
40
50.1
2019 Gears of War 5
32
41.0
2019 F1 2019
38
48.6
2019 GreedFall
36
45.2
2019 Borderlands 3
26
32.7
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
46
58.1
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
23
28.8
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
32
41.0
2018 Just Cause 4
32
41.2
2018 Monster Hunter: World
33
41.8
2018 Strange Brigade
47
58.9
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
42
53.2
2017 For Honor
45
56.4
2017 Project CARS 2
39
49.9
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
57
71.6
2016 Dishonored 2
35
44.9
2015 Rocket League
84
105.9
2015 Need For Speed
48
60.1
2015 Project CARS
45
57.4
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
65
82.1
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
106
133.2
2009 League of Legends
127
159.0

Resolution 3440x1440

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2019 Apex Legends
35
47.3
2019 Anthem
25
33.3
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
34
44.9
2019 Resident Evil 2
34
45.7
2019 Metro Exodus
21
28.2
2019 World War Z
33
43.6
2019 Gears of War 5
27
36.6
2019 F1 2019
33
43.6
2019 GreedFall
27
35.5
2019 Borderlands 3
20
27.3
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
38
50.9
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
19
25.8
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
27
36.6
2018 Just Cause 4
26
34.7
2018 Monster Hunter: World
26
34.4
2018 Strange Brigade
38
50.1
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
37
48.8
2017 For Honor
35
47.0
2017 Project CARS 2
37
49.1
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
53
70.6
2016 Dishonored 2
32
43.4
2015 Rocket League
66
86.9
2015 Need For Speed
41
54.4
2015 Project CARS
40
53.2
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
51
67.3
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
102
135.0
2009 League of Legends
96
126.5

Resolution 3840x2160

1% Low [Min FPS] Average FPS
Year Game Frames Per Second
2023 Resident Evil 4
23
34.1
2023 A Plague Tale: Requiem
14
21.3
2023 Hogwarts Legacy
14
21.3
2023 The Last of Us Part I
9
13.4
2023 Forspoken
8
12.1
2023 The Callisto Protocol
7
11.0
2023 Dead Space
9
13.4
2023 Baldur's Gate 3
16
24.1
2023 Armored Core VI
16
24.1
2023 Immortals of Aveum
6
8.9
2023 Ratchet and Clank Rift Apart
13
18.9
2023 Remnant II
7
10.3
2023 Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
10
14.4
2023 Atomic Heart
12
17.3
2023 Starfield
8
12.1
2022 Elden Ring
14
21.0
2022 God of War
19
28.5
2022 Overwatch 2
32
46.5
2022 F1 22
16
24.1
2022 Dying Light 2
16
24.1
2022 Total War: Warhammer III
18
26.7
2022 Spider-Man Remastered
27
38.8
2022 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
16
24.1
2021 Forza Horizon 5
19
28.5
2021 Halo Infinite
14
21.3
2021 Battlefield 2042
18
26.1
2021 Hitman 3
20
29.1
2021 Far Cry 6
18
25.8
2021 Guardians of the Galaxy
18
26.7
2020 Watch Dogs: Legion
20
29.1
2020 Assassin's Creed Valhalla
14
21.3
2020 Microsoft Flight Simulator
11
17.0
2020 Valorant
60
86.4
2020 Call of Duty: Black Ops Cold War
17
25.3
2020 Death Stranding
22
31.6
2020 Marvel's Avengers
12
17.9
2020 Godfall
15
22.0
2020 Cyberpunk 2077
15
22.0
2019 Apex Legends
24
35.0
2019 Anthem
16
23.5
2019 Far Cry New Dawn
21
31.1
2019 Resident Evil 2
21
30.5
2019 Metro Exodus
14
21.3
2019 World War Z
21
31.3
2019 Gears of War 5
19
27.9
2019 F1 2019
23
33.0
2019 GreedFall
14
21.3
2019 Borderlands 3
13
18.9
2019 Call of Duty Modern Warfare
26
37.4
2019 Red Dead Redemption 2
13
19.5
2019 Need For Speed: Heat
19
27.9
2018 Just Cause 4
16
23.8
2018 Monster Hunter: World
15
22.6
2018 Strange Brigade
24
35.3
2017 Need For Speed: Payback
27
39.1
2017 For Honor
22
31.6
2017 Project CARS 2
29
42.8
2017 Forza Motorsport 7
43
62.0
2016 Dishonored 2
25
36.9
2015 Rocket League
39
56.7
2015 Need For Speed
29
42.8
2015 Project CARS
29
42.8
2015 Rainbow Six Siege
30
43.6
2012 Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
85
122.5
2009 League of Legends
53
76.0
GTX 650 Ti Boost with i5-3450S at 1080p and Medium Quality settings
GTX 650 Ti Boost with i5-3450S at 1440p and Medium Quality settings
GTX 650 Ti Boost with i5-3450S at 4K and Medium Quality settings

Compare Against Competitors

AMD Radeon RX 460
AMD Radeon RX 460
2016 4GB $ 140
6% slower
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
2016 4GB $ 129
28% faster
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
2015 2GB $ 89
2% faster
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
2015 2GB $ 89
25% faster
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 370
AMD Radeon R7 370
2015 2GB $ 202
0% slower
Compare
AMD Radeon R9 380X
AMD Radeon R9 380X
2015 4GB $ 229
40% faster
Compare
AMD Radeon R9 380
AMD Radeon R9 380
2015 2GB $ 299
29% faster
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
2014 2GB $ 279
13% slower
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 265
AMD Radeon R7 265
2014 2GB $ 149
3% slower
Compare
AMD Radeon R9 280
AMD Radeon R9 280
2014 3GB $ 350
27% faster
Compare
AMD Radeon R9 285
AMD Radeon R9 285
2014 2GB $ 380
29% faster
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650
2013 1GB $ 49
43% slower
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
2013 2GB $ 320
22% faster
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770
2013 2GB $ 179
36% faster
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 7790
AMD Radeon HD 7790
2013 1GB $ 149
22% slower
Compare
AMD Radeon R9 270
AMD Radeon R9 270
2013 2GB $ 275
11% faster
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
2012 1GB $ 64
9% slower
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
2012 2GB $ 79
14% faster
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti
2012 2GB $ 299
38% faster
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 7750
AMD Radeon HD 7750
2012 1GB $ 140
45% slower
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 7950
AMD Radeon HD 7950
2012 3GB $ 149
40% faster
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 7850
AMD Radeon HD 7850
2012 2GB $ 249
14% faster
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti
2011 1GB $ 199
41% slower
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560
2011 1GB $ 153
8% slower
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti
2011 1GB $ 220
6% faster
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470
2010 1.3GB $ 299
12% slower
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480
2010 1.5GB $ 499
6% slower
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570
2010 1.3GB $ 349
24% faster
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580
2010 1.5GB $ 399
33% faster
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6870
AMD Radeon HD 6870
2010 1GB $ 199
3% slower
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6950
AMD Radeon HD 6950
2010 2GB $ 250
5% faster
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6970
AMD Radeon HD 6970
2010 2GB $ 299
18% faster
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 6850
AMD Radeon HD 6850
2010 1GB $ 199
22% slower
Compare

GTX 650 Ti Boost Specifications

GTX 650 Ti Boost Board Design

Board NumberP2030
Length9.5 inches 241 mm
Outputs2x DVI1x HDMI1x DisplayPort
Power Connectors1x 6-pin
Slot WidthDual-slot
TDP134 W

GTX 650 Ti Boost Clock Speeds

Boost Clock1032 MHz
GPU Clock980 MHz
Memory Clock1502 MHz 6008 MHz effective

GTX 650 Ti Boost Graphics Card

Bus InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
GenerationGeForce 600
Launch Price169 USD
ProductionEnd-of-life
Release DateMar 26th, 2013

GTX 650 Ti Boost Graphics Features

CUDA3
DirectX12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL1.2
OpenGL4.6
Shader Model5.1
Vulkan1.1.82

GTX 650 Ti Boost Graphics Processor

ArchitectureKepler
Die Size221 mm²
GPU NameGK106
GPU VariantGK106-240-A1
Process Size28 nm
Transistors2,540 million

GTX 650 Ti Boost Memory

Bandwidth144.2 GB/s
Memory Bus192 bit
Memory Size2048 MB
Memory TypeGDDR5

GTX 650 Ti Boost Render Config

ROPs24
SMX Count4
Shading Units768
TMUs64

GTX 650 Ti Boost Theoretical Performance

FP32 (float) performance1,585 GFLOPS
FP64 (double) performance66.05 GFLOPS (1:24)
Pixel Rate16.51 GPixel/s
Texture Rate66.05 GTexel/s

Critics Reviews

What to Consider Before Buying a Graphics Card

What to Consider Before Buying a Graphics Card

If you have been planning to upgrade your system by purchasing a new graphics card. Then there are some important factors to consider.
Resolution VS Quality: Impact on Game Performance

Resolution VS Quality: Impact on Game Performance

What affects game performance? Clarity or Details?

Ultra VS High Quality Settings in PC Games

Ultra VS High Quality Settings in PC Games

Every player has a different notion about the ideal setting for PC games. But in most cases, opting for a High quality graphics configuration is the way to go.

What are CPU or GPU Bottlenecks?

What are CPU or GPU Bottlenecks?

Are you getting sudden frame drops? you might have a bottleneck.
What is the acceptable FPS speed for me?

What is the acceptable FPS speed for me?

For some games, you can still enjoy great garphics at lower frame rates.
GPU Hierarchy
GPU Hierarchy
GPU Compare
GPU Compare
CPU Hierarchy
CPU Compare
Laptop Hierarchy
Gaming Laptops
Monitor Hierarchy
Gaming Monitors
Headset Hierarchy
Gaming Headsets

Discussion and Comments

Share Your Comments